Guest guest Posted May 15, 2007 Report Share Posted May 15, 2007 Dear All /message/7264 This is in response to Dr. Sadhu Charan Panda'a mail on the subject. It is unfortunate that the patient developed certain symptoms post operation that led to a HIV test (trust consent, counseling protocols were followed!!!). Do we understand that " sterilization " processes do not happen before / after operation in respect to theater and instruments? Fail to understand the concern here unless it is to push panic buttons some place. Surgeons are well aware of risks of HIV infections in patients on whom invasive procedures are planned. Hence " Universal Precautions " which goes beyond HIV. If suspicion and fears continue thay surely are not reasons to carry out HIV tests. There is no end to this road. There is also the problem of blood banks having a small percent of blood of people in the window period. The paradox of needing " fresh " blood for use during surgery vis a vis waiting for six weeks for antibody tests to come up with HIV needs tackling. Can we afford a more expensive PCR test in blood banks?!! These are questions that possibly arise in such cases. It is sad two people died " soon after " transfusion, but if the patient was in such advanced stage that could induce death immediately to two people then a normal Tri-dot should have come up with the correct diagnosis. I feel there are many gaps needing to be filled in this particular instance that otherwise would only lead to lengthy speculations. sincerely Sreeram Sreeram Varadadesikan e-mail: <setlurs01@...> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 15, 2007 Report Share Posted May 15, 2007 Dear FORUM, Re: /message/7264 Dr Sadhu Charan Panda's mail raises serious concerns. This means that the standard protocol of blood transfusion was/is not being followed in Orissa? No blood can be transfused without being tested for HIV (amongst other infections). The media also seems uniformed about this, else they should have investigated further and pinned responsibility for unsafe blood transfusion practice. It also seems starnge that a person who is to undergo operation himself has donated blood for other patients. And about the patient testing positive post operatively- if universal precautions were taken and the OT etc appropriately sterilized after the said operation, the chances are quite slim. But if this is the same hospital where unsafe blood was transfused one cannot be sure whether this was done. What is the issue? That the patient's HIV status was not known or that the standard operating practices are being compromised upon? Regards Vandana Nair Jaipur e-mail: <nair_vandana@...> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 15, 2007 Report Share Posted May 15, 2007 Dear FORUM and Dr. Sadhu Charan Panda, The accepted policy now is to consider all patients coming to your health-care facility alike & potentially infectious and hence to practice standard precautions, which will protect not only the health care professionals but also each and every client/patient from HIV and many other infections. So there is no need for testing the patient for this purpose. This is the only practical approach to the problem. Even with mandatory testing for all patients (which is ethically and legally incorrect), you cannot be 100% fool proof if you are not practicing these precautions. And there are guidelines for post-exposure prophylaxis if something goes wrong beyond our control. For the second part of your mail:- Blood transfusion received from an HIV infected person cannot cause immediate death due to that reason. Either there happened a transfusion re-action or there will be some co-existing fatal infection. And again if the lab is following the guidelines - it is less likely that this person's blood is transfused to those patients in need (with the exception of window period). They would have discarded it without informing them. Mandatory testing is done at labs for the purpose of screening; but the result is not made known to anyone as it is unlinked anonymous testing. Hope this helps, With regards, Dr.Nabeel. Dr.Nabeel.M.K. Alliance for Social Health Action (ASHA) Academy of Medical Sciences, Kannur Kerala e-mail: <drnabeelmk@...> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 16, 2007 Report Share Posted May 16, 2007 Dear FORUM, Re: /message/7264 Though these type of incidents are common, it is very painful to see or read such tragedies freequently. You are asking the group about preventing such incidents. But, do you think we have enough resources, creativity and political will to communicate with proper information ? Specially from organizations like NACO Or State HIV AIDS preventive societies? These organizations are spreading " Only " wrong information's like HIV Virus. Yesterday, in Bangalore I saw a 3 mts film on Role of women in local governance, produced by K'taka State HIV .. Prevention Society. The leading female artist talks about HIV. Right to Live and women's Right to question about the issue in family. But, through out the film she uses the word AIDS instead of HIV. And, this film targeting rural audiences, role PR in controlling and creating awareness about HIV. Just imagine about its impact on viewers. Dr Sadhu Charan or other members in the group need to discuss about intangible activities like creating awareness and educating the masses through social communication. Preventive activities are also equally important like curative activities. Unfortunately preventive work is not statistic oriented to high light with funders or on platforms while presenting a lecture but it plays a vital role in the community. This is not the first time we are coming across such type of films. I have seen posters, banners, booklets with full of content and presentation errors. Preventive activities are also as important as other policy matters. Shamantha Sarathi - A Resource Center for Communications Bangalore e-mail: <shamantha@...> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 17, 2007 Report Share Posted May 17, 2007 Dear FORUM, Re: /message/7264 Bood transfussion system has improved a lot in recent years and lot of training and C.M.E.programe are being carried out. In gujarat state regional trainig programe and updates are being done.i agree that 100%safe blood is a myth! I am in this field since 24years and even licence were not issued and no protocol was heard at present everybody knows SOP/TQM/GMP/etc. We still needs to educate medical feternity to learn rational use of blood and universal precaution and stigamtisation for HIV Dr.Niloo Vaishnav e-mail: <bhavnagarbloodbank@...> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.