Jump to content
RemedySpot.com

Re: Fwd: [EMT] Passed NR!

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

Does anyone know of any upcoming Paramedic Exam dates for the National

Registry in Texas?

(if so where, when)

" W. ,

LP " To:

<mreed911@hotmail cc:

.com> Subject: Fwd: [EMT]

Passed NR!

05/31/02 09:59 AM

Please respond to

FYI, take a look at the pass rate quotes... I wonder what Texas will

look like when our tests cut over.

Mike :)

>

>Subject: [EMT] Passed NR!

>Date: Fri, 31 May 2002 10:23:47 -0400

>

>Hey Everyone,

>

>I received my results back from National Registry and I passed. I'm

>very happy. That was the weirdest test I have ever taken. I'm now just

>waiting on my license to come from the State of Michigan. The education

>director where I am taking my paramedic course said that the current

>pass rate for the whole state is 39% for basic EMT and like 32% for

>paramedic. Guess I'm in the minority with no retakes. One down.

>paramedic left!

>

>--

_________________________________________________________________

Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Interesting, I just had a class take the registry 9/11 passed on first try;

two for retest in July (one station each).

Atwell Rasmussen, Ph.D., REMTP

Lieutenant, Education and Training

Greenville County Emergency Medical Services

301 University Ridge, Suite 1100

Greenville, SC 29601

[EMT] Passed NR!

>Date: Fri, 31 May 2002 10:23:47 -0400

>

>Hey Everyone,

>

>I received my results back from National Registry and I passed. I'm

>very happy. That was the weirdest test I have ever taken. I'm now just

>waiting on my license to come from the State of Michigan. The education

>director where I am taking my paramedic course said that the current

>pass rate for the whole state is 39% for basic EMT and like 32% for

>paramedic. Guess I'm in the minority with no retakes. One down.

>paramedic left!

>

>--

_________________________________________________________________

Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Mike,

I find this difficult to believe. When I took my NR back in the early 90's

the pass rate on first try was running better than 50%, and on second try

over 80%. This included the stats from states like Louisiana to seem to have

a greater than average fail rate. I think maybe somebody was blowing a

little smoke when they quoted these stats.

Regards,

Donn

[EMT] Passed NR!

> >Date: Fri, 31 May 2002 10:23:47 -0400

> >

> >Hey Everyone,

> >

> >I received my results back from National Registry and I passed. I'm

> >very happy. That was the weirdest test I have ever taken. I'm now just

> >waiting on my license to come from the State of Michigan. The education

> >director where I am taking my paramedic course said that the current

> >pass rate for the whole state is 39% for basic EMT and like 32% for

> >paramedic. Guess I'm in the minority with no retakes. One down.

> >paramedic left!

> >

> >--

>

>

> _________________________________________________________________

> Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at

http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp.

>

>

>

>

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

I'm willing to accept that. I thought it was interesting anecdotally.

I will be interested to see the first batch of pass/fail results on the

new tests when they deploy here.

Mike :)

> Re: Fwd: [EMT] Passed NR!

>

>

> Mike,

>

> I find this difficult to believe. When I took my NR back in

> the early 90's the pass rate on first try was running better

> than 50%, and on second try over 80%. This included the stats

> from states like Louisiana to seem to have a greater than

> average fail rate. I think maybe somebody was blowing a

> little smoke when they quoted these stats.

>

> Regards,

> Donn

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Yeah, me too. I remember when I was preparing for my NR test.Damn but I was

sweating it pretty bad. I was working for ETEMS in county (Tyler) at

the time and we had heard how difficult the NR test was going to be so we

were all bumping heads and studying together. ETEMS had signed a new

contract with the county that required us to all be NR by a certain date and

we were all feeling the heat. The word was that the test was really

difficult. Even though I was fortunate enough to pass on the first try, my

partner didn't and had to retest. This honestly blew my mind. I was still

pretty green at the time, but my partner wasn't. He was a seasoned veteran

and had been recognized all over the state, even had his picture in the

Texas EMS Magazine for some of his good calls. I'm sure he missed his first

try for no other reason than the test's reputation and his nervousness. I

was green and figured I wasn't going to make it anyhow, so I didn't worry so

much.

My thoughts are that the pass/fail rate on a NR test is directly related to

the nervousness factor caused by the test's reputation. Truth is the test

was no more difficult than any other test I have ever taken. The difficulty

factor of the NR test is just myth. Skills are skills and all the written

tests follow the same criteria. The most difficult thing about the test was

the fact that the questions were written in yankeese. If you can figure out

what the folks from Ohio are asking you will know the answer. The material

is the same. I see no reason for Texas folk to fear the NR test questions.

Best regards,

Donn

Re: Fwd: [EMT] Passed NR!

> >

> >

> > Mike,

> >

> > I find this difficult to believe. When I took my NR back in

> > the early 90's the pass rate on first try was running better

> > than 50%, and on second try over 80%. This included the stats

> > from states like Louisiana to seem to have a greater than

> > average fail rate. I think maybe somebody was blowing a

> > little smoke when they quoted these stats.

> >

> > Regards,

> > Donn

>

>

>

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

There is no reason to fear the NR. The questions are written by groups of

people from all over the country. I have been on one of the groups and have

written questions for it, and Jane Hill just recently returned from Ohio from

being on a test writing group. The standards for questions are absolutely

the same as they are for the state exam questions. I have written for both.

When you go to be on an exam writing group they send you several specific

knowledge objectives to write questions on. You submit the questions in

advance, and when you get there, the whole committee takes one question at a

time and reviews it. Nobody knows who the author is, and if you're smart you

keep your mouth shut because all of the questions are kicked, stomped,

dissected, shot down, wrung out and almost always rewritten. Many are simply

kicked out immediately. They are analyzed for clarity, directness, medical

correctness, grammar, spelling, and so forth. The answers are all

relentlessly analyzed and corrected so that there are never two correct

answers and one clearly correct answer. When the group meets, high security

is maintained. On the big table at which everybody sits, there are copies of

every standard textbook, medical dictionaries, and so forth.

The questions are rated as hard, medium and easy. There are never more than,

as I recall, about 40 questions out of 150 rated at maximum difficulty. So

you can miss all the difficult questions and possibly still pass, although

you do have to pass subscales.

The questions do require a certain amount of hard knowledge, critical

thinking skills and problem solving, but none of them are outside the

knowledge objectives, and each and every one is verified as being correct

according to the standard texts and current ACLS standards.

The reason some of the geezers like me have trouble with it is that they have

not stayed abreast of changes in treatment modalities. An excellent example

would be the treatment of rattlesnake bites which used to involve packing the

bite area in ice until research showed that vastly increased the possibility

of losing the limb. Others are the use of PASG, D5W, lowering BP of stroke

patients, and so on. So it is very important to keep up with things.

An excellent review for the exam would involve studying the latest editions

of the standard texts, reading the PHTLS manual, the latest ACLS standards,

and doing some online reading. eMedicine Online is an excellent source, and

it is written for all levels beginning with field practice and concluding in

the ER.

The most important thing is to continually review. Professionals in any

field must do this, and they must do it on their own. That's part of being a

professional. One needs to develop a systematic way of continual review and

relearning. It only takes 15 minutes a day to review a couple of subjects.

Take the knowledge objectives from the National Standard Curriculum the

teaching outline that follows them and start through it. When you get to a

place where you don't fully understand what the score is do a Google.com

search on the subject and look at a few of the hits you get. Voila! You'll

improve your knowledge base many times over, and exams will be a breeze.

GG

E. Gandy, JD, LP

4250 East Aquarius Drive

Tucson, AZ 85718

520 299-4448 home and fax (call before sending fax)

903 530-9826 cell

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

There is no reason to fear the NR. The questions are written by groups of

people from all over the country. I have been on one of the groups and have

written questions for it, and Jane Hill just recently returned from Ohio from

being on a test writing group. The standards for questions are absolutely

the same as they are for the state exam questions. I have written for both.

When you go to be on an exam writing group they send you several specific

knowledge objectives to write questions on. You submit the questions in

advance, and when you get there, the whole committee takes one question at a

time and reviews it. Nobody knows who the author is, and if you're smart you

keep your mouth shut because all of the questions are kicked, stomped,

dissected, shot down, wrung out and almost always rewritten. Many are simply

kicked out immediately. They are analyzed for clarity, directness, medical

correctness, grammar, spelling, and so forth. The answers are all

relentlessly analyzed and corrected so that there are never two correct

answers and one clearly correct answer. When the group meets, high security

is maintained. On the big table at which everybody sits, there are copies of

every standard textbook, medical dictionaries, and so forth.

The questions are rated as hard, medium and easy. There are never more than,

as I recall, about 40 questions out of 150 rated at maximum difficulty. So

you can miss all the difficult questions and possibly still pass, although

you do have to pass subscales.

The questions do require a certain amount of hard knowledge, critical

thinking skills and problem solving, but none of them are outside the

knowledge objectives, and each and every one is verified as being correct

according to the standard texts and current ACLS standards.

The reason some of the geezers like me have trouble with it is that they have

not stayed abreast of changes in treatment modalities. An excellent example

would be the treatment of rattlesnake bites which used to involve packing the

bite area in ice until research showed that vastly increased the possibility

of losing the limb. Others are the use of PASG, D5W, lowering BP of stroke

patients, and so on. So it is very important to keep up with things.

An excellent review for the exam would involve studying the latest editions

of the standard texts, reading the PHTLS manual, the latest ACLS standards,

and doing some online reading. eMedicine Online is an excellent source, and

it is written for all levels beginning with field practice and concluding in

the ER.

The most important thing is to continually review. Professionals in any

field must do this, and they must do it on their own. That's part of being a

professional. One needs to develop a systematic way of continual review and

relearning. It only takes 15 minutes a day to review a couple of subjects.

Take the knowledge objectives from the National Standard Curriculum the

teaching outline that follows them and start through it. When you get to a

place where you don't fully understand what the score is do a Google.com

search on the subject and look at a few of the hits you get. Voila! You'll

improve your knowledge base many times over, and exams will be a breeze.

GG

E. Gandy, JD, LP

4250 East Aquarius Drive

Tucson, AZ 85718

520 299-4448 home and fax (call before sending fax)

903 530-9826 cell

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...