Guest guest Posted July 19, 2007 Report Share Posted July 19, 2007 Department of Health and Human Services Participating Organizations National Institutes of Health (NIH), (http://www.nih.gov/) Components of Participating Organizations National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), (http://www.niaid.nih.gov) National Cancer Institute (NCI), (www.nci.nih.gov) National Heart Lung and Blood Institute (NHLBI), (www.nhlbi.nih.gov) National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA), (www.niaaa.nih.gov) National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD), (http://www.nichd.nih.gov/) National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA), (www.nida.nih.gov) National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH), (http://www.nimh.nih.gov/ ) Title: U.S.-India Bilateral Collaborative Research Partnerships (CRP) on the Prevention of HIV/AIDS (R21) Announcement Type New NOTICE: Applications submitted in response to this Funding Opportunity Announcement (FOA) for Federal assistance must be submitted electronically through Grants.gov (http://www.grants.gov) using the SF424 Research and Related (R & R) forms and the SF424 (R & R) Application Guide. APPLICATIONS MAY NOT BE SUBMITTED IN PAPER FORMAT. This FOA must be read in conjunction with the application guidelines included with this announcement in Grants.gov/Apply for Grants (hereafter called Grants.gov/Apply). A registration process is necessary before submission and applicants are highly encouraged to start the process at least four weeks prior to the grant submission date. See Section IV. Request For Applications (RFA) Number: RFA-AI-07-031 For Assistance downloading this or any Grants.gov application package, please contact Grants.gov Customer Support at http://grants.gov/CustomerSupport Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number(s) 93.242, 93.273, 93.279, 93.393, 93.394, 93.396, 93.855, 93.856, 93.865, 93.839 Key Dates Release/Posted Date: July 18, 2007 Opening Date: August 18, 2007 (Earliest date an application may be submitted to Grants.gov) Letters of Intent Receipt Date(s): September 18, 2007 NOTE: On time submission requires that applications be successfully submitted to Grants.gov no later than 5:00 p.m. local time (of the applicant institution/organization). Application Submission/Receipt Date(s): October 18, 2007 Peer Review Date(s): January 2008 Council Review Date(s): January 2008 Earliest Anticipated Start Date(s): April 2008 Additional Information To Be Available Date (Activation Date): Not Applicable Expiration Date: October 19, 2007 Due Dates for E.O. 12372 Not Applicable Additional Overview Content Executive Summary Purpose. This Funding Opportunity Announcement (FOA) solicits Exploratory/Developmental (R21) applications from United States (U.S.)-funded institutions with an Indian-institution partner to establish Collaborative Research Partnerships (CRP) in the field of HIV/AIDS prevention with an emphasis on topical microbicides as well as other modes of HIV/AIDS prevention. The U.S.-India Bilateral CRP Program is designed to develop collaborations between scientists and institutions in the U.S. and India to conduct high quality HIV/AIDS prevention research of mutual interest and benefit to both countries while developing the basis for future institutional and individual scientific collaborations. This FOA will utilize the research capacity of the institutions and scientists in both countries to advance the field of HIV/AIDS prevention and develop preliminary data that may support a research proposal to test an HIV/AIDS prevention program with public health significance. Mechanism of Support. This FOA will utilize the R21 grant mechanism. Funds Available and Anticipated Number of Awards. It is anticipated that $3 million will be available in FY 2008 to fund 8 to 10 new awards. The Indian Council for Medical Research (ICMR) and/or other Indian Government research funding organization plans to issue a similar call for applications to support the Indian collaborators. Awards issued under this FOA are contingent upon the availability of funds and the submission of a sufficient number of meritorious applications. Budget and Project Period. The total project period for an application submitted in response to this funding opportunity may not exceed two years. Direct costs are limited to $275,000 USD over an R21 two-year period, with no more than $200,000 USD in direct costs in any single year. Eligible Institutions/Organizations: Public/State Controlled Institutions of Higher Education; Private Institutions of Higher Education; Nonprofits with 501©(3) IRS Status (other than Institutions of Higher Education); Nonprofits without 501©(3) IRS status (other than Institutions of Higher Education); Small Businesses; For-Profit Organizations (other than Small Businesses); State Government; U.S. Territory or Possession; Indian/Native American Tribal Government (Federally Recognized); Indian/Native American Tribal Government (Other than Federally Recognized); Indian/Native American Tribally Designated Organization; Non-domestic (non-U.S.) Entitity (Foreign Organization); Hispanic-serving Institutions; Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCUs); Tribally Controlled Colleges and Universities (TCCUs); Alaska Native and Native Hawaiian Serving Institutions; Regional Organizations; Other(s): Eligible agencies of the U.S. Federal Government; Faith-based or community based organizations. Eligible Project Directors/Principal Investigators (PDs/PIs): Individuals with the skills, knowledge, and resources necessary to carry out the proposed research are invited to work with their Institution to develop an application for support. Individuals from underrepresented racial and ethnic groups as well as individuals with disabilities are always encouraged to apply for NIH support. Number of Applications. Applicants may submit more that one application provided each application is scientifically distinct. Renewals and Resubmissions: The R21 is not renewable. Number of PDs/PIs: This FOA does not use the multiple PDs/PIs format. Each application must list one U.S-funded investigator with a history of U.S. funding as the PD/PI on the CRP, and one Indian investigator as a collaborating partner. The NIH will make awards to the U.S. partner while the ICMR and/or other Indian Government research funding organization will make awards to the Indian partner. Application Materials. See Section IV.1 for application materials. General Information. For general information on SF424 (R & R) materials. Application and Electronic Submission, see these the following Web sites: SF424 (R & R) Application and Electronic Submission Information: http://grants.nih.gov/grants/funding/424/index.htm General Information on Electronic Submission Information of Grant Applications: http://era.nih.gov/ElectronicReceipt/ Hearing Impaired. Telecommunications for the hearing impaired is available at: TTY 301-451-0088. Initial merit review convened by the NIAID Division of Extramural Activities. Applications are due October 18, 2007. Table of Contents -------------------------------------------- Part I Overview Information Part II Full Text of Announcement Section I. Funding Opportunity Description 1. Research Objectives Section II. Award Information 1. Mechanism of Support 2. Funds Available Section III. Eligibility Information 1. Eligible Applicants A. Eligible Institutions B. Eligible Individuals 2. Cost Sharing or Matching 3. Other - Special Eligibility Criteria Section IV. Application and Submission Information 1. Request Application Information 2. Content and Form of Application Submission 3. Submission Dates and Times A. Submission, Review, and Anticipated Start Dates 1. Letter of Intent B. Submitting an Application Electronically to the NIH C. Application Processing 4. Intergovernmental Review 5. Funding Restrictions 6. Other Submission Requirements Section V. Application Review Information 1. Criteria 2. Review and Selection Process A. Additional Review Criteria B. Additional Review Considerations C. Sharing Research Data D. Sharing Research Resources 3. Anticipated Announcement and Award Dates Section VI. Award Administration Information 1. Award Notices 2. Administrative and National Policy Requirements 3. Reporting Section VII. Agency Contact(s) 1. Scientific/Research Contact(s) 2. Peer Review Contact(s) 3. Financial/Grants Management Contact(s) Section VIII. Other Information - Required Federal Citations Part II - Full Text of Announcement --------------------------------------------- Section I. Funding Opportunity Description ------------------------------------------ 1. Research Objectives Purpose The purpose of the U.S.-India Bilateral Collaborative Research Partnerships (CRP) on the Prevention of HIV/AIDS is to support innovative and basic research on strategies to prevent HIV infection and transmission that will advance the field of HIV/AIDS prevention through the collaborative efforts of U.S. and Indian investigators and their institutions. Background The National Institutes of Health (NIH) supports international collaborative research and research training on HIV/AIDS and the exchange of scientific information by HIV/AIDS researchers around the world. Scientific cooperation between the U.S. and India has been successfully conducted for over forty years under a variety of bilateral agreements. Recognizing that continuing cooperative research and research training focused on HIV/AIDS would be of mutual benefit to the U.S. and India, the U.S. Secretary of Health and Human Services (HHS) and the Indian Minister of Health and Family Welfare signed a “Joint Statement for Collaboration on Prevention of Sexually Transmitted Diseases and HIV/AIDS”(http://www3.niaid.nih.gov/research/resources/PDF/US-IndiaStatmnt_HIV_S\ TD.pdf) in June 2006. The lead U.S. agency identified to implement activities under this Joint Statement is the HHS, NIH, and the lead Indian agencies are the Indian Council for Medical Research (ICMR) and the Department of Biotechnology (DBT). The Joint Statement calls for the establishment of a Joint Working Group (JWG) to develop strategic plans for collaboration and to facilitate the expedited review and clearance of proposed bilateral projects. Both the U.S. Secretary of Health and Human Services (HHS) and India, (Indian Minister of Health and Family Welfare) have pledged funds to support joint activities pursued under this bilateral program. Collaborative Research Partnerships A critical feature of this FOA is the establishment and support of CRPs among researchers and institutions in the U.S. and India. Applications may be derived from existing collaborations with an established history of interaction, or from new partnerships developed in response to this FOA. The CRP must be based on an interactive relationship that maximizes the expertise of the individual U.S. and Indian research teams as well as the interaction between their parent institutions and granting agencies. It is expected that the unique opportunity available through the U.S.-India Collaborative Research Program will foster collaborative partnerships that will develop and mature, leading to the establishment of joint programs intended to pursue and develop HIV/AIDS prevention strategies/interventions beyond the scope of the proposed R21 application. Research Objectives and Scope As the HIV pandemic has continued and more information is obtained on the role of other microbes (i.e. viruses, bacteria, etc.), on the behavioral and social interactions, epidemiological factors and co-morbidities associated with HIV transmission, (e.g., mental health, substance abuse [alcohol and drugs], and with HIV infection, [Kaposi’s sarcoma (KS)]) is obtained, it has become apparent that controlling the HIV/AIDS pandemic will require the development of a multi-faceted approach to prevention. Therefore this FOA supports not only individual prevention strategies/interventions, but also combination prevention strategies. A combination prevention strategy is defined as being composed of multi-level or multi-modal prevention/intervention approaches to achieve the stated goals of this FOA. Examples include the ethical considerations associated with microbicide clinical trials; for instance, where an obligation exists to both counsel and provide condoms, or to integrate prevention strategies such as the use of a vaccine along with a microbicide. Highest priority will be given to collaborative research projects that focus on HIV prevention programs that test microbicides. Projects that develop and test other prevention strategies also will be considered. Applications may include, but are not limited to collaborations addressing the following aspects of HIV/AIDS prevention: Identification of behavioral, social, epidemiological and/or infectious disease relationships that represent barriers to, and/or opportunities for implementation of a microbicide-based prevention strategy or other prevention strategy Conduct of focused microbiological, epidemiological and behavioral and social science interventions and testing that addresses the implementation and/or understanding of the impact of a prevention strategy Acquisition of knowledge that assists the operational aspects of developing and testing microbicide and/or other HIV/AIDS prevention strategies or interventions. The R21 innovation grant mechanism does not allow for the conclusive and powered testing of proposed single and combination prevention strategies in its short duration. However, this mechanism does accommodate the performance of incremental studies or interventions that can either support progression to more comprehensive studies or provide evidence that the proposed intervention is not effective. CRP applications should incorporate activities that can test and pilot specific prevention interventions. The proposed studies must take into account the time limit and budget imposed by this mechanism (See Section 2: Award Information). It is expected that where possible the proposed applications will be interactive with ongoing prevention efforts in India and the U.S., and/or propose to integrate with existing Indian government-supported prevention programs. CRP interactions may include: ongoing and proposed clinical trials not requiring an IND of microbicides or other relevant interventions, i.e., diaphragm use, STI chemoprevention and/or vaccine trials secondary/supplemental studies to existing/ongoing intervention efforts or clinical studies integration with local, regional and/or national Indian government-supported HIV/AIDS prevention efforts, such as family or individual health care counseling and intervention efforts, including alcohol abuse and mental health programs integration with existing epidemiological and AIDS/co-morbidity databases and collection efforts, such as the NIH/NIAID-sponsored International Epidemiological Database to Evaluate AIDS (IEDEA) http://grants1.nih.gov/grants/guide/rfa-files/RFA-AI-05-014.html, cancer registries, etc. Applications may address key aspects using a broad range of study populations including men and women that are at-risk for HIV/AIDS infection and uninfected and HIV/STI-infected infants and children. Other specific at-risk populations of interest include, but are not limited to: Age defined groups such as pediatric, adolescent and/or geriatric populations Couples, sexually active pairings and married couples, including married men with multiple partners injection and non-injection drug users Alcohol abusers Men who have sex with men (MSM) Transgender populations Breast feeding or mother-infant pairs at high risk Occupationally defined populations such as commercial sex workers (CSWs), long-haul truck drivers and migrant workers Mentally ill individuals Because this FOA represents a broad-based international collaborative program to address HIV/AIDS prevention, applicants are encouraged to discuss the scope of their proposed application and its responsiveness to the FOA with the relevant Program contacts listed in Section VII. Specific areas of interest for this FOA include studies that may address or be focused within one or more of the following broad research areas: 1. Infectious Diseases and HIV/AIDS Co-morbidities The development of safe, effective and acceptable prevention strategies, including microbicides, must integrate efforts to understand how biochemical, pharmacological and biophysical factors affecting susceptibility and progression to HIV/AIDS disease interact with the implementation of any given prevention strategy. Efforts in this area may also address biological issues that could alter the potential effectiveness of interventional prevention strategies in at-risk individuals or populations. Examples of potential approaches include: integration of physical and in silico tools associated with medicinal chemistry and formulation to assess a potential prevention intervention’s success and/or failure adaptation/engineering of hardware or software for prevention applications, including data base strategies and modeling of the impact and potential success of single and combination prevention strategies use of in vivo animal models to test the proposed efficacy and safety of a prevention strategy, such as of a microbicide formulation being prepared for incorporation into a proposed intervention elucidation of the role of innate and adaptive immune function in response to the prevention strategy. This may include HIV, STI or other co-infection(s) in HIV-infected individuals or individuals at high-risk for HIV acquisition use of genomic or proteomic technologies to identify or test surrogate safety, efficacy and/or behavioral correlates to measure the impact of the prevention strategy or alter its implementation studies on the role of STIs and co-morbidities as linked to HIV/AIDS acquisition/progression and their effect(s) on prevention-based interventions. Specific pathogens of interest include viruses such as Herpes Simplex Virus (HSV), Human Papilloma Virus (HPV) and other AIDS-related oncogenic viruses; STIs, bacteria associated with bacterial vaginosis; bacterial and parasitic co-morbidity pathogens, such as multi-drug resistant TB strains (MDR and XDR) and malaria. Studies may address the positive and negative effects of these pathogens on the specific prevention intervention. 2. Behavioral and Social Sciences Primary and secondary prevention strategies addressing behaviors of at-risk persons or populations with the potential for scale-up to support larger populations are critical to the development of effective and sustainable single and combination prevention strategies. Examples of interventions and areas of interest that could be tested and/or developed in response to this FOA include: the factors associated with conversion of low prevalence HIV/STI areas to high prevalence areas, as a result of cultural issues and policies Impact of environmental/structural aspects on individual or group perceptions and dynamics of HIV/AIDS risk the uptake and sustainability of Voluntary Counseling and Testing (VCT), STI testing and other prevention modalities by at-risk populations multi-level, multi-modal structural interventions that address behavioral and social dynamics that can successfully impact the design of individual and population prevention approaches interventions to support HIV treatment adherence, particularly in the context of hospitals and public health clinics in the U.S. and India integration and linkage of HIV prevention/intervention with HIV treatment efforts, including delivery of primary care to individuals recently diagnosed with HIV/AIDS examination of the impact of HIV stigma, discrimination, intimate partner violence and/or history of abuse or trauma on risk behavior examination of the rates of co-occurring mental illness and drug or alcohol abuse among people living with HIV, as well as studies to develop multi-component interventions that address co-occurring disorders (may include alcohol use disorders (AUDS) or other recognized substance abuse syndromes and their impact on increased incidence of infection. 3. Epidemiology (Behavioral and Population) Applications proposing behavioral and population epidemiology may include assessment and evaluation of the scope of the Indian HIV/AIDS epidemic. Local, regional and national incidence and/or prevalence of HIV and STIs associated with HIV acquisition and HIV/AIDS co-morbidities in the Indian population will have a significant impact on the success or failure of proposed prevention efforts. Specific examples of interest include, but are not limited to: assessment(s) of HIV and STI incidence in preparation for use of single or combination prevention strategies on a local, regional and national scale assessment of risk, incidence and local and regional patterns of HIV-related malignancies in India, such as Kaposi’s Sarcoma in HIV-infected individuals and the seroprevalence of Kaposi's Sarcoma-associated Herpes Virus (KSHV) in India assessment of the distribution of STIs (i.e., HPV subtypes, HSV serotypes, etc.) in HIV-infected and HIV-uninfected at-risk populations and HIV clades in infected populations assessment of the effect of prevention strategies and interventions on existing or projected incidence rates, including the effect efficacious vaccines (i.e., HPV) have on HIV, STI and co-morbidity incidence and prevalence in HIV-infected individuals post-trial behavioral surveillance that tracks the impact of new products on perceived susceptibility/vulnerability to HIV infection, social norms, and adherence to risk reduction guidelines. 4. Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism This area of interest within the FOA includes the use and abuse of alcohol as it may directly or indirectly (through alterations in risk behaviors) alter and/or promote the acquisition and/or progression of HIV/AIDS, STIs associated with HIV acquisition and HIV/AIDS co-morbidities. Examples of intervention/research of interest to this FOA include: interventions targeting specific drinking settings such as bars and clubs, and medical settings concerned with the treatment of AUDs the influence of alcohol use on individual behaviors and group dynamics, as well as its effect(s) on non-abusers the role of drug abuse and alcoholism on the recruitment of individuals into user groups and/or stigma associated with drug and alcohol use in the context of HIV/AIDS approaches designed to develop and provide pilot individual and community-based HIV/AIDS intervention strategies for increased access, engagement, and sustained participation through enhanced recruitment, retention and adherence to prevention and treatment interventions of alcohol abusers in both behavioral and biomedical research protocols interventions to increase access to and the utilization of HIV testing combined with sexual and alcohol use risk-reduction and counseling the biological effects of alcohol abuse on individuals and populations who are at risk for HIV/AIDS infection, acquisition of co-infection and HIV/AIDS co-morbidities. 5. Drug Use and Abuse This area of interest within the FOA includes the use and abuse of both injection and non-injection drugs, that may be classified as legal or illegal, depending upon local, regional or national laws. These substances may directly or indirectly (e.g., through alteration in both sexual and substance use risk behaviors) alter acquisition, transmission and/or progression of HIV/AIDS, STIs associated with HIV acquisition, and HIV/AIDS-associated co-morbidities. Examples of intervention research of interest include: development of improved outreach strategies for drug users to increase access and utilization of HIV testing combined with sexual and drug use risk reduction counseling development and assessment of individual and community-based prevention outreach and intervention strategies to effectively reach women at risk for infection through drug use and high–risk sex identification of social and behavioral factors among drug users that influence recruitment, retention and adherence to prevention and treatment interventions, including therapeutics and microbicides development of strategies to increase access, engagement, and sustained participation of drug users in both behavioral and biomedical research protocols enhancement of efforts to evaluate new and existing treatment and prevention regimens among drug users in clinical trials, and the conduct of research on factors that will improve trial participation and adherence development of integrated biomedical and behavioral interventions, including pharmacologic and behavioral treatment for drug abuse combined with HIV treatment and treatment and care for other co-morbidities associated with drug use (hepatitis, TB) approaches to improve combined treatment and prevention, such as integration of drug abuse prevention into HIV treatment settings strategies to improve engagement in and initiation of HIV treatment, and to sustain adherence research on the acceptability and use of biomedical interventions such as microbicides relative to and in combination with other behavioral, preventive and therapeutic interventions among drug users. 6. Prevention of Mother-To-Child Transmission (MTCT) Effective interventions to prevent mother-to-child transmission of HIV that are applicable in resource-limited settings are now available. However, implementation of these strategies has been slow. Limitations include lack of access to antenatal care, lack of antenatal HIV counseling and testing, lack of more effective regimens (e.g., single dose nevirapine plus short course zidovudine), home delivery (emphasizing evaluation of innovative methods for providing single-dose nevirapine), and breastfeeding. Examples of prevention strategies include: examination of methodologies to incorporate HIV counseling and testing into antenatal clinic settings, including community-based strategies examination of infant feeding issues in India within the context of proven interventions to prevent mother-to-child transmission development of demonstration projects designed to identify effective approaches for screening and identifying HIV-infected pregnant women for treatment and antiretroviral prophylaxis for their personal health prior to initiation of therapy development of innovative methods to provide antiretroviral prophylaxis for preventing mother-to-child transmission, particularly in rural settings or settings with high home delivery frequency (e.g., use of traditional birth attendants to provide counseling and prophylaxis) evaluation of the effectiveness of infant feeding counseling. This may involve effectiveness of counseling women who exclusively breast feed, and/or the impact of replacement feeding on infant morbidity and mortality. Applications in the following areas will NOT be considered responsive and will be returned without review: clinical studies requiring an IND, including Phase 0 (Exploratory), Phase I, Phase II and Phase III clinical trials. Non-IND studies to assess behavioral, social and/or epidemiological parameters associated with HIV, STI co-infection and HIV/AIDS co-morbidities are responsive as long as there is no clinical intervention. applications proposing development of new vaccines or vaccine vectors (HIV or other viruses). Studies that provide supplemental or additional analysis, including studies that assess safety, efficacy and acceptability parameters of the vaccine-target population when associated with an ongoing vaccine trial(s) are responsive. proposed development and/or incremental modification of: a microbicide-based prevention strategy derived primarily from a detergent, surfactant, non-specific membrane active agent; over-the-counter products (OTC); non-specific female/male vaginal and/or rectal health products as a single or combination prevention strategy. applications proposing random or bulk screening (high through-put screening) of compound libraries or collections for potential anti-microbials, including HIV, STIs associated with HIV acquisition and/or pathogens associated with HIV/AIDS co-morbidities. screening efforts to identify new therapeutics for the cancers or STIs-associated with HIV acquisition. applications proposing or involving delivery of treatment (i.e., drugs, formulations, health foods, vitamins, Ayurvedic medicines or formulations) to individuals or populations for HIV/AIDS, opportunistic infections (OIs), co-infections or co-morbidities. See Section VIII, Other Information - Required Federal Citations, for policies related to this announcement. Section II. Award Information ------------------------------------------ 1. Mechanism of Support This Funding Opportunity Announcement (FOA) will use the NIH R21 Exploratory/Developmental grant award mechanism. The applicant will be solely responsible for planning, directing, and executing the proposed project. This FOA uses just-in-time concepts. For the R21, applicants must complete and submit detailed budget requests using the SF424 Research and Related (R & R) Budget component provided in the SF424 (R & R) Application Package and SF424 (R & R) Application Guide (see specifically Section 4.7, “R & R Budget Component,” of the Application Guide). Modular budgets are not permitted for this funding opportunity. Exploratory/developmental grant support is for new projects only; competing renewal (formerly " competing continuation " ) and resubmission applications will not be accepted. 2. Funds Available Because the nature and scope of the proposed research will vary from application to application, it is anticipated that the size and duration of each award will also vary. Although the financial plans of the NIH Institutes and Centers (ICs) and Indian partners provide support for this program, awards pursuant to this funding opportunity are contingent upon the availability of funds and the submission of a sufficient number of meritorious applications. The total project period for an application submitted in response to this funding opportunity may not exceed two years. Although the size of award may vary with the scope of research proposed, it is expected that applications will stay within the budgetary guidelines for an exploratory/developmental project. Direct costs are limited to $275,000 USD over an R21 two-year period, with no more than $200,000 USD in direct costs in any single year. The participating institutes intend to commit approximately 3 million total dollars in FY2008 to fund 8 to 10 applications. NIH grant policies described in the NIH Grants Policy Statement http://grants.nih.gov/grants/policy/nihgps_2003/index.htm will apply to the applications submitted and awards made in response to this FOA. F & A costs requested by consortium participants are not included in the direct cost limitation; see NOT-OD-05-004, November 2, 2004. Section III. Eligibility Information --------------------------------- 1. Eligible Applicants 1.A. Eligible Institutions You may submit an application(s) if your institution has any of the following characteristics: Public/State Controlled Institution of Higher Education Private Institution of Higher Education Hispanic-serving Institution Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCUs) Tribally Controlled Colleges and Universities (TCCUs) Alaska Native and Native Hawaiian Serving Institutions Nonprofit with 501©(3) IRS Status (Other than Institution of Higher Education) Nonprofit without 501©(3) IRS Status (Other than Institution of Higher Education) Non-domestic (non-U.S.) Entity Small Business For-Profit Organization (Other than Small Business) State Government Regional Organization U.S. Territory or Possession Indian/Native American Tribal Government (Federally Recognized) Indian/Native American Tribal Government (Other than Federally Recognized) Indian/Native American Tribally Designated Organization Other(s): Eligible agencies of the Federal government; Faith-based or community based organizations. 1.B. Eligible Individuals Any individual with the skills, knowledge, and resources necessary to carry out the proposed research as the Project Director/Principal Investigator (PD/PI) is invited to work with his/her organization to develop an application for support Individuals from underrepresented racial and ethnic groups as well as individuals with disabilities are always encouraged to apply for NIH support. The PD/PI must be from a U.S.-funded institution and must collaborate with an Indian investigator at an Indian institution and possessing complementary expertise. Investigators not qualifying for the U.S.-India Bilateral CRP are encouraged to apply for the NIH-wide R21 exploratory/developmental research grant program (see http://grants2.nih.gov/grants/guide/pa-files/PA-06-181.html), or other announcements. 2. Cost Sharing or Matching This program does not require cost sharing as defined in the current NIH Grants Policy Statement. 3. Other-Special Eligibility Criteria Applicants may submit more than one application, provided each application is scientifically distinct. Section IV. Application and Submission Information -------------------------------------------- To download a SF424 (R & R) Application Package and SF424 (R & R) Application Guide for completing the SF424 (R & R) forms for this FOA, link to http://www.grants.gov/Apply/ and follow the directions provided on that Web site. A one-time registration is required for institutions/organizations at both: Grants.gov (http://www.grants.gov/GetStarted) and eRA Commons (http://era.nih.gov/ElectronicReceipt/preparing.htm) PDs/PIs should work with their institutions/organizations to make sure they are registered in the eRA Commons. Several additional separate actions are required before an applicant institution/organization can submit an electronic application, as follows: 1) Organizational/Institutional Registration in Grants.gov/Get Started Your organization will need to obtain a Data Universal Number System (DUNS) Number and register with the Central Contractor Registration (CCR) as part of the Grants.gov registration process. If your organization does not have a Taxpayer Identification Number (TIN) or Employer Identification Number (EIN), allow for extra time. A valid TIN or EIN is necessary for CCR registration. The CCR also validates the EIN against Internal Revenue Service records, a step that will take an additional one to two business days. Direct questions regarding Grants.gov registration to: Grants.gov Customer Support Contact Center Phone: 800-518-4726 Business Hours: M-F 7:00 a.m. - 9:00 p.m. Eastern Time Email support@... 2) Organizational/Institutional Registration in the eRA Commons To find out if an organization is already Commons-registered, see the " List of Grantee Organizations Registered in NIH eRA Commons.” Direct questions regarding the Commons registration to: eRA Commons Help Desk Phone: 301-402-7469 or 866-504-9552 (Toll Free) TTY: 301-451-5939 Business hours: M-F 7:00 a.m. – 8:00 p.m. Eastern Time Email commons@... 3) Project Director/Principal Investigator (PD/PI) Registration in the NIH eRA Commons: Refer to the NIH eRA Commons System (COM) Users Guide. The individual designated as the PD/PI on the application must also be registered in the NIH eRA Commons. The PD/PI must hold a PD/PI account in the Commons. Applicants should not share a Commons account for both an Authorized Organization Representative/Signing Official (AOR/SO) role and a PD/PI role; however, if they have both a PD/PI role and an Internet Assisted Review (IAR) role, both roles should exist under one Commons account. This registration/affiliation must be done by the AOR/SO or their designee who is already registered in the Commons. Both the PD/PI and AOR/SO need separate accounts in the NIH eRA Commons since both are authorized to view the application image. Note that if a PD/PI is also an NIH peer-reviewer with an Individual DUNS and CCR registration, that particular DUNS number and CCR registration are for the individual reviewer only. These are different than any DUNS number and CCR registration used by an applicant organization. Individual DUNS and CCR registration should be used only for the purposes of personal reimbursement and should not be used on any grant applications submitted to the Federal Government. Several of the steps of the registration process could take four weeks or more. Therefore, applicants should immediately check with their business official to determine whether their organization/institution is already registered in both Grants.gov and the Commons. The NIH will accept electronic applications only from organizations that have completed all necessary registrations. 1. Request Application Information Applicants must download the SF424 (R & R) application forms and SF424 (R & R) Application Guide for this FOA through Grants.gov/Apply. Note: Only the forms package directly attached to a specific FOA can be used. You will not be able to use any other SF424 (R & R) forms (e.g., sample forms, forms from another FOA), although some of the " Attachment " files may be useable for more than one FOA. For further assistance, contact GrantsInfo: Telephone 301-435-0714, Email: GrantsInfo@.... Telecommunications for the hearing impaired: TTY 301-451-0088. 2. Content and Form of Application Submission Prepare all applications using the SF424 (R & R) application forms and in accordance with the SF424 (R & R) Application Guide. (http://grants.nih.gov/grants/funding/424/index.htm). The SF424 (R & R) Application Guide is critical to submitting a complete and accurate application to NIH. There are fields within the SF424 (R & R) application components that, although not marked as mandatory, are required by NIH (e.g., the “Credential” log-in field of the “Research & Related Senior/Key Person Profile” component must contain the PD/PI’s assigned eRA Commons User ID). Agency-specific instructions for such fields are clearly identified in the Application Guide. For additional information, see “Frequently Asked Questions – Application Guide, Electronic Submission of Grant Applications.” The SF424 (R & R) application is comprised of data arranged in separate components. Some components are required, others are optional. The forms package associated with this FOA in Grants.gov/APPLY will include all applicable components, required and optional. A completed application in response to this FOA will include the following components: Required Components: SF424 (R & R) (Cover component) Research & Related Project/Performance Site Locations Research & Related Other Project Information Research & Related Senior/Key Person Research & Related Budget PHS398 Cover Page Supplement PHS398 Research Plan PHS398 Checklist Optional Components: PHS398 Cover Letter File Research & Related Subaward Budget Attachment(s) Form Note: While both budget components are included in the SF424 (R & R) forms package, this FOA for which all applications must include a foreign component uses ONLY the Research & Related Budget. (Do not use the PHS398 Modular Budget.) Foreign Organizations NIH policies concerning grants to foreign (non-U.S.) organizations can be found in the in the NIH Grants Policy Statement at: http://grants.nih.gov/grants/policy/nihgps_2003/NIHGPS_Part12.htm#_Toc54600260. Application from foreign organizations must: Request budgets in U.S. dollars. Prepare detailed budgets for all applications (that is, complete the Research & Related Budget component of the SF424 (R & R) applications forms- not the PHS398 Modular Budget component). See NOT-OD-06-096, August 23, 2006. Charge back of customs and import fees is not allowed. Format: Every effort should be made to comply with the format specifications, which are based upon a standard U.S. paper size of 8.5” x 11” within each PDF. Funds for up to 8% administrative costs (excluding equipment) may be requested. See NOT-OD-01-028, March 29, 2001. Organizations must comply with Federal/NIH policies on human subjects, animals, and biohazards. Organizations must comply with Federal/NIH biosafety and biosecurity regulations. See Section VI.2., “Administrative and National Policy Requirements.” SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS Applications Involving Multiple Institutions When multiple institutions are involved, one institution must be designated as the prime institution and funding for the other institution(s) must be requested via a subcontract to be administered by the prime institution. When submitting a detailed budget, the prime institution should submit its budget using the Research & Related Budget component. All other institutions should have their individual budgets attached separately to the Research & Related Subaward Budget Attachment(s) Form. See Section 4.8 of the SF424 (R & R) Application Guide for further instruction regarding the use of the subaward budget form. 3. Submission Dates and Times See Section IV.3.A for details. 3.A. Submission, Review, and Anticipated Start Dates Opening Date: August 18, 2007 (Earliest date an application may be submitted to Grants.gov) Letters of Intent Receipt Date(s): September 18, 2007 NOTE: On time submission requires that applications be successfully submitted to Grants.gov no later than 5:00 p.m. local time (of the applicant institution/organization). Application Submission/Receipt Date(s): October 18, 2007 Peer Review Date(s): January 2008 Council Review Date(s): January 2008 Earliest Anticipated Start Date(s): April 2008 3.A.1. Letter of Intent Prospective applicants are asked to submit a Letter of Intent that includes the following information: Descriptive title of proposed research Name, address, and telephone number of the PD/PI. Names of other key personnel Participating institutions Number and title of this funding opportunity Although a LOI is not required, is not binding, and does not enter into the review of a subsequent application, the information that it contains allows IC staff to estimate the potential review workload and plan the review. The LOI is to be sent by the date listed in Section IV.3.A, The LOI should be sent to: Sujata Vijh, Ph.D. Division of Extramural Activities National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Room 3118, MSC-7616 6700-B Rockledge Drive Bethesda, MD 20892-7616 FedEx Zip: 20817-7616 Tel: (301) 594-0985 Fax: (301) 480-2408 Email: vijhs@... 3.B. Submitting an Application Electronically to the NIH To submit an application in response to this FOA, applicants should access this FOA via http://www.grants.gov/Apply and follow steps 1-4. Note: Applications must only be submitted electronically. PAPER APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED. 3.C. Application Processing Applications may be submitted on or after the opening date and must be successfully received by Grants.gov no later than 5:00 p.m. local time (of the applicant institution/organization) on the application submission/receipt date(s). (See Section IV.3.A. for all dates.) If an application is not submitted by the receipt date(s) and time, the application may be delayed in the review process or not reviewed. Once an application package has been successfully submitted through Grants.gov, any errors have been addressed, and the assembled application has been created in the eRA Commons, the PD/PI and the Authorized Organization Representative/Signing Official (AOR/SO) have two business days to view the application image. If everything is acceptable, no further action is necessary. The application will automatically move forward for processing by the Division of Receipt and Referral, Center for Scientific Review, NIH, after two business days. Prior to the submission deadline, the AOR/SO can “Reject” the assembled application and submit a changed/corrected application within the two-day viewing window. This option should be used if the AOR/SO determines that warnings should be addressed. Reminder: warnings do not stop further application processing. If an application submission results in warnings (but no errors) it will automatically move forward after two business days if no action is taken. Please remember that some warnings may not be applicable or may need to be addressed after application submission. If the two-day window falls after the submission deadline, the AOR/SO will have the option to “Reject” the application if, due to an eRA Commons or Grants.gov system issue, the application does not correctly reflect the submitted application package (e.g., some part of the application was lost or didn’t transfer correctly during the submission process). The AOR/SO should first contact the eRA Commons Helpdesk to confirm the system error, document the issue, and determine the best course of action. NIH will not penalize the applicant for an eRA Commons or Grants.gov system issue. If the AOR/SO chooses to “Reject” the image after the submission deadline for a reason other than an eRA Commons or Grants.gov system failure, a changed/corrected application still can be submitted, but it will be subject to the NIH late policy guidelines and may not be accepted. The reason for this delay should be explained in the cover letter attachment. Both the AOR/SO and PD/PI will receive e-mail notifications when the application is rejected or the application automatically moves forward in the process after two days. Upon receipt, applications will be evaluated for completeness by the Center for Scientific Review, NIH. Incomplete applications will not be reviewed. There will be an acknowledgement of receipt of applications from Grants.gov and the Commons. Information related to the assignment of an application to a Scientific Review Group is also in the Commons. Note: Since email can be unreliable, it is the responsibility of the applicant to check periodically on their application status in the Commons. The NIH will not accept any application in response to this funding opportunity that is essentially the same as one currently pending initial review, unless the applicant withdraws the pending application. However, when a previously unfunded application, originally submitted as an investigator-initiated application, is to be submitted in response to a funding opportunity, it is to be prepared as a NEW application, That is, the application for the funding opportunity must not include an Introduction describing the changes and improvements made, and text must not be marked to indicate changes from the previous unfunded version of the application. 4. Intergovernmental Review This initiative is not subject to intergovernmental review. 5. Funding Restrictions All NIH awards are subject to the terms and conditions, cost principles, and other considerations described in the NIH Grants Policy Statement. Pre-award costs are allowable. A grantee may, at its own risk and without NIH prior approval, incur obligations and expenditures to cover costs up to 90 days before the beginning date of the initial budget period of a new award if such costs: are necessary to conduct the project, and would be allowable under the grant, if awarded, without NIH prior approval. If specific expenditures would otherwise require prior approval, the grantee must obtain NIH approval before incurring the cost. NIH prior approval is required for any costs to be incurred more than 90 days before the beginning date of the initial budget period of a new award. The incurrence of pre-award costs in anticipation of a competing or non-competing award imposes no obligation on NIH either to make the award or to increase the amount of the approved budget if an award is made for less than the amount anticipated and is inadequate to cover the pre-award costs incurred. NIH expects the grantee to be fully aware that pre-award costs result in borrowing against future support and that such borrowing must not impair the grantee's ability to accomplish the project objectives in the approved time frame or in any way adversely affect the conduct of the project. See the NIH Grants Policy Statement. 6. Other Submission Requirements PD/PI Credential (e.g., Agency Login) The NIH requires the PD/PI to fill in his/her Commons User ID in the “PROFILE – Project Director/Principal Investigator” section, “Credential” log-in field of the “Research & Related Senior/Key Person Profile” component. The applicant organization must include its DUNS number in its Organization Profile in the eRA Commons. This DUNS number must match the DUNS number provided at CCR registration with Grants.gov. For additional information, see “Registration FAQs – Important Tips -- Electronic Submission of Grant Applications.” Organizational DUNS The applicant organization must include its DUNS number in its Organization Profile in the eRA Commons. This DUNS number must match the DUNS number provided at CCR registration with Grants.gov. For additional information, see “Frequently Asked Questions-Applications Guide, Electronic Submission of Grant Applications.” Research Plan Component Sections While each section of the Research Plan component needs to be uploaded separately as a PDF attachment, applicants are encouraged to construct the Research Plan component as a single document, separating sections into distinct PDF attachments just before uploading the files. This approach will enable applicants to better monitor formatting requirements such as page limits. All attachments must be provided to NIH in PDF format, filenames must be included with no spaces or special characters, and a .pdf extension must be used. All application instructions outlined in the SF424 (R & R) Application Guide are to be followed, incorporating “Just-in-Time” information concepts and with the following requirements for applications: Supplementary Instructions Total direct costs are limited to $275,000 USD over a 2-year period. No more than $200,000 USD in direct costs will be allowed in any single year of the R21. The NIH modular budget concept is NOT to be used. Even though the budget for the R21 phase is limited, applications must present the detailed SF424 (R & R) Budget forms for all years. The budget justification must include information about where the funds will be utilized. Preliminary data are not required for an R21 application but they may be included. Items 2-5 of the Research Plan of the R21 application may not exceed 15 pages, including tables, graphs, figures, diagrams, and charts. There should be a single Research Plan for the combined efforts of the two organizations. Item 2, Specific Aims, must identify which partner of the collaboration (U.S., India, or jointly) will be responsible for accomplishment for each proposed specific aim. Item 5, Research Design and Methods, should provide a complete description of the research, demonstrating the integration of the two researcher’s efforts. Applicants are required to provide a Collaboration Plan. This plan must be no more than 3 pages. The Collaboration Plan is NOT included in the 15-page limit of the Research Plan. The Collaborative Plan must be included as an attachment to the Research & Related Other Project Information form under item 11 “Other Attachments.” The Collaboration Plan should include a discussion on how the collaboration will be established and maintained by the U.S. and Indian partners including well-defined and identifiable responsibilities for the PD/PI and Indian collaborator. Describe resources available, including which collaborative partner is contributing the resources, a plan for how resources will be shared, and detail how the coordination will benefit HIV/AIDS prevention science. Individual contributions of specific reagents, i.e., patient samples, compounds and access to populations for epidemiological and behavioral studies should be identified. The governance and organizational structure of the collaboration should be described, including communication plans, process for making decisions on scientific direction, and procedures for resolving conflicts. Contingency plans should also be included for setbacks and delays. In preparing the R21 application, investigators should consider the fact that the application will be assigned a single priority score. Thus, clarity and completeness of the application with regard to specific goals and the proposed interactions of the U.S. and India collaborators are critical. A poorly developed collaboration strategy that is not sufficient for assessing the potential for a successful R21 research effort will reflect poorly on the scientific merit of the application. Appendix Materials NIH has published new limitations on grant application appendix materials to encourage applications to be as concise as possible while containing the information needed for expert scientific review. See http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/NOT-OD-07-018.html . Applicants must follow the specific instructions on Appendix materials as described in the SF424 (R & R) Application Guide (See http://grants.nih.gov/grants/funding/424/index.htm). Do not use the Appendix to circumvent the page limitations of the Research Plan component. An application that does not observe the relevant policies and procedures may be delayed in the review process. Plan for Sharing Research Data The precise content of the data-sharing plan will vary, depending on the data being collected and how the investigators are planning to share the data. Applicants who are planning to share data may wish to describe briefly the expected schedule for data sharing, the format of the final dataset, the documentation to be provided, whether or not any analytic tools also will be provided, whether or not a data-sharing agreement will be required and, if so, a brief description of such an agreement (including the criteria for deciding who can receive the data and whether or not any conditions will be placed on their use), and the mode of data sharing (e.g., under their own auspices by mailing a disk or posting data on their institutional or personal website, through a data archive or enclave). Investigators choosing to share under their own auspices may wish to enter into a data-sharing agreement. References to data sharing may also be appropriate in other sections of the application. All applicants must include a plan for sharing research data in their application. The data sharing policy is available at http://grants.nih.gov/grants/policy/data_sharing. All investigators responding to this funding opportunity should include a description of how final research data will be shared, or explain why data sharing is not possible. The reasonableness of the data sharing plan or the rationale for not sharing research data will be assessed by the reviewers. However, reviewers will not factor the proposed data sharing plan into the determination of scientific merit or the priority score. Sharing Research Resources NIH policy expects that grant recipients make unique research resources readily available for research purposes to qualified individuals within the scientific community after publication (See the NIH Grants Policy Statement http://grants.nih.gov/grants/policy/nihgps_2003/NIHGPS_Part7.htm#_Toc54600131). Investigators responding to this funding opportunity should include a sharing research resources plan addressing how unique research resources will be shared or explain why sharing is not possible. The adequacy of the resources sharing plan and any related data sharing plans will be considered by Program staff of the funding organization when making recommendations about funding applications. The effectiveness of the resource sharing will be evaluated as part of the administrative review of each Non-Competing Grant Progress Report (PHS 2590). See Section VI.3., “Reporting.” Section V. Application Review Information ------------------------------------------ 1. Criteria Only the review criteria described below will be considered in the review process. 2. Review and Selection Process Applications that are complete will be evaluated for scientific and technical merit by an appropriate review group convened by NIH in accordance with the review criteria stated below. As part of the initial merit review, all applications will: Undergo a selection process in which only those applications deemed to have the highest scientific merit, generally the top half of applications under review, will be discussed and assigned a priority score; Receive a written critique; Receive a second level of review by the National Advisory Allergy and Infectious Diseases Council. Applications submitted in response to this funding opportunity will compete for available funds with all other recommended applications. The following will be considered in making funding decisions: Scientific merit of the proposed project as determined by NIH peer review; Availability of funds; Relevance to NIH program priorities; Relevance to U.S. and Indian program priorities as evaluated by the Joint Working Group Convened under the U.S.-India Joint Statement cited above in Section I.1. “Research Objectives.” The goals of NIH supported research are to advance our understanding of biological systems, to improve the control of disease, and to enhance health. In their written critiques, reviewers will be asked to comment on each of the following criteria in order to judge the likelihood that the proposed research will have a substantial impact on the pursuit of these goals. Each of these criteria will be addressed and considered in assigning the overall score, weighting them as appropriate for each application. Significance Approach Innovation Investigator Environment Significance: Does this study address an important scientific health problem? If the aims of the application are achieved, how will scientific knowledge or clinical practice be advanced? What will be the effect of these studies on the concepts, methods, technologies, treatments, services, or preventative interventions that drive this field? Approach: Are the conceptual or clinical framework, design, methods, and analyses adequately developed, well integrated, well reasoned, and appropriate to the aims of the project? Does the applicant acknowledge potential problem areas and consider alternative tactics? Is the proposed collaborative team positioned to accomplish the proposed research, and does the collaboration of U.S.-funded investigators and Indian investigators add significantly to the approach being proposed? Innovation: Is the project original and innovative? For example: does the project challenge existing paradigms or clinical practice; address an innovative hypothesis or critical barrier to progress in the field? Does the project develop or employ novel concepts, approaches, methodologies, tools, or technologies in the area of HIV/AIDS prevention? Investigators: Are the PD/PI(s) and other key personnel appropriately trained and well suited to carry out this work? Is the work proposed appropriate to the experience level of the principal investigator and other researchers? Does the PD/PI(s) and investigative team bring complementary and integrated expertise to the project (if applicable)? Environment: Do(es) the scientific environment(s) in which the work will be done contribute to the probability of success? Do the proposed studies benefit from unique features of the scientific environment, or subject populations, or employ useful collaborative arrangements? Is there evidence of institutional support? 2.A. Additional Review Criteria: In addition to the above criteria, the following items will continue to be considered in the determination of scientific merit and the priority score: Collaborative Plan: Is the collaborative plan well-defined with identifiable responsibilities for the U.S. and India partners? Is a plan for management of the collaboration presented, as well as descriptions of what each participant proposes to supply to the collaborative partnership? Is there a clear and well thought out advantage to bringing the U.S. and Indian partners together in a collaborative partnership and is it clear how coordination will contribute to advances in prevention science? Protection of Human Subjects from Research Risk: The involvement of human subjects and protections from research risk relating to their participation in the proposed research will be assessed. See the “Human Subjects Sections” of the PHS398 Research Plan component of the SF424 (R & R). Inclusion of Women, Minorities and Children in Research: The adequacy of plans to include subjects from both genders, all racial and ethnic groups (and subgroups), and children as appropriate for the scientific goals of the research will be assessed. Plans for the recruitment and retention of subjects will also be evaluated. See the “Human Subjects Sections” of the PHS398 Research Plan component of the SF424 (R & R). Care and Use of Vertebrate Animals in Research: If vertebrate animals are to be used in the project, the adequacy of the plans for their care and use will be assessed. See the “Other Research Plan Sections” of the PHS398 Research Plan component of the SF424 (R & R). Biohazards: If materials or procedures are proposed that are potentially hazardous to research personnel and/or the environment, determine if the proposed protection is adequate. 2.B. Additional Review Considerations Budget and Period of Support: The reasonableness of the proposed budget and the appropriateness of the requested period of support in relation to the proposed research may be assessed by the reviewers. The priority score should not be affected by the evaluation of the budget. 2.C. Sharing Research Data Data Sharing Plan: The reasonableness of the data sharing plan or the rationale for not sharing research data will be assessed by the reviewers. However, reviewers will not factor the proposed data sharing plan into the determination of scientific merit or the priority score. The presence of a data sharing plan will be part of the terms and conditions of the award. The funding organization will be responsible for monitoring the data sharing 2.D. Sharing Research Resources NIH policy expects that grant recipients make unique research resources readily available for research purposes to qualified individuals within the scientific community after publication (See the NIH Grants Policy Statement http://grants.nih.gov/grants/policy/nihgps_2003/NIHGPS_Part7.htm#_Toc54600131). Investigators responding to this funding opportunity should include a sharing research resources plan addressing how unique research resources will be shared or explain why sharing is not possible. Program staff will be responsible for the administrative review of the plan for sharing research resources. The adequacy of the resources sharing plan and any related data sharing plans will be considered by Program staff of the funding organization when making recommendations about funding applications. The effectiveness of the resource sharing will be evaluated as part of the administrative review of each Non-Competing Grant Progress Report (PHS 2590), See Section VI.3., “Reporting.” Model Organism Sharing Plan: Reviewers are asked to assess the sharing plan in an administrative note. The sharing plan itself should be discussed after the application is scored. Whether a sharing plan is reasonable can be determined by the reviewers on a case-by-case basis, taking into consideration the organism, the timeline, the applicant’s decision to distribute the resource or deposit it in a repository, and other relevant considerations. 3. Anticipated Announcement and Award Dates Not Applicable. Section VI. Award Administration Information ------------------------------------------------- 1. Award Notices After the peer review of the application is completed, the PD/PI will be able to access his/her Summary Statement (written critique) via the NIH eRA Commons. If the application is under consideration for funding, NIH will request " just-in-time " information from the applicant. For details, applicants may refer to the NIH Grants Policy Statement Part II: Terms and Conditions of NIH Grant Awards, Subpart A: General. A formal notification in the form of a Notice of Award (NoA) will be provided to the applicant organization. The NoA signed by the grants management officer is the authorizing document. Once all administrative and programmatic issues have been resolved, the NoA will be generated via email notification from the awarding component to the grantee business official. Selection of an application for award is not an authorization to begin performance. Any costs incurred before receipt of the NoA are at the recipient's risk. These costs may be reimbursed only to the extent considered allowable pre-award costs. See Section IV.5., “Funding Restrictions.” 2. Administrative and National Policy Requirements All NIH grant and cooperative agreement awards include the NIH Grants Policy Statement as part of the NoA. For these terms of award, see the NIH Grants Policy Statement Part II: Terms and Conditions of NIH Grant Awards, Subpart A: General and Part II: Terms and Conditions of NIH Grant Awards, Subpart B: Terms and Conditions for Specific Types of Grants, Grantees, and Activities. 3. Reporting When multiple years are involved, awardees will be required to submit the Non-Competing Grant Progress Report (PHS 2590) annually and financial statements as required in the NIH Grants Policy Statement. Section VII. Agency Contacts ----------------------------------------------- We encourage your inquiries concerning this funding opportunity and welcome the opportunity to answer questions from potential applicants. Inquiries may fall into three areas: scientific/research, peer review, and financial or grants management issues: 1. Scientific/Research Contacts: Direct inquiries regarding scientific, programmatic, and review matters to the appropriate Program Official listed below: NCI Kishor Bhatia, Ph.D., MRCPath Office of AIDS Malignancy Program National Cancer Institute Room 6114, MSC-7204 6120 Executive Boulevard Bethesda, MD 20892-7204 (for U.S. Postal Service regular or express mail) Rockville, MD 20852 (for FedEx, UPS and other courier services) Telephone: (301) 496-4995 Fax: (301) 480-4137 E-mail: bhatiak@... NHLBI Cheryl L. Mc, M.D. AIDS Coordinator National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Room 8114, MSC-7940 6701 Rockledge Drive Bethesda, MD 20892-7940 (For courier services use Zip 20817) Telephone: (301) 435-0560 Fax: (301) 480-2858 E-mail: mcdonalc@... NIAAA Kendall , Ph.D. HIV/AIDS Research National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism Room 2069, MSC 9304 5635 Fishers Lane Rockville, MD 20892-9304 Telephone: (301) 402-9389 Fax: (301) 443-8614 E-mail: kbryant@... NIAID Jim A. Turpin, Ph.D. Division of AIDS National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Room 5114, MSC-7628 6700B Rockledge Drive Bethesda, MD 20892-7628 Phone: (301) 451-2732 Fax: (301) 496-8530 Email: jturpin@... NICHD Danuta Krotoski, Ph.D. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Room 2A01, MSC 7510 6100 Executive Boulevard Bethesda, MD 20892-7510 Phone: (301) 435-7566 Fax: (301) 435-0009 E-mail: krotoskd@... NIDA Davenny, M.P.H. AIDS Research Program National Institute on Drug Abuse Room 4215, MSC 9581 6001 Executive Boulevard Bethesda, MD 20892-9581 Telephone: (301) 443-2146 Fax: (301) 443-9127 E-mail: kdavenny@... NIMH Willo Pequenat, Ph.D. Division of Mental Disorders National Institute of Mental Health Room 6219B, MSC-9619 6001 Executive Boulevard Bethesda, MD 20892-9619 Telephone: (301) 443-1187 Fax: (301) 443-9719 E-mail: wpequegn@... 2. Peer Review Contacts: Sujata Vijh, Ph.D. Division of Extramural Activities National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Room 3118, MSC-7616 6700-B Rockledge Drive Bethesda, MD 20892-7616 FedEx Zip: 20817-7616 Tel: (301) 594-0985 Fax: (301) 480-2408 Email: vijhs@... 3. Financial or Grants Management Contacts: Chatman Division of Extramural Activities National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Room 2241, MSC-76146700-B Rockledge Drive Bethesda, MD 20892 (express zip 20817) Direct Line: (301) 402-6580 GMP: (301) 496-7075 Fax: (301) 493-0597 E-mail: chatmank@... Section VIII. Other Information --------------------------------------------------- Required Federal Citations Use of Animals in Research: Recipients of PHS support for activities involving live, vertebrate animals must comply with PHS Policy on Humane Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (http://grants.nih.gov/grants/olaw/references/PHSPolicyLabAnimals.pdf) as mandated by the Health Research Extension Act of 1985 (http://grants.nih.gov/grants/olaw/references/hrea1985.htm), and the USDA Animal Welfare Regulations (http://www.nal.usda.gov/awic/legislat/usdaleg1.htm) as applicable. Human Subjects Protection: Federal regulations (45 CFR 46) require that applications and proposals involving human subjects must be evaluated with reference to the risks to the subjects, the adequacy of protection against these risks, the potential benefits of the research to the subjects and others, and the importance of the knowledge gained or to be gained (http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/humansubjects/guidance/45cfr46.htm). Data and Safety Monitoring Plan: Data and safety monitoring is required for all types of clinical trials, including physiologic toxicity and dose-finding studies (phase I); efficacy studies (Phase II); efficacy, effectiveness and comparative trials (Phase III). Monitoring should be commensurate with risk. The establishment of data and safety monitoring boards (DSMBs) is required for multi-site clinical trials involving interventions that entail potential risks to the participants (“NIH Policy for Data and Safety Monitoring,” NIH Guide for Grants and Contracts, http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/not98-084.html). Sharing Research Data: Investigators submitting an NIH application seeking $500,000 or more in direct costs in any single year are expected to include a plan for data sharing or state why this is not possible (http://grants.nih.gov/grants/policy/data_sharing). Investigators should seek guidance from their institutions, on issues related to institutional policies and local IRB rules, as well as local, State and Federal laws and regulations, including the Privacy Rule. Reviewers will consider the data sharing plan but will not factor the plan into the determination of the scientific merit or the priority score. Access to Research Data through the Freedom of Information Act: The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Circular A-110 has been revised to provide access to research data through the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) under some circumstances. Data that are (1) first produced in a project that is supported in whole or in part with Federal funds and (2) cited publicly and officially by a Federal agency in support of an action that has the force and effect of law (i.e., a regulation) may be accessed through FOIA. It is important for applicants to understand the basic scope of this amendment. NIH has provided guidance at http://grants.nih.gov/grants/policy/a110/a110_guidance_dec1999.htm. Applicants may wish to place data collected under this funding opportunity in a public archive, which can provide protections for the data and manage the distribution for an indefinite period of time. If so, the application should include a description of the archiving plan in the study design and include information about this in the budget justification section of the application. In addition, applicants should think about how to structure informed consent statements and other human subjects procedures given the potential for wider use of data collected under this award. Sharing of Model Organisms: NIH is committed to support efforts that encourage sharing of important research resources including the sharing of model organisms for biomedical research (see http://grants.nih.gov/grants/policy/model_organism/index.htm). At the same time the NIH recognizes the rights of grantees and contractors to elect and retain title to subject inventions developed with Federal funding pursuant to the Bayh Dole Act (see the NIH Grants Policy Statement). Beginning October 1, 2004, all investigators submitting an NIH application or contract proposal are expected to include in the application/proposal a description of a specific plan for sharing and distributing unique model organism research resources generated using NIH funding or state why such sharing is restricted or not possible. This will permit other researchers to benefit from the resources developed with public funding. The inclusion of a model organism sharing plan is not subject to a cost threshold in any year and is expected to be included in all applications where the development of model organisms is anticipated. Inclusion of Women And Minorities in Clinical Research: It is the policy of the NIH that women and members of minority groups and their sub-populations must be included in all NIH-supported clinical research projects unless a clear and compelling justification is provided indicating that inclusion is inappropriate with respect to the health of the subjects or the purpose of the research. This policy results from the NIH Revitalization Act of 1993 (Section 492B of Public Law 103-43). All investigators proposing clinical research should read the " NIH Guidelines for Inclusion of Women and Minorities as Subjects in Clinical Research” (http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/NOT-OD-02-001.html); a complete copy of the updated Guidelines is available at http://grants.nih.gov/grants/funding/women_min/guidelines_amended_10_2001.htm. The amended policy incorporates: the use of an NIH definition of clinical research; updated racial and ethnic categories in compliance with the new OMB standards; clarification of language governing NIH-defined Phase III clinical trials consistent with the SF424 (R & R) application; and updated roles and responsibilities of NIH staff and the extramural community. The policy continues to require for all NIH-defined Phase III clinical trials that: a) all applications or proposals and/or protocols must provide a description of plans to conduct analyses, as appropriate, to address differences by sex/gender and/or racial/ethnic groups, including subgroups if applicable; and investigators must report annual accrual and progress in conducting analyses, as appropriate, by sex/gender and/or racial/ethnic group differences. Inclusion of Children as Participants in Clinical Research: The NIH maintains a policy that children (i.e., individuals under the age of 21) must be included in all clinical research, conducted or supported by the NIH, unless there are scientific and ethical reasons not to include them. All investigators proposing research involving human subjects should read the " NIH Policy and Guidelines " on the inclusion of children as participants in research involving human subjects (http://grants.nih.gov/grants/funding/children/children.htm). Required Education on the Protection of Human Subject Participants: NIH policy requires education on the protection of human subject participants for all investigators submitting NIH applications for research involving human subjects and individuals designated as key personnel. The policy is available at http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/NOT-OD-00-039.html. Human Embryonic Stem Cells (hESC): Criteria for federal funding of research on hESCs can be found at http://stemcells.nih.gov/index.asp and at http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/NOT-OD-02-005.html. Only research using hESC lines that are registered in the NIH Human Embryonic Stem Cell Registry will be eligible for Federal funding (http://escr.nih.gov). It is the responsibility of the applicant to provide in the project description and elsewhere in the application as appropriate, the official NIH identifier(s) for the hESC line(s) to be used in the proposed research. Applications that do not provide this information will be returned without review. NIH Public Access Policy: NIH-funded investigators are requested to submit to the NIH manuscript submission (NIHMS) system (http://www.nihms.nih.gov) at PubMed Central (PMC) an electronic version of the author's final manuscript upon acceptance for publication, resulting from research supported in whole or in part with direct costs from NIH. The author's final manuscript is defined as the final version accepted for journal publication, and includes all modifications from the publishing peer review process. NIH is requesting that authors submit manuscripts resulting from 1) currently funded NIH research projects or 2) previously supported NIH research projects if they are accepted for publication on or after May 2, 2005. The NIH Public Access Policy applies to all research grant and career development award mechanisms, cooperative agreements, contracts, Institutional and Individual Ruth L. Kirschstein National Research Service Awards, as well as NIH intramural research studies. The Policy applies to peer-reviewed, original research publications that have been supported in whole or in part with direct costs from NIH, but it does not apply to book chapters, editorials, reviews, or conference proceedings. Publications resulting from non-NIH-supported research projects should not be submitted. For more information about the Policy or the submission process, please visit the NIH Public Access Policy Web site at http://publicaccess.nih.gov/ and view the Policy or other Resources and Tools, including the Authors' Manual. Standards for Privacy of Individually Identifiable Health Information: The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) issued final modification to the " Standards for Privacy of Individually Identifiable Health Information " , the " Privacy Rule " , on August 14, 2002. The Privacy Rule is a federal regulation under the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) of 1996 that governs the protection of individually identifiable health information, and is administered and enforced by the HHS Office for Civil Rights (OCR). Decisions about applicability and implementation of the Privacy Rule reside with the researcher and his/her institution. The OCR website (http://www.hhs.gov/ocr/) provides information on the Privacy Rule, including a complete Regulation Text and a set of decision tools on " Am I a covered entity? " Information on the impact of the HIPAA Privacy Rule on NIH processes involving the review, funding, and progress monitoring of grants, cooperative agreements, and research contracts can be found at http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/NOT-OD-03-025.html. URLs in NIH Grant Applications or Appendices: All applications and proposals for NIH funding must be self-contained within specified page limitations. For publications listed in the appendix and/or Progress report, Internet addresses (URLs) or PubMed Central (PMC) submission identification numbers must be used for publicly accessible on-line journal articles. Publicly accessible on-line journal articles or PMC articles/manuscripts accepted for publication that are directly relevant to the project may be included only as URLs or PMC submission identification numbers accompanying the full reference in either the Bibliography & References Cited section, the Progress Report Publication List section, or the Biographical Sketch section of the NIH grant application. A URL or PMC submission identification number citation may be repeated in each of these sections as appropriate. There is no limit to the number of URLs or PMC submission identification numbers that can be cited. Healthy People 2010: The Public Health Service (PHS) is committed to achieving the health promotion and disease prevention objectives of " Healthy People 2010, " a PHS-led national activity for setting priority areas. This FOA is related to one or more of the priority areas. Potential applicants may obtain a copy of " Healthy People 2010 " at http://www.health.gov/healthypeople. Authority and Regulations: This program is described in the Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance in the following citations: 93.242, 93.273, 93.279, 93.393, 93.394, 93.396, 93.855, 93.856, 93.865, and 93.839, and is not subject to the intergovernmental review requirements of Executive Order 12372 or Health Systems Agency review. Awards are made under the authorization of Sections 301 and 405 of the Public Health Service Act as amended (42 USC 241 and 284) and under Federal Regulations 42 CFR Part 52 and 45 CFR Parts 74 and 92. All awards are subject to the terms and conditions, cost principles, and other considerations described in the NIH Grants Policy Statement. The PHS strongly encourages all grant recipients to provide a smoke-free workplace and discourage the use of all tobacco products. In addition, Public Law 103-227, the Pro-Children Act of 1994, prohibits smoking in certain facilities (or in some cases, any portion of a facility) in which regular or routine education, library, day care, health care, or early childhood development services are provided to children. This is consistent with the PHS mission to protect and advance the physical and mental health of the American people. Loan Repayment Programs: NIH encourages applications for educational loan repayment from qualified health professionals who have made a commitment to pursue a research career involving clinical, pediatric, contraception, infertility, and health disparities related areas. The LRP is an important component of NIH's efforts to recruit and retain the next generation of researchers by providing the means for developing a research career unfettered by the burden of student loan debt. Note that an NIH grant is not required for eligibility and concurrent career award and LRP applications are encouraged. The periods of career award and LRP award may overlap providing the LRP recipient with the required commitment of time and effort, as LRP awardees must commit at least 50% of their time (at least 20 hours per week based on a 40 hour week) for two years to the research. For further information, please see: http://www.lrp.nih.gov. ------------------------------------------------ Department of Health and Human Services National Institutes of Health (NIH) 9000 Rockville Pike Bethesda, land 20892 _____________________________ Usha Sharma PhD MPH Division of AIDS, Prevention Sciences Program National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Room 5117, 6700 B Rockledge Drive Bethesda, MD 20892-7628 Ph. 301-451-3441 Fax 301-496-8530 ************************* Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.