Guest guest Posted February 10, 2008 Report Share Posted February 10, 2008 Hi Desh, > As far as I know, the extra C strengthens the amniotic sac. But why four grams? The normal requirement for vitamin C is so low ordinarily, only 10 mg prevents scurvy, for example. It makes little sense that four grams would be required during pregnancy. It is completely impossible to get from food and the blood level kinetics seem to suggest that the body doesn't want much more than a couple hundred mg per day. Blood levels respond to diet greatest in the range of 30-100 mg, and raising status by C intake after that is much less efficient. High C intake can induce copper deficiency and potentially be detoxified into oxalate, so I would want to see some evidence that this is safe and effective before taking such a huge dose during pregnancy of all times. > If the sac breaks early in labor, then the baby is more vulnerable to > infection, and the cord more vulnerable to prolapse, plus if the sac > breaks later then the laboring woman gets less dehydrated, and the birth > canal more lubricated when the mother needs it. A mother with a healthy > strong amniotic sac will also break the sac just a little, and the > babies' head can engage- plug up the leaking water and prevent > dehydration. Also obviously the strong sac can help prevent miscarriage. > There are contraindications though, if you're birthing in a hospital. > Too high vitamin C can cause more bleeding during childbirth, which the > hospital may hold against you and use as an excuse to cut you. I read > that study at naturalchildbirth.org. This all makes sense, but it makes much less sense from an evolutionary or design perspective that the human body would require 4 grams of C to ensure against miscarraige and sac rupture when it is impossible to get anywhere near that from diet. Chris Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 10, 2008 Report Share Posted February 10, 2008 > breaks later then the laboring woman gets less dehydrated, and the birth > canal more lubricated when the mother needs it. A mother with a healthy > strong amniotic sac will also break the sac just a little, and the > babies' head can engage- plug up the leaking water and prevent A strong sac also prevents dry labor, which is incredibly uncomfortable, because there is no cushion for the contractions. With my first, the sac broke on its own before labor began and she was a dry birth. With my second, I had literally no pain until my water broke. HUGE difference. After that experience, I would never allow my water to be purposefully broken. KerryAnn www.tfrecipes.com/forum/ - Traditional Foods Menu Mailer and NEW Forum! " I could have saved thousands-if only I'd been able to convince them they were slaves. " Harriet Tubman Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 10, 2008 Report Share Posted February 10, 2008 On 2/10/08, penciloid <hoppythetoad@...> wrote: > How do people meet the RDA for vitamin E without supplements? When > using nutritiondata.com to check my diet, vitamin E seems to be about > the hardest thing. Is there any options besides eating tons of eggs > every day? The RDA for vitamin E is the most ridiculously laughable piece of junk science supported by the IOM. It was based on experiments with institutionalized people back in the 50s or 60s. They found it utterly impossible to induce vitamin E deficiency (as determined by the susceptibility of isolated red blood cells to H2O2-induced lysis) with a diet containing 3 mg/day with the staple fat as lard over the course of 2.5 years. Therefore, they dumped the lard and started feeding rancid corn oil as the main fat. This caused the " vitamin E deficiency " to develop, and seven patients were fed different amounts of vitamin E. Two patients fed amounts of 3-8 mg/day did not have the " deficiency " reversed, whereas four patients fed amounts of 10-60 mg/day did have it reversed. The two patients consuming with a blood level of 11.4 mcmol/L had the lowest blood level that allowed reversal of the " deficiency. " Therefore, it was determined that 12 mcmol/L is sufficient to prevent deficiency. Since one of the patients was eating 9.8 mg/day and the other 12.1 mg/day, it was determined that 12 mg/day should be sufficient to maintain a blood level of 12 mcmol/L, which will prevent one's extracted RBCs from succumbing to H2O2-induced lysis if one is eating primarily rancid corn oil. The most hilarious thing is that the whole point of eating 12 mg/day is to maintain a blood level of 12 mmol/L. But by the blood level, the average American is right on target. By the intake data, the average American is about 25% deficient. So, obviously the RDA is more than what is needed to maintain that blood level. And, of course, there is no in vivo data, and no data using a fat besides rancid corn oil. So unless you plan to eat nothing but rancid corn oil, I would not worry about meeting the RDA. Chris Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 10, 2008 Report Share Posted February 10, 2008 <repent_kog_is_near@...> wrote: > Do you eat organ meats/gizzards during this time? > > Dr.Bernard Jensen in his book says the above foods can make a big > difference for women in the first 3 months of pregnancy and probably > can help or even avoid the morning sickness? > > Interesting! I have also heard from many women that kombucha helps their morning sickness. I read that kombucha has B vitamins so perhaps that has something to do with it? Cheeseburgers and milkshakes really helped my morning sickness :-) I found that if I could keep myself full, I wouldn't get nauseous. If I waited until I was hungry/depleted, I'd get really nauseous and then couldn't bear to eat anything. So for me it was all about eating pretty much constantly. Lots of fat and meat and cheese and eggs. I remember once we went out for a steak dinner and I ate the whole entire steak (ate my husband under the table). Then I ordered cheesecake and a large glass of milk to take home! This was before I knew anything about traditional foods. I've never been into low-fat eating or salads (unless it was a Cobb salad with extra blue cheese dressing) -- always loved butter and heavy cream. So that probably helped. I didn't know about the nutritional benefits of organ meats back then when I was pregnant. if I had, I would have been taking liver tablets (next time I will). Liver and onions during morning sickness is not something I think I could stomach. Ann Marie Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 16, 2008 Report Share Posted February 16, 2008 On 2/15/08, lynchwt <lynchwt@...> wrote: > My two-year old son has been prescribed a 5 mg megadose of folic acid > for a genetic condition. We have been advised to give him a > multivitamin, since the high dose of folic acid may deplete B-6 and > zinc. I was wondering if there was a good way to get him B6 and zinc > supplementation without synthetic vitamins. He probably already gets a > good supply of B6 and zinc, I would guess, from a WAPF/NT diet (with > the exception of lactofermented prodcuts which I haven't succeeded in > introducing to him yet--but he loves his pastured beef and eggs, raw > milk, etc.) Also, should I request an alternative form of folic > acid?--it's mixed up in liquid at a compounding pharmacy. I would try to get folinic acid or 5-methyl-tetrahydrafolate. I seriously doubt he is converting anywhere remotely near 5 mg of folic acid into a usable form of folate. If you get a better form, you might want to start out with a lower dose in case it turns out to be much more effective. Tuna and liver are the best sources of B6. Bananas are a good source of B6. Most meats and fish are good sources. Chris Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.