Re: POLITICS Steinberg recommends low saturated fat, low cholesterol diet fro

[Guest guest]

Hi

> Perhaps someone might actually bother to check the EVIDENCE before

> such a ridiculous law would be passed?

I think it would be difficult to get Congress to pass such a law, but

that doesn't mean it won't happen. I think the basic trend is to make

Congress irrelevant, because it is too much of a pain in the butt to

deal with.

So, for example, on the national level, the executive branch has been

greatly strengthened and congressional oversight has been ripped

apart. And then, the alphabet soup of regulatory agencies have

arrogated all kinds of powers and the USDA is even launching NAIS

under it's own " regulatory authority " to bypass Congress. And then,

finally, there is a ring of " experts " who give congressmen laws to

sign and have encouraged a culture where it is not expected to

actually read the legislation you are voting on, so if one cannot

bypass congress through the various aforementioned means, there is

always a good chance of duping congress.

And then at the international level, there is a world government

composed of a variety of different supra-governmental institutions

forming that has been created and run by the financial elite that owns

the Federal Reserve and the other private central banks of

industrialized nations and owns the IMF and the World Bank, which they

are establishing as the world's central bank, and probably have plans

to use to issue a single global currency after the various paper money

currencies are allowed to collapse, which is probably why the IMF is

accumulating ownership of most of the world's gold.

At this level, they are creating supra-governmental boards like those

authorized by the WTO and NAFTA where unelected corporate lawyers get

authority over a nation's laws, and levy huge fines if the respective

national legislatures don't comply with their rulings. NAFTA, for

example, has struck down a number of US laws and levied huge fines for

things like banning asbestos.

Since, under UN auspices, international regulations on foods, drugs,

and nutritional supplementations are being developed under CODEX, this

could also represent a back door for implementing food-related

taxation or legislation that would not otherwise pass congress.

> Then again, the evidence hasn't really counted for much so far. Who

> needs evidence when you've got marketing, advertising and lobbying?

I think it goes a bit beyond those forces -- I think there are folks

with more power than the government that have been envisioning the

centralization of the world's food supply for quite some time now. It

makes sense. For example, on the Kissinger document for population

control from 1974, it talks about possibly needing to control world

population by directing food aid to some countries and away from other

countries depending on whether they implement population control

measures, which is something you can't really do very well if food is

distributed in a decentralized network.

So you have to wonder, why has the IMF been forcing third world

countries into export economies so that they are not self-sufficient

for their food, and does it have anythign to do with the fact that it

is owned and controlled by the same folks who own and control the

major food corporations here that are moving toward complete control

of the food supply, and does it have anything to do with the fact that

folks like Kissinger who write these population documents and folks

like Rockefeller have been lifelong friends with deep histories of

cooperation in busines, government, and para-governmental

institutions.

> I've written an article about it on my blog as well:

> http://thehealthyskeptic.org/how-to-increase-your-risk-of-heart-disease

Cool. I'll read it soon.

> Let's just hope that our politicians aren't as crazy as Dr. Steinberg.

Unfortunately I don't think they have to be. Let's hope America

hasn't put all her hope in her politicians.

Chris