Guest guest Posted August 14, 2009 Report Share Posted August 14, 2009 Great! How long have you been doing that? Several women commented to the writer " you must be a bald man, " saying they could never give up their shampoos! There are so many things we're trained (by commercials, store displays, magazine ads...) to think we need when really there are often simple alternatives that are more benign on the environment, on us, and on our budgets. Jeanmarie On Aug 13, 2009, at 6:01 PM, carolyn_graff wrote: > I use baking soda to wash my hair. it works great. I then rinse with > water/ACV. > > > > > > Here's a terrific article in Salon with a blow-by-blow accounting > off > > all the useless and toxic ingredients in shampoo, " natural " or not: > > What's really in your shampoo > > Sure, a couple ingredients clean your hair. But the rest are a > > veritable toxic dump on your head > > > > > > . > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 14, 2009 Report Share Posted August 14, 2009 I have an Ayurvedic-trained friend (a teacher and writer on the subject) and he recommends plain water instead of soap. He adds that it's OK to use soap sparingly on grime. Water is one of the best solvents for cleaning and will not kill the beneficial germs on our skin. -=mark=- Hansuke wrote: > What about soap? Is there also a better alternative? > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 14, 2009 Report Share Posted August 14, 2009 An alternative to soap? Soap is an alternative to harsher detergents or unnecessarily fancy cleansers... are you talking body care or hair or laundry or what? There are lots of low-impact soaps and cleansers out there, both commercially available and simple recipes you can make at home with cheap, basic ingredients. I can send you some links but I'm not clear which kind of soap you're talking about. Jeanmarie On Aug 14, 2009, at 1:40 AM, Hansuke wrote: > What about soap? Is there also a better alternative? > > > _ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 14, 2009 Report Share Posted August 14, 2009 Yes, soap isn't always necessary. Just definitely avoid antibacterial soap. The point of soap is to emulsify the dirt and excessive oil, making it easier for water to wash it away. It's not necessary to kill the bacteria that may be on your hands, unless you're performing surgery (and probably just thorough scrubbing and rinsing would be sufficient there), just to wash it away. Jeanmarie On Aug 14, 2009, at 6:17 AM, theta wrote: > I have an Ayurvedic-trained friend (a teacher and writer on the > subject) > and he recommends plain water instead of soap. He adds that it's OK to > use soap sparingly on grime. Water is one of the best solvents for > cleaning and will not kill the beneficial germs on our skin. -=mark=- > > Hansuke wrote: > > What about soap? Is there also a better alternative? > > > > > > _._,___ > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 14, 2009 Report Share Posted August 14, 2009 Well you certainly gave that a fair trial, ! I just tried one product some of the commenters to the article suggested, the Shikakai line from Dr. Bronners. It has very few, very pure ingredients. I had bought a bottle months ago and hadn't tried it yet. I liked it. But then, my hair is thick and short. I think the Shikakai liquid soaps are probably less drying than some people find Dr. Bronners to be. I don't think everyone needs to give up shampoo, and I hope I didn't imply that by posting that article link. For me, it brought up important issues to think about. It seems like if we don't overstrip our hair of oil when we wash it, we wouldn't have to put so much stuff on it afterwards. I'm just really cutting out commercial consumer products right and left and being more and more careful about the environmental impact of the products I use. Even with " green " products, they're usually packaged in plastic, and all those empty bottles weigh on my mind. I like how you can get refills of Dr. Bronners at a lot of stores and not have to throw away perfectly good bottles and then buy new ones each time. Trader Joe's has a peppermint body wash that's much like Dr. Bronners but cheaper, I hear. Jeanmarie On Aug 14, 2009, at 7:53 AM, wrote: > I tried going " no-poo " for almost 8 weeks (by using baking soda and > then rinsing with ACV/water). I also tried using nothing at all, but > lots of strokes with a washcloth, which I had also read an article > about. I really wished it had worked out for me, but I couldn't > stand it anymore and gave up. Maybe it works better for ladies with > curly hair. I have very fine, straight hair and while after a few > weeks my hair didn't look greasy, it always smelled like it needed a > wash to me. That was annoying, when others testified that their hair > and scalp smelled clean. But what I really couldn't stand was that > my hair was both lank and heavy and super staticy at the same time. > Sigh... > > B. > > - > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 14, 2009 Report Share Posted August 14, 2009 Sounds awful. Interestingly, though, several people who commented on the shampoo story on Salon.com specifically mentioned Aubrey as a good alternative to conventional shampoo brands. Maybe they hadn't actually tried it! Jeanmarie On Aug 14, 2009, at 1:30 PM, Stanley wrote: > > > > > What about soap? Is there also a better alternative? > > The shampoos from Aubrey Organics are soap based. I tried one, back > in the 1980s, and no matter how tightly I held by eyes closed, the > shampoo would get in my eyes and painfully burn them, leaving them > bloodshot like out of a horror movie. And, it made my hair feel like > straw. It became immediately obvious to me why soap is generally not > used in shampoos. That was the most violently irritating personal > care product I've ever used, which is kind of funny, because > Aubrey's marketing shtick was all about how the detergents in > regular shampoos are such powerful irritants. Yeah, right. > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 14, 2009 Report Share Posted August 14, 2009 Just my $0.02 worth, but I think most regular soaps are strongly antibacterial since they are based on caustic soda (Lye) - also known as Sodium Hydroxide or Potassium Hydroxide. Lye is a primary disinfectant around the house. Part of the hand-made soap process is the creation of this from wood ash. That is the primary reason I rarely use soap at all. I do not want to eradicate skin bacteria, I want to preserve it (and there are many good benefits from doing this). -=mark=- Jeanmarie Todd wrote: > Yes, soap isn't always necessary. Just definitely avoid antibacterial > soap. The point of soap is to emulsify the dirt and excessive oil, > making it easier for water to wash it away. It's not necessary to kill > the bacteria that may be on your hands, unless you're performing > surgery (and probably just thorough scrubbing and rinsing would be > sufficient there), just to wash it away. > Jeanmarie > > On Aug 14, 2009, at 6:17 AM, theta wrote: > >> I have an Ayurvedic-trained friend (a teacher and writer on the >> subject) >> and he recommends plain water instead of soap. He adds that it's OK to >> use soap sparingly on grime. Water is one of the best solvents for >> cleaning and will not kill the beneficial germs on our skin. -=mark=- >> >> Hansuke wrote: >>> What about soap? Is there also a better alternative? >>> >>> >>> _._,___ > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 15, 2009 Report Share Posted August 15, 2009 Lye itself is caustic but once it reacts with oil to become soap it's no longer so. Soap is not antibacterial, per se, without added ingredients such as trichlosan, which persist in the environment; the bacteria that aren't killed become resistant, thus the development of drug-resistant strains. Soap just acts to make water " wetter " (reduce its surface tension) to act as an emulsifying agent to suspend oil and dirt in water so they can be washed away. Sufficient washing removes bacteria without killing them. How gentle or irritating a particular soap is depends on the length of the carbon chain of the fatty acid. In this case longer is better. On Aug 14, 2009, at 2:29 PM, theta wrote: > Just my $0.02 worth, but I think most regular soaps are strongly > antibacterial since they are based on caustic soda (Lye) - also > known as > Sodium Hydroxide or Potassium Hydroxide. Lye is a primary disinfectant > around the house. Part of the hand-made soap process is the creation > of > this from wood ash. That is the primary reason I rarely use soap at > all. I do not want to eradicate skin bacteria, I want to preserve it > (and there are many good benefits from doing this). -=mark=- > > Jeanmarie Todd wrote: > > > ------------------------------------ > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 15, 2009 Report Share Posted August 15, 2009 On Aug 14, 2009, at 3:22 PM, Hansuke wrote: > I was thinking hands and body, however the other types (dishes & > laundry) would of course also be interesting. I'm in Germany, so I > would greatly appreciate if you sent me links to the recipes. > > > ,_._,___ > You could find any of this just by googling, but here's a list to get you started. I think Ecover brand is available in Europe; they make nontoxic household cleansers and soaps. Seventh Generation, BioKleen, Dr. Bronners come to mind; I have no idea whether they're in Germany. Here are some product sites: http://www.drbronner.com/ http://www.morroccomethod.com/ The Herbwife’s Kitchen » Shampoo? What shampoo? Simple herbal hair care. http://crabappleherbs.com/blog/2008/02/01/simple-herbal-hair-care/ Official Website of Onesta Hair Care http://onestahaircare.com/ Cal Ben Liquid Dish Glow Creme Soap http://www.calbenpuresoap.com/shampoo.htm Two books: Natural Beauty at Home by Janice . (ISBN 0-8050-3313-0) This book has easy (and cheap) recipes for making all of the items you listed and many more Herbs for Natural Beauty (Rosemary Gladstar's Herbal Remedies) by Rosemary Gladstar Here are some review sites that rate different products and explain ingredients: http://www.goodguide.com/ http://www.cosmeticsdatabase.com/ http://www.cosmeticscop.com/ingredient_dictionary.aspx?lid=532 To make your own household cleansers here are some recipes: http://organizedhome.com/clean-house/pantry-recipes-homemade-cleaning-products http://housekeeping.about.com/cs/environment/a/alternateclean.htm http://www.eartheasy.com/live_nontoxic_solutions.htm http://www.treehuggingfamily.com/25-safe-non-toxic-homemade-cleaning-supplies/ Here are homemade shampoo and soap recipes: http://www.pioneerthinking.com/hair.html http://chemistry.about.com/b/2009/01/10/homemade-shampoo-easy-recipe.htm http://www.instructables.com/id/Homemade-Shampoo/ http://www.bathgifts.us/shampoo/ http://www.ehow.com/way_5199663_homemade-baby-shampoo-recipe.html http://www.pureandnaturalsoaps.com/soap-recipes.html http://www.make-stuff.com/formulas/soap.html http://www.motherearthnews.com/Natural-Health/2007-08-01/Recipes-to-Make-Your-Ow\ n-Soap-Lotion-and-More.aspx http://www.treehugger.com/files/2005/12/easy_homemade_s.php http://www.stretcher.com/stories/981207b.cfm Here are some tips from the stretcher.com site on simply using less: Just Dilute The main ingredient in most deodorants is alcohol! If you use plain alcohol with a cotton ball each morning, it will last all day! For your teeth, Baking soda and salt make a very effective toothpaste. Also, salt water makes a good mouthwash. Dish detergent is just as good as shampoo. If you think that this might be too harsh, just dilute it with water. For those of you who say, " what, I would never use detergent on my hair " Just look at the list of ingredients on the back of your shampoo bottle. You might be surprised. Many common toiletry items can be diluted or have the recommended amount reduced. Shampoo - There is no need to shampoo twice. Dilute shampoo by 50 percent. Ditto conditioner. Buy no-name or store brands. Buy in bulk. Toothpaste - A paste of baking soda works well. Or reduce amount used by half. Mouthwash - Use only once per day. Dilute by 50 percent. Buy no name or store brands. Laundry soap - Use 1/2 cup of vinegar in place of bleach (this sterilizes in case of fungal infections,and also softens in the rinse cycle, eliminating the need for expensive softeners). Use 1/2 the recommended amount (this also saves excessive wear on clothing). Wash in cold water. Hang 1-2 loads a week (clothes last longer, saves on electricity). Do less laundry (hang towels after use, wear items more than once where possible ie. sweaters, dresses, pants). Paper Towels - Cut roll in half. Use rags instead. Facial Tissue - Use handkerchiefs (monogram if needed), soak in ice cream bucket until laundry day. Deodorant - Let dry uncovered for a couple of days, it will last longer. Ditto bar soap, but leave it for at least 1 week. Cheers, Jeanmarie Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 15, 2009 Report Share Posted August 15, 2009 Does anybody use www.cosmeticdatabase.com or do you just not trust it? Kathy From: [mailto: ] On Behalf Of Jeanmarie Todd Sent: Friday, August 14, 2009 4:04 PM Subject: Re: Re: the truth about shampoo Sounds awful. Interestingly, though, several people who commented on the shampoo story on Salon.com specifically mentioned Aubrey as a good alternative to conventional shampoo brands. Maybe they hadn't actually tried it! Jeanmarie On Aug 14, 2009, at 1:30 PM, Stanley wrote: > > > > > What about soap? Is there also a better alternative? > > The shampoos from Aubrey Organics are soap based. I tried one, back > in the 1980s, and no matter how tightly I held by eyes closed, the > shampoo would get in my eyes and painfully burn them, leaving them > bloodshot like out of a horror movie. And, it made my hair feel like > straw. It became immediately obvious to me why soap is generally not > used in shampoos. That was the most violently irritating personal > care product I've ever used, which is kind of funny, because > Aubrey's marketing shtick was all about how the detergents in > regular shampoos are such powerful irritants. Yeah, right. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 15, 2009 Report Share Posted August 15, 2009 I haven't really used it because I trust my own judgment in selecting products with very simple ingredient lists. I use basics like salt, soda, vinegar, castile soap a lot. I think EWG is a good resource though and I respect them. What has your experience been? Jeanmarie On Aug 14, 2009, at 8:43 PM, Kathy Dickson wrote: > Does anybody use www.cosmeticdatabase.com or do you just not trust it? > > Kathy > > From: > [mailto: ] On Behalf Of Jeanmarie Todd > Sent: Friday, August 14, 2009 4:04 PM > > Subject: Re: Re: the truth about shampoo > > Sounds awful. Interestingly, though, several people who commented on > the shampoo story on Salon.com specifically mentioned Aubrey as a good > alternative to conventional shampoo brands. Maybe they hadn't actually > tried it! > Jeanmarie > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 17, 2009 Report Share Posted August 17, 2009 I think if we all just simplify or cut back where we can (and that will be different for each of us), it could reduce the load of toxins in our water systems. Not trying to part you from your Pantene, but truly, lather doesn't really have that much to do with cleaning. Here's an excerpt from the article: Consumers believe that thick is better. Which may explain why Bush was a two-termer. Shampooers trust the velvet heft of the shampoo in the palms of their hands. So five of the 20 ingredients on the list are there because they help thicken the soap. Thickness also guarantees that people use more shampoo than necessary. There's salt, glycol distearate, cetyl alcohol, ammonium xylene sulfonate and others: body on tap. And where would we be without suds? Cleaning agents do tend to foam a little when they're used, but the bubbles don't affect the cleansing much. However, the extra lather helps convince the shampooer that the soap is working. Lathering agents are added to boost the suds, chemicals like cocamide MEA. This little devil, besides being toxic in a few ways, also helps the lather to stay once it's been raised, a sudsy Viagra, with the help of known associates like the plastic PEG-7M. Great lather for great-looking hair. On Aug 16, 2009, at 2:05 PM, Joy Rex wrote: > Just about my only concession to conventional toiletries is shampoo > (since the water in this area is very, very hard). I sure love my > Pantene ;+) I did try the no-name brands, but saw that it takes like > five times as much of the cheap shampoos to get a similar lather. > Didn't do the math, but I would imagine it comes out cheaper to use > the thick shampoos, not to mention it fills up fewer murderous big > trucks rolling on our highways (think about how that shampoo and > everything else gets to your local store). > > As far as laundry -- even in this hard water, soap works very well > for laundry. I just put borax in it. Too bad that won't work for > hair... > > <<<< > ----------------- > Shampoo - There is no need to shampoo twice. Dilute shampoo by 50 > percent. Ditto conditioner. Buy no-name or store brands. Buy in bulk. > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.