Jump to content
RemedySpot.com

Re: Comforting Article

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Hi Rick

The worst that I think could be said about banding is that for

milder cases it may be unnecessary, or simply achieve the

same result in a quicker time frame. The best is that is prevents

continuing plagio as the child gets older. On this basis, it seems

to me that it does not have really major disadvantages (there are

some minor ones such as sweating), so it may be a low-risk

option worth taking! For more severe cases, I personally don' t

think there is much debate about the benefits of a helmet (they

would probably be the remaining 3 or 12% depending which

version of the analysis you prefer to go with)

Funnily enough, although I am sceptical about industry

sponsored and produced research, I still recommend NRT

myself as a clinician, having studied as much as I can in my

area. Although you may not want to accept the recommendation

of a company about the use of their own products, their products

may yet be very effective!

Good luck with it all

Hannah (mum to Lucia, London UK)

Cranio grad

>

> >

> > From: " hannah_farrimond " <hannah_farrimond@y...>

> > Date: 2004/12/30 Thu AM 09:46:33 EST

> > Plagiocephaly

> > Subject: Re: Comforting Article

> >

>

> >Hi Rick

>

> >One of the problems is in this area that most of the work

> >published in peer-reviewed journals nevertheless represents

>a

> >vested interest, as few genuinely neutral academic

> >establishments actually make helmets themselves, therefore

> >most of the research into the effectiveness of helmets is

> >published by the orthotics industry. For example, the last

>paper

> >in the recent journal Prosthetics and Orthotics you have

>been

> >discussing with Christie on the way forward for plagio is

>written

> >by Tim Littlefield of Cranial Technologies. Now, he is

>probably an

> >expert in the field having worked in this area for so long, >but

he

> >cannot, by any stretch of the imagination, be said to be a

>neutral

> >academic and his recommendations will clearly be pro-band

as

> >well pro-repo and education.

>

> Excellent points, Hannah. Working in an academic medical

center, I'm well aware of these sorts of problems. It's very

similar to pharmaceutical research when drug companies fund

research on their own medications and have significant input

into the content of manuscripts eventually submitted for

publication. I've always had scientific " issues " with that

approach. I don't think the FDA in the U.S. should allow it, but

that's another issue.

>

>

> >However, up until now I think the standard of research

>papers is

> >poor, given their origins.

>

> One of the other articles from the October issue of the journal

of prosthetics and orthotics reviewed and graded all of the

outcome research in this area based on scientific rigor. The

majority of the studies were graded " C " with a smattering of " B "

grades. There was nothing higher than a " B. "

>

> >This might seem unfair to those

> >beavering away within orthotics companies doing very

>excellent

> >research, but personally I would always be sceptical about

> >industry produced research full stop, whether it be plagio

>studies

> >produced by orthotic companies or, in my area, NRT or Zyban

> >studies produced by pharmaceutical companies.

>

> Exactly.

>

> >I haven' t read the posts about your decisions about your

>son yet,

> >so I hope you are working your way successfully through this

> >minefield!

>

>

> I'm still in the obsessive-compulsive information gathering

phase. :) Unfortunately - and as you indicated in a previous post

- I'm quickly learning that I'm simply not going to find good

scientific evidence to make the kind of decision I would feel

comfortable with one way or the other. That being the case, I'll

most likely wait another month or two at the most, and then

request a helmet from the plastic surgeon if I'm not happy with

his head shape at that time. It seems to me if I have to " gamble " ,

getting a helmet might be a safer gamble. It sounds like parents

of children 10 years from now will have much more information

available to them to make a decision they are comfortable with.

>

> Rick

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...