Guest guest Posted April 26, 2008 Report Share Posted April 26, 2008 So... basically, raw milk is legal in PA and all this man had to do was maintain his permit (as he was arrested for lack of permit, not for selling goods not covered by the permit). This isn't a case against raw milk: it is a case against a man who didn't have a permit, didn't adhere to warnings that he needed a permit and made it loud and clear that he did not intend to obtain a permit! It would be nice if raw milk producers would understand the importance of cooperating with the state - it would be bad if raw milk became illegal as a result of farmers who didn't file for their permits. Sure, it would be nice if PA legislation would open up to raw milk products in addition to raw milk, but these things don't happen overnight and purposefully selling raw milk illegally in a state where it is actually legal to sell it is not only ridiculous, it is also counterproductive to getting other raw milk products approved! -Lana On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 3:32 PM, haecklers <haecklers@...> wrote: > http://www.counterpunch.org/cohen04262008.html > > (I love counterpunch!!!) > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 26, 2008 Report Share Posted April 26, 2008 Evidently there was an issue with him selling the raw butter, too which he believed he should be able to do. I do believe there's also a lot more history than what's said and that both sides have their points but unfortunately not enough communication is happening. > > > http://www.counterpunch.org/cohen04262008.html > > > > (I love counterpunch!!!) > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 27, 2008 Report Share Posted April 27, 2008 Please note that the following is not directed at any individual, the " you " is just a general youse guys. If you needed a permit to do most anything that would net you some income there might, just might, come a time when you just HAD ENOUGH. This could very well be the point most small farmers are coming to. For a start we can look at vegetables, not nearly as controversial as dairy. In order for me to legally sell vegetable plants in Tennessee I need to be a licensed green house, inspected, naturally. Move another step forward and sell the veggies themselves and I need an inspected sales place. Yes, the roadside stand should be inspected. Also, an inspected storage area. Remember not to store any leftovers or dairy in with the veggies. This separate refrigerator is for your vegetables only. If selling herbs and they dry out they must not, under any circumstances, be sold unless you have dried them in a licensed inspected facility. You see, dried herbs are a processed food. Those who produce hay are looking at a future in which each field's production would be numbered and have to be kept separate. This will be a real treat for those of us with small 10-15 acre plots of hay ground. OK, now for live animals. I'm not sure about any animals but goats and sheep. At this point to legally sell a goat or sheep I need to have a scrapies tag attached to its ear. This is true for private sales as well as auctions. Simple, right? Not really. When you apply for the scrapies tag they automatically sign you up for the National Animal Identification System. This wonderful system set you up for future tagging of every animal on your farm, reporting every birth or death within 24 hours and paying for every one of these events. Ahhh yes, if only the farmer would abide by the law then all would be well with the world! As for cooperation. We have tried that but here's just a couple of examples. The gov't official comes to inspect the custom slaughter and tells us to remove the screen door we'd thought would better help keep flies out. The next gov't official asks why the doorway has trim. We reply that we had a screen door there. He tells us to put it back. The gov't officials come to the door waving our web page and accuse us of selling cheese and butter. The web page is advertising workshops to learn to make these things. No matter, the mantra is " All cheese and butter must be made in a licensed inspected facility. " We ask about the demos we do at events, the fair, the programs for schools, the mantra is the same, " All cheese and butter must be made in a licensed inspected facility. " We say that we are making cheese presses and can't possibly sell them if we can't demonstrate them, we show them the presses. Still, " All cheese and butter must be made in a licensed inspected facility. " We offer to build a licensed inspected facility and ask if we can then bring people in to learn to make cheese and are told that only employees would be allowed to handle the cheese. It's all about cooperation, right? There are plenty more examples about eggs, meat and dairy but my rant is about run out of steam. Perhaps what small farmers can't understand is why they should jump through all these hoops just to make a living. At times we sit and wonder if the best thing wouldn't be to just sell this place to a developer, blow the money in Vegas and live on welfare, eating the crap the stores sell and running up medical bills for the general public to pay. Perhaps one dairy farmer in PA is just sick of it. I know one farmer in TN is! I'm never able to keep up with all the posts on this group, especially in the spring. Email me if you like and I'll try to respond. Belinda > > > http://www.counterpunch.org/cohen04262008.html > > > > (I love counterpunch!!!) > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 27, 2008 Report Share Posted April 27, 2008 > > If you needed a permit to do most anything that would net you some > income there might, just might, come a time when you just HAD ENOUGH. > This could very well be the point most small farmers are coming to. <snip> > Move another step forward and sell the veggies themselves and I need > an inspected sales place. Yes, the roadside stand should be inspected. > Also, an inspected storage area. Remember not to store any leftovers > or dairy in with the veggies. This separate refrigerator is for your > vegetables only. <snip> > OK, now for live animals. I'm not sure about any animals but goats > and sheep. At this point to legally sell a goat or sheep I need to > have a scrapies tag attached to its ear. This is true for private > sales as well as auctions. Simple, right? Not really. When you apply > for the scrapies tag they automatically sign you up for the National > Animal Identification System. This wonderful system set you up for > future tagging of every animal on your farm, reporting every birth or > death within 24 hours and paying for every one of these events. This is just completely and utterly outrageous. The police state is here. Suze Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 27, 2008 Report Share Posted April 27, 2008 Belinda, I truly understand that small farmers have financial issues with these things - and all the extra stress from the bureaucratic BS... But why bother to fight for legalization of these things in the first place if farmers aren't going to respect it? Sure, you could just sell on the black market but that gives raw milk a bad image which is totally counterproductive to the efforts made to legalize it. Regarding the financial costs for the PA permit, according to http://www.realmilk.com/raw-milk-future.html: " There is no cost for the permit. There are costs for the tests that are required to receive the permit. Tests necessary to get the permit include: - TB test annually - Johanes test and program - Water tested twice a year - Monthly milk test (standard plate, choloform, growth inhibitors, Somatic cell count). - Milk test must be through a state monitored lab. In Pennsylvania, there are two kinds of raw milk permits: *Customer container permit* <snip> and *Prefilled Container Permit* <snip> " So basically, the cows must be healthy, they must be drinking " clean " water and the milk has to be monitored (according to the same article: OPDC does this per batch, not just per month!). For prefilled containers, the dairy must have acceptable sanitization equipment. These requests are all within reason and IMHO they are all things the farmer should be doing anyway, permit or no. I admire anyone running a small business as the US really isn't set up to support small businesses. It sucks, but it isn't just small farms that are being harassed by requirements that cost money - every small business out there has these seemingly impossible financial responsibilities to meet. It is part of being a small business. It is very sad, especially when I think about all the small businesses I've ever worked for... not one was breaking even. Then again, most of the large corporations I've worked for weren't either. It is sad and scary that almost everything in this country gets done by borrowing money/being in debt (perhaps with the exception of the big corporations we all have come to know and hate: Monsanto, Pharma, etc). -Lana > Perhaps what small farmers can't understand is why they should jump > through all these hoops just to make a living. <snip> > Perhaps one dairy farmer in PA is just sick of it. I > know one farmer in TN is! > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 27, 2008 Report Share Posted April 27, 2008 The state of PA is very hypocritical in requiring permits to ensure quality raw milk considering most pasteurized milk is contaminated and has GM hormones. I'd say let the free market reign. Get the nasty state out of our lives and you will see peoples' health flourish. More state involvement, more problems. On Sun, Apr 27, 2008 at 12:07 PM, Lana Gibbons <lana.m.gibbons@...> wrote: > Belinda, > > I truly understand that small farmers have financial issues with these > things - and all the extra stress from the bureaucratic BS... But why > bother to fight for legalization of these things in the first place if > farmers aren't going to respect it? Sure, you could just sell on the black > market but that gives raw milk a bad image which is totally > counterproductive to the efforts made to legalize it. > > Regarding the financial costs for the PA permit, according to > http://www.realmilk.com/raw-milk-future.html: > > " There is no cost for the permit. There are costs for the tests that are > required to receive the permit. Tests necessary to get the permit include: > > - TB test annually > - Johanes test and program > - Water tested twice a year > - Monthly milk test (standard plate, choloform, growth inhibitors, > Somatic cell count). > - Milk test must be through a state monitored lab. > > In Pennsylvania, there are two kinds of raw milk permits: *Customer > container permit* <snip> and *Prefilled Container Permit* <snip> " > So basically, the cows must be healthy, they must be drinking " clean " > water > and the milk has to be monitored (according to the same article: OPDC does > this per batch, not just per month!). For prefilled containers, the dairy > must have acceptable sanitization equipment. These requests are all within > reason and IMHO they are all things the farmer should be doing anyway, > permit or no. > > I admire anyone running a small business as the US really isn't set up to > support small businesses. It sucks, but it isn't just small farms that are > being harassed by requirements that cost money - every small business out > there has these seemingly impossible financial responsibilities to meet. > It > is part of being a small business. It is very sad, especially when I think > about all the small businesses I've ever worked for... not one was > breaking > even. Then again, most of the large corporations I've worked for weren't > either. It is sad and scary that almost everything in this country gets > done by borrowing money/being in debt (perhaps with the exception of the > big > corporations we all have come to know and hate: Monsanto, Pharma, etc). > > -Lana > > > > Perhaps what small farmers can't understand is why they should jump > > through all these hoops just to make a living. <snip> > > > Perhaps one dairy farmer in PA is just sick of it. I > > know one farmer in TN is! > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 27, 2008 Report Share Posted April 27, 2008 In light of all this, for a small farmer that is considering selling items, how would I go about finding the rules and regs for my state (well, for any state for that matter). My goal is to one day be able to sell bone broth, fermented sodas, and such. Not any dairy product at this time. No desire to get a licensed dairy going, plenty of those around so we just milk for ourselves. How or where on earth would I look to find the specifics on selling anything? I don't have a clue where to start! I happen to live in WA, but I'll bet there are more wanna be farmers out there that are in the same boat. Chrissie Bunnyearsfamily Heritage Farm firstclassskagitcounty.org Stanwood, WA Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 27, 2008 Report Share Posted April 27, 2008 I called the TN Dept of Agriculture main office in Nashville. The extension office in your area might have a person who knows the law but ours did not. They will send you all sorts of written material and answer most of your questions. When we built our custom slaughter they would not tell us what was required. They told us to build it and they would inspect. Really nice idea if you have the money to keep rebuilding. We ran into the inspector at our local mom & pop store and got the information we needed from him. You might run into the same thing. I think they want you to hire a " specialist " to build your facility, we didn't have that kind of money. I'm 99% sure that you'll need a separate place to make your broth (not your kitchen) as well as a separate storage area (not your refrigerator) for pet food only. Be aware that when your inspector changes the rules change as well. Laws don't necessarily change, just the way individuals interpret them. Belinda > > In light of all this, for a small farmer that is considering selling items, > how would I go about finding the rules and regs for my state (well, for any > state for that matter). My goal is to one day be able to sell bone broth, > fermented sodas, and such. Not any dairy product at this time. No desire to > get a licensed dairy going, plenty of those around so we just milk for > ourselves. How or where on earth would I look to find the specifics on > selling anything? I don't have a clue where to start! I happen to live in > WA, but I'll bet there are more wanna be farmers out there that are in the > same boat. Chrissie > > > > Bunnyearsfamily Heritage Farm > > firstclassskagitcounty.org > > Stanwood, WA > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 27, 2008 Report Share Posted April 27, 2008 Excellent rant!!!! I don't need or expect the government to " save " me from anything. Why a license on raw milk? Because the government wants to big brother the small farmers. In TN you can get a permit to spray commercial round up as part of your lawn business for 25 dollars. If you want to sell NATIVE PLANTS you pay 200 dollars for a license. Explain that to me! Nanette L. Re: PA Farmer arrested for selling raw milk Please note that the following is not directed at any individual, the " you " is just a general youse guys. If you needed a permit to do most anything that would net you some income there might, just might, come a time when you just HAD ENOUGH. This could very well be the point most small farmers are coming to. For a start we can look at vegetables, not nearly as controversial as dairy. In order for me to legally sell vegetable plants in Tennessee I need to be a licensed green house, inspected, naturally. Move another step forward and sell the veggies themselves and I need an inspected sales place. Yes, the roadside stand should be inspected. Also, an inspected storage area. Remember not to store any leftovers or dairy in with the veggies. This separate refrigerator is for your vegetables only. If selling herbs and they dry out they must not, under any circumstances, be sold unless you have dried them in a licensed inspected facility. You see, dried herbs are a processed food. Those who produce hay are looking at a future in which each field's production would be numbered and have to be kept separate. This will be a real treat for those of us with small 10-15 acre plots of hay ground. OK, now for live animals. I'm not sure about any animals but goats and sheep. At this point to legally sell a goat or sheep I need to have a scrapies tag attached to its ear. This is true for private sales as well as auctions. Simple, right? Not really. When you apply for the scrapies tag they automatically sign you up for the National Animal Identification System. This wonderful system set you up for future tagging of every animal on your farm, reporting every birth or death within 24 hours and paying for every one of these events. Ahhh yes, if only the farmer would abide by the law then all would be well with the world! As for cooperation. We have tried that but here's just a couple of examples. The gov't official comes to inspect the custom slaughter and tells us to remove the screen door we'd thought would better help keep flies out. The next gov't official asks why the doorway has trim. We reply that we had a screen door there. He tells us to put it back. The gov't officials come to the door waving our web page and accuse us of selling cheese and butter. The web page is advertising workshops to learn to make these things. No matter, the mantra is " All cheese and butter must be made in a licensed inspected facility. " We ask about the demos we do at events, the fair, the programs for schools, the mantra is the same, " All cheese and butter must be made in a licensed inspected facility. " We say that we are making cheese presses and can't possibly sell them if we can't demonstrate them, we show them the presses. Still, " All cheese and butter must be made in a licensed inspected facility. " We offer to build a licensed inspected facility and ask if we can then bring people in to learn to make cheese and are told that only employees would be allowed to handle the cheese. It's all about cooperation, right? There are plenty more examples about eggs, meat and dairy but my rant is about run out of steam. Perhaps what small farmers can't understand is why they should jump through all these hoops just to make a living. At times we sit and wonder if the best thing wouldn't be to just sell this place to a developer, blow the money in Vegas and live on welfare, eating the crap the stores sell and running up medical bills for the general public to pay. Perhaps one dairy farmer in PA is just sick of it. I know one farmer in TN is! I'm never able to keep up with all the posts on this group, especially in the spring. Email me if you like and I'll try to respond. Belinda > > > http://www.counterpunch.org/cohen04262008.html > > > > (I love counterpunch!!!) > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 27, 2008 Report Share Posted April 27, 2008 Monsanto is well-known for lining the pockets of officials and regulators to get their way - who is doing that for healthy food or native plants?? Who can afford to? > > > > > http://www.counterpunch.org/cohen04262008.html > > > > > > (I love counterpunch!!!) > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 27, 2008 Report Share Posted April 27, 2008 Lana, > I admire anyone running a small business as the US really isn't set up to > support small businesses. Why does the *****state***** have to support small businesses? Why don't they just get the heck out of the way? > It sucks, but it isn't just small farms that are > being harassed by requirements that cost money - every small business out > there has these seemingly impossible financial responsibilities to meet. And to the extent that the state wants its piece of the pie, those burdens are increased proportionally. But even the ***very idea*** that the state can regulate what one produces for food and what one can eat for food should be noxious to anyone who is a lover of liberty. For anyone who wants a good dose of how the state can literally destroy people economically with their seemingly " commonsense " notions of regulations, I would highly suggest Walter , _The State Against Blacks_. It is an older read that is just as relevant today as it was when first written. http://www.amazon.com/State-Against-Blacks-Walter-/dp/0070703787 Hats off to people like Mark Nolt. It is just a reminder of the words of Henry, " Give me liberty or give me the lesser of two evils. " Oh wait, he didn't say that :-) -- " And true manhood is shown not in the choice of a celibate life. On the contrary, the prize in the contest of men is won by him who has trained himself by the discharge of the duties of husband and father and by the supervision of a household, regardless of pleasure and pain. It is won by him, I say, who in the midst of his solicitude for his family, shows himself inseparable from the love of God. " - Clement of andria Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 27, 2008 Report Share Posted April 27, 2008 Lana, I understand that you believe the farmer should simply get the necessary permits to do what they need to do to make a living. My feeling is that I shouldn't have to have a permit to sell you something, anything. If this country is about freedom I should be able to eat whatever I want which in turn means you should be able to sell it to me. It makes me madder than a hatter to hear that officials have told people to " buy a cow " if they want to drink raw milk. Belinda > > Belinda, > > I truly understand that small farmers have financial issues with these > things - and all the extra stress from the bureaucratic BS... But why > bother to fight for legalization of these things in the first place if > farmers aren't going to respect it? Sure, you could just sell on the black > market but that gives raw milk a bad image which is totally > counterproductive to the efforts made to legalize it. > > Regarding the financial costs for the PA permit, according to > http://www.realmilk.com/raw-milk-future.html: > > " There is no cost for the permit. There are costs for the tests that are > required to receive the permit. Tests necessary to get the permit include: > > - TB test annually > - Johanes test and program > - Water tested twice a year > - Monthly milk test (standard plate, choloform, growth inhibitors, > Somatic cell count). > - Milk test must be through a state monitored lab. > > In Pennsylvania, there are two kinds of raw milk permits: *Customer > container permit* <snip> and *Prefilled Container Permit* <snip> " > So basically, the cows must be healthy, they must be drinking " clean " water > and the milk has to be monitored (according to the same article: OPDC does > this per batch, not just per month!). For prefilled containers, the dairy > must have acceptable sanitization equipment. These requests are all within > reason and IMHO they are all things the farmer should be doing anyway, > permit or no. > > I admire anyone running a small business as the US really isn't set up to > support small businesses. It sucks, but it isn't just small farms that are > being harassed by requirements that cost money - every small business out > there has these seemingly impossible financial responsibilities to meet. It > is part of being a small business. It is very sad, especially when I think > about all the small businesses I've ever worked for... not one was breaking > even. Then again, most of the large corporations I've worked for weren't > either. It is sad and scary that almost everything in this country gets > done by borrowing money/being in debt (perhaps with the exception of the big > corporations we all have come to know and hate: Monsanto, Pharma, etc). > > -Lana > > > > Perhaps what small farmers can't understand is why they should jump > > through all these hoops just to make a living. <snip> > > > > > Perhaps one dairy farmer in PA is just sick of it. I > > know one farmer in TN is! > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 27, 2008 Report Share Posted April 27, 2008 [belinda] [...] If you needed a permit to do most anything that would net you some > income there might, just might, come a time when you just HAD ENOUGH. > This could very well be the point most small farmers are coming to. [...] Belinda, Wow! That was a *great* thorough post and very inspiring! I wasn't even aware of those regulatory issues with veggies and so on. I totally agree with you and Mark Nolt should be celebrated as a great person for standing by the truth and not capitulating to government corruption. I've followed the Nolt saga here in Pennsylvania and though I don't know him personally I know a great many of his colleagues in the area closer to me. It's incredibly tragic. The issue is being able to sell raw cream and butter and other forms of milk besides just the fresh whole milk. It just doesn't make sense to have those restrictions. On the bright side, raw milk in PA seems to be doing pretty well in general. I know a farmer who got a bottling license recently and has his milk sold in a few spots in Philadelphia. In fact, at the moment there's a small store that's open almost everyday and stocks raw cow milk from three different farms, each with a different breed of cow, and at least one source of raw goat milk. As far as raw butter and cream, well, that's still done in secretive ways by the farmers I know, or via " buying clubs " , which might be kind of legal I think. I don't know if this is true, but I was told that raw cow and goat milk can be legally sold in PA, but not sheep milk! I have a great local source of raw sheep milk and it's pretty sad that they suffer this arbitrary regulatory nonsense. They have a license to sell their raw cow milk, yet have to treat their sheep milk differently and have to be careful about selling it at all. We still urgently need dramatic widespread strong revisions legalizing unrestricted on-farm sales of anything a farmer produces. It's a basic right. The current nickel-and-dime regulatory hoopla about raw milk in CA and elsewhere is missing the forest for the trees. Mike Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 27, 2008 Report Share Posted April 27, 2008 The elite " banksters " who run our government (and pretty much the whole world) want to extend their control grid and establish a scientific global dictatorship. Watch EndGame: Blueprint for Global Enslavement on Google Video. http://whatistheendgame.com http://infowars.com On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 12:14 AM, Anton < michaelantonparker@...> wrote: > [belinda] [...] If you needed a permit to do most anything that would > > net you some > > income there might, just might, come a time when you just HAD ENOUGH. > > This could very well be the point most small farmers are coming to. > [...] > > Belinda, > Wow! That was a *great* thorough post and very inspiring! I wasn't > even aware of those regulatory issues with veggies and so on. I > totally agree with you and Mark Nolt should be celebrated as a great > person for standing by the truth and not capitulating to government > corruption. I've followed the Nolt saga here in Pennsylvania and > though I don't know him personally I know a great many of his > colleagues in the area closer to me. It's incredibly tragic. The > issue is being able to sell raw cream and butter and other forms of > milk besides just the fresh whole milk. It just doesn't make sense to > have those restrictions. On the bright side, raw milk in PA seems to > be doing pretty well in general. I know a farmer who got a bottling > license recently and has his milk sold in a few spots in Philadelphia. > In fact, at the moment there's a small store that's open almost > everyday and stocks raw cow milk from three different farms, each with > a different breed of cow, and at least one source of raw goat milk. > As far as raw butter and cream, well, that's still done in secretive > ways by the farmers I know, or via " buying clubs " , which might be kind > of legal I think. I don't know if this is true, but I was told that > raw cow and goat milk can be legally sold in PA, but not sheep milk! > I have a great local source of raw sheep milk and it's pretty sad that > they suffer this arbitrary regulatory nonsense. They have a license > to sell their raw cow milk, yet have to treat their sheep milk > differently and have to be careful about selling it at all. > > We still urgently need dramatic widespread strong revisions legalizing > unrestricted on-farm sales of anything a farmer produces. It's a basic > right. The current nickel-and-dime regulatory hoopla about raw milk > in CA and elsewhere is missing the forest for the trees. > > Mike > > -- Rashad Tatum ---- " [W]e shall not fight our battles alone. There is a just God who presides over the destinies of Nations, and who will raise up friends to fight our battles for us. The battle, Sir, is not to the strong alone. It is to the vigilant, the active, the brave. " - Henry on the fight for independence " The moral and constitutional obligations of our representatives in Washington are to protect our liberty, not coddle the world, precipitating no-win wars, while bringing bankruptcy and economic turmoil to our people. " Freedom Under Siege, 1987 by Ron " I sincerely believe that banking establishments are more dangerous than standing armies, and that the principle of spending money to be paid by posterity, under the name of funding, is but swindling futurity on a large scale. " - Jefferson Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 28, 2008 Report Share Posted April 28, 2008 And then they tell you you can't have one because you don't have enough acres, don't live in the right " zone " etc. There's a funny bumper sticker out that says " When Chickens are Outlawed, Only Outlaws Will Have Chickens! " --- In , " labelleacres " <bilherbs@...> wrote: > > Lana, > > I understand that you believe the farmer should simply get the > necessary permits to do what they need to do to make a living. My > feeling is that I shouldn't have to have a permit to sell you > something, anything. > > If this country is about freedom I should be able to eat whatever I > want which in turn means you should be able to sell it to me. It makes > me madder than a hatter to hear that officials have told people to > " buy a cow " if they want to drink raw milk. > > Belinda > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 28, 2008 Report Share Posted April 28, 2008 - > The police state is here. > > > Suze > Hello Suze.. We have been a police state for many decades. US has the largest prison population by both numbers and % of its people in prison. prison is big business. so are we a evil people/populace or is there a problem with 'law' and 'enforcement'? i know several doctors in the netherlands. they say the best thing for their country was to legalize drugs. it lowered the price of drugs so no more pushers. it emptied their prisons and cut the drug use in half. the only place to buy the drugs are in state stores and the stores are not attractive places to go. but drugs are cheap. no more margin in drugs we are a land of laws...no longer have our freedoms. the moniker 'where freedom rings' is a lie today.... we are controlled and imprisoned. hey, who is imprisoned for drugs? the lowly street pushers and users. who makes the money? and big margin? who makes the money to keep drugs illegal? the money makers are not the ones going to prison... i can assure you of this why keep the boarders open? drugs... there is no terrorist threat... while i'm at it... the CIA is the enforcement/facilitator branch for the fed reserve and world banks....with this realization much more of the world events start to make sense... control of the population and redistribution of wealth.... this is what it is all about...including 'real milk'.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 28, 2008 Report Share Posted April 28, 2008 Nanette- > I don't need or expect the government to " save " me from anything. > Why a > license on raw milk? Because the government wants to big brother the > small > farmers. I think there's a key error many people are making here in assessing the situation. While the government is supposed to be of people, by the people and for the people, it's been co-opted by big business and now it's of big business, by big business and for big business. And yet most people seem furious at the concept of government itself rather than at the Monsantos and Archer s Midlands of the world which have taken over. Get rid of government and big business will adjust its tools and tactics as necessary to achieve its ends; take back government and we the people will actually have a modicum of power with which to secure our freedoms again. - Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 28, 2008 Report Share Posted April 28, 2008 Well said, !! -Lana > I think there's a key error many people are making here in assessing > the situation. While the government is supposed to be of people, by > the people and for the people, it's been co-opted by big business and > now it's of big business, by big business and for big business. And > yet most people seem furious at the concept of government itself > rather than at the Monsantos and Archer s Midlands of the world > which have taken over. Get rid of government and big business will > adjust its tools and tactics as necessary to achieve its ends; take > back government and we the people will actually have a modicum of > power with which to secure our freedoms again. > > - > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 28, 2008 Report Share Posted April 28, 2008 > Well said, !! Thanks, Lana. I sometimes find it depressing that there's so much short-sighted anarchist anti-government sentiment in the traditional and (genuinely) healthy foods movement. - Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 28, 2008 Report Share Posted April 28, 2008 I truly and wholeheartedly agree. It is really nice to know I'm not the only one that feels that way! -Lana On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 1:20 PM, Idol <paul.idol@...> wrote: > > Well said, !! > > Thanks, Lana. I sometimes find it depressing that there's so much > short-sighted anarchist anti-government sentiment in the traditional > and (genuinely) healthy foods movement. > > - > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 28, 2008 Report Share Posted April 28, 2008 According to the Community Environmental Legal Defence group who run the Pennock School for Democracy, the government has always been set up to protect the interests of big business/big money; but yet it must maintain the illusion that it is run by " we the people " . They've actually explored ways to find weaknesses in it's armor so " we the people " can take back our government and make it more democratic. Here's a link: www.celdf.org/DemocracySchool/tabid/60/Default.aspx They presented at the last PASA conference and one attendee gave them a wonderful review; perhaps WAPF will invite them for their next conference - it certainly pertains to the issue of food sales. --- In , Idol <paul.idol@...> wrote: > > Nanette- > > > I don't need or expect the government to " save " me from anything. > > Why a > > license on raw milk? Because the government wants to big brother the > > small > > farmers. > > I think there's a key error many people are making here in assessing > the situation. While the government is supposed to be of people, by > the people and for the people, it's been co-opted by big business and > now it's of big business, by big business and for big business. And > yet most people seem furious at the concept of government itself > rather than at the Monsantos and Archer s Midlands of the world > which have taken over. Get rid of government and big business will > adjust its tools and tactics as necessary to achieve its ends; take > back government and we the people will actually have a modicum of > power with which to secure our freedoms again. > > - > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 28, 2008 Report Share Posted April 28, 2008 --- Idol <paul.idol@...> wrote: > I think there's a key error many people are making here in assessing > the situation. While the government is supposed to be of people, by > the people and for the people, it's been co-opted by big business > and now it's of big business, by big business and for big business. > And yet most people seem furious at the concept of government itself > rather than at the Monsantos and Archer s Midlands of the > world which have taken over. Get rid of government and big business > will adjust its tools and tactics as necessary to achieve its ends; > take back government and we the people will actually have a modicum > of power with which to secure our freedoms again. , I think you're exactly right. The real challenge is to win people's minds from the constant brainwashing that comes from big money advertising and influence on perceived " science " . The other big factor to overcome is the huge amount of lobbying and bribery from big money interests. It's a difficult challenge. But again, the key is persuading enough people to get involved and elect responsible legislators as well as to vote with their dollars by purchasing foods and products that support what we want in business. Easier said than done, when most people are already brainwashed. It's also tough if you have a limited budget. More people may have to go back to being self-sufficient. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 28, 2008 Report Share Posted April 28, 2008 Thanks, Lana. I sometimes find it depressing that there's so much > > short-sighted anarchist anti-government sentiment in the traditional > > and (genuinely) healthy foods movement. > i think the anti-government movement goes beyond traditional foods. you will meet many within the traditional foods movement as the same people who are tired of the lies and loss of freedoms are the same people who research many topics including food... we do not take to 'spoon feeding' propagated distorted truths. and food is part of the industrial/governmental lie. Washington would be considered a anti-government anarchist/terrorist by todays definition. i like Washington. he did not act for wealth or comfort but because it was the right thing to do. at least most americans would view his life and history this way. i suppose unless one was english. was george washington short sighted? i think the revolution took place with 30% of the populace support. this is what it takes for change. we are at 10% i think during the revolution it was split 1/3 change/ 1/3 apathetic/ 1/3 establishment Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 28, 2008 Report Share Posted April 28, 2008 dcw338, > Hello Suze.. > > We have been a police state for many decades. True, but the advantage/disadvantage of the current administration is that more people have become aware of and are reacting to it. How much that will matter in the end I don't know. Lots of people saw the rise of Hitler and what it portended, but nonetheless only a very view took action before it was too late. Ludwig Von Mises was said to be going out the back window when the Nazi's were knocking at his front door after his ideas became politically unpopular. Fortunately for him, seeing what was coming, he had already sent his family out of the country. Unfortunately, he lost his library, something which is very very difficult for a scholar. Mises: The Last Knight of Liberalism http://snipurl.com/268dn > US has the largest > prison population by both numbers and % of its people in prison. > > prison is big business. so are we a evil people/populace or is there > a problem with 'law' and 'enforcement'? The world has definitely taken notice of this very problem and is quite critical of it. We have fallen a long way since the days when our criminal justice system was admired the world over. As the French foreign minister recently said referring to America, " The Magic is Gone. " -- " And true manhood is shown not in the choice of a celibate life. On the contrary, the prize in the contest of men is won by him who has trained himself by the discharge of the duties of husband and father and by the supervision of a household, regardless of pleasure and pain. It is won by him, I say, who in the midst of his solicitude for his family, shows himself inseparable from the love of God. " - Clement of andria Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 28, 2008 Report Share Posted April 28, 2008 , > , I think you're exactly right. The real challenge is to win > people's minds from the constant brainwashing that comes from big > money advertising and influence on perceived " science " . The other big > factor to overcome is the huge amount of lobbying and bribery from big > money interests. > > It's a difficult challenge. But again, the key is persuading enough > people to get involved and elect responsible legislators as well as to > vote with their dollars by purchasing foods and products that support > what we want in business. Easier said than done, when most people are > already brainwashed. It's also tough if you have a limited budget. > More people may have to go back to being self-sufficient. That is all fine and well but exactly how would one go about saving people from their brainwashing? And while you are at it can you provide an historical example where such a dramatic altering of the people's mindset was ever accomplished peacefully? -- " And true manhood is shown not in the choice of a celibate life. On the contrary, the prize in the contest of men is won by him who has trained himself by the discharge of the duties of husband and father and by the supervision of a household, regardless of pleasure and pain. It is won by him, I say, who in the midst of his solicitude for his family, shows himself inseparable from the love of God. " - Clement of andria Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.