Guest guest Posted March 2, 2008 Report Share Posted March 2, 2008 Hmm, not suspicious at all, is it? Business as usual. - Gray, Chandler, AZ (SE Valley chapter) http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5jmMDqqS37QeJR2uBIwSOwQPtBUaAD8V3K7582 USDA Shuts Down Congressional Audit By BEN EVANS – 2 days ago WASHINGTON (AP) — The Agriculture Department abruptly ordered congressional auditors to leave its Washington offices this week and told employees not to cooperate with them. " You are hereby instructed not to meet with any member of the (Government Accountability Office) today, or until this matter is resolved, " Watts, head of the department's office of adjudication, wrote to employees Wednesday in an e-mail obtained by The Associated Press. The auditors were seeking information for an ongoing review of Agriculture's civil rights office, including whether the department had provided false information about the office's progress in handling discrimination complaints. J. , Agriculture's deputy general counsel, said the GAO investigators called the department Wednesday morning to say they were on their way over and wanted to speak with certain employees. He said the auditors refused to let department attorneys sit in on the meetings. After initially allowing interviews to proceed, department officials stopped them and told the investigators to leave the building, said. " We are not interested in having our employees potentially put themselves at risk when they have not yet been advised of their rights and when we were not allowed to provide counsel, " said. " We also pointed out to them that while they hold themselves out to be criminal investigators, GAO is an arm of Congress and has no authority to investigate violations of criminal law. " A spokesman for the GAO, the investigative arm of Congress, said federal agencies cooperate with its audits in the " vast majority " of cases. " In those instances where we encounter certain difficulties, we consider an array of options, " said the spokesman, Young. He said the audit is expected to be completed in July. Lawrence Lucas, president of the USDA Coalition of Minority Employees, said the GAO inquiry focuses on whether Agriculture presents misleadingly rosy accounts of the civil rights office's accomplishments. " They had about seven to nine people who were willing to talk to GAO and that's why they kicked them out of the building, " Lucas said. One employee who spoke with The Associated Press on condition of anonymity out of fear of retaliation, met with the auditors before they were asked to leave. The worker said department attorneys stood outside the interview room, telling employees that they had no obligation to talk to the GAO auditors. said the department has been cooperating with the GAO for a year but will not let its employees discuss the matter until it gets more information about what is being investigated. " We don't have anything to hide, " said. " We have absolutely no understanding of why anybody at GAO believes there's been any misrepresentation. " Although executive agencies frequently chafe at the GAO's findings, the agency has a reputation as an independent, nonpartisan investigative office. The agency has clashed with the Bush administration, however, most notably in 2002 when it sued Vice President Dick Cheney to get the names of energy executives who met with a White House task force working on President Bush's energy policy. The lawsuit marked the first time in the GAO's nearly 90-year history that it had resorted to asking a federal judge to force a president or vice president or their aides to release documents. The GAO lost the case. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.