Guest guest Posted September 3, 2007 Report Share Posted September 3, 2007 Dear All, Re: /message/7766 It is a very welcome move. Explicit communication of the expected roles and responsibilities clearly laid down as statutory provisions will go a long way in ensuring adherence to the prescribed norms and regulations. The acts of omissions and commissions are bound to be regulated by the additional provisions. The draft public health Acts of the states of Gujarat and Andhra Pradesh are also expected to address some of the issues in a synergistic manner. I wish the document was more vocal in terms of denial of services on some pretext ,primarily because of the serostatus of the clients/patients also. Best wishes, Dr. Rajesh Gopal, MD Joint Director, Gujarat State AIDS Control Society (GSACS), O/1 Block, New Mental Hospital Complex, Meghaninagar, Ahmedabad, Gujarat. PIN 380016 Phone (O) 079-22680211--12--13,22685210 Fax 079-22680214 e-mail: <dr_rajeshg@...> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 3, 2007 Report Share Posted September 3, 2007 Dear Members, Re: /message/7766 There is a slight difference between the terms when we generally speak of law & ethics. But in the Indian Scenario, the Code of Medical Ethics laid down by the Medical Council of India is infact a legal entity by virtue of the powers conferred upon it by a parliamentary act. Please read the full text of the Code of Medical Ethics revised in the year 2002. http://www.mciindia.org/know/rules/ethics.htm There are a few points to be noted here. This is a law which all registered modern medical practitioners in India should abide by. Apart from making references to some other related Acts, it also refers to the ICMR guidelines on Research involving human participants. http://icmr.nic.in/ethical.pdf So this guidelines indirectly becomes legally binding on all Modern Medical Practitioners undertaking research. The above mentioned guidelines is in the process of being enacted into a law soon, so that all investigators (even if they are not medical doctors) undertaking research involving Human Participants will have to legally abide by it. Thanks & regards, Dr.Nabeel.M.K. e-mail: <drnabeelmk@...> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 6, 2007 Report Share Posted September 6, 2007 Dear all, Re: /message/7766 Dr Gopal has raised a very important point when he talks of the explicit mention of of denial of services based on serostatus. All laws and statutes need to be reviewed at regular intervals to bring it in line with changing situations and issues. In addition I wish there would be a mention of doctors not indulging in strikes and paralysing services. I fully support all the issues that have lead to the protests of of my young AIIMS colleagues in recent times but am not in agreement with the manner of expressing their protest. Surely there can be a way to realise one's rights and not endanger lives of those who are dependent on us in sickness. With regards Dr Charulatha Banerjee 25A, Sarat Bose Road 3B, Sindu apartments KOLKATA 700020 e-mail: <charulatha.banerjee@...> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.