Guest guest Posted May 13, 2008 Report Share Posted May 13, 2008 On 5/13/08, crayfishfeed <crayfishfeed@...> wrote: > We want our stomachs to have enough HCL to kill harmful stuff but how > come it doesn't kill the good flora that yogurt and kefir give us? The milk matrix is protective. With supplements, you get a much larger dose -- I think that's most of it. Chris Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 13, 2008 Report Share Posted May 13, 2008 I don't know if this is true but I was looking at an enzyme supplement (bio-core optimum) and they mentioned the stomach with food in it was only like ph 2.5 to 4 and that doesn't seem way to acidic to me. http://www.nationalenzyme.com/pdf-downloads/biocore-bg/optimum-bg.pdf I think its when your stomach is empty that the ph can be very low. - > > We want our stomachs to have enough HCL to kill harmful stuff but how > > come it doesn't kill the good flora that yogurt and kefir give us? > > The milk matrix is protective. With supplements, you get a much > larger dose -- I think that's most of it. > > Chris > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 13, 2008 Report Share Posted May 13, 2008 Ideally when you are done digesting the food you've eaten, the stomach is back to it's low PH before it empties. Most foods spend at least 15 minutes in the stomach - except water that passes right through. When I take probiotics I mix them with water to ensure they do not stay in my stomach for long. -Lana On 5/13/08, gdawson6 <gdawson6@...> wrote: > > I don't know if this is true but I was looking at an enzyme supplement > (bio-core optimum) and they mentioned the stomach with food in it was > only like ph 2.5 to 4 and that doesn't seem way to acidic to me. > > http://www.nationalenzyme.com/pdf-downloads/biocore-bg/optimum-bg.pdf > > I think its when your stomach is empty that the ph can be very low. > > - > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 13, 2008 Report Share Posted May 13, 2008 Starch that has been heated and cooled, such as that found in sourdough bread, also protects the microbes on their passage through the stomach. -Lana On 5/13/08, Masterjohn <chrismasterjohn@...> wrote: > > On 5/13/08, crayfishfeed <crayfishfeed@...> wrote: > > We want our stomachs to have enough HCL to kill harmful stuff but how > > come it doesn't kill the good flora that yogurt and kefir give us? > > > The milk matrix is protective. With supplements, you get a much > larger dose -- I think that's most of it. > > > Chris Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 13, 2008 Report Share Posted May 13, 2008 --- <gdawson6@...> wrote: > I don't know if this is true but I was looking at an enzyme > supplement (bio-core optimum) and they mentioned the stomach with > food in it was only like ph 2.5 to 4 and that doesn't seem way to > acidic to me. , digestive stomach pH of 2.5 to 4 is what I remember reading also. I've also read that kombucha typically has a pH of about 2.5 and kefir about 4, so these probiotics may already be able to survive stomach acid. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 14, 2008 Report Share Posted May 14, 2008 --- In , " gdawson6 " <gdawson6@...> wrote: <<they mentioned the stomach with food in it was only like ph 2.5 to 4 and that doesn't seem way to acidic to me. >> No it isn't. We don't digest food like catnivores that have very strong stomach acid and do a lot of the work there. Their stomach acid will dissolve bone quite easily. I feed my miniscule yorkie raw meat and bones, and its amazing to see a chicken thigh go into the front end and a little owl pellet emerge at the back lol! Primates start the process by " pre-degesting " in the mouth as we chew, then into the stomach for a further breakdown, then into all those yards and yards of intestine that finish off the job. Its more of a classical assembly line (or dis-assembly line I suppose!). Each area is very specific in how food is broken down at that stage - if you are diabetic, you know more about all this stuff than you ever thought that you would - but its fascinating and quite wonderful. regards from edella, who tries to be careful to chew thoroughly and east slowly (which will help mend a lot of food problems on its own). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 14, 2008 Report Share Posted May 14, 2008 > > <<they mentioned the stomach with food in it was only like ph 2.5 to 4 > and that doesn't seem way to acidic to me. >> > > No it isn't. We don't digest food like catnivores that have very strong > stomach acid and do a lot of the work there. Their stomach acid will > dissolve bone quite easily. This is not actually true. From the studies I've seen the pH of the stomach during digestion is approximately the same for both humans and dogs - roughly 2.0. It's often higher when no food is present. IF dogs indeed digest bone better than humans (which I haven't seen evidence of) it may be because food stays in their stomach longer. According to Steve Brown in " See Spot Live Longer " food can stay in a dog's stomach up to 8 hours. That's a very long time for it to be in an acid bath even if the pH is the same as in a human's stomach. Suze Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 14, 2008 Report Share Posted May 14, 2008 On 5/14/08, Suze Fisher <suzefisher@...> wrote: > This is not actually true. From the studies I've seen the pH of the stomach > during digestion is approximately the same for both humans and dogs - > roughly 2.0. It's often higher when no food is present. IF dogs indeed > digest bone better than humans (which I haven't seen evidence of) it may be > because food stays in their stomach longer. According to Steve Brown in " See > Spot Live Longer " food can stay in a dog's stomach up to 8 hours. That's a > very long time for it to be in an acid bath even if the pH is the same as in > a human's stomach. This is more in agreement with what I have read, although the stomach actually has different regions with different pH's. But trypsin's ideal pH is 2.0 I believe -- don't think it would work very well at 4.5. I seem to recall, though, that the stomach can also go below this in pH. Chris Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 14, 2008 Report Share Posted May 14, 2008 Lana, > Most foods spend at least 15 minutes in the stomach - except water that > passes right through. I'm not sure this is true. I recently went to a lecture by a guy who was an expert on sodium and water balance, and he said that there is a finite gastric emptying speed for water and that for this reason heavily sweating athletes cannot keep up with sweat loss no matter how much they drink. If you drink beyond the emptying capacity you just get bloated I guess. Chris Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 14, 2008 Report Share Posted May 14, 2008 >According to Steve Brown in " See Spot Live Longer " > food can stay in a dog's stomach up to 8 hours Isn't that for grain-based kibbles? Is it the same figure for BARF (bones and raw food)? Kathy ---- Suze Fisher <suzefisher@...> wrote: ============= > > <<they mentioned the stomach with food in it was only like ph 2.5 to 4 > and that doesn't seem way to acidic to me. >> > > No it isn't. We don't digest food like catnivores that have very strong > stomach acid and do a lot of the work there. Their stomach acid will > dissolve bone quite easily. This is not actually true. From the studies I've seen the pH of the stomach during digestion is approximately the same for both humans and dogs - roughly 2.0. It's often higher when no food is present. IF dogs indeed digest bone better than humans (which I haven't seen evidence of) it may be because food stays in their stomach longer. According to Steve Brown in " See Spot Live Longer " food can stay in a dog's stomach up to 8 hours. That's a very long time for it to be in an acid bath even if the pH is the same as in a human's stomach. Suze Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 14, 2008 Report Share Posted May 14, 2008 I don't think is true either. I've heard multiple things that disagree with this, like don't drink water with your meal because it dilutes your digestive acids, and to sloe weight, drink a glass of water 30 minutes before your meal so you won't feel as full. But, by 30 minutes the digestive acids will start to build up again. Kathy ---- Masterjohn <chrismasterjohn@...> wrote: ============= Lana, > Most foods spend at least 15 minutes in the stomach - except water that > passes right through. I'm not sure this is true. I recently went to a lecture by a guy who was an expert on sodium and water balance, and he said that there is a finite gastric emptying speed for water and that for this reason heavily sweating athletes cannot keep up with sweat loss no matter how much they drink. If you drink beyond the emptying capacity you just get bloated I guess. Chris ------------------------------------ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 14, 2008 Report Share Posted May 14, 2008 Interesting! I wonder how much fluid and what period of time he's talking about? I also wonder how well this pertains to someone who hasn't been heavily exercising. During exercise, blood moves to other parts of your body and the stomach gets put on hold so it would make sense that it takes longer to empty the stomach after exercise. -Lana On 5/14/08, Masterjohn <chrismasterjohn@...> wrote: > > I'm not sure this is true. I recently went to a lecture by a guy who > was an expert on sodium and water balance, and he said that there is a > finite gastric emptying speed for water and that for this reason > heavily sweating athletes cannot keep up with sweat loss no matter how > much they drink. If you drink beyond the emptying capacity you just > get bloated I guess. > > > Chris > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 14, 2008 Report Share Posted May 14, 2008 > >According to Steve Brown in " See Spot Live Longer " > > food can stay in a dog's stomach up to 8 hours > > Isn't that for grain-based kibbles? Is it the same figure for BARF (bones and raw > food)? He didn't specify. He just wrote that food stays in their stomach from 4 to 8 hours compared to about 30+ mins in the human stomach. Both his citations seem to be related to human transit time for this statement. Suze Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 14, 2008 Report Share Posted May 14, 2008 Lana, > Interesting! I wonder how much fluid and what period of time he's talking > about? I also wonder how well this pertains to someone who hasn't been > heavily exercising. During exercise, blood moves to other parts of your > body and the stomach gets put on hold so it would make sense that it takes > longer to empty the stomach after exercise. I'm not sure if I have it in my notes or if I still have the notes (I'll look later) but I think he cited the limit as somewhere around 1.5 L/hour. Some things might get put on hold in the stomach, like digestive secretions, but that doesn't necessarily mean the sphincter rate changes. I think what you may have been referring to might have been that food must take time to be ground into semi-liquid before it can exit the sphincter, whereas water is ready immediately. However, the sphincter still opens and closes and only lets something like 3 mL through per opening, so the actual exit time is limited by that when it isn't extended by the need for liquifying. That's my guess. Chris Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 14, 2008 Report Share Posted May 14, 2008 1.5L/hr is a LOT!! I have read the kidneys are only capable of processing approximately 1 cup of water an hour, but that is in the instance of normal fluid loss so that probably changes with heavy sweating. No wonder athletes can give themselves hyponatremia when attemping to offset fluid loss! Yes, it does have to do with the liquification - different foods take longer to be broken down enough to be washed out of the stomach by the stomach acid. Clear fluids are the quickest at exiting the stomach, followed by opaque fluids (like milk) and then (in order) fruits, veggies, low fat fish, grains, legumes, chicken, beef. Liquification for most foods is a byproduct of acid secretion, unless another form of fluids are supplied with the meal. It is also changed by particle size, which is dictated by chewing. I honestly hadn't expected anyone to be consuming liters of water in that short of a period. I usually use about 2 ounces of water to deliver probiotics to an empty stomach. -Lana I'm not sure if I have it in my notes or if I still have the notes > (I'll look later) but I think he cited the limit as somewhere around > 1.5 L/hour. Some things might get put on hold in the stomach, like > digestive secretions, but that doesn't necessarily mean the sphincter > rate changes. I think what you may have been referring to might have > been that food must take time to be ground into semi-liquid before it > can exit the sphincter, whereas water is ready immediately. However, > the sphincter still opens and closes and only lets something like 3 mL > through per opening, so the actual exit time is limited by that when > it isn't extended by the need for liquifying. That's my guess. > > > Chris > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 14, 2008 Report Share Posted May 14, 2008 During a meal in which one eats to their capacity: Most people imagine that the stomach is a tub of both acid and food that mixes up and sits until digested. But in reality, it is more like a block of food that acid secreted from the top of the stomach is slowly mashed into the food and then washes away/squirts out whatever has liquified. When water or other low acidity fluids are consumed, it interferes with the washing effect of acid because it travels around the food along the same path as the acid does and counteracts some of the acid's progress. Fullness is triggered by the exit of acid into the duodenum which triggers CCK release. When people have low stomach acid, they don't register fullness. By consuming water before a meal, you wash the acid out of your stomach which results in the PH starting higher at the beginning of the meal, and therefore it takes longer to reach the level of acid necessary to trigger CCK release. In the instance of low stomach acid, consuming water before a meal may actually prevent you from feeling full for quite some time. While this may seem good at first, CCK is also responsible for triggering enzyme and bile secretion so slowing CCK from being released is likely to result in inadequate digestion. This of course is a bit different than snacking on small amounts of food, where the acid normally present in the stomach is typically enough to dissolve the food as long as the food particles are small. The most complete digestion is attained by consuming small meals, or consuming large meals over a long period of time. Which all goes in line with the problem that our society eats too fast and chews too little. -Lana On 5/14/08, Kathy Dickson <kathy.dickson@...> wrote: > > I don't think is true either. I've heard multiple things that disagree with > this, like don't drink water with your meal because it dilutes your > digestive acids, and to sloe weight, drink a glass of water 30 minutes > before your meal so you won't feel as full. But, by 30 minutes the digestive > acids will start to build up again. > > Kathy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 14, 2008 Report Share Posted May 14, 2008 In this passage I'm talking about sips of water - not chugging glasses worth. (I forget some people tend to drink large amounts of fluid with meals) Consuming large amounts of water in a short time would fall into the sphincter limitation that pointed out, making a cushion of water underneath the food and effectively pausing digestion until the sphincter could empty the stomach of the excess fluids. The water is still emptied first since it is the most liquid substance in the stomach. So in this instance you could say that the water is diluting the stomach acid, because it is preventing the wash through effect. -Lana On 5/14/08, Lana Gibbons <lana.m.gibbons@...> wrote: > > When water or other low acidity fluids are consumed, it interferes with the > washing effect of acid because it travels around the food along the same > path as the acid does and counteracts some of the acid's progress. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 14, 2008 Report Share Posted May 14, 2008 Lana, Your comment is very much in line with natural hygiene, & native nutrition. Thanks for sharing. Best Always, Jim Lana Gibbons <lana.m.gibbons@...> wrote: During a meal in which one eats to their capacity: Most people imagine that the stomach is a tub of both acid and food that mixes up and sits until digested. But in reality, it is more like a block of food that acid secreted from the top of the stomach is slowly mashed into the food and then washes away/squirts out whatever has liquified. When water or other low acidity fluids are consumed, it interferes with the washing effect of acid because it travels around the food along the same path as the acid does and counteracts some of the acid's progress. Fullness is triggered by the exit of acid into the duodenum which triggers CCK release. When people have low stomach acid, they don't register fullness. By consuming water before a meal, you wash the acid out of your stomach which results in the PH starting higher at the beginning of the meal, and therefore it takes longer to reach the level of acid necessary to trigger CCK release. In the instance of low stomach acid, consuming water before a meal may actually prevent you from feeling full for quite some time. While this may seem good at first, CCK is also responsible for triggering enzyme and bile secretion so slowing CCK from being released is likely to result in inadequate digestion. This of course is a bit different than snacking on small amounts of food, where the acid normally present in the stomach is typically enough to dissolve the food as long as the food particles are small. The most complete digestion is attained by consuming small meals, or consuming large meals over a long period of time. Which all goes in line with the problem that our society eats too fast and chews too little. -Lana On 5/14/08, Kathy Dickson <kathy.dickson@...> wrote: > > I don't think is true either. I've heard multiple things that disagree with > this, like don't drink water with your meal because it dilutes your > digestive acids, and to sloe weight, drink a glass of water 30 minutes > before your meal so you won't feel as full. But, by 30 minutes the digestive > acids will start to build up again. > > Kathy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 14, 2008 Report Share Posted May 14, 2008 Hi, A starchy potato obviously takes hours longer to digest than a watermelon, less than an hour if eaten alone. Pavlov studies on salivating dogs are what reinforced food combining theory as we know it today. Just, Jim Suze Fisher <suzefisher@...> wrote: > >According to Steve Brown in " See Spot Live Longer " > > food can stay in a dog's stomach up to 8 hours > > Isn't that for grain-based kibbles? Is it the same figure for BARF (bones and raw > food)? He didn't specify. He just wrote that food stays in their stomach from 4 to 8 hours compared to about 30+ mins in the human stomach. Both his citations seem to be related to human transit time for this statement. Suze Well done is better than well said..., Jim Igo Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 14, 2008 Report Share Posted May 14, 2008 > > A starchy potato obviously takes hours longer to digest than a watermelon, less > than an hour if eaten alone. Jim, We were only discussing transit time through the *stomach* not the entire GI tract and not talking about watermelons but rather grain-based processed dog food vs. raw meat, bones, organs, etc. Suze Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 14, 2008 Report Share Posted May 14, 2008 Thanks for your reply. Grain feed fits into the starchy modality, where as raw meat, bone, organ, etc. is much easier for a dog to digest no matter what part of the GI transit it is digested. Obviously most dogs do not go around eating watermelon, it was simply used as a human comparison on how quickly food can pass through the stomach & the rest of the GI process. Outside of plain water, melon seems to be one of the fastest in humans. Again, Pavlov did a lot of experimentation on salivating dogs. Many researchers have found that humans digest meat faster than starchy potatoes & grains, as well. Hence the theory of food combining makes sense for both humans & animals in that regard. Just, Jim Suze Fisher <suzefisher@...> wrote: > > A starchy potato obviously takes hours longer to digest than a watermelon, less > than an hour if eaten alone. Jim, We were only discussing transit time through the *stomach* not the entire GI tract and not talking about watermelons but rather grain-based processed dog food vs. raw meat, bones, organs, etc. Suze Well done is better than well said..., Jim Igo Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 14, 2008 Report Share Posted May 14, 2008 Jim, Everything I have read indicates that potatoes are digested faster than most meat except fish which digest at about the same rate (about 40 minutes), grains and legumes are digested as fast as chicken (about 2 hours) and beef and pork takes longer than most starches at almost 3 hours. I find this to be true due to tests with my own stomach. -Lana On 5/14/08, Igo <jimi761@...> wrote: > > Many researchers have found that humans digest meat faster than starchy > potatoes & grains, as well. Hence the theory of food combining makes sense > for both humans & animals in that regard. > > > Just, Jim > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 14, 2008 Report Share Posted May 14, 2008 Let's say I ate beans about 90 minutes ago and then ate some cabbage like 20 minutes ago and I have gas right now, which food is giving me the gas? In other words would the beans give me the gas closer to eating them or is gas produced toward the end of digestion? I know there's a better way to asking this question rather than making it into an SAT word problem, I am just really tired right now. > > > > Many researchers have found that humans digest meat faster than starchy > > potatoes & grains, as well. Hence the theory of food combining makes sense > > for both humans & animals in that regard. > > > > > > Just, Jim > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 14, 2008 Report Share Posted May 14, 2008 Do you have upper GI gas or lower GI gas? If upper GI gas, it is likely the beans. If it is lower GI gas, there's a chance it is what you ate 8-18 hours ago that is causing the gas. -Lana On 5/14/08, crayfishfeed <crayfishfeed@...> wrote: > > Let's say I ate beans about 90 minutes ago and then ate some cabbage > like 20 minutes ago and I have gas right now, which food is giving me > the gas? In other words would the beans give me the gas closer to > eating them or is gas produced toward the end of digestion? I know > there's a better way to asking this question rather than making it > into an SAT word problem, I am just really tired right now. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 14, 2008 Report Share Posted May 14, 2008 I am glad you gave the answer for both. I didn't even think of upper intestinal but it's good to know.. So what a person ate like twenty minutes ago wouldn't have baring on lower intestinal gas? Is gas presence always a bad thing? Couldn't be someone just swallowed air while they were eating or is that mythology? > > > > Let's say I ate beans about 90 minutes ago and then ate some cabbage > > like 20 minutes ago and I have gas right now, which food is giving me > > the gas? In other words would the beans give me the gas closer to > > eating them or is gas produced toward the end of digestion? I know > > there's a better way to asking this question rather than making it > > into an SAT word problem, I am just really tired right now. > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.