Guest guest Posted December 30, 2004 Report Share Posted December 30, 2004 Hi Rick One of the problems is in this area that most of the work published in peer-reviewed journals nevertheless represents a vested interest, as few genuinely neutral academic establishments actually make helmets themselves, therefore most of the research into the effectiveness of helmets is published by the orthotics industry. For example, the last paper in the recent journal Prosthetics and Orthotics you have been discussing with Christie on the way forward for plagio is written by Tim Littlefield of Cranial Technologies. Now, he is probably an expert in the field having worked in this area for so long, but he cannot, by any stretch of the imagination, be said to be a neutral academic and his recommendations will clearly be pro-band as well pro-repo and education. The Atlanta study will be fascinating, I think Hopkins are also doing one, and I know the specialist I went to see in the UK, Dr Blecher is also involved in a multi-site plagio study, so there are some promising studies which are yet to report. However, up until now I think the standard of research papers is poor, given their origins. This might seem unfair to those beavering away within orthotics companies doing very excellent research, but personally I would always be sceptical about industry produced research full stop, whether it be plagio studies produced by orthotic companies or, in my area, NRT or Zyban studies produced by pharmaceutical companies. I haven' t read the posts about your decisions about your son yet, so I hope you are working your way successfully through this minefield! Take care Hannah (mum to Lucia, London, UK) Cranio grad > > > > > From: " hannah_farrimond " <hannah_farrimond@y...> > > Date: 2004/12/28 Tue PM 04:14:34 EST > > Plagiocephaly > > Subject: Re: Comforting Article > > >Good luck with making your way through this all- I'm also a > >psychologist and am used to reading this type of material. > >Personally I think there is not enough good research at >present > >to make a judgement based on the evidence and that the few > >papers that have been produced don't seem to say the same > >things at all (even the baselines are so different you >wonder > >what on earth they are studying). I think on this one you >may have > >to go with a wait and see and a bit of daddy instinct thrown >in. > > >Take care- keep us updated on your thoughts! > >Hannah (mum to Lucia, London, UK) > >Cranio grad > > Unfortunately that's been my impression too from the limited amount of medline searching I've been able to do so far. I haven't been able to find the type of info I was hoping to find. I do want to ask my pediatrician what her experience has been (kids she's seen for many years). Although we may end up getting a helmet if needed, I'm skeptical about getting info from a helmet manufacturer, because they (naturally)probably are not disinterested. I'd rather rely on my own observations of progress, what I can find in peer-reviewed journals, and the experiences of others. > > Rick Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.