Guest guest Posted March 2, 2009 Report Share Posted March 2, 2009 Do these authors provide evidence that you can completely go without any carbs? Does your body learn to more efficient in it's ability to convert to glucose. Barry Grives gives a very basic explanation and does not present any science with fat to carb conversion. I have heard that fat is converted to ketones however based on research I have looked there are some parts of the body that cannot utilize ketones as fuel. Does the body learn how to convert fat completely to glucose efficiently. Our paleolythic ancestors got their carbs from fresh meat some 40,000 years ago. They most have chosen to keep in most of their energy most of the time and only use it when they had to, fight or flight. I personally doubt potatoes deplete that much in vitamin C stores. Barry Groves had charts that showed that 100g of starches such as potatoes didn't have nearly as bad an impact on the immune system compared to other types of carbs. 15% decrease vs. 50% decrease. I would realistically be having 30g of starches with each meal. My meal plan would be 40g carbs in the morning. 35g carbs inevening. 25g carbs at night. However, you have to cook potatoes in order to consume them. This destroys digestive enzymes. In this case you may want to have a fermented beverage such as beet kvass with that meal. Or maybe have a predigested starch such as Berlin sourdough spelt bread which is yeast free. Do you have the recipe for acid porrige? Sent from my iPhone On Mar 1, 2009, at 8:58 PM, " paulsonntagericson " <paulsonntagericson@...> wrote: In Fat of the Land, Steffenson says the first nations people didn't consider fruits and vegetables " proper human food " . But of course we don't know very much about the life expectancy or overall health of these people. Although most reports indicated that without the presence of " modern foods of commerce " , they were very healthy and lived long lives. But we don't have health or longevity data that meets modern standards of rigor. Taubes in Good Calorie, Bad Calorie makes a strong case against carbs. Most vegetables are mostly carbs. I would recommend you read this book. I would say the answer really depends on a couple of factors. If you have a hard time controlling your weight, I would recommend a low-carb diet to see if that helps. Many popular vegetables are high in carbs. Taubes talks about some people who are so sensitive to carbs that eating a single apple in a low-carb diet can stop their weight loss. But of course this is an extreme example. Also keep in mind that is appears that carbs increase our requirements for certain vitamins like the Bs and C so it's important to realize that if you are eating starchy veggies for the vitamins, that the carbs themselves are an anti-nutrient of sorts. The other concern I have about anything from the vegetable kingdom is genistein. All plants contain sterols which are hormones. Some are similar to estrogen, like genistein. Many plants CAN contain genistein and some have rather high quantities. But there has not been a lot of testing, although because of recent interest in genistein, more is being published all the time. The reason I say " can " is that the levels seem to vary by species, variety, crop, field, season, etc. After soy, my next concern is peanuts. Some studies list 0 genistein and other list amount equal to soy so I don't know what to believe about peanuts. But I would avoid all legumes--yet another reason not to be a vegetarian. In my opinion humans are faunivores and the preferred food of most humans throughout history has been meat. Grains, fruits and vegetables are eaten for three main reasons: 1-sometimes they're all we have, 2-they taste delicious, and 3-carbs stimulate the appetite so that we can have " cravings " for them. Even in modern times when a culture becomes more affluent it usually increases it's consumption of meat. I wouldn't worry to much about veggies. I would make sure you're getting the big things right first. Pastured meats and eggs, raw fermented dairy (fresh milk is high in carbs, is non-traditional and is on our list of compromise foods). Veggies do have lots of beneficial nutrients, taste delicious, complement main foods like meat, eggs and dairy. But I would eat them in moderation. --- In , " cbrown2008 " <cbrown2008@...> wrote: > > > hi all, > > > > i am just wondering how many i actually need in my diet? w/ talk of > > anti-nutrients and food chemicals, plus the fact that I am trying to > > eat locally, i just wonder which ones to eat and how much. I am also > > totally revamping my diet to go gluten free and possibly casein free > > and low grain, so what to eat? living in colorado, the only local > > veggies I have right now are beets, onions, potatoes, turnips and > > carrots > > I really like the Polish Dr. Kwasniewski, and he says minimal carbs > from root veg are the best. So you are doing great for this time of > year. His ammounts are, at most, take your ideal weight in pounds, > times .8 and that is grams of carb per day. Starch is best. > > He says leafy veg are okay if you like animal fodder. This is why I > like this plan. > > But you do have to have lots of sat fat to help with the glucose too. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 2, 2009 Report Share Posted March 2, 2009 perhaps that was more due to the milk? Re: are vegetables healthy? Just to chime in, in the book " Potato " about the rise of potatoes as a food crop, it said that the Irish lived off mainly potatoes and milk and many of those who visited the country remarked on the squalor of the living conditions, as they didn't have enough land to support themselves very well, but also the extreme health and beauty of the Irish as a people. > > > > > hi all, > > > > > > i am just wondering how many i actually need in my diet? w/ talk of > > > anti-nutrients and food chemicals, plus the fact that I am trying to > > > eat locally, i just wonder which ones to eat and how much. I am also > > > totally revamping my diet to go gluten free and possibly casein free > > > and low grain, so what to eat? living in colorado, the only local > > > veggies I have right now are beets, onions, potatoes, turnips and > > > carrots > > > > I really like the Polish Dr. Kwasniewski, and he says minimal carbs > > from root veg are the best. So you are doing great for this time of > > year. His ammounts are, at most, take your ideal weight in pounds, > > times .8 and that is grams of carb per day. Starch is best. > > > > He says leafy veg are okay if you like animal fodder. This is why I > > like this plan. > > > > But you do have to have lots of sat fat to help with the glucose too. > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 2, 2009 Report Share Posted March 2, 2009 So basicly you need only a small amount of carbs. They will metabolize as glycogen stores and any extra will be converted to fat. It would be useless to eat excess carbs before a workout because it has not digested yet and will not be utilized as energy. It would also weaken one's performance to work out right after eating. The goal is to focus on high intensity, going to failure, and getting more done in a short period of time rather than doing higher volume anaerobic work. Spend only 45 minutes at the most doing this activity, preferably 10-25 minutes. You would want to eat immediatly after words to replenish glycogen stores. Preferably a starch as it converts directly to glucose. I am guessing our paleolythic ancestors were more methodical with their hunting and seldom used up much energy as they weren't taking in a high carb intake. They either got their carbs from animal flesh I'd from fresh berries, bananas, pineapples, etc. Foods that did not involve cooking. They must not have had any vegetable. Notice that fruits in nature such as apples and bananas do not exceed 30g of carbs. I wonder if there is any relevance to this. Sent from my iPhone On Mar 2, 2009, at 8:44 AM, " cbrown2008 " <cbrown2008@...> wrote: > > Do these authors provide evidence that you can completely go without any carbs? Does your body learn to more efficient in it's ability to convert to glucose. The fact that you can't go without glucose, but you can go without carbs maybe depending on what you eat - that is more of a basic physiology thing. Just Google Images " metabolism krebs cycle " and you'll find all kinds of explanations. here's just one http://images.google.com/imgres? imgurl= & i mgrefurl=http://www.bmb.leeds.ac.uk/teaching/icu3/lecture/14/index.htm & usg=___ZUD2zXJ0NLkXhxCy58crVMXSOE= & h=500 & w=500 & sz=11 & hl=en & start=13 & t bnid=cn6eCNbElU2u_M: & tbnh=130 & tbnw=130 & prev=/images%3Fq%3Dkrebs% 2Bcycle%26gbv%3D2%26hl%3Den%26safe%3Dstrict%26client%3Ddell-usuk% 26channel%3Dus%26ad%3Dw5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 2, 2009 Report Share Posted March 2, 2009 I don't know... If you listen to some of the anti-carb people it makes it sound as if the carbs themselves cause disease and in that case I don't think any amount of milk would make up for it. I, for one, do fantastically on a carb (predominantly starch) containing diet, perhaps not as much as the USDA recommends, but when I low carbed I got very ill. I honestly question the usefulness of the low carb diet for those who are not trying to lose weight. -Lana " There is nothing more useful than sun and salt. " - Latin proverb On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 10:22 AM, <sarahlyao@...> wrote: > perhaps that was more due to the milk? > > Re: are vegetables healthy? > > Just to chime in, in the book " Potato " about the rise of potatoes as > a food crop, it said that the Irish lived off mainly potatoes and > milk and many of those who visited the country remarked on the > squalor of the living conditions, as they didn't have enough land to > support themselves very well, but also the extreme health and beauty > of the Irish as a people. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 2, 2009 Report Share Posted March 2, 2009 How many carbs do you generally have in a day. I have a good percentage of Irish in me and take more after that side of the family. I was reading that groups of people that have consumed milk for over 500 generations developed a better digestion for it. Sent from my iPhone On Mar 2, 2009, at 1:47 PM, Lana Gibbons <lana.m.gibbons@...> wrote: I don't know... If you listen to some of the anti-carb people it makes it sound as if the carbs themselves cause disease and in that case I don't think any amount of milk would make up for it. I, for one, do fantastically on a carb (predominantly starch) containing diet, perhaps not as much as the USDA recommends, but when I low carbed I got very ill. I honestly question the usefulness of the low carb diet for those who are not trying to lose weight. -Lana " There is nothing more useful than sun and salt. " - Latin proverb On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 10:22 AM, <sarahlyao@...> wrote: > perhaps that was more due to the milk? > > Re: are vegetables healthy? > > Just to chime in, in the book " Potato " about the rise of potatoes as > a food crop, it said that the Irish lived off mainly potatoes and > milk and many of those who visited the country remarked on the > squalor of the living conditions, as they didn't have enough land to > support themselves very well, but also the extreme health and beauty > of the Irish as a people. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 2, 2009 Report Share Posted March 2, 2009 I think it really has to do with one's heritage. On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 2:12 PM, Holt <danthemanholt@...> wrote: > How many carbs do you generally have in a day. I have a good percentage > of Irish in me and take more after that side of the family. I was reading > that groups of people that have consumed milk for over 500 generations > developed a better digestion for it. > > S > . > > > -- -Anne Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 2, 2009 Report Share Posted March 2, 2009 Our bodies aren't the best equipped to digest plant carbs. Just look at the difference between our stomachs compared to ruminant animals such as cows. Carbs deplete vitamins and minerals from the body. Starches such as potatoes do the least amount to weaken the immune system. Sent from my iPhone On Mar 2, 2009, at 3:35 PM, " cbrown2008 " <cbrown2008@...> wrote: > I don't know... If you listen to > some of the anti-carb people it makes it > sound as if the carbs themselves cause disease That's a good point - I must myself be careful to say, excess refined carbs are the problem > perhaps not as much as the USDA recommends Yes, the definition of " low carb " is all over the place. Is less than the USDA, low carb? I see a growing presence in the blogosphere about lower carb for general health and longevity especially. Mark Sissons is a good example. He recently published a hilarious article with pictures over the years, laughing at himself in an 80s speedo. He talks about the metabolic " cost " of the high starch diet being expensive for some people. He uses low carb for general health, not fat loss on 100-120 g a day. Body Composition Through the Years http://www.marksdailyapple.com/body-composition-how-diet-and-exercise- affect-muscle-mass-and-body-fat/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 3, 2009 Report Share Posted March 3, 2009 On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 3:12 PM, Holt <danthemanholt@...> wrote: > How many carbs do you generally have in a day. I have a good percentage of > Irish in me and take more after that side of the family. I was reading that > groups of people that have consumed milk for over 500 generations developed > a better digestion for it. I too have a good percentage of Irish. I eat around 200g/day. Sometimes as low as 150g, sometimes as much as the USDA (300g), but very rarely more than that. Most of that is good old starch - predominantly from whole grains but also legumes and tubers. I eat very little sugar, with the exception of the lactose in milk. I don't eat much fruit either, at least not fruit with any significant sugar content (mmm avocado). On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 4:35 PM, cbrown2008 <cbrown2008@...> wrote: > > perhaps not as much as the USDA recommends > > Yes, the definition of " low carb " is all over the place. > Is less than the USDA, low carb? > AFAIK, " low " carb is 60g/day or less (as low as 20g/day for those starting Atkins). The point of low carb is to be in ketosis, at least to me. I don't do well in ketosis at all. I would call what I do " moderate " carb, and anything over the USDA " excess " carb. -Lana Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 3, 2009 Report Share Posted March 3, 2009 Is there gluten in oats? What foods contain gluten? Sent from my iPhone On Mar 2, 2009, at 4:13 PM, Lana Gibbons <lana.m.gibbons@...> wrote: On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 3:12 PM, Holt <danthemanholt@...> wrote: > How many carbs do you generally have in a day. I have a good percentage of > Irish in me and take more after that side of the family. I was reading that > groups of people that have consumed milk for over 500 generations developed > a better digestion for it. I too have a good percentage of Irish. I eat around 200g/day. Sometimes as low as 150g, sometimes as much as the USDA (300g), but very rarely more than that. Most of that is good old starch - predominantly from whole grains but also legumes and tubers. I eat very little sugar, with the exception of the lactose in milk. I don't eat much fruit either, at least not fruit with any significant sugar content (mmm avocado). On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 4:35 PM, cbrown2008 <cbrown2008@...> wrote: > > perhaps not as much as the USDA recommends > > Yes, the definition of " low carb " is all over the place. > Is less than the USDA, low carb? > AFAIK, " low " carb is 60g/day or less (as low as 20g/day for those starting Atkins). The point of low carb is to be in ketosis, at least to me. I don't do well in ketosis at all. I would call what I do " moderate " carb, and anything over the USDA " excess " carb. -Lana Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 3, 2009 Report Share Posted March 3, 2009 >Our bodies aren't the best equipped to digest plant carbs. Just look at the >difference between our stomachs compared to ruminant animals such as >cows. Carbs deplete vitamins and minerals from the body. Starches such >as potatoes do the least amount to weaken the immune system. well this might explain why i have been feeling under the weather in the last week or so...the first time in i don't know how long! i haven't been sick in ages! i went from eating high fat, moderate protein--mostly meats, and low carbs--just potatoes, very little fruit, to eating that plus some vegetables and more fruits and sugar in things like ice cream and commercial apple sauce. but i am pregnant and i guess i feel obligated plus for whatever reason i am craving more sweet and carby. i have even eaten rice pasta more in the last 2 weeks than i have in 3 years! i don't know why i am finding it difficult to eat this pregnancy. it's hard for me to believe pregnant women *need* all the vegetables and grains and fruit that most people preach. sometimes i start to feel pressured into eating things b/c it sounds somewhat convincing. amanda Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 3, 2009 Report Share Posted March 3, 2009 I had the same thing happen when I was pregnant (re: ice cream and fruit). I think it was who pointed out to me that the gestating body has a higher carb requirement. I didn't have any ill effects from it though (but I tend to stick to berries when I eat fruit - fructose and I don't agree and apples are pretty high in it, and when I'd get commercial ice cream it was Breyer's natural only so no HFCS). -Lana " There is nothing more useful than sun and salt. " - Latin proverb On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 5:39 PM, <amanda@...>wrote: > well this might explain why i have been feeling under the weather in the > last week or so...the first time in i don't know how long! i haven't been > sick in ages! i went from eating high fat, moderate protein--mostly meats, > and low carbs--just potatoes, very little fruit, to eating that plus some > vegetables and more fruits and sugar in things like ice cream and commercial > apple sauce. but i am pregnant and i guess i feel obligated plus for > whatever reason i am craving more sweet and carby. i have even eaten rice > pasta more in the last 2 weeks than i have in 3 years! i don't know why i am > finding it difficult to eat this pregnancy. > > it's hard for me to believe pregnant women *need* all the vegetables and > grains and fruit that most people preach. sometimes i start to feel > pressured into eating things b/c it sounds somewhat convincing. > > amanda Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 3, 2009 Report Share Posted March 3, 2009 Yeah, I've heard of a few dietary guidelines women should follow run pregnant but some of them conflict. Here are a couple principles you can't go wrong with. Have 10,000 IU of vitamins A a day from animal flesh. Have atleast 1000 IU of Vit D from animal flesh a day. Have mostly fat, preferably from pastures grassfed egg yolks, extravirgin coconut oil, beef liver/dessicated live, cooking food in beef tallow/suet, raw dairy such as butter, cheese and milk, and raw colostrum if you have access. Don't exceed 1 fruit a day. Kiwi fruit is an exception because it is very low in calories, this and pineapple are my favorite fruits. Cooked vegetables are good. You can have more because they are low in carbs. You can have more carbs as starches because they don't have as much as a negative impact on the immune system. You probably don't need nuts if you are getting all those fat and protein sources. Macademia nuts and apples are a good source of b15,17. I could go on but these are some good principals to follow. www.westonaprice.org has more guidelines. I guess Iodine/Iodide intake are an issue but I personally argue with the different recommendations. My guess is if you can get highly bioavailable sources such as sun dried Celtic seasalt and fish, raw milk, various parts of the chicken, you don't need as much. These ones store long in the body. I don't know what WAPF's recommendation for intake is. Sent from my iPhone On Mar 2, 2009, at 4:39 PM, " " <amanda@...> wrote: >Our bodies aren't the best equipped to digest plant carbs. Just look at the >difference between our stomachs compared to ruminant animals such as >cows. Carbs deplete vitamins and minerals from the body. Starches such >as potatoes do the least amount to weaken the immune system. well this might explain why i have been feeling under the weather in the last week or so...the first time in i don't know how long! i haven't been sick in ages! i went from eating high fat, moderate protein--mostly meats, and low carbs--just potatoes, very little fruit, to eating that plus some vegetables and more fruits and sugar in things like ice cream and commercial apple sauce. but i am pregnant and i guess i feel obligated plus for whatever reason i am craving more sweet and carby. i have even eaten rice pasta more in the last 2 weeks than i have in 3 years! i don't know why i am finding it difficult to eat this pregnancy. it's hard for me to believe pregnant women *need* all the vegetables and grains and fruit that most people preach. sometimes i start to feel pressured into eating things b/c it sounds somewhat convincing. amanda Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 3, 2009 Report Share Posted March 3, 2009 I don't remember exactly... I want to say a few months - felt great at first and then I crashed and burned towards the end... Quickly learned that ketosis was not for me. LOL -Lana People can feel awful during the adaptation period. How long did you > try it? I've heard people say anything from weeks to months to adapt > from a diet of mostly carb to one of mostly fat. I felt awful on > Atkins " induction " too and never stuck it out. Also a fair amount of > Irish and German ethicity, and I do well on non-ketogenic low carb. > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 3, 2009 Report Share Posted March 3, 2009 Great on principle, I'm sure... but during my 1st trimester I couldn't eat (or even smell) meat of any kind (fish excluded) and I couldn't stomach any decent amount of fat - at least not if I wanted to keep anything down. Sushi was my savior, especially the salmon roe... So I was pretty much pesca-vegetarian for that trimester - lots of milk, whole grains, some cashews and as much sushi as I could afford. I snacked on berries too, especially raspberries as they seemed to take the edge off the nausea (which thankfully went away about halfway through the 1st trimester... unless I smelled meat). I guess what I'm saying is " dietary guidelines " go pretty much out the window for pregnant women. <G> -Lana On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 6:06 PM, Holt <danthemanholt@...> wrote: > Yeah, I've heard of a few dietary guidelines women should follow run > pregnant but some of them conflict. Here are a couple principles you can't > go wrong with. > > Have 10,000 IU of vitamins A a day from animal flesh. > Have atleast 1000 IU of Vit D from animal flesh a day. > Have mostly fat, preferably from pastures grassfed egg yolks, extravirgin > coconut oil, beef liver/dessicated live, cooking food in beef tallow/suet, > raw dairy such as butter, cheese and milk, and raw colostrum if you have > access. Don't exceed 1 fruit a day. Kiwi fruit is an exception because it > is very low in calories, this and pineapple are my favorite fruits. Cooked > vegetables are good. You can have more because they are low in carbs. You > can have more carbs as starches because they don't have as much as a > negative impact on the immune system. You probably don't need nuts if you > are getting all those fat and protein sources. Macademia nuts and apples > are a good source of b15,17. I could go on but these are some good > principals to follow. > > www.westonaprice.org has more guidelines. > > I guess Iodine/Iodide intake are an issue but I personally argue with the > different recommendations. My guess is if you can get highly bioavailable > sources such as sun dried Celtic seasalt and fish, raw milk, various parts > of the chicken, you don't need as much. These ones store long in the body. > I don't know what WAPF's recommendation for intake is. > > Sent from my iPhone Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 3, 2009 Report Share Posted March 3, 2009 The very flaw of atkins diet is ketosis. Mainly the metabolism of protein into ketones. It's better to go higher fat than what atkins recommends and to go slightly higher carbs. Just enough to repenish glycogen stores but not to convert fat. Converting fat to ketones can be beneficial. Sent from my iPhone On Mar 2, 2009, at 5:16 PM, Lana Gibbons <lana.m.gibbons@...> wrote: I don't remember exactly... I want to say a few months - felt great at first and then I crashed and burned towards the end... Quickly learned that ketosis was not for me. LOL -Lana People can feel awful during the adaptation period. How long did you > try it? I've heard people say anything from weeks to months to adapt > from a diet of mostly carb to one of mostly fat. I felt awful on > Atkins " induction " too and never stuck it out. Also a fair amount of > Irish and German ethicity, and I do well on non-ketogenic low carb. > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 3, 2009 Report Share Posted March 3, 2009 Oats are often contaminated with wheat. Rye, barley and wheat (and close relatives like spelt) contain gliadin, the problematic gluten protein. Rice and corn contain a different non-problematic form of gluten. -jennifer On Mar 2, 2009, at 7:33 PM, Holt wrote: > Is there gluten in oats? What foods contain gluten? > > Sent from my iPhone > > On Mar 2, 2009, at 4:13 PM, Lana Gibbons <lana.m.gibbons@...> > wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 3:12 PM, Holt > <danthemanholt@...> wrote: > > > How many carbs do you generally have in a day. I have a good > percentage of > > Irish in me and take more after that side of the family. I was > reading that > > groups of people that have consumed milk for over 500 generations > developed > > a better digestion for it. > > I too have a good percentage of Irish. I eat around 200g/day. > Sometimes as low as 150g, sometimes as much as the USDA (300g), but > very > rarely more than that. Most of that is good old starch - > predominantly from > whole grains but also legumes and tubers. I eat very little sugar, > with the > exception of the lactose in milk. I don't eat much fruit either, at > least > not fruit with any significant sugar content (mmm avocado). > > On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 4:35 PM, cbrown2008 <cbrown2008@...> > wrote: > > > > perhaps not as much as the USDA recommends > > > > Yes, the definition of " low carb " is all over the place. > > Is less than the USDA, low carb? > > > > AFAIK, " low " carb is 60g/day or less (as low as 20g/day for those > starting > Atkins). The point of low carb is to be in ketosis, at least to me. I > don't do well in ketosis at all. I would call what I do " moderate " > carb, > and anything over the USDA " excess " carb. > > -Lana > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 3, 2009 Report Share Posted March 3, 2009 It sounds like you followed the principals well. Sushi would probably be a great choice because it is raw. Is white rice a starch? Sent from my iPhone On Mar 2, 2009, at 5:24 PM, Lana Gibbons <lana.m.gibbons@...> wrote: Great on principle, I'm sure... but during my 1st trimester I couldn't eat (or even smell) meat of any kind (fish excluded) and I couldn't stomach any decent amount of fat - at least not if I wanted to keep anything down. Sushi was my savior, especially the salmon roe... So I was pretty much pesca-vegetarian for that trimester - lots of milk, whole grains, some cashews and as much sushi as I could afford. I snacked on berries too, especially raspberries as they seemed to take the edge off the nausea (which thankfully went away about halfway through the 1st trimester... unless I smelled meat). I guess what I'm saying is " dietary guidelines " go pretty much out the window for pregnant women. <G> -Lana On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 6:06 PM, Holt <danthemanholt@...> wrote: > Yeah, I've heard of a few dietary guidelines women should follow run > pregnant but some of them conflict. Here are a couple principles you can't > go wrong with. > > Have 10,000 IU of vitamins A a day from animal flesh. > Have atleast 1000 IU of Vit D from animal flesh a day. > Have mostly fat, preferably from pastures grassfed egg yolks, extravirgin > coconut oil, beef liver/dessicated live, cooking food in beef tallow/suet, > raw dairy such as butter, cheese and milk, and raw colostrum if you have > access. Don't exceed 1 fruit a day. Kiwi fruit is an exception because it > is very low in calories, this and pineapple are my favorite fruits. Cooked > vegetables are good. You can have more because they are low in carbs. You > can have more carbs as starches because they don't have as much as a > negative impact on the immune system. You probably don't need nuts if you > are getting all those fat and protein sources. Macademia nuts and apples > are a good source of b15,17. I could go on but these are some good > principals to follow. > > www.westonaprice.org has more guidelines. > > I guess Iodine/Iodide intake are an issue but I personally argue with the > different recommendations. My guess is if you can get highly bioavailable > sources such as sun dried Celtic seasalt and fish, raw milk, various parts > of the chicken, you don't need as much. These ones store long in the body. > I don't know what WAPF's recommendation for intake is. > > Sent from my iPhone Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 3, 2009 Report Share Posted March 3, 2009 Does fermenting cooking help with the gluten at all? If not I'll just stick to potatoes. Sent from my iPhone On Mar 2, 2009, at 5:34 PM, Steinbachs <jen@...> wrote: Oats are often contaminated with wheat. Rye, barley and wheat (and close relatives like spelt) contain gliadin, the problematic gluten protein. Rice and corn contain a different non-problematic form of gluten. -jennifer On Mar 2, 2009, at 7:33 PM, Holt wrote: Is there gluten in oats? What foods contain gluten? Sent from my iPhone On Mar 2, 2009, at 4:13 PM, Lana Gibbons <lana.m.gibbons@...> wrote: On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 3:12 PM, Holt <danthemanholt@...> wrote: How many carbs do you generally have in a day. I have a good percentage of Irish in me and take more after that side of the family. I was reading that groups of people that have consumed milk for over 500 generations developed a better digestion for it. I too have a good percentage of Irish. I eat around 200g/day. Sometimes as low as 150g, sometimes as much as the USDA (300g), but very rarely more than that. Most of that is good old starch - predominantly from whole grains but also legumes and tubers. I eat very little sugar, with the exception of the lactose in milk. I don't eat much fruit either, at least not fruit with any significant sugar content (mmm avocado). On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 4:35 PM, cbrown2008 <cbrown2008@...> wrote: perhaps not as much as the USDA recommends Yes, the definition of " low carb " is all over the place. Is less than the USDA, low carb? AFAIK, " low " carb is 60g/day or less (as low as 20g/day for those starting Atkins). The point of low carb is to be in ketosis, at least to me. I don't do well in ketosis at all. I would call what I do " moderate " carb, and anything over the USDA " excess " carb. -Lana Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 3, 2009 Report Share Posted March 3, 2009 I believe it needs to ferment for a long time to break down the troublesome proteins. Highly sensitive folks will still not be able to eat even fermented gluten. -jennifer On Mar 2, 2009, at 8:39 PM, Holt wrote: > Does fermenting cooking help with the gluten at all? If not I'll > just stick to potatoes. > > Sent from my iPhone > > On Mar 2, 2009, at 5:34 PM, Steinbachs <jen@...> > wrote: > > Oats are often contaminated with wheat. > > Rye, barley and wheat (and close relatives like spelt) contain > gliadin, the problematic gluten protein. > > Rice and corn contain a different non-problematic form of gluten. > > -jennifer > > On Mar 2, 2009, at 7:33 PM, Holt wrote: > > Is there gluten in oats? What foods contain gluten? > > Sent from my iPhone > > On Mar 2, 2009, at 4:13 PM, Lana Gibbons <lana.m.gibbons@...> > wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 3:12 PM, Holt > <danthemanholt@...> wrote: > > How many carbs do you generally have in a day. I have a good > percentage of > Irish in me and take more after that side of the family. I was > reading that > groups of people that have consumed milk for over 500 generations > developed > a better digestion for it. > > I too have a good percentage of Irish. I eat around 200g/day. > Sometimes as low as 150g, sometimes as much as the USDA (300g), but > very > rarely more than that. Most of that is good old starch - > predominantly from > whole grains but also legumes and tubers. I eat very little sugar, > with the > exception of the lactose in milk. I don't eat much fruit either, at > least > not fruit with any significant sugar content (mmm avocado). > > On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 4:35 PM, cbrown2008 <cbrown2008@...> > wrote: > > perhaps not as much as the USDA recommends > > Yes, the definition of " low carb " is all over the place. > Is less than the USDA, low carb? > > AFAIK, " low " carb is 60g/day or less (as low as 20g/day for those > starting > Atkins). The point of low carb is to be in ketosis, at least to me. I > don't do well in ketosis at all. I would call what I do " moderate " > carb, > and anything over the USDA " excess " carb. > > -Lana > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 3, 2009 Report Share Posted March 3, 2009 , > In Fat of the Land, Steffenson says the first nations people didn't > consider fruits and vegetables " proper human food " . But of course we > don't know very much about the life expectancy or overall health of > these people. Although most reports indicated that without the > presence of " modern foods of commerce " , they were very healthy and > lived long lives. But we don't have health or longevity data that > meets modern standards of rigor. But even if they did live long and healthy lives, there are other groups that did consider fruits and vegetables " proper human food " and live apparently long and healthy lives. So the data per se wouldn't answer the question of what we should adopt as the ideal diet. > Taubes in Good Calorie, Bad Calorie makes a strong case against > carbs. Most vegetables are mostly carbs. I would recommend you read > this book. I like him, but when it comes to carbs, IMO, he paints with way too broad a brush, but that is not unusual for " low-carbers " > I would say the answer really depends on a couple of factors. If you > have a hard time controlling your weight, I would recommend a low-carb > diet to see if that helps. Many popular vegetables are high in carbs. > Taubes talks about some people who are so sensitive to carbs that > eating a single apple in a low-carb diet can stop their weight loss. > But of course this is an extreme example. > > Also keep in mind that is appears that carbs increase our requirements > for certain vitamins like the Bs and C so it's important to realize > that if you are eating starchy veggies for the vitamins, that the > carbs themselves are an anti-nutrient of sorts. Obviously there is a place for low carb, but more and more " low-carb " seems to be developing its own " this is the only way mentality. " You simply cannot draw such a conclusion from the work of Price, not to mention the research of others. > The other concern I have about anything from the vegetable kingdom is > genistein. All plants contain sterols which are hormones. Some are > similar to estrogen, like genistein. Many plants CAN contain genistein > and some have rather high quantities. But there has not been a lot of > testing, although because of recent interest in genistein, more is > being published all the time. The reason I say " can " is that the > levels seem to vary by species, variety, crop, field, season, etc. So is this a function of depleted soils? -- It doesn't matter how many people don't get it. What matters is how many people do. If you have a strong informed opinion, don't keep it to yourself. Try and help people and make the world a better place. If you strive to do anything remotely interesting, just expect a small percentage of the population to always find a way to take it personally. F*ck 'em. There are no statues erected to critics. - Ferriss Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 3, 2009 Report Share Posted March 3, 2009 , > Do these authors provide evidence that you can completely go without any > carbs? I don't know about the authors you are referencing, but Stefansson sure does -- It doesn't matter how many people don't get it. What matters is how many people do. If you have a strong informed opinion, don't keep it to yourself. Try and help people and make the world a better place. If you strive to do anything remotely interesting, just expect a small percentage of the population to always find a way to take it personally. F*ck 'em. There are no statues erected to critics. - Ferriss Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 3, 2009 Report Share Posted March 3, 2009 Of course no one ever really goes without carbs, even on an all meat diet. I remember a study that seem to suggest the Inuit averaged about 53 grams of carbs per day. On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 7:57 PM, <slethnobotanist@...> wrote: > , > >> Do these authors provide evidence that you can completely go without any >> carbs? > > I don't know about the authors you are referencing, but Stefansson sure does Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 3, 2009 Report Share Posted March 3, 2009 Correct me if I'm wrong, but I thought that was from stored glycogen in the meat? Is there any proof the meat we eat nowadays still has glycogen content? -Lana On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 8:59 PM, <slethnobotanist@...> wrote: > Of course no one ever really goes without carbs, even on an all meat > diet. I remember a study that seem to suggest the Inuit averaged > about 53 grams of carbs per day. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 3, 2009 Report Share Posted March 3, 2009 Connie, >> I don't know... If you listen to >> some of the anti-carb people it makes it >> sound as if the carbs themselves cause disease > > That's a good point - I must myself be careful to say, excess refined > carbs are the problem But even unrefined carbs can be a problem if they are not properly prepared, whether that means super fresh, ripe, soaked, fermented, cooked, lime processed, or what have you. >> perhaps not as much as the USDA recommends > > Yes, the definition of " low carb " is all over the place. > Is less than the USDA, low carb? > > I see a growing presence in the blogosphere about lower carb for > general health and longevity especially. I also see the tendency towards " this is the only way or **the** optimal way " which is really just the opposite of what he have ahd all these years from the high carb folks. > Mark Sissons is a good example. He recently published a hilarious > article with pictures over the years, laughing at himself in an 80s > speedo. He talks about the metabolic " cost " of the high starch diet > being expensive for some people. He uses low carb for general > health, not fat loss on 100-120 g a day. > > Body Composition Through the Years > > http://www.marksdailyapple.com/body-composition-how-diet-and-exercise- > affect-muscle-mass-and-body-fat/ Hey, I already posted that here, LOL! -- It doesn't matter how many people don't get it. What matters is how many people do. If you have a strong informed opinion, don't keep it to yourself. Try and help people and make the world a better place. If you strive to do anything remotely interesting, just expect a small percentage of the population to always find a way to take it personally. F*ck 'em. There are no statues erected to critics. - Ferriss Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 3, 2009 Report Share Posted March 3, 2009 , > Our bodies aren't the best equipped to digest plant carbs. Certainly not as is, in most cases. > Just look at the > difference between our stomachs compared to ruminant animals such as cows. Right, which is why traditional groups went through such great pains to prepare their carbs. > Carbs deplete vitamins and minerals from the body. Starches such as potatoes > do the least amount to weaken the immune system. Where are you sourcing the information that properly prepared carbs weaken the immune system? -- It doesn't matter how many people don't get it. What matters is how many people do. If you have a strong informed opinion, don't keep it to yourself. Try and help people and make the world a better place. If you strive to do anything remotely interesting, just expect a small percentage of the population to always find a way to take it personally. F*ck 'em. There are no statues erected to critics. - Ferriss Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.