Guest guest Posted March 14, 2008 Report Share Posted March 14, 2008 After reading NAFD, and a few other books with pictures of natives, I noticed something interesting, almost a complete lack of the multitude of stretchmarks that seem to plague modern mothers. Some loseness of skin yes, but not the other. I am a mother too, and have some stretchmarks, though not many at all on my stomach. I always hear the " gene " copout. But, I know its more than that. Stretchmarks cannot be a sign of healthy skin. I mean, a womans body will change a bit after pregnancy, but having skin that cannot handle a growing uterus doesn't seem normal to me. Any input on this? -T Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.