Guest guest Posted November 2, 2008 Report Share Posted November 2, 2008 , > Actually, I do have a reference, although I'm not sure what data was > used to support this conclusion: > http://www.westonaprice.org/brochures/wapfbrochure.html > ========================================================== > Characteristics of Traditional Diets > 7. Total fat content of traditional diets varies from 30 percent to 80 > percent of calories but only about 4 percent of calories come from > polyunsaturated oils naturally occurring in grains, legumes, nuts, > fish, animal fats and vegetables. The balance of fat calories is in > the form of saturated and monounsaturated fatty acids. > ========================================================== Yes I'm familiar with the WAPF position, as I alluded to in my previous post, but WAPF has no apparent reference for what they are saying, so right now it appears to me to be an arbitrary statement. I'm certainly not arguing that PUFA should be higher, in fact I have believed for quite awhile that it should be lower than 4% as a general rule, and Chris's Special Report on the topic seems to confirm that in a pretty rigorous fashion. http://www.wolfrivernaturals.com/chris-masterjohn-special-reports.htm -- Buffalo too, has beautiful summers but not this year. Cool and rainy. For the first time in ten years, we never installed the air conditioners. My line on all this is, somebody better do something about global warming before I freeze to death. - Ostrowski " If you're not on somebody's watch list, you're not doing your job " - Dave Von Kleist Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 2, 2008 Report Share Posted November 2, 2008 - I agree, but it's basically impossible to keep PUFA meaningfully below 4% on a high-fat, whole-foodsy sort of diet. I get most of my fat from dairy, for example, and butter fat is unfortunately almost 4% PUFA. - > I'm certainly not arguing that PUFA should be higher, in fact I have > believed for quite awhile that it should be lower than 4% as a general > rule, and Chris's Special Report on the topic seems to confirm that in > a pretty rigorous fashion. > > http://www.wolfrivernaturals.com/chris-masterjohn-special-reports.htm Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 2, 2008 Report Share Posted November 2, 2008 , > I agree, but it's basically impossible to keep PUFA meaningfully below > 4% on a high-fat, whole-foodsy sort of diet. I get most of my fat > from dairy, for example, and butter fat is unfortunately almost 4% PUFA. Definitely so if dairy is a large part of your diet. You would have to eliminate dairy for the most part and probably lower your intake of animal foods overall. I depend a lot on dairy fat myself. I'm not sure how great a concern it is depending on other variables, but I do think we should probably stop referencing the unverified attribution of 4% made by the WAPF, which I know you didn't but originally did. -- Buffalo too, has beautiful summers but not this year. Cool and rainy. For the first time in ten years, we never installed the air conditioners. My line on all this is, somebody better do something about global warming before I freeze to death. - Ostrowski " If you're not on somebody's watch list, you're not doing your job " - Dave Von Kleist Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 2, 2008 Report Share Posted November 2, 2008 - > Definitely so if dairy is a large part of your diet. You would have to > eliminate dairy for the most part and probably lower your intake of > animal foods overall. I depend a lot on dairy fat myself. I'm not sure > how great a concern it is depending on other variables, but I do think > we should probably stop referencing the unverified attribution of 4% > made by the WAPF, which I know you didn't but originally did. Yeah, the 4% threshold itself is probably of no particular value, but based on Chris's work, I'd think reducing PUFA consumption dramatically below 4% would be generally desirable, so if anything, the situation is much worse than the WAPF figure suggests, not better. That said, replacing animal fat with carbs would have far more immediate and dramatic negative effects on my health, so it's simply not an option for me, and probably shouldn't be for most people and maybe even everyone. - Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.