Guest guest Posted August 4, 2007 Report Share Posted August 4, 2007 Dear all Including 'transgenders' in MSM is nothing but completely denying their gender identities there by disempowering them. Lumping large sections of society with different sexual and/or gender identities under one single category MSM doesn't help in addressing AIDS epidemic as well. MSM doesn't recognize the different kinds of vulnerabilities people have with regard to HIV based on their specific sexual and/or gender identity. MSM also doesn't acknowledge the existence of people with specific sexual preferences/identities (gay, homosexual, bisexual etc.) hence doesn't aid people in building a positive self identity about their sexual preference. MSM doesn't help in mobilizing and building communities, building movements and solidarity, which is essential in addressing AIDS epidemic effectively among marginalized populations. 'MSM' helps in making conservative funders (such as USAID, whose conditionalities are against sexworkers, sexual rights - Eg. right to abort) and conservative governments happy. MSM helps in making 'AIDS sector' or 'AIDS industry' grow. It often helps in making male/transgender sexworkers invisible to avoid taking a stand on sexwork and sexworkers pay maximum price for this. If we really want to address AIDS epidemic among sexual minorities, we need to take stands - about sexual preferences, about gender indentities/preferences, about sexwork, about criminalisation of consensual sex between adults. We need to defend human rights. We need to mobilize and build communities and solidarity. We need to build democratic community organisations. Present (predominant) mode of delivering HIV/AIDS services and products doesn't help in addressing AIDS epidemic. In Solidarity Elavarthi Manohar Karnataka Sexworkers Union Bangalore, India e-mail: <manoharban@...> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 7, 2007 Report Share Posted August 7, 2007 Dear Manohar and others, Re: /message/7674 This is to inform you that right from the planning stage of NACP III from 2005 onwards, some of us have not only insisted that TG should be separately mentioned and engaged but that bisexual women and lesbians were also at risk to HIV due to their vulnerability due to gender disabilities. At the inssistence of many activists and planners at that stage, we have managed to get Transgendered M2F included in the NACO programs and presently all NACO programs for MSM mention MSM and TG or MSM/TG as a separate sub-category at higher risks to HIV. Hence Manohar's fears are well founded but have been addressed by NACO and the NACP III planners right from the beginning. I must say that there are many MSM or gay organisations that seem to speak on behalf of the transgendered without really understanding or knowing about their problems or issues. The organisation I come from, the Humsafar Trust , was instrumental in not only giving space to the transgendered but finally was also a co-partner with the Dai Society for hijras in Mumbai and helped it through many of its early teething problems. Though there are many probems, it is important that the more empowered MSM organisations speak on behalf of TG but sometimes do not allow them to speak. But given the larger issues around sex, sexuality and gender, the historical existence of the trannsgendered is now better understood in India than in many other countries of the world. It is only in India that the transgendered can get a passport under the category of EU and yet the paradox is that TG are totally disempowered thanks to the debris of colonialism and its repurcussions. Even in the planning stages some of us made it clear that hijra CBOs must be nurtured through different stages of empowerment. Therefore relaxation of protocols considered necessary for other NGOs/CBOs were written into the operational guidelines of NACO. Hijra CBOs have been allocated more money for community moblisation under various headings. The special categorical statement that hijra and sex worker CBOs should get free condoms was put in at my insistence. For the first year, lubrication was to be provided free to build up a corpus to buy more from the next year. A whole protocol for oral/anal STIs was set up on the NACO website and flip charts prepared. In fact, there is very extensive protocol now ready for all district hospitals that is being readied by UNAIDS in close collaboration with various international bodies to look at the medical issues around transgendered persons. There is much more on the cards but that is as the NACP III roll-out takes place. Till then we all mobilise for all marginalised communities. regards Ashok Row Kavi Consultant, UNAIDS e-mail: <arowkavi@...> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.