Guest guest Posted April 21, 2008 Report Share Posted April 21, 2008 What is the cost of the proposed Indian HIV/AIDS Bill? The Civil society organizations taking lead in advocating for the HIV/AIDS Bill should be congratulated as an HIV/AIDS law is essential and timely. However, it appears that, one of reason for the delay in implementing the proposed law is the cost involved in implementing such a law. Was there any costing analysis done on the cost of proposed Indian HIV/AIDS Bill at all?, What would be the capital investment and the recurring per annum cost of this bill? Who will bear the cost of implementing this bill, will this come from HIV/AIDS budget or from some other source? Will an expensive HIV/AIDS stand alone bill distort the need for a comprehensive Public Health Law? Will the implementation of this bill take essential resources from prevention and treatment or the ministry of law and Justice would underwrite this law? Will the cost of compliance unduly influence any other HIV prevention, care and treatment resource allocation decisions? Any serious costing has ever been carried out before proposing an elaborate HIV bureaucracy such as appointment of Health Ombudsman in each 612 districts, district Authorities and the national HIV/AIDS Authority with related Institutional Obligations. Some of the proposed HIV bureaucracies are; a) Appointment of Health Ombud. — (1) The Appropriate Government shall, within 90 days of the commencement of this Act, appoint by notification in the Official Gazette, one or more Health Ombuds for each district to exercise the powers conferred upon and perform the functions assigned, under this Act. Office of HIV/AIDS Authority. — (1) The head office of the National HIV/AIDS Authority shall be at Delhi and the National HIV/AIDS Authority may establish offices at such other places in India. (2) The head office of State, Union Territory and District HIV/AIDS Authorities shall be at the State capital, Union Territory capital and District headquarters respectively and such Authorities may establish offices at other places in their jurisdiction as may be deemed necessary. Do we really need to develop such an elaborate HIV bureaucracy in the name of an HIV/AIDS Law? Any cost benefit analysis or gender impact analysis of the proposed HIV law has ever been conducted? If not, the civil society organizations taking lead in advocating for the HIV/AIDS Bill should not delay such an analysis. An HIV/AIDS law is essential and timely. But should it be such an elaborate bureaucracy? The author wish to remain anonyms Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.