Guest guest Posted February 1, 2002 Report Share Posted February 1, 2002 (I.. like you.. am a patient) (Nick) Hi Gayle, At 1/31/02 02:44 PM, you wrote: >Hi Nick! > >Thanks for confusing me even more!!!! > >Is it the combo of scan doses from the prior scan and the proposed new >scan that could cause stunning or is the thyrogen scan alone a problem? >Is stunning a definate or a possiblity? *** It is the 3-5 mCi RAI administered during the Thyrogen process that may have caused a " stunning " condition. And the condition, if it exists, could compromise this new medical work-up and treatment process scheduled. >My other question pertains TG - is TG (even if I knew for sure that I >previously had RAI) a less reliable indicator for someone diagnosed with > " poorly differentiated " thyca? *** No. *** As long as cancer cell(s) retain the ability to produce tg.. and if one has no tg anti-bodies.. than tg is still an excellent marker for cancer. <-- That's the _good-news_. However.. if the remaining cancer cells have kept the ability to produce tg.. but have lost the ability to _up-take_ Iodine... then treatment may be difficult. This because RAI will not be taken up in the cells for ablation. This is just one aspect of a thyroid cancer cell becoming " poorly-differentiated " . There are several known and identifiable conditions that " poorly-differentiated " cells are known to exibit as they become " less-well differentiated " . You're welcome, Nick >Naturally, I'm going to discuss this whole " stunning " issue with my >doctor, and I really appreciate your pointing it out to me. > >Thanks again for your input! > >- Gayle > North Salem, New York > TT 1990 > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.