Jump to content
RemedySpot.com

Re: Re: the truth about shampoo

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Great! How long have you been doing that? Several women commented to

the writer " you must be a bald man, " saying they could never give up

their shampoos! There are so many things we're trained (by

commercials, store displays, magazine ads...) to think we need when

really there are often simple alternatives that are more benign on the

environment, on us, and on our budgets.

Jeanmarie

On Aug 13, 2009, at 6:01 PM, carolyn_graff wrote:

> I use baking soda to wash my hair. it works great. I then rinse with

> water/ACV.

>

>

> >

> > Here's a terrific article in Salon with a blow-by-blow accounting

> off

> > all the useless and toxic ingredients in shampoo, " natural " or not:

> > What's really in your shampoo

> > Sure, a couple ingredients clean your hair. But the rest are a

> > veritable toxic dump on your head

> >

> >

>

> .

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have an Ayurvedic-trained friend (a teacher and writer on the subject)

and he recommends plain water instead of soap. He adds that it's OK to

use soap sparingly on grime. Water is one of the best solvents for

cleaning and will not kill the beneficial germs on our skin. -=mark=-

Hansuke wrote:

> What about soap? Is there also a better alternative?

>

>

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

An alternative to soap? Soap is an alternative to harsher detergents

or unnecessarily fancy cleansers... are you talking body care or hair

or laundry or what? There are lots of low-impact soaps and cleansers

out there, both commercially available and simple recipes you can make

at home with cheap, basic ingredients. I can send you some links but

I'm not clear which kind of soap you're talking about.

Jeanmarie

On Aug 14, 2009, at 1:40 AM, Hansuke wrote:

> What about soap? Is there also a better alternative?

>

>

> _

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, soap isn't always necessary. Just definitely avoid antibacterial

soap. The point of soap is to emulsify the dirt and excessive oil,

making it easier for water to wash it away. It's not necessary to kill

the bacteria that may be on your hands, unless you're performing

surgery (and probably just thorough scrubbing and rinsing would be

sufficient there), just to wash it away.

Jeanmarie

On Aug 14, 2009, at 6:17 AM, theta wrote:

> I have an Ayurvedic-trained friend (a teacher and writer on the

> subject)

> and he recommends plain water instead of soap. He adds that it's OK to

> use soap sparingly on grime. Water is one of the best solvents for

> cleaning and will not kill the beneficial germs on our skin. -=mark=-

>

> Hansuke wrote:

> > What about soap? Is there also a better alternative?

> >

> >

> > _._,___

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well you certainly gave that a fair trial, ! I just tried one

product some of the commenters to the article suggested, the Shikakai

line from Dr. Bronners. It has very few, very pure ingredients. I had

bought a bottle months ago and hadn't tried it yet. I liked it. But

then, my hair is thick and short. I think the Shikakai liquid soaps

are probably less drying than some people find Dr. Bronners to be.

I don't think everyone needs to give up shampoo, and I hope I didn't

imply that by posting that article link. For me, it brought up

important issues to think about. It seems like if we don't overstrip

our hair of oil when we wash it, we wouldn't have to put so much stuff

on it afterwards. I'm just really cutting out commercial consumer

products right and left and being more and more careful about the

environmental impact of the products I use. Even with " green "

products, they're usually packaged in plastic, and all those empty

bottles weigh on my mind. I like how you can get refills of Dr.

Bronners at a lot of stores and not have to throw away perfectly good

bottles and then buy new ones each time. Trader Joe's has a peppermint

body wash that's much like Dr. Bronners but cheaper, I hear.

Jeanmarie

On Aug 14, 2009, at 7:53 AM, wrote:

> I tried going " no-poo " for almost 8 weeks (by using baking soda and

> then rinsing with ACV/water). I also tried using nothing at all, but

> lots of strokes with a washcloth, which I had also read an article

> about. I really wished it had worked out for me, but I couldn't

> stand it anymore and gave up. Maybe it works better for ladies with

> curly hair. I have very fine, straight hair and while after a few

> weeks my hair didn't look greasy, it always smelled like it needed a

> wash to me. That was annoying, when others testified that their hair

> and scalp smelled clean. But what I really couldn't stand was that

> my hair was both lank and heavy and super staticy at the same time.

> Sigh...

>

> B.

>

> -

>

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sounds awful. Interestingly, though, several people who commented on

the shampoo story on Salon.com specifically mentioned Aubrey as a good

alternative to conventional shampoo brands. Maybe they hadn't actually

tried it!

Jeanmarie

On Aug 14, 2009, at 1:30 PM, Stanley wrote:

>

> >

> > What about soap? Is there also a better alternative?

>

> The shampoos from Aubrey Organics are soap based. I tried one, back

> in the 1980s, and no matter how tightly I held by eyes closed, the

> shampoo would get in my eyes and painfully burn them, leaving them

> bloodshot like out of a horror movie. And, it made my hair feel like

> straw. It became immediately obvious to me why soap is generally not

> used in shampoos. That was the most violently irritating personal

> care product I've ever used, which is kind of funny, because

> Aubrey's marketing shtick was all about how the detergents in

> regular shampoos are such powerful irritants. Yeah, right.

>

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just my $0.02 worth, but I think most regular soaps are strongly

antibacterial since they are based on caustic soda (Lye) - also known as

Sodium Hydroxide or Potassium Hydroxide. Lye is a primary disinfectant

around the house. Part of the hand-made soap process is the creation of

this from wood ash. That is the primary reason I rarely use soap at

all. I do not want to eradicate skin bacteria, I want to preserve it

(and there are many good benefits from doing this). -=mark=-

Jeanmarie Todd wrote:

> Yes, soap isn't always necessary. Just definitely avoid antibacterial

> soap. The point of soap is to emulsify the dirt and excessive oil,

> making it easier for water to wash it away. It's not necessary to kill

> the bacteria that may be on your hands, unless you're performing

> surgery (and probably just thorough scrubbing and rinsing would be

> sufficient there), just to wash it away.

> Jeanmarie

>

> On Aug 14, 2009, at 6:17 AM, theta wrote:

>

>> I have an Ayurvedic-trained friend (a teacher and writer on the

>> subject)

>> and he recommends plain water instead of soap. He adds that it's OK to

>> use soap sparingly on grime. Water is one of the best solvents for

>> cleaning and will not kill the beneficial germs on our skin. -=mark=-

>>

>> Hansuke wrote:

>>> What about soap? Is there also a better alternative?

>>>

>>>

>>> _._,___

>

>

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lye itself is caustic but once it reacts with oil to become soap it's

no longer so. Soap is not antibacterial, per se, without added

ingredients such as trichlosan, which persist in the environment; the

bacteria that aren't killed become resistant, thus the development of

drug-resistant strains. Soap just acts to make water " wetter " (reduce

its surface tension) to act as an emulsifying agent to suspend oil and

dirt in water so they can be washed away. Sufficient washing removes

bacteria without killing them. How gentle or irritating a particular

soap is depends on the length of the carbon chain of the fatty acid.

In this case longer is better.

On Aug 14, 2009, at 2:29 PM, theta wrote:

> Just my $0.02 worth, but I think most regular soaps are strongly

> antibacterial since they are based on caustic soda (Lye) - also

> known as

> Sodium Hydroxide or Potassium Hydroxide. Lye is a primary disinfectant

> around the house. Part of the hand-made soap process is the creation

> of

> this from wood ash. That is the primary reason I rarely use soap at

> all. I do not want to eradicate skin bacteria, I want to preserve it

> (and there are many good benefits from doing this). -=mark=-

>

> Jeanmarie Todd wrote:

>

> > ------------------------------------

>

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On Aug 14, 2009, at 3:22 PM, Hansuke wrote:

> I was thinking hands and body, however the other types (dishes &

> laundry) would of course also be interesting. I'm in Germany, so I

> would greatly appreciate if you sent me links to the recipes.

>

>

> ,_._,___

>

You could find any of this just by googling, but here's a list to get

you started.

I think Ecover brand is available in Europe; they make nontoxic

household cleansers and soaps. Seventh Generation, BioKleen, Dr.

Bronners come to mind; I have no idea whether they're in Germany. Here

are some product sites:

http://www.drbronner.com/

http://www.morroccomethod.com/

The Herbwife’s Kitchen » Shampoo? What shampoo? Simple herbal hair care.

http://crabappleherbs.com/blog/2008/02/01/simple-herbal-hair-care/

Official Website of Onesta Hair Care http://onestahaircare.com/

Cal Ben Liquid Dish Glow Creme Soap http://www.calbenpuresoap.com/shampoo.htm

Two books:

Natural Beauty at Home by Janice . (ISBN 0-8050-3313-0) This book

has easy (and cheap) recipes for making all of the items you listed

and many more

Herbs for Natural Beauty (Rosemary Gladstar's Herbal Remedies) by

Rosemary Gladstar

Here are some review sites that rate different products and explain

ingredients:

http://www.goodguide.com/

http://www.cosmeticsdatabase.com/

http://www.cosmeticscop.com/ingredient_dictionary.aspx?lid=532

To make your own household cleansers here are some recipes:

http://organizedhome.com/clean-house/pantry-recipes-homemade-cleaning-products

http://housekeeping.about.com/cs/environment/a/alternateclean.htm

http://www.eartheasy.com/live_nontoxic_solutions.htm

http://www.treehuggingfamily.com/25-safe-non-toxic-homemade-cleaning-supplies/

Here are homemade shampoo and soap recipes:

http://www.pioneerthinking.com/hair.html

http://chemistry.about.com/b/2009/01/10/homemade-shampoo-easy-recipe.htm

http://www.instructables.com/id/Homemade-Shampoo/

http://www.bathgifts.us/shampoo/

http://www.ehow.com/way_5199663_homemade-baby-shampoo-recipe.html

http://www.pureandnaturalsoaps.com/soap-recipes.html

http://www.make-stuff.com/formulas/soap.html

http://www.motherearthnews.com/Natural-Health/2007-08-01/Recipes-to-Make-Your-Ow\

n-Soap-Lotion-and-More.aspx

http://www.treehugger.com/files/2005/12/easy_homemade_s.php

http://www.stretcher.com/stories/981207b.cfm

Here are some tips from the stretcher.com site on simply using less:

Just Dilute

The main ingredient in most deodorants is alcohol! If you use plain

alcohol with a cotton ball each morning, it will last all day! For

your teeth, Baking soda and salt make a very effective toothpaste.

Also, salt water makes a good mouthwash. Dish detergent is just as

good as shampoo. If you think that this might be too harsh, just

dilute it with water. For those of you who say, " what, I would never

use detergent on my hair " Just look at the list of ingredients on the

back of your shampoo bottle. You might be surprised.

Many common toiletry items can be diluted or have the recommended

amount reduced.

Shampoo - There is no need to shampoo twice. Dilute shampoo by 50

percent. Ditto conditioner. Buy no-name or store brands. Buy in bulk.

Toothpaste - A paste of baking soda works well. Or reduce amount used

by half.

Mouthwash - Use only once per day. Dilute by 50 percent. Buy no name

or store brands.

Laundry soap - Use 1/2 cup of vinegar in place of bleach (this

sterilizes in case of fungal infections,and also softens in the rinse

cycle, eliminating the need for expensive softeners). Use 1/2 the

recommended amount (this also saves excessive wear on clothing). Wash

in cold water. Hang 1-2 loads a week (clothes last longer, saves on

electricity). Do less laundry (hang towels after use, wear items more

than once where possible ie. sweaters, dresses, pants).

Paper Towels - Cut roll in half. Use rags instead.

Facial Tissue - Use handkerchiefs (monogram if needed), soak in ice

cream bucket until laundry day.

Deodorant - Let dry uncovered for a couple of days, it will last

longer. Ditto bar soap, but leave it for at least 1 week.

Cheers,

Jeanmarie

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Does anybody use www.cosmeticdatabase.com or do you just not trust it?

Kathy

From:

[mailto: ] On Behalf Of Jeanmarie Todd

Sent: Friday, August 14, 2009 4:04 PM

Subject: Re: Re: the truth about shampoo

Sounds awful. Interestingly, though, several people who commented on

the shampoo story on Salon.com specifically mentioned Aubrey as a good

alternative to conventional shampoo brands. Maybe they hadn't actually

tried it!

Jeanmarie

On Aug 14, 2009, at 1:30 PM, Stanley wrote:

>

> >

> > What about soap? Is there also a better alternative?

>

> The shampoos from Aubrey Organics are soap based. I tried one, back

> in the 1980s, and no matter how tightly I held by eyes closed, the

> shampoo would get in my eyes and painfully burn them, leaving them

> bloodshot like out of a horror movie. And, it made my hair feel like

> straw. It became immediately obvious to me why soap is generally not

> used in shampoos. That was the most violently irritating personal

> care product I've ever used, which is kind of funny, because

> Aubrey's marketing shtick was all about how the detergents in

> regular shampoos are such powerful irritants. Yeah, right.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I haven't really used it because I trust my own judgment in selecting

products with very simple ingredient lists. I use basics like salt,

soda, vinegar, castile soap a lot. I think EWG is a good resource

though and I respect them. What has your experience been?

Jeanmarie

On Aug 14, 2009, at 8:43 PM, Kathy Dickson wrote:

> Does anybody use www.cosmeticdatabase.com or do you just not trust it?

>

> Kathy

>

> From:

> [mailto: ] On Behalf Of Jeanmarie Todd

> Sent: Friday, August 14, 2009 4:04 PM

>

> Subject: Re: Re: the truth about shampoo

>

> Sounds awful. Interestingly, though, several people who commented on

> the shampoo story on Salon.com specifically mentioned Aubrey as a good

> alternative to conventional shampoo brands. Maybe they hadn't actually

> tried it!

> Jeanmarie

>

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think if we all just simplify or cut back where we can (and that

will be different for each of us), it could reduce the load of toxins

in our water systems.

Not trying to part you from your Pantene, but truly, lather doesn't

really have that much to do with cleaning. Here's an excerpt from the

article:

Consumers believe that thick is better. Which may explain why

Bush was a two-termer. Shampooers trust the velvet heft of the shampoo

in the palms of their hands. So five of the 20 ingredients on the list

are there because they help thicken the soap. Thickness also

guarantees that people use more shampoo than necessary. There's salt,

glycol distearate, cetyl alcohol, ammonium xylene sulfonate and

others: body on tap.

And where would we be without suds? Cleaning agents do tend to foam a

little when they're used, but the bubbles don't affect the cleansing

much. However, the extra lather helps convince the shampooer that the

soap is working. Lathering agents are added to boost the suds,

chemicals like cocamide MEA. This little devil, besides being toxic in

a few ways, also helps the lather to stay once it's been raised, a

sudsy Viagra, with the help of known associates like the plastic

PEG-7M. Great lather for great-looking hair.

On Aug 16, 2009, at 2:05 PM, Joy Rex wrote:

> Just about my only concession to conventional toiletries is shampoo

> (since the water in this area is very, very hard). I sure love my

> Pantene ;+) I did try the no-name brands, but saw that it takes like

> five times as much of the cheap shampoos to get a similar lather.

> Didn't do the math, but I would imagine it comes out cheaper to use

> the thick shampoos, not to mention it fills up fewer murderous big

> trucks rolling on our highways (think about how that shampoo and

> everything else gets to your local store).

>

> As far as laundry -- even in this hard water, soap works very well

> for laundry. I just put borax in it. Too bad that won't work for

> hair...

>

> <<<<

> -----------------

> Shampoo - There is no need to shampoo twice. Dilute shampoo by 50

> percent. Ditto conditioner. Buy no-name or store brands. Buy in bulk.

>

>

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...