Guest guest Posted August 6, 2008 Report Share Posted August 6, 2008 Dear FORUM, /message/9137 Its very clear that early and regular treatment with ART will prolong the life span of HIV infected children. But my concern is that, when the child loses both the parents and becomes an orphan he/she becomes a burden for the next caregiver. How far do the caregivers who are not parents take responsibility in administering the drugs to the child regularly. How many understand its importance? The situation worsens if the child is not old enough to take care of himself or herself. Motivation, imparting knowlege on HIV treatment, Developing positive attitute towards HIV treatment is very important in ensuring 100% adherence. Abigail Divya e-mail <abigaildivya@...> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 11, 2008 Report Share Posted August 11, 2008 Dear Forum Re: /message/9137 Abigail Divya wrote " Its very clear that early and regular treatment with ART will prolong the life span of HIV infected children. But my concern is that, when the child loses both the parents and becomes an orphan he/she becomes a burden for the next caregiver. How far do the caregivers who are not parents take responsibility in administering the drugs to the child regularly. How many understand its importance? The situation worsens if the child is not old enough to take care of himself or herself. Motivation, imparting knowlege on HIV treatment, Developing positive attitute towards HIV treatment is very important in ensuring 100% adherence " . I agree with this opinion. This is a big social and human issue. We make life more miserable for children surviving on ART. It is the same way that a couple was denied MTP (abortion ) for a unborn child with heart disease, who may required costly treatment soon after birth and still lives a compromised life. Medical science want unhealthy people to survive long and be burden of care provider? Are we concern with quantity of life or the quality of life? It is debatable issue. just because we have no right to take away some ones life. Dr Deepti Dongaonkar GMC, Mumbai Deepti Dongaonkar Prof OBGY Grant Medical College Mumbai, India M 9323808838 e-mail: <ddongaonkar@...> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 12, 2008 Report Share Posted August 12, 2008 Dear FORUM, Re: /message/9137 Yes, the problem is a complicated one. On the one side medical science tries to improve the life of the person suffering from the disease but on the other hand the problem only lengthens, it does not go away, the suffering is worsened. It is even more saddening that the relatives bear the burden of helping to continue the life of someone while they themselves are barely able to manage their own lives. It is a lose-lose situation all the way for children for no fault of theirs. And to top it all is the uncertainty of availability of the line of treatment. S. A. Joshi Nutritionist E-MAIL: <shubha_joshi6@...> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.