Guest guest Posted January 8, 2009 Report Share Posted January 8, 2009 I believe the emphasis on raw milk is motivated by several things. Two big ones are first is that the dairy industry and public health officials have a vendetta against raw milk and that needs a counter. It's unjust and wrong headed and is keeping a good food down. Second a lot of us have children and kids just seem to naturally transition from breast milk to cow's milk and pasteurized milk is really inferior compared to raw milk. I agree that raw milk is not a necessary part of a healthy diet. If you don't have children, can't get raw milk, don't like milk or have physiological problems related to milk then avoiding it is certainly reasonable. Cheers, > > Carla, > > > Tom~ Thanks for the insight. We have become accustomed to drinking > no milk. Would you > > say that drinking raw milk is better than no milk at all? I know > that raw is better than > > conventional. Here in South Carolina raw milk is difficult to come > by, but I know that I can > > order it frozen online. > > If you can find it locally, I would give raw milk a try. Despite its > benefits, even raw milk can give problems to people who are sensitive. > If you can find pure Jersey, Guernsey, Brown Swiss or other > non-Holstein milk that would be best, but Holsteins (the iconic black > and white cows) are far and away the major dairy cows in America > because they've been breed to produce more and more. > > Raw milk is an excellent source of raw animal protein and other > nutrients, but it's not essential to an optimal diet. Price found many > traditional peoples around the world who didn't drink milk and were > very healthy. WAPF puts a little more emphasis on raw milk than is > perhaps deserved in my opinion. If you don't drink milk I would make > sure you're getting lots of high-quality animal products, including > eggs from a local farmer who lets their chickens spend most of their > time outdoors. Egg yolks are amazingly nutritious, as is liver from > pastured animals. Both can be eaten raw as well. > > Maybe some others can chime in here with other info or opinions on the > importance of raw milk. > > Tom > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 8, 2009 Report Share Posted January 8, 2009 I love milk and cheese, and am grateful it's available. It's true that lots of cultures that Price found didn't consume milk products and were healthy. But they all consumed some sort of animal protein raw. I eat my meat rare, and raw egg yolks, and sometimes I make a dish with raw salmon, but otherwise I don't eat much raw animal food. Except for dairy. I think dairy is the easiest way for modern Westerners to consume raw animal protein, so it's emphasized. Ann B. --- In , " Tom Jeanne " <tjeanne@...> wrote: > > Carla, > > > Tom~ Thanks for the insight. We have become accustomed to drinking > no milk. Would you > > say that drinking raw milk is better than no milk at all? I know > that raw is better than > > conventional. Here in South Carolina raw milk is difficult to come > by, but I know that I can > > order it frozen online. > > If you can find it locally, I would give raw milk a try. Despite its > benefits, even raw milk can give problems to people who are sensitive. > If you can find pure Jersey, Guernsey, Brown Swiss or other > non-Holstein milk that would be best, but Holsteins (the iconic black > and white cows) are far and away the major dairy cows in America > because they've been breed to produce more and more. > > Raw milk is an excellent source of raw animal protein and other > nutrients, but it's not essential to an optimal diet. Price found many > traditional peoples around the world who didn't drink milk and were > very healthy. WAPF puts a little more emphasis on raw milk than is > perhaps deserved in my opinion. If you don't drink milk I would make > sure you're getting lots of high-quality animal products, including > eggs from a local farmer who lets their chickens spend most of their > time outdoors. Egg yolks are amazingly nutritious, as is liver from > pastured animals. Both can be eaten raw as well. > > Maybe some others can chime in here with other info or opinions on the > importance of raw milk. > > Tom > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 9, 2009 Report Share Posted January 9, 2009 Kids do not naturally transition to cow's milk. Children are weaned unnaturally early here, and cow's milk is the closest culturally available substitute. Cow's milk is one of the most allergenic of foods (which fact in itself is a warning from nature, eh?). There are many ideas about the rise of milk consumption in western culture, the most interesting of which to me is the prevalence of lead and other heavy metal poisoning compared to other cultures (from pipes and coal extraction and burning)- extra calcium in the diet helps prevent the absorbtion of lead. Desh ____________________________________________________________ Purify your water with professional water treatment. Click now! http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL2141/fc/PnY6rw2uXr885u4a2SevZzdIy9flRE3vt35J\ TMiBICEAKp5QDT8fc/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 9, 2009 Report Share Posted January 9, 2009 Desh, There certainly are many traditional food cultures where milk is only consumed in the first few years of life from one's mother. However, there are also many traditional food cultures based on herding where milk is consumed by everyone for their entire lives. Meat was the first food for humans and milk was probably second. The vegetable kingdom has always been an adjunct and supplementary source of nutrition. One's genetic inheritance has a strong effect on whether milk can be tolerated. As with any food, if you have an allergy or have difficulty digesting it, you should avoid it. Large, industrial milk plants should be shut down for so many reasons. Cheers, > > Kids do not naturally transition to cow's milk. Children are weaned > unnaturally early here, and cow's milk is the closest culturally > available substitute. Cow's milk is one of the most allergenic of foods > (which fact in itself is a warning from nature, eh?). > > There are many ideas about the rise of milk consumption in western > culture, the most interesting of which to me is the prevalence of lead > and other heavy metal poisoning compared to other cultures (from pipes > and coal extraction and burning)- extra calcium in the diet helps prevent > the absorbtion of lead. > > Desh > ____________________________________________________________ > Purify your water with professional water treatment. Click now! > http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL2141/fc/PnY6rw2uXr885u4a2SevZzdIy9flRE3vt35J\ TMiBICEAKp5QDT8fc/ > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 9, 2009 Report Share Posted January 9, 2009 In my Texas history class, we learned that in Texas, there was a tribe of Indians that lived along the gulf coast that nursed their young until the children went through puberty. The most efficient use of their food supply was for the mother to use the food to produce milk. Kathy ---- paulsonntagericson <paulsonntagericson@...> wrote: ============= Desh, There certainly are many traditional food cultures where milk is only consumed in the first few years of life from one's mother. However, there are also many traditional food cultures based on herding where milk is consumed by everyone for their entire lives. Meat was the first food for humans and milk was probably second. The vegetable kingdom has always been an adjunct and supplementary source of nutrition. One's genetic inheritance has a strong effect on whether milk can be tolerated. As with any food, if you have an allergy or have difficulty digesting it, you should avoid it. Large, industrial milk plants should be shut down for so many reasons. Cheers, > > Kids do not naturally transition to cow's milk. Children are weaned > unnaturally early here, and cow's milk is the closest culturally > available substitute. Cow's milk is one of the most allergenic of foods > (which fact in itself is a warning from nature, eh?). > > There are many ideas about the rise of milk consumption in western > culture, the most interesting of which to me is the prevalence of lead > and other heavy metal poisoning compared to other cultures (from pipes > and coal extraction and burning)- extra calcium in the diet helps prevent > the absorbtion of lead. > > Desh > ____________________________________________________________ > Purify your water with professional water treatment. Click now! > http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL2141/fc/PnY6rw2uXr885u4a2SevZzdIy9flRE3vt35J\ TMiBICEAKp5QDT8fc/ > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 10, 2009 Report Share Posted January 10, 2009 what is even better than raw milk is fermented raw milk like kefir. it more nutritious and has way more beneficial bacteria. personally fermented is the only way i can drink it otherwise i'm in for severe intestinal cramping. i've also found that besides carbohydrates (which i don't eat much of), milk products (preferably raw) are the best thing to keep weight on. cheers, sabine. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 10, 2009 Report Share Posted January 10, 2009 It's important to remember that consuming large quantities of fresh milk is a relatively recent practice that's only been possible with refrigeration. Herding cultures definitely drink fresh milk, but fermented products like clabber, yogurt, kefir and of course cheese are much more common ways to consume dairy through out history. Fermented milk is far better than fresh milk. It is much easier to digest and contains more enzymes and vitamins. I try to drink more kefir than fresh milk, but of course fresh milk is more convenient so I probably drink about 50% fresh, 50% kefir. Cheers, > > what is even better than raw milk is fermented raw milk like kefir. it more nutritious and has way more beneficial bacteria. > personally fermented is the only way i can drink it otherwise i'm in for severe intestinal cramping. i've also found that besides carbohydrates (which i don't eat much of), milk products (preferably raw) are the best thing to keep weight on. > cheers, > sabine. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 11, 2009 Report Share Posted January 11, 2009 What cultures? Where? The Maasai do not give cow's milk as a first food, afaik. All so-called tradtional cultures are not correct in their dietary choices. The infant gut does not produce it's own immunuglobulin A, and gets it from human milk. The mother's IgA is antigen specific, which that of cow's milk is not. The infant gut seals to allergens at the time of crawling. . . .so regardless of whether a culture seems traditional to us, if they are giving cow's milk (or mare's or goat's) before the time of the maturation of the gut, then they are harming the gut in multifarious ways. They are harming the growth of the gut mucosa, and making it permeable. Host A, Husby S, Osterballe O. A prospective study of cow's milk allergy in exclusively breastfed infants. Acta Paediatr Scand 1988; 77:663-670 Host A. Importance of the first meal on the development of cow's milk allergy and intolerance. Allergy Proc 1991; 10:227-232 Karjalainen J, JM, Knip M, et al. A bovine albumin peptide as a possible trigger of insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med 1992; 327:302-307 Kostraba JN, Cruickshanks KJ, Lawler-Heavner J, et al. Early exposure to cow's milk and solid foods in infancy, genetic predisposition, and risk of IDDM. Diabetes 1993; 42:288-295 Zetterstrom R, et al. Early infant feeding and micro-ecology of the gut. Acta Paediatr Jpn 1994; 36:562-571 Zieger R. Prevention of food allergy in infants and children. Immunology & Allergy Clinics of North America 1999; 19(3) Wold AE, Adlerberth I. Breast feeding and the intestinal microflora of the infant--implications for protection against infectious diseases. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2000;478:77-93. <<An example of changed consequences of the same microbial colonization is that secretory IgA in the breast-milk protects very efficiently from translocation of intestinal bacteria across the gut mucosa by coating intestinal bacteria and blocking their interaction with the epithelium.>> If milk was our second food, wouldn't early humans be called hunter-milkers, rather than hunter-gatherers? Desh ____________________________________________________________ Click now for debt negotiation and settlement services. http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL2141/fc/PnY6rw394msOaJFfP2h9L65s8x8YcVLDsAXm\ P9WzCQy8zbMvY4bMy/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.