Raw-Milk lovers skirt the law

[Guest guest]

One can only hope that the sheer numbers of raw milk drinkers will

overwhelm the FDA and they'll eventually back off. But so far they

show no signs of it. Why they aren't as vigilant in policing agri-

business producers, who are responsible for actual food-borne illness

outbreaks, as opposed to theoretical, beat's me. Oh, of course, they

make political contributions to members of Congress.

Jeanmarie

On Aug 4, 2009, at 1:43 PM, Carolyn Graff wrote:

> http://tinyurl.com/lk5yq4

>

> The label on the jug reads " for pet use only, " but in the privacy of

> their kitchens, thousands of people statewide mix smoothies with,

> churn ice cream with, and drink cold glasses of raw milk...Marji

> Bitterman, 64, says she buys raw milk for her pet. By that she means

> husband. Every morning in her Sarasota kitchen, she puts eight ounces

> into their smoothies...

>

>

[Guest guest]

It's getting overwhelming to protect healthy, natural, fun, explorative,

humanistic, loving, sharing, cheap/free, self produced, free (freedom/liberty)

with all the (or striving few) control freekazoids taking all liberties from us

in the vailed guise of safety, health and protection. Without the choice of

risks we choose we'll be only left with death by transportation, natural

disaster, object (plates, axes, etc.), bare hands, falling in the bathroom and

such... Oh what a sterile world they strive to achieve with all controlled

processed food to eat, no need to think, decide, learn or skill to develope.

When will the Matrix be real?

Sorry for the rant. I'm frustrated with my congressman's supportive letter to me

regading the foods bill. The bill limiting our food growing options.

Re: Raw-milk lovers skirt the law

One can only hope that the sheer numbers of raw milk drinkers will

overwhelm the FDA and they'll eventually back off. But so far they

show no signs of it. Why they aren't as vigilant in policing agri-

business producers, who are responsible for actual food-borne illness

outbreaks, as opposed to theoretical, beat's me. Oh, of course, they

make political contributions to members of Congress.

Jeanmarie

On Aug 4, 2009, at 1:43 PM, Carolyn Graff wrote:

> http://tinyurl.com/lk5yq4

>

> The label on the jug reads " for pet use only, " but in the privacy of

> their kitchens, thousands of people statewide mix smoothies with,

> churn ice cream with, and drink cold glasses of raw milk...Marji

> Bitterman, 64, says she buys raw milk for her pet. By that she means

> husband. Every morning in her Sarasota kitchen, she puts eight ounces

> into their smoothies...

>

>

[Guest guest]

http://tinyurl. com/lk5yq4

<<One can only hope that the sheer numbers of raw milk drinkers will

overwhelm the FDA and they'll eventually back off. But so far they

show no signs of it. Why they aren't as vigilant in policing agri-

business producers, who are responsible for actual food-borne illness

outbreaks, as opposed to theoretical, beat's me. Oh, of course, they

make political contributions to members of Congress.

Jeanmarie>>

 

Carolyn and Jeanmarie,

     I agree this is not good news. I believe within time as ObamaCare gets the

green light we will see police activity resembling drug enforcement raids on

individuals who consume raw milk and parents who feed it to their children.

Being busted for raw milPOSSESSIONON will become a reality. Selling it for any

purpose will be prohibited.

 

With NAIS, merely having a cow will require strict monitoring and if the cow

isn't registered with NAIS, it will be the same as having being discovered with

a marijuanana plot. Well, maybe not marijuana which will most likely be declared

legal merely for tax revenue purposes [like taking the big agri business' money

Jeanmarie spoke of], while raw milk will remain a crime.

 

Giving raw milk to children will be considered child abuse. If one's child was

to become sick with an illness that could be 'linked' to raw milk consumption,

the parents would be reported by our 'govt doctors' and then prosecuted. I find

it hard to accept that the general public is so uneducated in political

matters that they would paint themselves into this corner, but I see it coming.

--Bill

[Guest guest]

I think the numbers of people who not only want to drink raw milk, but

who want to either grow their own food or buy directly from trusted

small, sustainable eco-farmers and artisanal food producers is growing

rapidly. It's all the press about the real food movement that has made

the corporations concerned enough to get their congressional lackeys

to do their bidding. Things could get ugly but I think there will be

one hell of a resistance movement. The whole swine flu vaccine

nonsense is similarly stirring up anger. Count me in!

Jeanmarie

On Aug 5, 2009, at 10:52 AM, B wrote:

> http://tinyurl. com/lk5yq4

> <<Carolyn and Jeanmarie,

> I agree this is not good news. I believe within time as

> ObamaCare gets the green light we will see police activity

> resembling drug enforcement raids on individuals who consume raw

> milk and parents who feed it to their children. Being busted for raw

> milPOSSESSIONON will become a reality. Selling it for any purpose

> will be prohibited.

>

> With NAIS, merely having a cow will require strict monitoring and if

> the cow isn't registered with NAIS, it will be the same as having

> being discovered with a marijuanana plot. Well, maybe not marijuana

> which will most likely be declared legal merely for tax revenue

> purposes [like taking the big agri business' money Jeanmarie spoke

> of], while raw milk will remain a crime.

>

> Giving raw milk to children will be considered child abuse. If one's

> child was to become sick with an illness that could be 'linked' to

> raw milk consumption, the parents would be reported by our 'govt

> doctors' and then prosecuted. I find it hard to accept that the

> general public is so uneducated in political matters that they would

> paint themselves into this corner, but I see it coming.

> --Bill

>