RE: POLITICS: Ron 's Campaign for Liberty

[Guest guest]

> Ron ¢s letter, below, makes it clear that his Campaign for Liberty

will go

> on, and on, and on. He is not giving up. Some of you may want to know

about this

> and even support it/him. I certainly will.

> Pamela

Hi Pamela,

Many of us are starting Campaign for Liberty movements in our own states.

It's critical that we get the liberty message out and quickly as an educated

public is our best defense against the rapidly increasing tyranny we are

facing.

The Campaign for Liberty will indeed go on and on and on even if they

succeed in taking out Ron . There is heavy suspicion that the

decompressurization of the cabin on his airplane yesterday was either a

warning or valid attempt at his life. But the campaign is not about him,

it's about us. And we are legion.

Suze

[Guest guest]

Yes. ron paul is the only hope for civilization. Everyone knows that.

-------------- Original message ----------------------

From: " Suze Fisher " <suzefisher@...>

> > Ron ¢s letter, below, makes it clear that his Campaign for Liberty

> will go

> > on, and on, and on. He is not giving up. Some of you may want to know

> about this

> > and even support it/him. I certainly will.

> > Pamela

>

> Hi Pamela,

>

> Many of us are starting Campaign for Liberty movements in our own states.

> It's critical that we get the liberty message out and quickly as an educated

> public is our best defense against the rapidly increasing tyranny we are

> facing.

>

> The Campaign for Liberty will indeed go on and on and on even if they

> succeed in taking out Ron . There is heavy suspicion that the

> decompressurization of the cabin on his airplane yesterday was either a

> warning or valid attempt at his life. But the campaign is not about him,

> it's about us. And we are legion.

>

> Suze

>

>

[Guest guest]

> Yes. ron paul is the only hope for civilization. Everyone knows that.

I assume this comment is in response to my comment about the possibility

that the depressurization of his plane a few days ago was an attempt on his

life. I don't know what the frequency of plane depressurization is, but it's

awfully interesting that a) he was on his way to a vote on the FAA where he

was going to lambast them for corruption and other misdeeds and he's a

famous person who's woken up millions of Americans as to what's really going

on in the world beyond the narrow, controlled lens of corporate media. A

huge grassroots liberty movement has grown out of his presidential candidacy

and he is egging us on. All this at a time when the international banking

cartel (that RP has exposed for what they are) and their power elite cronies

are stepping up the war against Americans' liberties and very lives. There

is no doubt that Ron poses a threat to them by continuing to expose

their activities as well as the misdeeds of Congress like the 1984-esque

Housing Bill that I mention in another email. Common sense would dictate

that one should question whether the depressurization was just an innocent

coincidence.

Suze

[Guest guest]

I really don't think that corporate america is so afraid of Ron that they

would have him killed. Of course, one can't prove that this didn't happen,

similarly to the 9/11 conspiracy theories. But if you want to believe that there

was a conspiracy to have him killed, and that these people put their own lives

in jeopardy (how can one know that there will never be a leak, by anyone at

all), feel free. I can enjoy watching people deify this man, though...

-------------- Original message ----------------------

From: " Suze Fisher " <suzefisher@...>

> > Yes. ron paul is the only hope for civilization. Everyone knows that.

>

> I assume this comment is in response to my comment about the possibility

> that the depressurization of his plane a few days ago was an attempt on his

> life. I don't know what the frequency of plane depressurization is, but it's

> awfully interesting that a) he was on his way to a vote on the FAA where he

> was going to lambast them for corruption and other misdeeds and he's a

> famous person who's woken up millions of Americans as to what's really going

> on in the world beyond the narrow, controlled lens of corporate media. A

> huge grassroots liberty movement has grown out of his presidential candidacy

> and he is egging us on. All this at a time when the international banking

> cartel (that RP has exposed for what they are) and their power elite cronies

> are stepping up the war against Americans' liberties and very lives. There

> is no doubt that Ron poses a threat to them by continuing to expose

> their activities as well as the misdeeds of Congress like the 1984-esque

> Housing Bill that I mention in another email. Common sense would dictate

> that one should question whether the depressurization was just an innocent

> coincidence.

>

> Suze

>

[Guest guest]

Suze,

> I assume this comment is in response to my comment about the possibility

> that the depressurization of his plane a few days ago was an attempt on his

> life. I don't know what the frequency of plane depressurization is,

According to the original article, which is posted on my blog, there

were two other flights, I think from that airport, that had the

problem that weekend. Of course that raises the question of why they

would occur in a cluster. I don't think that proves anything one way

or the other. But I would say this is more likely a scare tactic or

an accident rather than an attempt on his life. The plane was

carrying 118 people.

Chris

[Guest guest]

>

> > I assume this comment is in response to my comment about the possibility

> > that the depressurization of his plane a few days ago was an attempt on

his

> > life. I don't know what the frequency of plane depressurization is,

>

> According to the original article, which is posted on my blog, there

> were two other flights, I think from that airport, that had the

> problem that weekend. Of course that raises the question of why they

> would occur in a cluster. I don't think that proves anything one way

> or the other. But I would say this is more likely a scare tactic or

> an accident rather than an attempt on his life. The plane was

> carrying 118 people.

I don't think the number of people on board has any bearing on whether the

killers would try to kill RP or not. Note that I said that there is heavy

suspicion that the depressurization might have been an attempt on his life

or a warning. I personally am not really sure what it was but do find it

worthy of suspicion.

When I went to the FAA's database (http://www.ntsb.gov/ntsb/query.asp) and

typed in " depressurization " for the time period 1/1/2003 to 7/24/2008 I only

got 4 returns. 25% of those incidences included fatalities. If there have

only been 4 other incidences of depressurization in the past 8 years, then

the probability that there would be 3 incidences in one day is...what?

Astronomical?

I'm not entirely sure that the database results I got are realistic, but

even if the true number were double that, triple that or quadruple that, the

incidences the other day would still be unlikely.

Suze

[Guest guest]

Suze,

> I don't think the number of people on board has any bearing on whether the

> killers would try to kill RP or not.

I don't think it is evidence one way or another but it affects the

plausibility. More people means more families with dead loved ones

who want investigations, more attention in the media, etc. No reason

to risk it.

> Note that I said that there is heavy

> suspicion that the depressurization might have been an attempt on his life

> or a warning. I personally am not really sure what it was but do find it

> worthy of suspicion.

I do find it worthy of suspicion too, but it doesn't seem the most

likely scenario to me. It should definitely be investigated and of

course will be.

> When I went to the FAA's database (http://www.ntsb.gov/ntsb/query.asp) and

> typed in " depressurization " for the time period 1/1/2003 to 7/24/2008 I only

> got 4 returns. 25% of those incidences included fatalities. If there have

> only been 4 other incidences of depressurization in the past 8 years, then

> the probability that there would be 3 incidences in one day is...what?

> Astronomical?

Right. Someone was fooling with the planes there, it seems, because I

think the article said they were from different airlines. The chances

that three flights on the same weekend from different airlines but at

the same airport would experience something that occurs nationally at

a rate of once every two years seems completely astronomical to make

an understatement.

> I'm not entirely sure that the database results I got are realistic, but

> even if the true number were double that, triple that or quadruple that, the

> incidences the other day would still be unlikely.

Right, something is fishy.

Chris