Guest guest Posted January 21, 2008 Report Share Posted January 21, 2008 The Deficits are worse than most people really know. Social Security funding has exceeded expenditures for quite some time. The money is supposed to be segregated from the regular budget because it is earmarked strictly for retirement/retirees. However, our legislators figured out the budget deficits wouldn't look nearly as bad if we took the Social Security surplus and added it back to the overall deficit and reported a smaller deficit number. During the Clinton administration, everyone reported that the government was running a surplus..., when in fact it was a deficit. Until they added the Social Security Surplus in. If my memory is correct, the last time the US Government truly had a surplus was when Truman was in office. As always, someone else will correct this statement if it is wrong. Jim <///>< **************Start the year off right. Easy ways to stay in shape. http://body.aol.com/fitness/winter-exercise?NCID=aolcmp00300000002489 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 21, 2008 Report Share Posted January 21, 2008 In the United States the supply is expanded or retracted to meet demand. In Canada the demand is controlled by limiting supply. Kunkel MSPT **************Start the year off right. Easy ways to stay in shape. http://body.aol.com/fitness/winter-exercise?NCID=aolcmp00300000002489 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 23, 2008 Report Share Posted January 23, 2008 - I am not a proponent of a one payer system. However, I think the traditional supply / demand model you mention in your message breaks down in healthcare due to the 3rd party payer system and how medical providers are paid. In US healthcare there are numerous examples where DEMAND is created to meet the SUPPLY. This is one factor that unfortunately drives up costs in the system. " When you have a hammer everything looks like a nail. " When you own an MRI everyone needs imaging. Areas of the country with high numbers of surgical specialists per capita tend to have higher numbers of surgical patients. " There is a significant relationship between the specialist physician supply per hundred thousand residents and Medicare spending on physicians' services. As the supply of specialist physicians increases by 100 per hundred thousand population (e.g., from 150 to 250), Medicare spending could be predicted to increase by $136 per enrollee (R2 = .15). " http://www.dartmouthatlas.org/atlases/96Atlas.pdf I have met with insurance company reps that complain that PTs treat to the patient's benefit. If the patient's plan allows 20 PT visits in the calendar year, the patient seems to get 20 PT visits. Unless providers focus on taking on the role of managing care and work with the other stakeholders in the system to develop a payment system that rewards these efforts along with good clinical outcomes and preventative activities, we will continue to face lower reimbursement regardless of the payer system (private or government). My 2 cents. Todd Gifford PT TherapeuticAssociates www.therapeuticassociates.com www.careconnections.com / Re: Re: Effect of National Health Care on Private Practice Physic... In the United States the supply is expanded or retracted to meet demand. In Canada the demand is controlled by limiting supply. Kunkel MSPT **************Start the year off right. Easy ways to stay in shape. http://body.aol.com/fitness/winter-exercise?NCID=aolcmp00300000002489 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.