Guest guest Posted February 10, 2008 Report Share Posted February 10, 2008 Penciloid Have you considered Food-based multivitamins compared to the regular ones? In the case of pantothenic acid, remember it is a B vitamin, and Vit B & C are water soluble. Excess intake of pantothenic acid or any other Water -soluble Vits, are excreted and not stored in the body, perhaps on a daily basis. So you may have got 10000% one day, and the body took 100%, and the next day, you did not take any, and the body is starving for it. But, the Fat Solubles are different story(Vit A,D,E). Too much can be dangerous. That is why there is a controversy of having too much Vit D from CLO etc. It probably will be severe damage or fatal if someone megadosed on Fat vitamins. Regards Vijay -------------------------- If thou, Lord, shouldest mark iniquities, O Lord, who shall stand? But there is forgiveness with thee, that thou mayest be feared. Psalm 130:3-4 --------------------------------- Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Mobile. Try it now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 10, 2008 Report Share Posted February 10, 2008 > Have you considered Food-based multivitamins compared to the regular ones? I would prefer a food based multi. Any recommendations? Several at the store claimed to be gluten-free, despite listing wheat grass or oats. I'm leary of taking them. Is it only the mature wheat grain that has gluten? made a good point about 4 grams of vitamin C being way more than I could ever get from food. I struggle with figuring out what the truth is, since there seem to be two perspectives: 1. Eat well and you won't need vitamins. 2. The RDAs are too low and with poor soil quality, etc, you'll never get enough from food only. Klennar reported that women taking large amounts of vitamin C had fewer miscarriages, fewer birth defects, almost no stretch marks, and much more content babies. This make the idea appealing. However, like said, that amount of vitamin C couldn't be necessary from a design (or evolutionary, although I don't believe in it) standpoint. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 10, 2008 Report Share Posted February 10, 2008 --- Masterjohn <chrismasterjohn@...> wrote: > If the RDA for vitamin C was based on what is necessary to prevent > scurvy, for example, it would be 10 mg/day rather than 90 mg/day for > men and 75 mg/day for women. The current RDA is not really based on > health outcomes, but rather on maximizing blood neutrophil > concentrations and minimizing urinary excretion. and from what I have been reading, the optimal levels of vitamins C and E may very well depend on your diet. If the diet is high in PUFA and refined flour and sugar, you may need a lot more C and E than if your diet is low in PUFA and starch/sugar. I thought someone wrote here recently that sailors only got scurvy when their diet included lots of flour, though I haven't confirmed this possibility. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.