Guest guest Posted October 1, 2008 Report Share Posted October 1, 2008 My first child has A- blood, so thankfully Rhogram wasn't an issue. I'm 13 weeks pregnant with number two, so it's time to start looking into this issue again. My midwife has 10 children and she took it (only after the birth). She recommends it after birth, if necessary, despite it being a blood product with aluminum or whatever garbage is in it these days. (She once had a patient who became sensitized and the baby needed a transfusion.) She understands my concerns and agrees it's less necessary with a gentle birth. However, in her opinion, the risk of disease or problems from the preservatives is worth taking, especially if a patient may decide to have a large family. Any thoughts? To me, it seems hard to believe that God would design us in a way that would require Rhogam shots to protect future babies. On the other hand, when a mother becomes sensitized, future babies suffer. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.