Jump to content
RemedySpot.com

Productivity

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Re: performance appraisal assessing dollars charged/hour:

I would find it ethically challenging as a therapist knowing that my

performance appraisal and thus likely my raise are partly contingent

upon using higher-revenue codes. It would appear to put oneself at

an ethical crossroads between doing what may be better for a patient

versus what may be better for one's checking account with a pay

raise?

>

> Steve-

>

> Our outpatient productivity standard is 2.8 one-on-one units

charged per

> hour worked.

>

> That equals 112 units in a 40-hour week.

>

> That equals 70% productivity.

>

> I count all the staff meetings, marketing visits, documentation

time, etc.

> etc. as hours worked.

>

> One of the scoring parameters on our performance appraisals asks

for units

> per hour worked and another asks for dollars charged per hour

worked. The

> latter is to encourage clinicians to charge higher quality codes.

>

> Rene van Doorn

> Highline Therapy Services

> Seattle

>

> Productivity

>

>

> Can anyone share what standards they use for in patient OT and

PT,

> along with outpatient OT and PT. I.e are standards 75% of time

worked

> billable etc. Just looking for some comparisons, Also do people

ie

> productivity to their performance evaluations and how do you

break

> down average, above average etc.

>

> Steve Brown PT,SCS,ATC

> Clinical Coordinator of Rehabilitation

> Mercy Memorial Hospital System

> Monroe, MI

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Our company expects 32 units per day or 160 units per week. That is

100% productivity. Until recently we were all salaried. Now we are

being pain commission. A percentage of each charges. The more charges

we record the more money each therapists make. Makes for interesting

discussion regarding ethics.

Lynette Jamison

Director Of Aquatic & Rehab Services

6309 E. Baywood Avenue

Mesa, AZ 85206

ext 208

Fax

________________________________

From: PTManager [mailto:PTManager ] On

Behalf Of Rene Vandoorn

Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2007 5:08 PM

To: PTManager

Subject: RE: Productivity

Steve-

Our outpatient productivity standard is 2.8 one-on-one units charged per

hour worked.

That equals 112 units in a 40-hour week.

That equals 70% productivity.

I count all the staff meetings, marketing visits, documentation time,

etc.

etc. as hours worked.

One of the scoring parameters on our performance appraisals asks for

units

per hour worked and another asks for dollars charged per hour worked.

The

latter is to encourage clinicians to charge higher quality codes.

Rene van Doorn

Highline Therapy Services

Seattle

Productivity

Can anyone share what standards they use for in patient OT and PT,

along with outpatient OT and PT. I.e are standards 75% of time worked

billable etc. Just looking for some comparisons, Also do people ie

productivity to their performance evaluations and how do you break

down average, above average etc.

Steve Brown PT,SCS,ATC

Clinical Coordinator of Rehabilitation

Mercy Memorial Hospital System

Monroe, MI

Link to comment
Share on other sites

bfs-

You are absolutely right. We have made a direct link between the company's

bottom line and the employee's bottom line. We believe that there should be

a component of that in the employee's understanding of how a business

operates.

Our performance appraisal covers 36 parameters and 2 address productivity.

That's 5.5% of their performance appraisal. Then only 10% of their pay is

affected by the outcome of the performance review. That means these

production parameters could affect a maximum of 0.5% of their pay.

Clinicians should have their knowledge, skills, evidence, ethics and

evaluation findings direct their intervention decisions. We don't feel that

our system challenges them to forego these priorities.

But it does raise a question for the group: at what percentage would we

start enticing clinicians to forego their ethical priorities? And, how do

bonus programs or incentive bonuses fit into this story? It seems to me that

those programs are widely used, but rarely questioned for their enticing

qualities.

Rene van Doorn

Highline Therapy Services

Seattle

Productivity

>

>

> Can anyone share what standards they use for in patient OT and

PT,

> along with outpatient OT and PT. I.e are standards 75% of time

worked

> billable etc. Just looking for some comparisons, Also do people

ie

> productivity to their performance evaluations and how do you

break

> down average, above average etc.

>

> Steve Brown PT,SCS,ATC

> Clinical Coordinator of Rehabilitation

> Mercy Memorial Hospital System

> Monroe, MI

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How many hours per day are worked to achieve the 32 units?

If the therapists are working 8 hours, the company must have zero tolerance for

no shows, cancellations, or changes in treatment plans that do not allow for

100% billable time with the patient.

This is an unrealistic expectation and sets up the therapists to either inflate

their billing and question ethics? Or work greater then 8 hours to achieve the

productivity requirements.

Ann Heiman, MS, MPT

Director of Rehab Services

aheiman@...

________________________________

From: PTManager [mailto:PTManager ] On Behalf Of

Lynette Jamison

Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2007 12:18 PM

To: PTManager

Subject: RE: Productivity

Our company expects 32 units per day or 160 units per week. That is

100% productivity. Until recently we were all salaried. Now we are

being pain commission. A percentage of each charges. The more charges

we record the more money each therapists make. Makes for interesting

discussion regarding ethics.

Lynette Jamison

Director Of Aquatic & Rehab Services

6309 E. Baywood Avenue

Mesa, AZ 85206

ext 208

Fax

________________________________

From: PTManager <mailto:PTManager%40yahoogroups.com>

[mailto:PTManager <mailto:PTManager%40yahoogroups.com> ] On

Behalf Of Rene Vandoorn

Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2007 5:08 PM

To: PTManager <mailto:PTManager%40yahoogroups.com>

Subject: RE: Productivity

Steve-

Our outpatient productivity standard is 2.8 one-on-one units charged per

hour worked.

That equals 112 units in a 40-hour week.

That equals 70% productivity.

I count all the staff meetings, marketing visits, documentation time,

etc.

etc. as hours worked.

One of the scoring parameters on our performance appraisals asks for

units

per hour worked and another asks for dollars charged per hour worked.

The

latter is to encourage clinicians to charge higher quality codes.

Rene van Doorn

Highline Therapy Services

Seattle

Productivity

Can anyone share what standards they use for in patient OT and PT,

along with outpatient OT and PT. I.e are standards 75% of time worked

billable etc. Just looking for some comparisons, Also do people ie

productivity to their performance evaluations and how do you break

down average, above average etc.

Steve Brown PT,SCS,ATC

Clinical Coordinator of Rehabilitation

Mercy Memorial Hospital System

Monroe, MI

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree that the 32 units for an 8 hour day is unrealistic and can only

be achieved if a therapist does not take a lunch, break, or any

scheduled non-productive meetings and does not have any

cancellations/no-shows. Our goal is 80% or 6.4 billable hours or

approximately 26 units.

Ann O'Donnell

Director, Physical Medicine Department

Methodist Charlton Medical Center

3500 Wheatland Road

Dallas, Texas 75237

Office

Fax

________________________________

From: PTManager [mailto:PTManager ] On

Behalf Of Ann Heiman

Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2007 8:45 AM

To: PTManager

Subject: RE: Productivity

How many hours per day are worked to achieve the 32 units?

If the therapists are working 8 hours, the company must have zero

tolerance for no shows, cancellations, or changes in treatment plans

that do not allow for 100% billable time with the patient.

This is an unrealistic expectation and sets up the therapists to either

inflate their billing and question ethics? Or work greater then 8 hours

to achieve the productivity requirements.

Ann Heiman, MS, MPT

Director of Rehab Services

aheiman@... <mailto:aheiman%40spencerhospital.org>

________________________________

From: PTManager <mailto:PTManager%40yahoogroups.com>

[mailto:PTManager <mailto:PTManager%40yahoogroups.com> ]

On Behalf Of Lynette Jamison

Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2007 12:18 PM

To: PTManager <mailto:PTManager%40yahoogroups.com>

Subject: RE: Productivity

Our company expects 32 units per day or 160 units per week. That is

100% productivity. Until recently we were all salaried. Now we are

being pain commission. A percentage of each charges. The more charges

we record the more money each therapists make. Makes for interesting

discussion regarding ethics.

Lynette Jamison

Director Of Aquatic & Rehab Services

6309 E. Baywood Avenue

Mesa, AZ 85206

ext 208

Fax

________________________________

From: PTManager <mailto:PTManager%40yahoogroups.com>

<mailto:PTManager%40yahoogroups.com> [mailto:PTManager

<mailto:PTManager%40yahoogroups.com>

<mailto:PTManager%40yahoogroups.com> ] On

Behalf Of Rene Vandoorn

Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2007 5:08 PM

To: PTManager <mailto:PTManager%40yahoogroups.com>

<mailto:PTManager%40yahoogroups.com>

Subject: RE: Productivity

Steve-

Our outpatient productivity standard is 2.8 one-on-one units charged per

hour worked.

That equals 112 units in a 40-hour week.

That equals 70% productivity.

I count all the staff meetings, marketing visits, documentation time,

etc.

etc. as hours worked.

One of the scoring parameters on our performance appraisals asks for

units

per hour worked and another asks for dollars charged per hour worked.

The

latter is to encourage clinicians to charge higher quality codes.

Rene van Doorn

Highline Therapy Services

Seattle

Productivity

Can anyone share what standards they use for in patient OT and PT,

along with outpatient OT and PT. I.e are standards 75% of time worked

billable etc. Just looking for some comparisons, Also do people ie

productivity to their performance evaluations and how do you break

down average, above average etc.

Steve Brown PT,SCS,ATC

Clinical Coordinator of Rehabilitation

Mercy Memorial Hospital System

Monroe, MI

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Many therapy companies and therapists see 2 patients every 45 minutes. And

when they bill 3-4 units per patient, the 100% productivity becomes

attainable. The difficulty comes in with Medicare patients and 1 on 1 vs

group charge. The question of quality of care is a valid one.

Normington

Cherokee, Iowa

From: PTManager [mailto:PTManager ] On Behalf

Of Ann Heiman

Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2007 8:45 AM

To: PTManager

Subject: RE: Productivity

How many hours per day are worked to achieve the 32 units?

If the therapists are working 8 hours, the company must have zero tolerance

for no shows, cancellations, or changes in treatment plans that do not allow

for 100% billable time with the patient.

This is an unrealistic expectation and sets up the therapists to either

inflate their billing and question ethics? Or work greater then 8 hours to

achieve the productivity requirements.

Ann Heiman, MS, MPT

Director of Rehab Services

aheiman@... <mailto:aheiman%40spencerhospital.org>

________________________________

From: PTManager <mailto:PTManager%40yahoogroups.com>

[mailto:PTManager <mailto:PTManager%40yahoogroups.com> ] On

Behalf Of Lynette Jamison

Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2007 12:18 PM

To: PTManager <mailto:PTManager%40yahoogroups.com>

Subject: RE: Productivity

Our company expects 32 units per day or 160 units per week. That is

100% productivity. Until recently we were all salaried. Now we are

being pain commission. A percentage of each charges. The more charges

we record the more money each therapists make. Makes for interesting

discussion regarding ethics.

Lynette Jamison

Director Of Aquatic & Rehab Services

6309 E. Baywood Avenue

Mesa, AZ 85206

ext 208

Fax

________________________________

From: PTManager <mailto:PTManager%40yahoogroups.com>

<mailto:PTManager%40yahoogroups.com> [mailto:PTManager

<mailto:PTManager%40yahoogroups.com> <mailto:PTManager%40yahoogroups.com> ]

On

Behalf Of Rene Vandoorn

Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2007 5:08 PM

To: PTManager <mailto:PTManager%40yahoogroups.com>

<mailto:PTManager%40yahoogroups.com>

Subject: RE: Productivity

Steve-

Our outpatient productivity standard is 2.8 one-on-one units charged per

hour worked.

That equals 112 units in a 40-hour week.

That equals 70% productivity.

I count all the staff meetings, marketing visits, documentation time,

etc.

etc. as hours worked.

One of the scoring parameters on our performance appraisals asks for

units

per hour worked and another asks for dollars charged per hour worked.

The

latter is to encourage clinicians to charge higher quality codes.

Rene van Doorn

Highline Therapy Services

Seattle

Productivity

Can anyone share what standards they use for in patient OT and PT,

along with outpatient OT and PT. I.e are standards 75% of time worked

billable etc. Just looking for some comparisons, Also do people ie

productivity to their performance evaluations and how do you break

down average, above average etc.

Steve Brown PT,SCS,ATC

Clinical Coordinator of Rehabilitation

Mercy Memorial Hospital System

Monroe, MI

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Listserve:

I couldn't agree more with Ann Heiman's posting. The requirement of 32

units in an 8 hour day is setting the therapist up for an unethical,

unrealistic situation at best. Knowing full well that patient

documentation time is not billable, when are the therapists expected to

document? If they do so during their 8 hour day, they are never going

to meet their productivity expectation. If they are expected to

document on their own time, outside of their 8 hours, it is illegal not

to pay them for that time. If I were hunting for a job, I would be very

careful about what my potential employer's productivity expectations

are. I would direct this warning to new-grad therapists especially,

knowing that they may not be as well versed about what is and isn't

billable time.

Thanks,

Curtis Marti

Hillcrest Medical Center

Tulsa, OK

________________________________

From: PTManager [mailto:PTManager ] On

Behalf Of Ann Heiman

Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2007 8:45 AM

To: PTManager

Subject: RE: Productivity

How many hours per day are worked to achieve the 32 units?

If the therapists are working 8 hours, the company must have zero

tolerance for no shows, cancellations, or changes in treatment plans

that do not allow for 100% billable time with the patient.

This is an unrealistic expectation and sets up the therapists to either

inflate their billing and question ethics? Or work greater then 8 hours

to achieve the productivity requirements.

Ann Heiman, MS, MPT

Director of Rehab Services

aheiman@... <mailto:aheiman%40spencerhospital.org>

________________________________

From: PTManager <mailto:PTManager%40yahoogroups.com>

[mailto:PTManager <mailto:PTManager%40yahoogroups.com> ]

On Behalf Of Lynette Jamison

Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2007 12:18 PM

To: PTManager <mailto:PTManager%40yahoogroups.com>

Subject: RE: Productivity

Our company expects 32 units per day or 160 units per week. That is

100% productivity. Until recently we were all salaried. Now we are

being pain commission. A percentage of each charges. The more charges

we record the more money each therapists make. Makes for interesting

discussion regarding ethics.

Lynette Jamison

Director Of Aquatic & Rehab Services

6309 E. Baywood Avenue

Mesa, AZ 85206

ext 208

Fax

________________________________

From: PTManager <mailto:PTManager%40yahoogroups.com>

<mailto:PTManager%40yahoogroups.com> [mailto:PTManager

<mailto:PTManager%40yahoogroups.com>

<mailto:PTManager%40yahoogroups.com> ] On

Behalf Of Rene Vandoorn

Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2007 5:08 PM

To: PTManager <mailto:PTManager%40yahoogroups.com>

<mailto:PTManager%40yahoogroups.com>

Subject: RE: Productivity

Steve-

Our outpatient productivity standard is 2.8 one-on-one units charged per

hour worked.

That equals 112 units in a 40-hour week.

That equals 70% productivity.

I count all the staff meetings, marketing visits, documentation time,

etc.

etc. as hours worked.

One of the scoring parameters on our performance appraisals asks for

units

per hour worked and another asks for dollars charged per hour worked.

The

latter is to encourage clinicians to charge higher quality codes.

Rene van Doorn

Highline Therapy Services

Seattle

Productivity

Can anyone share what standards they use for in patient OT and PT,

along with outpatient OT and PT. I.e are standards 75% of time worked

billable etc. Just looking for some comparisons, Also do people ie

productivity to their performance evaluations and how do you break

down average, above average etc.

Steve Brown PT,SCS,ATC

Clinical Coordinator of Rehabilitation

Mercy Memorial Hospital System

Monroe, MI

Link to comment
Share on other sites

At my clinic, we have set a standard of 10-12 patients seen per therapist in a

10 hour day. Cancellations and DNS happen so I do not base productivity on

patients seen. My PTA's, I have 2 with 5 PT's, must be 90% productive. Meaning

they need to be treating and billing 90% of their total time worked in the

facility.

I have monthly productivity benchmarks for all my therapists. We are an

aquatic/land based treatment facility, and when a patient is an aquatic/land

treatment on the same day, the therapists must have a benchmark of 2.7units of

97113 (aquatics) and 1.2 units of some land code (normally it is 97112). This

totals to 3.9 units/patient who get aquatic/land same day. For land only

patients the benchmark is 3.5 units/pt.

90% of the time we are one on one for all patients.

10% of their performance criteria (for salary appraisals) is based on these

benchmarks.

Hankins, PT

Synergy Therapies, LLC

Independence, MO

synergytherapiesofkc.com

Normington wrote:

Many therapy companies and therapists see 2 patients every 45 minutes.

And

when they bill 3-4 units per patient, the 100% productivity becomes

attainable. The difficulty comes in with Medicare patients and 1 on 1 vs

group charge. The question of quality of care is a valid one.

Normington

Cherokee, Iowa

From: PTManager [mailto:PTManager ] On Behalf

Of Ann Heiman

Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2007 8:45 AM

To: PTManager

Subject: RE: Productivity

How many hours per day are worked to achieve the 32 units?

If the therapists are working 8 hours, the company must have zero tolerance

for no shows, cancellations, or changes in treatment plans that do not allow

for 100% billable time with the patient.

This is an unrealistic expectation and sets up the therapists to either

inflate their billing and question ethics? Or work greater then 8 hours to

achieve the productivity requirements.

Ann Heiman, MS, MPT

Director of Rehab Services

aheiman@... <mailto:aheiman%40spencerhospital.org>

________________________________

From: PTManager <mailto:PTManager%40yahoogroups.com>

[mailto:PTManager <mailto:PTManager%40yahoogroups.com> ] On

Behalf Of Lynette Jamison

Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2007 12:18 PM

To: PTManager <mailto:PTManager%40yahoogroups.com>

Subject: RE: Productivity

Our company expects 32 units per day or 160 units per week. That is

100% productivity. Until recently we were all salaried. Now we are

being pain commission. A percentage of each charges. The more charges

we record the more money each therapists make. Makes for interesting

discussion regarding ethics.

Lynette Jamison

Director Of Aquatic & Rehab Services

6309 E. Baywood Avenue

Mesa, AZ 85206

ext 208

Fax

________________________________

From: PTManager <mailto:PTManager%40yahoogroups.com>

<mailto:PTManager%40yahoogroups.com> [mailto:PTManager

<mailto:PTManager%40yahoogroups.com> <mailto:PTManager%40yahoogroups.com> ]

On

Behalf Of Rene Vandoorn

Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2007 5:08 PM

To: PTManager <mailto:PTManager%40yahoogroups.com>

<mailto:PTManager%40yahoogroups.com>

Subject: RE: Productivity

Steve-

Our outpatient productivity standard is 2.8 one-on-one units charged per

hour worked.

That equals 112 units in a 40-hour week.

That equals 70% productivity.

I count all the staff meetings, marketing visits, documentation time,

etc.

etc. as hours worked.

One of the scoring parameters on our performance appraisals asks for

units

per hour worked and another asks for dollars charged per hour worked.

The

latter is to encourage clinicians to charge higher quality codes.

Rene van Doorn

Highline Therapy Services

Seattle

Productivity

Can anyone share what standards they use for in patient OT and PT,

along with outpatient OT and PT. I.e are standards 75% of time worked

billable etc. Just looking for some comparisons, Also do people ie

productivity to their performance evaluations and how do you break

down average, above average etc.

Steve Brown PT,SCS,ATC

Clinical Coordinator of Rehabilitation

Mercy Memorial Hospital System

Monroe, MI

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rene,

Perhaps I am wrong, but I think we are dealing with the difference between

" ethical " issues and " legal " issues. It is my understanding that all

insurance companies do not follow the 8 minute rule. Legally, only Medicare

does. So many of my carries do not set rules on how many minutes constitutes

" 1 " unit billed. Now, in my area I believe BlueCross has adopted the 8

minute rule. And we, as a hospital, have made the choice to treat everyone

according to that rule. We believe this follows the " uniformed billing "

regulations that are out there. Others disagree and say that that insurance

companies shouldn't dictate care.

So I see both sides and I choose the conservative for my group. I certainly

understand 'timed codes " and all of the minute rules. The system needs some

change to clarify these issues. Remember, the APTA produces mostly

guidelines and not laws. Medicare writes rules for itself, not for private

insurance companies. We need to look to our state practice acts and

insurance companies on many of these issues.

My thoughts.

Normington

Cherokee, Iowa

From: PTManager [mailto:PTManager ] On Behalf

Of Rene Vandoorn

Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2007 11:52 AM

To: PTManager

Subject: RE: Productivity

-

I continue to be baffled that after years of education from the insurance

companies, the APTA and on local levels (cont ed, etc) many therapy

companies don't want to realize that they are committing insurance fraud if

they see 2 patients every 45 minutes and charge 3-4 one-on-one CPT codes for

each patient.

Additionally, one needs to treat 53 minutes to be able to charge 4 units.

So, the many companies you're referring to are not kosher on 2 fronts. I

wouldn't want to be associated with them.

Now, if they charge group codes (non one-on-one) for all these treatments,

they are complying with the rules, but those charges and the insurance

reimbursement and the quality of care is significantly lower.

Rene van Doorn

Highline Therapy Services

Seattle

Productivity

Can anyone share what standards they use for in patient OT and PT,

along with outpatient OT and PT. I.e are standards 75% of time worked

billable etc. Just looking for some comparisons, Also do people ie

productivity to their performance evaluations and how do you break

down average, above average etc.

Steve Brown PT,SCS,ATC

Clinical Coordinator of Rehabilitation

Mercy Memorial Hospital System

Monroe, MI

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Kathi-

If you are billing with timed one-on-one CPT codes for 30 minutes of service

you can only charge 2 one-on-one units for one patient at a time.

You need a minimum of 8 minutes of intervention of a timed one-on-one code

to be allowed to charge 1 unit. You need 23 minutes minimum for 2 charges.

You need 38 minutes minimum for 3 units and 53 minutes minimum for 4

charges.

Group codes are untimed, so no matter how much time you spend with a

patient, you can only charge it once for that patient. But you're treating a

group of patients, so if you have 50 patients in a group, then technically

you could charge 50 group codes (one for each patient). In that latter case

you may have to ask yourself if the quality of your care warrants any charge

at all!

I hope this helps.

Rene van Doorn

Highline Therapy Services

Seattle

Productivity

Some one please correct me if I am wrong. It is my interpretation if

you are billing with timed cpt codes, for 30 minutes of service you

can only charge 2 units regardless if you are treating 1 or 50

patients in that time period and only if you spend at least 8 minutes

of 1:1 per patient.

Kathi Lee PT

Carson City MI

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I believe you can only bill the patient 2 units if you spend 23 minutes

of 1:1 time with them if you are talking about a Medicare patient. If

you have more than one patient in the clinic with the Medicare

patient, you must use the group charge. That's been my understanding.

Amy son, OT, CHT

Midwest Hand Therapy

>

> Some one please correct me if I am wrong. It is my interpretation if

> you are billing with timed cpt codes, for 30 minutes of service you

> can only charge 2 units regardless if you are treating 1 or 50

> patients in that time period and only if you spend at least 8 minutes

> of 1:1 per patient.

>

> Kathi Lee PT

> Carson City MI

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 8 months later...
Guest guest

Hello group--

I know we've been around the productivity block before, but would outpatient

clinics please share how they measure their staff's productivity and what is the

benchmark?

We have historically used 75%, so if you take out paperwork time and lunch, we

ask our therapists to be 75%. Does anyone use RVUs? If so, do you have a

reference?

Thanks again,

Laurie Heer, MS,PT

Supervisor of Rehabilitation Services

Medical Associated Health Centers

Wisconsin

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

At our clinic we base productivity based on two values. One is billable time to

total time in facility. Our benchmark is 80% of total time in facility should be

billable time (8 out of 10 hours should be with a patient). If they have

cancellations or DNS, we subtract them off the total time in facility so to not

penalize them for non-compliant patients.

The other productivity factor is total units billed per hour. Our monthly

productivity benchmark is 3.8 & nbsp;procedure & nbsp;units & nbsp;per patient (60 min

treatment slots) for PT's and 3.9 procedure units per patient for PTA's. We also

have defined low productivity values for both. Based on their productivity marks

we tag on a % & nbsp;to these values and that % is added to their annual raises.

So to sum up, a productive & nbsp;PT is treating patients 80% of the time per day

and coding their hourly patients 3.8 procedure units. I

As you may note we do not use modality codes that often due to our philosophy of

care.

& nbsp;

Hope this helps,

Hankins, PT

President

Synergy Therapies, LLC

From: Laurie Heer & lt;heerflute@... & gt;

Subject: Productivity

To: PTManager

Date: Wednesday, June 11, 2008, 4:40 PM

Hello group--

I know we've been around the productivity block before, but would outpatient

clinics please share how they measure their staff's productivity and what is the

benchmark?

We have historically used 75%, so if you take out paperwork time and lunch, we

ask our therapists to be 75%. Does anyone use RVUs? If so, do you have a

reference?

Thanks again,

Laurie Heer, MS,PT

Supervisor of Rehabilitation Services

Medical Associated Health Centers

Wisconsin

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

In the PT Benchmark studies I look at productivity per paid hour and per

clinical hour (time actually available for patient care, so it excludes

meeting time and PTO). Visits are an imperfect measure since the economic

value of visits varies significantly. Therefore I prefer looking at charges

and collections per hour. Charges are easier to monitor on a short term

basis, collections are what really count but requires a longer time frame

due to the delays we experience in collections.

This year's study using FY2007 data from 64 locations across the USA showed

the following medians, although the range and standard deviations were

rather large:

* Visits per licensed hour: 1.091

* Charges per licensed hour: $149.36

* Collections per licensed hour: $97.48

Contact me directly if you'd like further information.

Chuck

R. Felder, PT, MBA

HCS Consulting, Inc.

1303 W 6th St, Ste 104

Corona, CA 92882

Mobile:

Fax:

Office Phone:

CFelder@...

<http://www.hcsconsulting.com/> www.HCSconsulting.com

This message contains confidential information intended only for the

individual name and is protected from disclosure. If you are not the

intended recipient you should delete this message, not use or disclose it in

any form and contact the sender.

_____

From: PTManager [mailto:PTManager ] On Behalf

Of Laurie Heer

Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 2:41 PM

To: PTManager

Subject: Productivity

Hello group--

I know we've been around the productivity block before, but would outpatient

clinics please share how they measure their staff's productivity and what is

the benchmark?

We have historically used 75%, so if you take out paperwork time and lunch,

we ask our therapists to be 75%. Does anyone use RVUs? If so, do you have a

reference?

Thanks again,

Laurie Heer, MS,PT

Supervisor of Rehabilitation Services

Medical Associated Health Centers

Wisconsin

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

We ask our therapists for an average of 80% productivity which equates to

3.2 procedures per hour worked. An evaluation would count as 2 procedures.

E. Muller, PhD, PT

Director of Outpatient Rehab

Stuart, FL.

_____

From: PTManager [mailto:PTManager ] On Behalf

Of bchacko71

Sent: Monday, October 13, 2008 11:08 PM

To: PTManager

Subject: Productivity

Dear Group,

I have been asked by a lot of Physical Therapists during interview's

as to how many patients they are expected to see in a day (8hrs).

Would the members here be kind enough to share their thoughts? Also

what would be a good productivity standard to follow?

Thank you

B. Chacko

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We have a productivity standard of 2.70 units per hour. We are an hospital based

practice mostly outpatient (85%) inpatient (15%), I realize that this is

probably a little low compared to everyone else. We still use a hour for new

evals and half hour for repeat visits. Hopes that this helps.

Jeff Nolder

CRMC

To: PTManager@...: bchacko71@...: Tue, 14 Oct 2008

03:08:20 +0000Subject: Productivity

Dear Group,I have been asked by a lot of Physical Therapists during interview's

as to how many patients they are expected to see in a day (8hrs).Would the

members here be kind enough to share their thoughts? Also what would be a good

productivity standard to follow?Thank youB. Chacko

_________________________________________________________________

Stay up to date on your PC, the Web, and your mobile phone with Windows Live.

http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/msnnkwxp1020093185mrt/direct/01/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think this discussion of productivity is an excellent one. An 80%

efficient therapist is a great valuable member of the team. I might add

that productivity needs to be linked to therapist's pay. Every new hire

needs to understand that, as an employer, I want them to be the highest paid

therapist in the area. But, if they want a high salary, they need to

produce. 3.2 procedures per hour in upstate New York (the lowest

reimbursement in the country) would not be viable. The same productivity in

Texas might be appropriate. A therapist needs to produce approximately 3.8

to 4.5 times their own salary (including benefits) to cover the overhead and

the payroll of administrative staff. Using this formula, the employer can

work backwards from the production the therapist is willing/able to produce

to offer a salary consistent with that production. This prevents the

employer from setting productivity standards based upon units per hour

(which has been controversial on this posting site) and allows the employer

to intelligently set salary based upon production. Some PTs and PTAs are

production machines, others are not. The producers should be paid more than

the loafers.

Rob Jordan, PT

_____

From: PTManager [mailto:PTManager ] On Behalf

Of Dr. Muller

Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2008 5:59 AM

To: PTManager

Subject: RE: Productivity

We ask our therapists for an average of 80% productivity which equates to

3.2 procedures per hour worked. An evaluation would count as 2 procedures.

E. Muller, PhD, PT

Director of Outpatient Rehab

Stuart, FL.

_____

From: PTManager@yahoogrou <mailto:PTManager%40yahoogroups.com> ps.com

[mailto:PTManager@yahoogrou <mailto:PTManager%40yahoogroups.com> ps.com] On

Behalf

Of bchacko71

Sent: Monday, October 13, 2008 11:08 PM

To: PTManager@yahoogrou <mailto:PTManager%40yahoogroups.com> ps.com

Subject: Productivity

Dear Group,

I have been asked by a lot of Physical Therapists during interview's

as to how many patients they are expected to see in a day (8hrs).

Would the members here be kind enough to share their thoughts? Also

what would be a good productivity standard to follow?

Thank you

B. Chacko

Link to comment
Share on other sites

B. Chacko,

We require the following productivity standards for an 8 hour work day.

This is for Acute Care and IRU.

21 UOS (Units of Service) 70% Productivity

24 UOS (Unit of Service) 80% Productivity

Do others require the same?

B. Stowers, PTA, Ed.D.

Clinical Manager

CHRISTUS -St. Regional Medical Center

Rehabilitation Services

________________________________

From: PTManager [mailto:PTManager ] On

Behalf Of bchacko71

Sent: Monday, October 13, 2008 9:08 PM

To: PTManager

Subject: Productivity

Dear Group,

I have been asked by a lot of Physical Therapists during interview's

as to how many patients they are expected to see in a day (8hrs).

Would the members here be kind enough to share their thoughts? Also

what would be a good productivity standard to follow?

Thank you

B. Chacko

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 PT with an Aid 2 patients per hour (4 units). New evals 1 hour and 1 hour

for notes. 13 patients per day. PT is salary 90K plus 10% bonus over 21K

month collections. aid is 18/hour.

Productivity

Dear Group,I have been asked by a lot of Physical Therapists during

interview's as to how many patients they are expected to see in a day

(8hrs).Would the members here be kind enough to share their thoughts? Also

what would be a good productivity standard to follow?Thank youB. Chacko

__________________________________________________________

Stay up to date on your PC, the Web, and your mobile phone with Windows

Live.

http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/msnnkwxp1020093185mrt/direct/01/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Recently, I have been conducting my own informal survey of productivity

standards. Unfortunately, we do not all measure in the exactly the same

way. The definition of " units " is muddy at best. Some of us count

" billed " units, others count " timed " units. In addition, some of us

include time not directly linked to CPT procedures, such as team

conference time or time spent in consultation with other caregivers.

For those of us who measure productivity in units per hour, I would like

to survey productivity expectations with just two points of comparison:

* Type of facility / setting

* Expected percentage of treatment time per hour or number of

15-minute timed units per hour (including both timed and untimed

procedures) based only upon the linear time spent providing skilled

therapy procedures (as defined by Rehab-designated CPT codes)

Thanks very much,

Jane Meador

Director of Rehabilitation Services

Truman Medical Center

Kansas City, Mo

816 404-4328

________________________________

From: PTManager [mailto:PTManager ] On

Behalf Of Babloo Chacko

Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2008 3:08 PM

To: PTManager

Subject: RE: Productivity

I agree with you Rob Jordan. The discussion of productivity is very

appropriate. I have come across new graduates as well as " seasoned "

therapists who always ask about the number of patients that they are

expected to see in an 8 hr day. They all expect to be paid top dollars

for their service but does not show productivity to justify the pay. I

have been trying to find an answer for a PT and tech working together as

to how many patients that they should see in an 8 hr period not

including evals or re-evals.

Thank you

B. Chacko

From: Jordan <rjordanpt@...

<mailto:rjordanpt%40cablelynx.com> >

Subject: RE: Productivity

To: PTManager <mailto:PTManager%40yahoogroups.com>

Date: Tuesday, October 14, 2008, 9:21 AM

I think this discussion of productivity is an excellent one. An 80%

efficient therapist is a great valuable member of the team. I might add

that productivity needs to be linked to therapist's pay. Every new hire

needs to understand that, as an employer, I want them to be the highest

paid

therapist in the area. But, if they want a high salary, they need to

produce. 3.2 procedures per hour in upstate New York (the lowest

reimbursement in the country) would not be viable. The same productivity

in

Texas might be appropriate. A therapist needs to produce approximately

3.8

to 4.5 times their own salary (including benefits) to cover the overhead

and

the payroll of administrative staff. Using this formula, the employer

can

work backwards from the production the therapist is willing/able to

produce

to offer a salary consistent with that production. This prevents the

employer from setting productivity standards based upon units per hour

(which has been controversial on this posting site) and allows the

employer

to intelligently set salary based upon production. Some PTs and PTAs are

production machines, others are not. The producers should be paid more

than

the loafers.

Rob Jordan, PT

_____

From: PTManager@yahoogrou ps.com [mailto:PTManager@yahoogrou ps.com] On

Behalf

Of Dr. Muller

Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2008 5:59 AM

To: PTManager@yahoogrou ps.com

Subject: RE: Productivity

We ask our therapists for an average of 80% productivity which equates

to

3.2 procedures per hour worked. An evaluation would count as 2

procedures.

E. Muller, PhD, PT

Director of Outpatient Rehab

Stuart, FL.

_____

From: PTManager@yahoogrou <mailto:PTManager% 40yahoogroups. com> ps.com

[mailto:PTManager@ yahoogrou <mailto:PTManager% 40yahoogroups. com>

ps.com] On

Behalf

Of bchacko71

Sent: Monday, October 13, 2008 11:08 PM

To: PTManager@yahoogrou <mailto:PTManager% 40yahoogroups. com> ps.com

Subject: Productivity

Dear Group,

I have been asked by a lot of Physical Therapists during interview's

as to how many patients they are expected to see in a day (8hrs).

Would the members here be kind enough to share their thoughts? Also

what would be a good productivity standard to follow?

Thank you

B. Chacko

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I’d like to comment on some of the previous posts and most especially the

one below with respects to the following quotes---'how many patients do I

have to see in a day'------and -“ We as employers are to blame for not

correcting this unprofessional behavior.”------------I believe that is a

fair question to ask and don’t particularly think it’s unprofessional (if

asked in the proper manner) by a new grad or an experienced employee. Isn’t

it acceptable to know what your new employer expects up front? That being

said, I’ve seen practices where a therapist was expected to see 15-20

patients in a day. I would think that most of us out there would think this

is over the top and too many. I’ve seen places that just had a revolving

door of patients with the goal of seeing as many patients as possible, vs

being more productive with fewer patients and provide better care.

Sure with the high salaries, much is expected. Clear expectations up front

is the key but guidelines and standards still need to be reasonable albeit,

at times we have to stretch ourselves.

Mr. Chacko, our clinic operates very well with a PT treating 9-12 patients

in an 8-8 ½ hour day and be very productive with quality/higher reimbursing

interventions. The real issue here is having to find the most efficient way

for documentation be done without impeding on the family life in the

evening. Then, that’s a whole other subject.

Kevyn Soupiset, MPT

Progressive Therapy & Sports Medicine

117 West 6th Street

Larned, KS 67550

Ph:

Fax:

From: PTManager [mailto:PTManager ] On Behalf

Of Rapposelli

Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2008 8:51 AM

To: PTManager

Subject: RE: Productivity

Amen to the 'how many patients do I have to see in a day' question from a

new grad who wants $70k plus benefits. We as employers are to blame for not

correcting this unprofessional behavior. Besides the benchmarking of revenue

generated that we use, I want to switch to compensation as a percentage of

revenue. If they can not stomach an 'eat what you kill' philosophy, then

accept less pay. 'little risk, little reward'. Perhaps then, these new

grads will be taught about risk vs. reward that they obviously did not get

in PT school. As I tell prospective employees, 'we are all being paid to be

here, including me.'

From: Jordan <rjordanpt@cablelynx .com>

Subject: RE: Productivity

To: PTManager@yahoogrou ps.com

Date: Tuesday, October 14, 2008, 9:21 AM

I think this discussion of productivity is an excellent one. An 80%

efficient therapist is a great valuable member of the team. I might add

that productivity needs to be linked to therapist's pay. Every new hire

needs to understand that, as an employer, I want them to be the highest paid

therapist in the area. But, if they want a high salary, they need to

produce. 3.2 procedures per hour in upstate New York (the lowest

reimbursement in the country) would not be viable. The same productivity in

Texas might be appropriate. A therapist needs to produce approximately 3.8

to 4.5 times their own salary (including benefits) to cover the overhead and

the payroll of administrative staff. Using this formula, the employer can

work backwards from the production the therapist is willing/able to produce

to offer a salary consistent with that production. This prevents the

employer from setting productivity standards based upon units per hour

(which has been controversial on this posting site) and allows the employer

to intelligently set salary based upon production. Some PTs and PTAs are

production machines, others are not. The producers should be paid more than

the loafers.

Rob Jordan, PT

_____

From: PTManager@yahoogrou ps.com [mailto:PTManager@ yahoogrou ps.com] On

Behalf

Of Dr. Muller

Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2008 5:59 AM

To: PTManager@yahoogrou ps.com

Subject: RE: Productivity

We ask our therapists for an average of 80% productivity which equates to

3.2 procedures per hour worked. An evaluation would count as 2 procedures.

E. Muller, PhD, PT

Director of Outpatient Rehab

Stuart, FL.

_____

From: PTManager@yahoogrou <mailto:PTManager% 40yahoogroups. com> ps.com

[mailto:PTManager@ yahoogrou <mailto:PTManager% 40yahoogroups. com> ps.com]

On

Behalf

Of bchacko71

Sent: Monday, October 13, 2008 11:08 PM

To: PTManager@yahoogrou <mailto:PTManager% 40yahoogroups. com> ps.com

Subject: Productivity

Dear Group,

I have been asked by a lot of Physical Therapists during interview's

as to how many patients they are expected to see in a day (8hrs).

Would the members here be kind enough to share their thoughts? Also

what would be a good productivity standard to follow?

Thank you

B. Chacko

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have heard a lot of the same regarding new grads whom have interviewed with

some of my fellow directors. I have interviewed one new grad in the past year.

Asking how many patients are expected to be seen is a fair question, and knowing

what you're worth is respectable from a new grad. I have often heard of new

grads recently declaring how many patients they'll treat in a day rather than

asking. Some schools from what I've seen in Florida are grooming their new grads

to assert how much they want, and how many patients they'll treat in a day in

interviews. They do not have a grasp on productivity however. New

grads' willingness to command such expectations would be quite different were

the job market not still so slim. I've heard of new grad interviews sound

something like " I'll need $70,000, I'll treat 10 patients per day, I won't work

with athletic trainers...etc. The problem is, many do not know what they are

really worth. They only know what the

job market is allowing them to expect. My clinic simply bases the productivity

on cost per visit vs. therapists generated revenue per visit. We average a cost

of $80 per visit for the clinic to operate. Therapists must obviously average

more than that per visit, or see enough patients in a day to lower our per visit

operating cost. Myself and my therapists average $100 per visit. I don't assess

based on units per visit.

 

Bisesi MPT COMT

Winter Haven, FL

From: Jordan <rjordanpt@cablelyn x .com>

Subject: RE: Productivity

To: PTManager@yahoogrou ps.com

Date: Tuesday, October 14, 2008, 9:21 AM

I think this discussion of productivity is an excellent one. An 80%

efficient therapist is a great valuable member of the team. I might add

that productivity needs to be linked to therapist's pay. Every new hire

needs to understand that, as an employer, I want them to be the highest paid

therapist in the area. But, if they want a high salary, they need to

produce. 3.2 procedures per hour in upstate New York (the lowest

reimbursement in the country) would not be viable. The same productivity in

Texas might be appropriate. A therapist needs to produce approximately 3.8

to 4.5 times their own salary (including benefits) to cover the overhead and

the payroll of administrative staff. Using this formula, the employer can

work backwards from the production the therapist is willing/able to produce

to offer a salary consistent with that production. This prevents the

employer from setting productivity standards based upon units per hour

(which has been controversial on this posting site) and allows the employer

to intelligently set salary based upon production. Some PTs and PTAs are

production machines, others are not. The producers should be paid more than

the loafers.

Rob Jordan, PT

_____

From: PTManager@yahoogrou ps.com [mailto:PTManager@ yahoogrou ps.com] On

Behalf

Of Dr. Muller

Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2008 5:59 AM

To: PTManager@yahoogrou ps.com

Subject: RE: Productivity

We ask our therapists for an average of 80% productivity which equates to

3.2 procedures per hour worked. An evaluation would count as 2 procedures.

E. Muller, PhD, PT

Director of Outpatient Rehab

Stuart, FL.

_____

From: PTManager@yahoogrou <mailto:PTManager% 40yahoogroups. com> ps.com

[mailto:PTManager@ yahoogrou <mailto:PTManager% 40yahoogroups. com> ps.com]

On

Behalf

Of bchacko71

Sent: Monday, October 13, 2008 11:08 PM

To: PTManager@yahoogrou <mailto:PTManager% 40yahoogroups. com> ps.com

Subject: Productivity

Dear Group,

I have been asked by a lot of Physical Therapists during interview's

as to how many patients they are expected to see in a day (8hrs).

Would the members here be kind enough to share their thoughts? Also

what would be a good productivity standard to follow?

Thank you

B. Chacko

Link to comment
Share on other sites

,

If you don't mind me asking, when you are assessing revenue per

visit, are you gerneralizing based on insurance companies

reimbursement rate, or do you have the therapists take

responsibility for tracking the actual revenue? We are trying to

find an easier way to do this, but as part of a hospital system, it

is very difficult.

Michigan

>

> From: Jordan <rjordanpt@cablelyn x .com>

> Subject: RE: Productivity

> To: PTManager@yahoogrou ps.com

> Date: Tuesday, October 14, 2008, 9:21 AM

>

> I think this discussion of productivity is an excellent one. An 80%

> efficient therapist is a great valuable member of the team. I

might add

> that productivity needs to be linked to therapist's pay. Every new

hire

> needs to understand that, as an employer, I want them to be the

highest paid

> therapist in the area. But, if they want a high salary, they need

to

> produce. 3.2 procedures per hour in upstate New York (the lowest

> reimbursement in the country) would not be viable. The same

productivity in

> Texas might be appropriate. A therapist needs to produce

approximately 3.8

> to 4.5 times their own salary (including benefits) to cover the

overhead and

> the payroll of administrative staff. Using this formula, the

employer can

> work backwards from the production the therapist is willing/able

to produce

> to offer a salary consistent with that production. This prevents

the

> employer from setting productivity standards based upon units per

hour

> (which has been controversial on this posting site) and allows the

employer

> to intelligently set salary based upon production. Some PTs and

PTAs are

> production machines, others are not. The producers should be paid

more than

> the loafers.

>

> Rob Jordan, PT

>

> _____

>

> From: PTManager@yahoogrou ps.com [mailto:PTManager@ yahoogrou

ps.com] On

> Behalf

> Of Dr. Muller

> Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2008 5:59 AM

> To: PTManager@yahoogrou ps.com

> Subject: RE: Productivity

>

> We ask our therapists for an average of 80% productivity which

equates to

> 3.2 procedures per hour worked. An evaluation would count as 2

procedures.

>

> E. Muller, PhD, PT

>

> Director of Outpatient Rehab

>

> Stuart, FL.

>

> _____

>

> From: PTManager@yahoogrou <mailto:PTManager% 40yahoogroups. com>

ps.com

> [mailto:PTManager@ yahoogrou <mailto:PTManager% 40yahoogroups.

com> ps.com]

> On

> Behalf

> Of bchacko71

> Sent: Monday, October 13, 2008 11:08 PM

> To: PTManager@yahoogrou <mailto:PTManager% 40yahoogroups. com>

ps.com

> Subject: Productivity

>

> Dear Group,

> I have been asked by a lot of Physical Therapists during

interview's

> as to how many patients they are expected to see in a day (8hrs).

> Would the members here be kind enough to share their thoughts?

Also

> what would be a good productivity standard to follow?

> Thank you

> B. Chacko

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

With cost per visit, I assess this monthly. I look at numbers for total overhead

for a given  month - salaries, space rental etc (all expenses), which fluctuates

obviously, and divide that by the total visits for that month. So, for a sample

month, the expense is $80 per visit, I then evaluate therapists as a team

and individually on whether they are generating more than that per visit. It

works out because, if we have a very busy month, the therapists may have more

patients and not be able to bill as much per visit. However, with more patients,

the cost per visit will drop. Looking at two sample months, we averaged $68,000

overhead for all expenses: one month we saw 850 patients and the cost per visit

was $80. My therapists averaged $100 revenue per visit. Another month we saw 920

patients and the cost per visit lowered to $74 per visit, and the therapists

averaged $95 revenue per visit. If I were evaluating the therapists'

productivity on

units per visit, productivity would have dropped. If I am rating revenue per

visit vs operating cost per visit, productivity increased.

 

Bisesi MPT COMT

Winter Haven, FL

 

Subject: Re: Productivity

To: PTManager

Date: Thursday, October 16, 2008, 9:29 AM

,

If you don't mind me asking, when you are assessing revenue per

visit, are you gerneralizing based on insurance companies

reimbursement rate, or do you have the therapists take

responsibility for tracking the actual revenue? We are trying to

find an easier way to do this, but as part of a hospital system, it

is very difficult.

Michigan

>

> From: Jordan <rjordanpt@cablelyn x .com>

> Subject: RE: Productivity

> To: PTManager@yahoogrou ps.com

> Date: Tuesday, October 14, 2008, 9:21 AM

>

> I think this discussion of productivity is an excellent one. An 80%

> efficient therapist is a great valuable member of the team. I

might add

> that productivity needs to be linked to therapist's pay. Every new

hire

> needs to understand that, as an employer, I want them to be the

highest paid

> therapist in the area. But, if they want a high salary, they need

to

> produce. 3.2 procedures per hour in upstate New York (the lowest

> reimbursement in the country) would not be viable. The same

productivity in

> Texas might be appropriate. A therapist needs to produce

approximately 3.8

> to 4.5 times their own salary (including benefits) to cover the

overhead and

> the payroll of administrative staff. Using this formula, the

employer can

> work backwards from the production the therapist is willing/able

to produce

> to offer a salary consistent with that production. This prevents

the

> employer from setting productivity standards based upon units per

hour

> (which has been controversial on this posting site) and allows the

employer

> to intelligently set salary based upon production. Some PTs and

PTAs are

> production machines, others are not. The producers should be paid

more than

> the loafers.

>

> Rob Jordan, PT

>

> _____

>

> From: PTManager@yahoogrou ps.com [mailto:PTManager@ yahoogrou

ps.com] On

> Behalf

> Of Dr. Muller

> Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2008 5:59 AM

> To: PTManager@yahoogrou ps.com

> Subject: RE: Productivity

>

> We ask our therapists for an average of 80% productivity which

equates to

> 3.2 procedures per hour worked. An evaluation would count as 2

procedures.

>

> E. Muller, PhD, PT

>

> Director of Outpatient Rehab

>

> Stuart, FL.

>

> _____

>

> From: PTManager@yahoogrou <mailto:PTManager% 40yahoogroups. com>

ps.com

> [mailto:PTManager@ yahoogrou <mailto:PTManager% 40yahoogroups.

com> ps.com]

> On

> Behalf

> Of bchacko71

> Sent: Monday, October 13, 2008 11:08 PM

> To: PTManager@yahoogrou <mailto:PTManager% 40yahoogroups. com>

ps.com

> Subject: Productivity

>

> Dear Group,

> I have been asked by a lot of Physical Therapists during

interview's

> as to how many patients they are expected to see in a day (8hrs).

> Would the members here be kind enough to share their thoughts?

Also

> what would be a good productivity standard to follow?

> Thank you

> B. Chacko

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

: You make a lot of sense as you have the same ideas as many of us who are

small private practise owners. I have been a PT in practise since 1985 and have

seen all types of new grads. I am hoping that our state assoc approach each

school and let them know the reality of reimbusement situation. I do not know

how hospital based practises make money. In CA my reimbusements have

consistently gone down throughout the years and PT salary expectations have

consistently gone up...there seems to be no match. I had to finally let go many

of my staff PTs and consolidate my practises and work myself. With this economy

I am certainly learning to live slightly below my means.

Hiten Dave' PT

--------- Productivity

>

> Dear Group,

> I have been asked by a lot of Physical Therapists during interview's

> as to how many patients they are expected to see in a day (8hrs).

> Would the members here be kind enough to share their thoughts? Also

> what would be a good productivity standard to follow?

> Thank you

> B. Chacko

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...