Guest guest Posted May 5, 2008 Report Share Posted May 5, 2008 , > I wanted some input regarding the claims that high calcium diets (aka, > Eskimo) are correlated with osteoporosis while low intakes (such as the > Bantu's and Japanese) rarely develope Osteo. This seems a pretty > common anti-meat party line and it " appears " to have some people group > supporting research. > > One, are the researchers ignoring minerals in the bone broths that > these people may be consuming? What other factors are at play? In the chapter on calcium by Heaney (well known vitamin D researcher) and another author in Shills, et al., eds., _Modern Nutrition in Health and Disease_ they state that it is estimated that ancient hunter-gatherers eating mainly plant-based diets had intakes of Ca of at least 1500 mg/day assuming typical caloric consumption and possibly twice this if it is assumed that their caloric intake was about doubled due to lifestyle/activity differences. I'm not sure what they reference for it but I can look it up later. Interesting food for thought since they are calculating this on the vegetarian-ish assumption. Don't forget it is not just bone *broths* that have calcium, but bones, which might be more commonly eaten, especially in very small animals and fish where bones are soft and edible. Chris Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 5, 2008 Report Share Posted May 5, 2008 , > I wanted some input regarding the claims that high calcium diets (aka, > Eskimo) are correlated with osteoporosis while low intakes (such as the > Bantu's and Japanese) rarely develope Osteo. This seems a pretty > common anti-meat party line and it " appears " to have some people group > supporting research. Also, this seems completely illogical. What is the reasoning that *calcium* intake would cause osteoporosis? I thought they usually blame meat, even though research shows that high meat protein intakes are clearly associated with higher calcium absorption, retention, bone mineral density, and lower risk of fracture. This is based on an outdated hypothesis that sulfur amino acids increase acid load and thereby bone resorption, based on the observation that urinary Ca increases on a high-meat diet, though it is now know that 80% of this increase is due to increased intestinal absorption and that bone resorption markers at least do not increase, and maybe decrease, and that this is true even at protein intakes twice the standard recommended amount of 0.85g/kg, which the vegetarians say are even too high. Chris Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 5, 2008 Report Share Posted May 5, 2008 > > Friends, > I wanted some input regarding the claims that high calcium diets (aka, > Eskimo) are correlated with osteoporosis while low intakes (such as the > Bantu's and Japanese) rarely develope Osteo. This seems a pretty > common anti-meat party line and it " appears " to have some people group > supporting research. > > One, are the researchers ignoring minerals in the bone broths that > these people may be consuming? What other factors are at play? > > Much thanks, > > They simply haven't read their Stefansson or their Dr. Price, or even bothered visitng native groups. Price and Stefansson both verified the excellent health of the Eskimo/Inuit groups. Price's studies of the Masai versus the Bantu clearly show much better teeth on a high-meat diet. The only other options would be to call Price an utter fool or a liar. Since he was probably the single most important dentist of the 20th century, the fool accusation probably won't stick. He certainly didn't win all that many friends by talking about butter quality or how great meat and fish are, and how terrible canned foods and vegetable oils are, so...he'd have to have some other reason to lie, other than money or power. I certainly can't find one. I will say that it is very important to get plenty of fat with your meat. It's almost depressing to see the ultra-lean steaks and burgers with nearly all the fat removed. OTOH, it's very easy to see why the vegetarians lie. Their religion either IS vegetarianism, or involves vegetarianism very heavily, like being Seventh Day Adventist, or Buddhist. People lie to convert people to their religions all the time. mike Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 6, 2008 Report Share Posted May 6, 2008 I always think. . . cofactors as you said. I don't know what studies you're referring to, but I know that Americans can pop calcium pills all day long, but their diets are deficient in magnesium and D3, so they don't use the calcium. Plus if they have a high phosphorus diet like the SAD, doesn't phosphorus waste calcium, or prevent its absorbtion? Desh Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.