Guest guest Posted March 22, 2006 Report Share Posted March 22, 2006 Christie, I understand what you are saying here, but it is just too difficult and tedious for me to lift a weight that is heavy, that slowly. I slow down as much as I can to make for, hopefully, an effective workout. The trainers I've used before thought I was lifting too slowly at 4/4 sec., so I changed it to 4/2. jafa Christie <christiekeith@...> wrote: >> Sorry, yes the weights and I lift at about 4 sec up and down. It's too hard for me to go slower than that. << Lift as heavy a weight as you can without losing form, the heaviest weight you can lift slowly and smoothly through the complete range of motion, even if you can only lift it once or twice per set without losing control of your form, very, very slowly being the key. Four seconds is just not going to cut it. Having to lift faster/being unable to lift slower means you are using momentum instead of your muscles, and that isn't going to get you anywhere. If you aren't using your muscles, you aren't making them stronger, it's that simple. Christie Caber Feidh ish Deerhounds Raising Our Dogs Holistically Since 1986 http://www.caberfeidh.com/ http://doggedblog.com/ <HTML><!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC " -//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN " " http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd " ><BODY><FONT FACE= " monospace " SIZE= " 3 " > <B>IMPORTANT ADDRESSES</B> <UL> <LI><B><A HREF= " / " >NATIVE NUTRITION</A></B> online</LI> <LI><B><A HREF= " http://onibasu.com/ " >SEARCH</A></B> the entire message archive with Onibasu</LI> </UL></FONT> <PRE><FONT FACE= " monospace " SIZE= " 3 " ><B><A HREF= " mailto: -owner " >LIST OWNER:</A></B> Idol <B>MODERATOR:</B> Wanita Sears </FONT></PRE> </BODY> </HTML> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 22, 2006 Report Share Posted March 22, 2006 >> I understand what you are saying here, but it is just too difficult and tedious for me to lift a weight that is heavy, that slowly. << Well, you should do what you want, I'm just saying... that's how you build muscle. Christie Caber Feidh ish Deerhounds Raising Our Dogs Holistically Since 1986 http://www.caberfeidh.com/ http://doggedblog.com/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 22, 2006 Report Share Posted March 22, 2006 Quoting cbrown2008 <cbrown2008@...>: > > >> I understand what you are saying here, but it is just too > difficult and > > tedious for me to lift a weight that is heavy, that slowly. << > > > > Well, you should do what you want, I'm just saying... that's how you > build > > muscle. > > I think the " tedious " part is an important clue. > Yes you have to continually add resistance to build muscle, > but there are must be a zillion protocols for that and the slow pacing > of a rep is just one. It's hard enough to find and keep an exercise > routine. I wouldn't pick one I found tedious! Agreed. Lifting at an exaggeratedly slow muscle may be *a* way to build muscle, but it's not *the* way. In fact, if you poke around on the Internet, it's not hard to find people complaining of losing muscle mass on the SuperSlow protocol and then regaining it when they switched back. -- Berg bberg@... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 22, 2006 Report Share Posted March 22, 2006 >> Yes you have to continually add resistance to build muscle, but there are must be a zillion protocols for that and the slow pacing of a rep is just one. << I wasn't talking about the slow pacing. Because this conversation has been extremely fragmented, I think my point might have been lost. ALL I'm saying is that if you want to make your muscles stronger, you have to increase resistance... or as I said in the context of lifting weights, lift heavier ones. I'm not " in love " with super slow weight lifting, in fact, I don't do it. I think it's fine, but it's not what I'm advocating. My suggestion of slowing down was to avoid the loss of resistance that comes from using momentum to move the weight, and to enable her to do FEWER reps with heavier weights. If someone doesn't like lifting weights, but is doing it anyway, it seems to me that a program that enables you to get more benefit in a fraction of the time might be a good idea. All that said, I couldn't agree more that no one should do a physical activity they dislike. My comments were soley intended to be a suggestion on how someone could use weight lifting to increase their muscle tissue. And what I said, I stand by: You gotta lift heavier. HOW you can lift heavier is a separate discussion, and my input on that so far was to lift the heaviest weight you can lift slowly and smoothly, with good form, just a few times - I usually do three sets of somewhere from 8-5-3 to 6-4-2, depending on how I feel that day and if I've recently increased my weight. I see women at the gym all the time whipping little two pound weights up and down for three sets of 12. They have stringbean arms, too. Why are they even bothering? I'm just saying.... <G> Christie Caber Feidh ish Deerhounds Raising Our Dogs Holistically Since 1986 http://www.caberfeidh.com/ http://doggedblog.com/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 23, 2006 Report Share Posted March 23, 2006 >-----Original Message----- >From: >[mailto: ]On Behalf Of cbrown2008 > > >> I said, I stand by: You gotta lift heavier. >> >> Why are they even bothering? I'm just saying.... <G> >> >> Christie > >Duly noted, Christie. I must have had a button pushed or something >about the word " tedious. " Thanks for 'splaining. > >Totally agree on lifting heavy. On the fun factor, I'd put in a plug >for the heavy weights that take advantage of momentum instead of >discouraging its use. Kettlebells and clubbells. Controlling the weight >plus controlling acceleration is a blast and you can build muscle that >way too. I didn't realize until I made the switch, how much >difference " things that swing " made in my enjoyment. I couldn't agree more on the fun factor in swinging kettlebells! The kettlebell swing has become my all time favorite weight training movement. And I've found kettlebells in general to be 10x more fun than other types of weightlifting I did in the past. The movements feel much more natural and intuitive to me. Very addictive. Suze Fisher Web Design and Development http://www.allurecreative.com Weston A. Price Foundation Chapter Leader, Mid Coast Maine http://www.westonaprice.org ---------------------------- “The diet-heart idea (the idea that saturated fats and cholesterol cause heart disease) is the greatest scientific deception of our times.” -- Mann, MD, former Professor of Medicine and Biochemistry at Vanderbilt University, Tennessee; heart disease researcher. The International Network of Cholesterol Skeptics <http://www.thincs.org> ---------------------------- Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 24, 2006 Report Share Posted March 24, 2006 On 3/23/06, cbrown2008 <cbrown2008@...> wrote: > Totally agree on lifting heavy. On the fun factor, I'd put in a plug > for the heavy weights that take advantage of momentum instead of > discouraging its use. Kettlebells and clubbells. Well don't forget Olympic Lifting, which I have plugged numerous times on this list. Although today the competitive Olympic Lifts have been reduced to the Clean and Jerk and the Snatch, years ago there were many many lifts that made up Olympic Lifting. I found a site a couple of months back showing many of these old lifts (which are still done at a club level in some parts of the country) and one can see where all the kettlebell movements came from. Kettlebells make those lifts much more accessible to the average person because while there is technique involved, the learning curve is not nearly as steep. >Controlling the weight > plus controlling acceleration is a blast and you can build muscle that > way too. Hey that is an understatement. Here is a little ditty: Weightlifting is a sport in which the strongest and most powerful men and women in the world - bar none (as well as some of the world's fastest and most flexible men and women) compete. Many people who are unfamiliar with the sport are surprised to learn that Weightlifters don't necessarily have the biggest muscles in the world. In fact, some could easily be mistaken for well conditioned athletes who compete in other sports. Weightlifters simply have the strongest and most powerful muscles in the world, developed by hard and very specialized training that develops enormous strength without the " bulk " that bodybuilders, like Arnold Schwarzenegger, possess. Bodybuilders are dedicated athletes and many are quite strong, but they are not as strong as the best weightlifters and their muscles needn't be strong because they compete solely on the basis of the appearance of their muscles, not their strength (muscle size and strength are not highly correlated). http://www.wlinfo.com/what_is_olympic.htm > I didn't realize until I made the switch, how much > difference " things that swing " made in my enjoyment. > > Connie Very fun. I have only done the kettlebells a couple of times and I enjoyed them. I see them as something I can do at home in addition to Olympic Lifting which generally can only be done in a gym with bumpers and a good platform. But for sheer cosmetic purposes, i.e. bodyshaping, nothing compares to " bodybuilding, " as I am reminded of everytime I look at my chest, LOL! -- You are a libertarian because " you're willing to tolerate anything that's peaceful, and you practice the principle of live and let live – opposing the initiation of force (violence) against anyone for any purpose. " The late Harry Browne Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 25, 2006 Report Share Posted March 25, 2006 >-----Original Message----- >From: >[mailto: ]On Behalf Of cbrown2008 > > >> I couldn't agree more on the fun factor >> in swinging kettlebells! The >> kettlebell swing has become my all >> time favorite weight training movement. >> And I've found kettlebells in general >> to be 10x more fun than other types of >> weightlifting I did in the past. >> The movements feel much more natural and >> intuitive to me. Very addictive. >> >> Suze Fisher > >Hey Suze have you tried a heavy CB? No! I didn't even know what it was until I asked my kettlebell training after reading it in your email. WEight even farther out from a >more challenging grip means even more wild and primitive gonzo fun that >makes you feel like Queen Boadicea. Grrrrls rule! LOL! You mean there's a type of weight training that's even *more* primitive gonzo fun than kettlebells??? Suze Fisher Web Design and Development http://www.allurecreative.com Weston A. Price Foundation Chapter Leader, Mid Coast Maine http://www.westonaprice.org ---------------------------- “The diet-heart idea (the idea that saturated fats and cholesterol cause heart disease) is the greatest scientific deception of our times.” -- Mann, MD, former Professor of Medicine and Biochemistry at Vanderbilt University, Tennessee; heart disease researcher. The International Network of Cholesterol Skeptics <http://www.thincs.org> ---------------------------- > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.