Guest guest Posted June 25, 2008 Report Share Posted June 25, 2008 I'm reading " Peace Child " now by Don , about his first missionary trip to New Guinea to reach a tribe of people who had been untouched by civilization until the 1970's. They were living as their ancestors had, on a native diet, and while he doesn't mention their teeth, they had a truly violent and dysfunctional culture! I thought Price noticed that people on native diets were more harmonious? These guys would force their wives to sit in a corner and beat them whenever she looked around, shot them through with arrows, and are hugely warlike and even frequently fought amonst themselves - in their villages. So what do you think? Is a healthy diet one that ALWAYS leads to greater compassion and amounts of those good attributes that we think belong to humans in their highest level of self-actualization, or can incredibly dysfunctional peoples remain incredibly dysfunctional even on the best of diets? Can we assume that the New Guinea cannibals were deficient in some nutrient that led to their violent and warlike ways, or is that another form of " normal " for a " healthy " human being? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.