Guest guest Posted November 1, 2008 Report Share Posted November 1, 2008 , > Too bad they don't require the amount of polyunsaturated fat to be > labeled. That's a lot more important than the amount of saturated fat! In at least some contexts, it is a lot more important than the amount of trans fat as well: http://jn.nutrition.org/cgi/reprint/51/3/441 In the above-linked study, the toxic and diabetes-producing effects of alloxan were directly proportional to the unsaturation of the fat in the diet. Saturated fat was protective compared to carbohydrate, but PUFA was aggravative. Vitamin E did not protect against the effect of PUFA at all, but partial hydrogenation *did* protect against both the toxic and diabetogenic effects. Chris Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 2, 2008 Report Share Posted November 2, 2008 Oh great, so now I can't see what to avoid; partially hydrogenated or fully hydrogenated. And is E protective against anything? I just bought red palm oil for it's full spectrum E. I also just went to a talk where a wholistic doctor just learned that anti oxydents were bad; that they were only for the plant's protection and we eat them with no such protection for ourselves. Once again, white and black change positions. On Nov 1, 2008, at 7:20 PM, Masterjohn wrote: In the above-linked study, the toxic and diabetes-producing effects of alloxan were directly proportional to the unsaturation of the fat in the diet. Saturated fat was protective compared to carbohydrate, but PUFA was aggravative. Vitamin E did not protect against the effect of PUFA at all, but partial hydrogenation *did* protect against both the toxic and diabetogenic effects. Parashis artpages@... artpagesonline.com Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 2, 2008 Report Share Posted November 2, 2008 On 11/2/08, Parashis <artpages@...> wrote: > Oh great, so now I can't see what to avoid; partially hydrogenated or > fully hydrogenated. And is E protective against anything? I just bought > red palm oil for it's full spectrum E. I also just went to a talk where > a wholistic doctor just learned that anti oxydents were bad; that they > were only for the plant's protection and we eat them with no such > protection for ourselves. Some antioxidants are protective and some aren't. There is good evidence that blueberries are protective. Red palm oil protects against atherosclerosis in primates. I don't know if it's the vitamin E or not. It is best to maximize the vitamin E in your diet if for no other reason because it *might* be important, but it is not a replacement for restricting PUFA. Chris Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.