Guest guest Posted June 7, 2008 Report Share Posted June 7, 2008 Dear Forum, One of the pillar on which Positive network is rooted is advocacy. Advocacy steps have been reducing our burden and has enabled us to reach our voice against oppression and violence. Based on this, we had been advocacting our issues and the treatment related issues to the forum and the government. one similar issue that affected us is pictured descriptively below: Earlier we were the ey openers of TANSACS, to the activities of Dr. Rohini, the then senior medical oficer at the ART centre, Madurai in Tamilnadu. (Dr. Rohini had been canvasing PLHA at the ART centre to her personal clinic and not adhereing to the issues of PLHA at the ART centre) But TANSACS had placed Dr. Rohini in the JAT visit.This oppurtunity proved to be a golden chance to revenge MDPS+. When she was supposed to select the positive network for providing the DIC project, she purposely tuned the JAT committe to revenge her vengence on our positive network MDPS+. She made the JAT committe reject the MDPS+application form saying that we had submitted both the application for DIC and CCC in one form , which was utterly a flase statement. This prevented the JAT committe from even shortlisting MDPS+ for the visit. This was made clear to TANSACS and the collectorate by the MDPS+. But our justification was denied without a word. To make things worse Dr. Rohini, the employee at TANSACS ART centre had tuned more than 10 PLHA against MDPS+ and brought out a silent revolt among the governing body in MDPS+ and has brought an end to the effective functioning of MDPS+ in Madurai. This issue had made me resign from MDPS+. When her target was over she tuned TANSACS and the collectorate to give legal Aid clinic project to MDPS+ and the DIC to our parallel network. So far TANSACS was talking about parallel network and the need for oneness among positive network.Today please tell us who is responsible for this division among the network, Is'nt  people like Dr. Rohini, TANSACS responsible for this. Do they want to create a misunderstanding among PLHA and reduce the effectiveness of us in bring their rude clold attitude against the network. 2. Is this act of Dr. Rohini appreciateable? 3. Why has there been unjustice caried out when Positive network fight for their rights? 4. why should TANSACS appreciate such acts of a medical profesional by heeding to her lies and justification and turning a blunt ear to MDPS+ (PLHA network). we trust and believe that the higher authorities to SACS would listen and pay attention to us. We are not for projects alone but we are advocates , whether there be projects or not we will still advocacte for our rights. We were more competive for projects since our people will be benefited and would enjoy the servcies of the government. Thanks and Regards Anbalagan e-mail: <anbuhiv@...> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.