Guest guest Posted April 11, 2004 Report Share Posted April 11, 2004 ALL bacteria are doing a job. There is some hint that we have microbes in our body that actually change into the type of bacteria (morph) that we need to do the job. We don't necessarily ACQUIRE them. They are in our bodies and produced by our bodies. You are assuming things come from without and attack us? I am saying they do not. ALL bacteria are doing a job and the symptoms produced that are painful and difficult are the toxic effects of them doing their job - it is our ability to cope with that that is at issue and needs help sometimes. But the answer is NOT to kill the bacteria unless there is NO time to find a way to cope. But most times there is. ALL bacteria are doing an important job. They are cleaning up the mess. Read the articles I sent out. What do you mean negative bacteria inocculated? At 08:53 PM 04/10/2004 -0700, you wrote: >Sheri, >When you say that ALL bacteria are beneficial...postive and negative gram bacteria. Maybe that's what needs some clarification? >I'm assuming what you're getting at is that everytime the body NATURALLY acquires negative bacteria...that as the immune system is challenged by it (as with viruses), and while it's fighting it, it's strengthening our immune system in the end? This I can certainly go along with. >Yet, when we have negative bacteria inoculated into our bodies, are you saying this is beneficial too, or no? I hope that's not what you're saying (?) > >-------Kimberley Medlin--------- >VACCINES: Keeping our children from harm >....or playing Russian Roulette? >http://www.vaccinationsandSIDS.com/ >ChristianityandVaccinations_AZvac-lib/ > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 11, 2004 Report Share Posted April 11, 2004 My thinking is that the immune system of inocculated infants and children are week and stunted because they were not " naturally " infected with the negative bacterium and viruses. It gets injected, goes to their blood stream without first being introduced to the immune system the way our bodies are " designed " to detect infections. Their immune systems are thrown off. Not just by the other added toxic ingredients. There aren't just many things wrong with vaccinations. There's literally everything wrong with them. There's no telling how many contaminants (via vaccines) a child receives by 18 months of age or time of school registeration. It's known that with FDA policy, the FDA has to turn a blind eye to as many as 100 contaminants per dose of the polio vaccines. The contaminants I would certainly like to zap and kill. In my thinking, they don't belong there because chances are, we would've never had to deal with their infection had vaccines never been " enforced " into a routine practice. Those contaminants have not been conclusively proven to be beneficial. The human population is suffering the consequences of them. Has been and always will be. It's one thing to have these things " naturally emerge " as has been described. It's another thing to have them inocculated into our blood stream. Going back to the bacterium. There's no conclusive evidence that having negative bacterium inocculated/injected into the blood stream is beneficial either. I'd rather deal with what was already in my body without the vaccine introduction. I think I understand what Jowanna was getting at. -------Kimberley Medlin--------- VACCINES: Keeping our children from harm .....or playing Russian Roulette? http://www.vaccinationsandSIDS.com/ ChristianityandVaccinations_AZvac-lib/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 12, 2004 Report Share Posted April 12, 2004 She wasn't zapping vaccine stuff She was zapping what she said was chickenpox At 08:02 PM 04/11/2004 -0700, you wrote: >My thinking is that the immune system of inocculated infants and children are week and stunted because they were not " naturally " infected with the negative bacterium and viruses. It gets injected, goes to their blood stream without first being introduced to the immune system the way our bodies are " designed " to detect infections. Their immune systems are thrown off. Not just by the other added toxic ingredients. There aren't just many things wrong with vaccinations. There's literally everything wrong with them. >There's no telling how many contaminants (via vaccines) a child receives by 18 months of age or time of school registeration. It's known that with FDA policy, the FDA has to turn a blind eye to as many as 100 contaminants per dose of the polio vaccines. The contaminants I would certainly like to zap and kill. In my thinking, they don't belong there because chances are, we would've never had to deal with their infection had vaccines never been " enforced " into a routine practice. Those contaminants have not been conclusively proven to be beneficial. The human population is suffering the consequences of them. Has been and always will be. >It's one thing to have these things " naturally emerge " as has been described. It's another thing to have them inocculated into our blood stream. Going back to the bacterium. There's no conclusive evidence that having negative bacterium inocculated/injected into the blood stream is beneficial either. I'd rather deal with what was already in my body without the vaccine introduction. I think I understand what Jowanna was getting at. -------------------------------------------------------- Sheri Nakken, R.N., MA, Classical Homeopath Vaccination Information & Choice Network, Nevada City CA & Wales UK $$ Donations to help in the work - accepted by Paypal account vaccineinfo@... voicemail US 530-740-0561 (go to http://www.paypal.com) or by mail Vaccines - http://www.nccn.net/~wwithin/vaccine.htm Vaccine Dangers On-Line course - http://www.nccn.net/~wwithin/vaccineclass.htm Homeopathy On-Line course - http://www.nccn.net/~wwithin/homeo.htm ANY INFO OBTAINED HERE NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS MEDICAL OR LEGAL ADVICE. THE DECISION TO VACCINATE IS YOURS AND YOURS ALONE. ****** " Just look at us. Everything is backwards; everything is upside down. Doctors destroy health, lawyers destroy justice, universities destroy knowledge, governments destroy freedom, the major media destroy information and religions destroy spirituality " .... Ellner Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 1, 2009 Report Share Posted March 1, 2009 here's a better link to the article http://tinyurl.com/cnps64 > > Beneficial Bacteria > > Probiotics, Which Aid Digestion, Are Gaining New Respect As An > Important Part Of A Healthy Diet > > there was an article in our local paper (Madison, WI) about kefir and > kombucha with contact info and our local WAPF website address. There > were pictures of kefir grains and a kombucha SCOBY along with a > picture of nne holding up a copy of Nourishing Traditions. here > is the online version of the article (no pictures). > > http://www.madison.com/archives/read.php?ref=/wsj/ > 2009/02/20/0902190234.php > > > And last Saturday I was interviewed by Wisconsin Trails Magazine for > an article on raw milk for their May/June issue!!! > > Carolyn > Madison, WI > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 20, 2009 Report Share Posted June 20, 2009 I think good bacteria count has more to do with the health and activity of your kefir grains. Marilyn, who favors raw milk of course because that's what I want to drink On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 12:26 PM, vettehead2 <vettehead59@...> wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I am very new to this ,and have yet to make any Kefir. I was wondering if > it makes any difference in the good bacteria count as to which kind of milk > I were to use. > > Thanks to all > Jim > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.