Guest guest Posted October 17, 2007 Report Share Posted October 17, 2007 Drug scarcity hits AIDS programme ToI, 17th OCT.2007. New Delhi: Three years after the free ART (anti-retroviral therapy) programme for AIDS patients was launched, the nine ART centres in the city are plagued by long waiting lists, a result, according to officials, of the shortage of drugs. Antiretroviral drugs are medications for the treatment of infections by retroviruses, primarily HIV. Three to four drugs are used in combination to slow down the replication process of the virus inside the body and is believed to be the most effective option available for AIDS patients. Through health officials are loathe to use the word waiting list, all the nine centres in Delhi that include premier hospitals like AIIMS and RML, show Huge gaps between the number of patients who have registered for ART and the number of people who have actually been started on the regimen. Which essentially means that these people are still waiting for the therapy to start. Ram Monohar Lohia tops the list of waiting patients with 2,166 of its 4,281registered people still waiting for the therapy to start, followed by AIIMS at 1,506 patients. The dropout rates too are quite alarming, with nearly 50% discontinuing the treatment at RML and more than 30 % at AIIMS and Lala Ram Swarup Hospital. Health official say that shortage of drugs is the main reason for the long waiting lists. ¡°The dropout rate is not as alarming as it sounds because Cause the figure also includes patients who were started on the therapy but died later,¡± explained a doctor at Lok Nayak Hospital. A health department official said: ¡°There may be many patients waiting for the therapy but we take all precautions to ensure that those in the more advanced stages of the disease are not left waiting for too long for the therapy to start. We cannot really do anything about the availability of the drugs because the project itself is under the aegis of NACO, we just act as managers.¡± As per the estimation of the 9th Annual Sentinel Surveillance conducted in 2006, Delhi has 26,653 people living with HIV, many of whom are full blown AIDS cases. Abantika.ghosh@... Dr.Chinkholal Thangsing e-mail: <chinkholal.thangsing@...> Dr Chinkholal Thangsing Asia Pacific Bureau Chief AIDS Healthcare Foundation S7 Panchsheel Park, New Delhi 110017 India +91 11 41745541[O] +91 98 18270687[Cell] chinkholal.thangsing@... www.aidshealth.org Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 18, 2007 Report Share Posted October 18, 2007 Dear all, Re: /message/7969 The report is factually incorrect as all patients registered at ART centres do not need ART. There are clinical and laboratory parameters that determine initiation of treatment. The following rejoinder has been carried by THE TIMES OF INDIA , Delhi Edition on 18th October 2007 on page 6 Whenever a person is found to be HIV positive, he is referred to an ART centre where he is “registered " in Pre ART Care. Following " registration " he undergoes different investigations including a marker called CD4 cell count which determines whether person is to be started on ART or not. If CD4 cell count (blood test) is less than 200 cells/cmm, only then person is to be started on ART as per national & WHO treatment protocols. Those with CD4 count more than 200 are kept on follow up and CD4 count is repeated every 6 months to determine his requirement of ART. HIV infected persons with CD4 count less 200 are treated as AIDS patients. Those with CD4 count more than 200 do not require ART though they are " registered " for ART. Since launch of ART services in the 9 hospitals referred to in the report, of the 5478 patients ever started on treatment with ARV only 448 have died, 406 have been transferred out to centres nearer to their residences and 705 patients are actually lost to follow up. Delhi has been given ARV drugs for 5,710 patients for year 2007-08. There are at present 3,611 patients receiving ART. Hence there is no Drug scarcity as reported. Nationally 2,80,000 patients are " registered " of whom 1,05,000 patients on ART. All patients who require ART as per treatment protocols are getting it and there is no waiting for ART drugs. I hope this clarifies the issue raised Dr B.B.Rewari MD,FICP,FIACM,FIMSA Sr.Physician, Dr RML Hospital & National Programme Officer (ART) National AIDS Control Organistion New Delhi Tel;23325343,23325335(O) FAX : 011-23731746 e-mail: <drbbrewari@...> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 18, 2007 Report Share Posted October 18, 2007 Dear Forum, Re: /message/7969 For the last 2 years DNP+ has been closely monitoring " drug supplies interuption " in all the ART clinic in Delhi. Our staff are on the move everyday at most of the ART clinic, giving adherence support et al, but also always observing the drug supplies. In the past 2 years we have document at least 5 incidence of supply interuption of various drug/s in various ART Clinic. For these reasons we have been at loggerhead with NACO on many occasion. But i would like to say these report about people who are register doesn't mean they need treatment. As many people who register are having a good CD4 count and no clinical indication to start ARV. We also observed that some people whose CD4 count is more then 200 are also on put on ARV as they are clinically indicated. No doubt, NACO needs to urgently look into more efficient way to disburse ARV at all the ART clinic in the country, to avoid this (periodic) drug supply interuption. I want to inform the Forum that Registering at ART Clinic doesn't mean you need or you have to take ARV. However, irrespective of their CD4 count, if we came across any persons who needs ARV treatment it's our duty to refer them to ART clinic and ensure that they get their treatment. To the best of my knowledge people who needs 1st line ARV in Delhi gets it. If you come across any people who needs treatment but don't get, let us know, we will be happy to assist him/her. Yes, drop out rate is very alarming and its a concern for us. So far DNP+ tried to trace back approx. 40 people who drop out, but our success rate is very low. Out of 40 we follow up, we manage to put back only 3 people on Treatment. Most of the people whom we follow up, when we visit at their given address many are already death or wrong address or no further information or.?. To trace back this drop out case, we had discuss with the treating Doctors and DSACS, but not concrete strategy has come out so far.We simple got the list and address of the drop out people, but this system is not so fruitful. DNP+ would be happy to join hands with ART doctors and SACS to strategise to do follow up of defaulter case. For this, i believe the network should be involve from day one, verification of their address and so on. Otherwise we are given the address of a drop client to trace back after a year or so, doesn't bear much fruits. Further, i suggest that NACO must start a Treatment iteracy/education initiative for the PLHA as well as Doctors, health care worker, drug supplier and other stakeholder who are directly or indirectly involved. Had the policy makers,the Doctors, the supplier, the PLHA, SACS knows how important it is to achieved atleast 95% adherence, and had we all know the consequence of non-adherence, i believe it will be much better. Isn't it? Loon Gangte e-mail: <dnpplus@...> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 21, 2007 Report Share Posted October 21, 2007 Dear FORUM, We read the reply from Dr. Rewari, with interest. Re: /message/7981 I sat with Dr. Rewari and Mrs. Rao in her office for an over an hour during the third week of November of 2006, and you are witness to the fact that she told myself and Eugene Schiff that she was " hoping " for 2nd line medications in January, but that, " at the latest, " this would occur in April, of 2007. Yet, as of today, my understanding is that the public health care system in India is still not providing 2nd line treatment. Would you call this description above, " factually incorrect? " I think it is highly unfortunate that the highest level of decision makers are willing to make untrue statements that are perhaps designed to placate people in the activist community. Sincerely, e-mail: <rastern@...> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.