Guest guest Posted September 1, 2006 Report Share Posted September 1, 2006 > > > > > -------------- Original message ---------------------- > From: " kristinmoke " <kmoke@...> > > > > > > > > This is just an article that pertains to this topic. I think > > it's a > > > > good example of how so many accept evolutionary theory as fact > > that > > > > contrary evidence isn't even recognized as such, much less > > > > acknowledged. > > > > > > > > > > I didn't see anything in the article that was contrary to the > > theory of evolution. How does this article imply that the theory of > > evolution is false? All that can be drawn from it is that there may > > be other factors involved in our understanding of how species > > evolve, no? I think that there is a big difference between saying > > that a theory, as we understand it, is 100% correct and final, and > > allowing for the fact that we don't understand completely how it > > works. > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.