Guest guest Posted December 17, 1999 Report Share Posted December 17, 1999 --- Begin Forwarded Message --- THE PURPOSE OF STATEMENTS ON DRUGS BY POLITICIANS By Freek Polak This column appeared in: Vlugschrift of 27.11.99, an internet-weekly of the Partij van de Arbeid (the Social-Democratic Party, the largest party in the Netherlands coalition government) Recently, European Union president Prodi allegedly said, " it is unacceptable that XTC and other drugs from the Netherlands are exported to Italy and kill young people. " Also, Prodi allegedly called for the harmonization of national drug policies within the European Union. This caused a brief media hype in the Netherlands but when checked, it became clear that Prodi never made these statements. However, even if Prodi did not make these accusations, it is important to openly contradict and refute them since they are part of the core repertoire of false accusations against our drug policy, for instance by French president Chirac and American drug czar general McCaffrey. Even before the report was checked, the reaction of several Dutch politicians expressed an understanding that Chirac and Prodi were concerned about the Dutch drug policy because of its negative effects on their voters. The open European borders, so they said, bring Dutch cannabis and 'designer drugs' within easy reach of the French and Italian youth. This argument makes no sense. If Dutch drugs can create such serious problems in Italy and France, then why are there less of those problems in the Netherlands? The drugs that allegedly cause such disastrous effects are not only less hard to come by in the Netherlands, they are cheaper too. Yet, if one compares the public health statistics, there are less problematic drug users and less first time users in various groups of the Dutch population than in France and Italy. Also, the users' health is far better. The Dutch figures are around the European average, while those of Italy and France are higher. Remarkably, Italy and France have never officially contradicted these figures. Can a policy with positive results in the Netherlands have harmful results at long-distance in other countries? It seems a paradoxical situation: less drug dependence in the Netherlands under a less repressive system. But the paradox is only apparent. There is a logical explanation: the so-called War on Drugs in effect guarantees the illegal trade in drugs as well as promoting the unsafe consumption of those drugs. The net result of the more tolerant climate in the Netherlands is a public health situation superior to that of the countries criticizing us. Why do politicians make misleading statements about the Netherlands? They do so for internal political purposes, as an example may demonstrate. McCaffrey visited the Netherlands in July 1998 on a 'fact finding mission'. Already before his arrival, he stated to the press that the Dutch drug policy was a failure. To support this claim he alleged that the murder rate in the Netherlands was double of that in the United States. " That's drugs, " he said. This verifiable nonsense was targeted directly to the American public. McCaffrey got away with it because he knew that the American media would reproduce it without question. Several people, including the Netherlands ambassador to the United States, wrote to newspapers with facts disproving McCaffrey's statements. The media attention, however, had already shifted to new topics. This example illustrates how politicians attain their goal of discrediting the Netherlands drug policy. They are faced with the problem that the more tolerant Dutch policy has better results and is repeatedly held up as an example in the scientific literature. But it is not their intention that their citizens should find out about this. Drug prohibition is not only a very useful instrument for politicians and their bureaucracies, it is also a very profitable occupation for many civil servants. --- Freek Polak is a psychiatrist and member of the board of the Netherlands Drug Policy Foundation. -- ___________________________________________________________ APA division of psychopharmacology and substance abuse div28@... http://www.apa.org/divisions/div28 enough? send: " SIGNOFF DIV28 " to listserv@... 1 summary/day? " SET DIV28 DIGEST " .. Vacation? " ... NOMAIL " ___________________________________________________________ --- End Forwarded Message --- ---------------------- Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.