Guest guest Posted March 27, 2008 Report Share Posted March 27, 2008 I am reconsidering my ideas about pesticides or at least certain of them, used for plants and fruits. Apparently, many plants produce toxins that fail the Ame's test: http://tierneylab.blogs.nytimes.com/2007/06/06/synthetic-v-natural-pesticides/ Well, one might conclude, correctly, that our bodies might at least have developed some resistance to these older toxins than to the new synthetic ones. Why add one more thing for our liver to deal with? But it occurs to me that organic plants have been developed to be resistant to insects, etc, which means that they have developed new toxins. Who is to say that these might not be as bad or worse than some of the synthetic pesticides? After all, we need only go and eat some types of mushroom or, for that matter, acorns if we want to get the experience that " natural " is not always safe. I would appreciate if you can provide an intelligent, non-dogmatic, discussion of this or can point me to sources of such discussion. - Things fall apart; the center cannot hold; Mere anarchy is loosed upon the world, The blood-dimmed tide is loosed, and everywhere The ceremony of innocence is drowned; The best lack all conviction, while the worst Are full of passionate intensity. -WB Yeats ________________________________________________________________________________\ ____ Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Mobile. Try it now. http://mobile./;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.