Guest guest Posted April 16, 2008 Report Share Posted April 16, 2008 - > , I think you're right that " too much " is probably different for > everyone. Here's a biased, but interesting opinion from an expert on > brewing: I think that's a bit too biased to be meaningful. Note the conclusion. >> " The message for consumers, " Bamforth said, " is that the only >> sustainable and sensible way to lose weight and avoid weight gain is >> to focus on the calorie content of all foods and beverages, including >> beer, " Bamforth said. He's pretty clearly opposing the notion that carb restriction (as opposed to calorie counting) is a " sustainable " and " sensible " way to lose weight and avoid weight gain, which I think most of us would agree is patent nonsense. Of course, as a purveyor of beer, what else can he say? Beers are carby. Here's a page with carb and calorie counts for a number of beers. <http://www.beer100.com/ beercalories.htm> Oh, and here's another one with a few additional data points. <http://www.realbeer.com/edu/health/calories.php> On the low end there's stuff like Michelob Ultra, a low-carb beer, with 2.6g of carb (not counting alcohol, of course) and 95 calories. On the high end, there's stuff like Sam Boston Ale, with 19.9g and 160 calories and Sam Cream Stout, with 23.94g of carb and 195 calories. I've had a couple Michelob Ultras, and they are BORING. Pretty much the ultimate in pointless, empty calories, even if they don't have many carbs. 84.6 calories of alcohol for absolutely no gustatory enjoyment whatsoever. Between the alcohol and the carbs, though, just one regular, carby beer is pretty much enough to destroy weight loss for many people, and more than one... well, it wouldn't be a pretty picture. Dry red wines, I think, are roughly in light beer territory, which is to say a glass is a little carbier and more caloric than a Michelob Ultra, though it probably varies significantly from wine to wine. And of course it also depends on how you pour the glass. <g> I think dry whites are a little less carby (maybe closer to a low-carb beer) though maybe not any less caloric. Regardless of the straight carb count of various drinks, though, I think not counting alcohol at all when trying to lose (or maintain) weight through carb restriction is a mistake. Alcohol has 7 calories per gram, and while only a relatively small amount of it is turned directly into fat, most of it is converted to acetate, which then shuts off the body's own fat burning for quite some time while the acetate is metabolized. Alcohol further contributes to the problem by stimulating appetite, so when drinking, you're likely to eat more... right when your fat burning is shut off, meaning more of your larger portion of food will be converted to fat and deposited rather than being burned. - Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.