Guest guest Posted October 8, 2008 Report Share Posted October 8, 2008 Global Fund Can Be More Effective If It Improves Civil Society Participation in All Aspects of Its Work Treatment Monitoring and Advocacy Project - A Research Project conducted by the India HIV/AIDS Alliance Report on How To Make This Happen Contact: Sonal Mehta: smehta@... ; 011-41633081 Padma Buggineni: pbuggineni@... ; 011-41633081 The report, Making Global Fund Country Coordinating Mechanisms Work through Full Engagement of Civil Society, provides key recommendations for the Global Fund Secretariat, UN agencies, CCM leadership, and civil society. The CCM Monitoring and Advocacy was a multi-national project (Argentina, Jamaica, Cambodia, Uganda, Cameroon, Romania, and India) designed to review and assess how civil society can have greater impact as an advocate for improved Global Fund programming at the country level, principally through participation on CCM. It was researched by the India HIV/AIDS Alliance in India. Countries establish CCMs in order to apply for Global Fund resources and then to manage Global Fund-supported projects. CCMs are meant to bring together multiple stakeholders to collectively identify country needs for AIDS, TB and malaria services, design programming, and oversee implementation of Global Fund-supported projects. The CCM model shows great promise, and civil society involvement is key to realising that promise. Yet, to date there has been very limited investment in supporting civil society representatives so that they can be as effective as possible on CCMs. This can and must be remedied as quickly as possible. The innovative CCM model is a testament to how civil society engagement and advocacy has strengthened the AIDS response in most countries. However, there is a long way to go for civil society representatives to be fully recognised as equal players. And until this happens, and civil society steps up to the challenge of advocating on behalf of the most marginalised, we will not deliver on the promise of universal access to health. Several overarching themes emerged through this research, including: · Civil society CCM members have been responsible for notable contributions but, in general, there is limited influence of civil society in proposal preparation, shaping programme implementation, and programme oversight. This can be attributed to the limited opportunities for capacity building of civil society CCM members. · There is a need to improve civil society representation of constituent priorities as well as communication between civil society representatives and the broader civil society sector. · Civil society CCM representatives need more opportunities to build their skills and capacities in a range of areas. This report provides several recommendations to improve the CCM process and ensure that Global Fund resources are used to the best advantage. The Global Fund should: · Do more to promote and invest in capacity building for civil society members of CCMs. · Empower CCMs to play the appropriate strategic performance monitoring and programme implementation oversight role expected of them. UNAIDS should: · Help convene civil society on neutral ground outside of CCM meetings and support efforts of civil society to identify strategic priorities and define an advocacy agenda. · Disseminate information and provide technical support to enable civil society to play a more effective role in CCM deliberations. CCM leadership should: · Provide resources and support to enable the full participation of civil society representatives in CCM deliberations and ongoing communication with constituencies. · Ensure that civil society and all members of the CCM are engaged in oversight of grant implementation. Civil society representatives and organisations should: · Seek funding to ensure civil society CCM members have access to the capacity development opportunities they need. · Communicate with the broader civil society sector and health care consumers, including grassroots and underserved communities, on a regular basis. · Address potential conflicts of interest openly by being transparent about the financial involvement of civil society and other agencies represented on the CCM. · Create accountability mechanisms so that the civil society sector and health consumers themselves can assess the work of civil society representatives and provide input on how this representation can be improved. The ultimate goal of the Global Fund, CCMs, and civil society is improving health services for people living with HIV/AIDS and people affected by TB and malaria. The CCM model has enormous potential to revolutionise healthcare delivery, but only if healthcare consumers and their representatives can have a strong and informed voice. Padma Buggineni Program Manager - Policy India HIV/AIDS Alliance Kushal House, Third Floor 39 Nehru Place New Delhi 110019 India e-mail: <buggineni_padma@...> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.