Guest guest Posted July 6, 2007 Report Share Posted July 6, 2007 Dear Forum members, The 20th UNAIDS PCB (Programme Coordinating Board) held in Geneva on June 25-27 was a unique and very important than the other ones held in the past in terms of many things e.g. number of participants from all the 3 sections i.e. Member states (Government delegates), Co sponsors (UN agencies) and Civil Society observers, key issues raised by NGOs delegates and debate held thereon and the statement delivered by the delegate of Government of India on the issue of voting right to the NGO delgation in the PCB etc. The issue of voting right to the PCB NGO delegation was discussed widely in the plenary to send the issue to the ECOSOC to take a resolution in order to make it a legal right. At one time there was a stalemate for few moments as the discussion was taking a hot turn when some of the country delegates outright supported the NGOs' demand whereas many couldn't take a clear stand. In such a situation the PCB NGO delegation requested the Chairman for a 5 minutes interval to discuss the matter with other NGO observers present in the plenary. It was decided unanimously among the NGOs that they should request the chairman for a vote of the house on the issue, but when the NGO delegation put this before the plenary after 5 minute interval the scenerio was entirely changed in the house as the Member States (The delagates of country Governments) had decided their stand. Ultimately the NGO delegation constrained to withdraw its request for vote of the house. What surprising not only to me (being NGO delegate for Asia Pacific and and an Indian citizen), but for all those who were present in the house, particulalry the CS observers including many NGOs from around the world was the opinion expressed by the delegate of India Government. What he spoke on the issue (I can't quote the exact words, but it is essence of what he spoke in the house) during the debate was " The NGO delagates should tell us as what they want to achieve by the voting right in the UNAIDS PCB? " The tone he spoke in looked as he was not in favour of the right to vote to the NGO delegation in the PCB. Whole the house was seriously and surprisingly looking at the diction and intonation he was speaking in as no one else spoke in such a negative tone ? Later, many of the CS observers asked me personally as why this kind of attitude had been shown by the representative of India Government while all were expecting their support for the NGOs, but I was not in a position to respond their question as I was shocked too on his statement. He left the house before I could see him personally to discuss the matter. The NGO observers participating in the PCB expresed their views critically on the opinion of the delegate of India Government, like -- " we, the NGO delegats want to achieve whatever they (the government delegates) want to " , " right to vote is a fundamental right of every one in the democracy, so why should we not ask for that? " , " when every Government delegate in the PCB speak for equal participation of the NGO delgates in the PCB how can they deny us for the voting right? " etc. I wonder as whether the delegate spoke in the UNAIDS PCB 20th meeting on behalf of India Government (though the authorised delegate was another one), was authorised by the MoH or NACO to take such a stand on the issue of right to vote to the NGO delagation? If yes, it is a serious matter for the CS people of the country as a whole, and if not, how did he speak in such a negative way? I look for your comments. with regards, Bhawani Bhawani Shanker Kusum Secretary & Executive Director Gram Bharati Samiti (GBS) NGO Delegate for Asia Pacific, UNAIDS PCB Amber Bhawan, Amber 302 028 Jaipur India Tel.: 91-141-2531242 Fax.: 91-141-2530719 E-mail: gbsbsk@... www.gbsjp.org Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.