Guest guest Posted August 20, 2009 Report Share Posted August 20, 2009 Well, establish that I call anyone that I disagree with names, and we'll talk. please no name-calling  Please let's not do this, name-calling anyone you disagree with. On Aug 20, 2009, at 7:17 AM, Ancient Eyeball Recipe wrote: > > There is no bipartisan debate. You people are nuts. > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 20, 2009 Report Share Posted August 20, 2009 " you people are nuts " Really, does this advance your cause? On Aug 20, 2009, at 10:45 AM, Ancient Eyeball Recipe wrote: > Well, establish that I call anyone that I disagree with names, and > we'll talk. > please no name-calling > > > > Please let's not do this, name-calling anyone you disagree with. > > On Aug 20, 2009, at 7:17 AM, Ancient Eyeball Recipe wrote: > > > > There is no bipartisan debate. You people are nuts. > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 20, 2009 Report Share Posted August 20, 2009 Ok - so that quote establishes that I call everyone that I disagree " names " ? Or are you saying that I shouldn't post things that are counterproductive to my cause? I think that it's quite obvious to anyone with a brain that there is no 'bipartisan debate' at all. The Democrats, at least Obama have sold out to pharma and large corporations, and the Republicans want to derail the whole thing, with insane talk of 'death panels', and inciting people to violence. Pure demogoguery....as far as advancing a cause like this - do you think that anyone on this little list is " advancing " a cause? please no name-calling > > > > Please let's not do this, name-calling anyone you disagree with. > > On Aug 20, 2009, at 7:17 AM, Ancient Eyeball Recipe wrote: > > > > There is no bipartisan debate. You people are nuts. > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 20, 2009 Report Share Posted August 20, 2009 I'm just asking for civility on this list. I'm not taking a position on any policy opinion of yours, for or against. Just asking you to be civil. Thanks, Jeanmarie On Aug 20, 2009, at 11:02 AM, Ancient Eyeball Recipe wrote: > > > Ok - so that quote establishes that I call everyone that I disagree > " names " ? > > Or are you saying that I shouldn't post things that are > counterproductive to my cause? > > I think that it's quite obvious to anyone with a brain that there is > no 'bipartisan debate' at all. The Democrats, at least Obama have > sold out to pharma and large corporations, and the Republicans want > to derail the whole thing, with insane talk of 'death panels', and > inciting people to violence. Pure demogoguery....as far as advancing > a cause like this - do you think that anyone on this little list is > " advancing " a cause? > > > > RECENT ACTIVITY > 24 > New Members > Visit Your Group > Give Back > for Good > Get inspired > by a good cause. > Y! Toolbar > Get it Free! > easy 1-click access > to your groups. > > Start a group > in 3 easy steps. > Connect with others. > . > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 21, 2009 Report Share Posted August 21, 2009 Jeanmarie, I find it best to ignore this person. It's typical behavior I've come to expect after years of reading this list. Dawn From: [mailto: ] On Behalf Of Jeanmarie Todd Sent: Thursday, August 20, 2009 1:17 PM Subject: Re: please no name-calling I'm just asking for civility on this list. I'm not taking a position on any policy opinion of yours, for or against. Just asking you to be civil. Thanks, Jeanmarie On Aug 20, 2009, at 11:02 AM, Ancient Eyeball Recipe wrote: > > > Ok - so that quote establishes that I call everyone that I disagree > " names " ? > > Or are you saying that I shouldn't post things that are > counterproductive to my cause? > > I think that it's quite obvious to anyone with a brain that there is > no 'bipartisan debate' at all. The Democrats, at least Obama have > sold out to pharma and large corporations, and the Republicans want > to derail the whole thing, with insane talk of 'death panels', and > inciting people to violence. Pure demogoguery....as far as advancing > a cause like this - do you think that anyone on this little list is > " advancing " a cause? > > > > RECENT ACTIVITY > 24 > New Members > Visit Your Group > Give Back > for Good > Get inspired > by a good cause. > Y! Toolbar > Get it Free! > easy 1-click access > to your groups. > > Start a group > in 3 easy steps. > Connect with others. > . > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 21, 2009 Report Share Posted August 21, 2009 This is far closer to name calling than anything I've done in this thread. But your behavior is 'typical' of someone who ignores reason. Re: please no name-calling I'm just asking for civility on this list. I'm not taking a position on any policy opinion of yours, for or against. Just asking you to be civil. Thanks, Jeanmarie On Aug 20, 2009, at 11:02 AM, Ancient Eyeball Recipe wrote: > > > Ok - so that quote establishes that I call everyone that I disagree > " names " ? > > Or are you saying that I shouldn't post things that are > counterproductive to my cause? > > I think that it's quite obvious to anyone with a brain that there is > no 'bipartisan debate' at all. The Democrats, at least Obama have > sold out to pharma and large corporations, and the Republicans want > to derail the whole thing, with insane talk of 'death panels', and > inciting people to violence. Pure demogoguery....as far as advancing > a cause like this - do you think that anyone on this little list is > " advancing " a cause? > > > > RECENT ACTIVITY > 24 > New Members > Visit Your Group > Give Back > for Good > Get inspired > by a good cause. > Y! Toolbar > Get it Free! > easy 1-click access > to your groups. > > Start a group > in 3 easy steps. > Connect with others. > . > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 21, 2009 Report Share Posted August 21, 2009 ly, both of the ladies are right. Anytime you disagree you have to insult in some way whether it be flat out name calling or insinuation, you hurl insults. Like a kid having a tantrum, not getting their way so they resort to name calling. You think your opinion is the only that matters and the rest of us are idiots and shouldn't be allowed to speak. Pretty much the only time you post on here is to be inflammatory, not for thoughtful debate. Your behavior is typical of someone who is so full of themselves that they do not have any reason. You slam people left and right for not believing as you. You define hypocrisy and rudeness. You accuse others of not having any tolerance of your ideas/beliefs, when all the while it is you who do not have any tolerance for anyone who believes differently than yourself. Preaching tolerance, while being intolerant to any and all who disagree with you. Your way or the hiway. Very common character trait in your type. --- In , Ancient Eyeball Recipe <implode7@...> wrote: > > > > This is far closer to name calling than anything I've done in this thread. > > > > But your behavior is 'typical' of someone who ignores reason. > RE: please no name-calling > > Â > > > > > Jeanmarie, > > I find it best to ignore this person. It's typical behavior I've come to > expect after years of reading this list. > > Dawn > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 21, 2009 Report Share Posted August 21, 2009 It's a amusing, because if I say anything negative then you will insist that here is yet another example of me insulting everyone I disagree with, and if I don't you'll think that you made your case. But obviously you feel that you can make your point with a gross exaggeration. > ly, both of the ladies are right. Anytime you disagree you have > to insult in some way whether it be flat out name calling or > insinuation, you hurl insults. Like a kid having a tantrum, not > getting their way so they resort to name calling. You think your > opinion is the only that matters and the rest of us are idiots and > shouldn't be allowed to speak. Pretty much the only time you post on > here is to be inflammatory, not for thoughtful debate. Your behavior > is typical of someone who is so full of themselves that they do not > have any reason. You slam people left and right for not believing as > you. You define hypocrisy and rudeness. You accuse others of not > having any tolerance of your ideas/beliefs, when all the while it is > you who do not have any tolerance for anyone who believes > differently than yourself. Preaching tolerance, while being > intolerant to any and all who disagree with you. Your way or the > hiway. Very common character trait in your type. > > > > > > > > > > > > This is far closer to name calling than anything I've done in this > thread. > > > > > > > > But your behavior is 'typical' of someone who ignores reason. > > RE: please no name-calling > > > > Â > > > > > > > > > > Jeanmarie, > > > > I find it best to ignore this person. It's typical behavior I've > come to > > expect after years of reading this list. > > > > Dawn > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 21, 2009 Report Share Posted August 21, 2009 You're right. I wasn't planning to respond further if he had any more obnoxious things to say. I'll speak up once or twice, then drop it, is my policy. Fortunately most people on this list are well behaved. <g> BTW I'm having trouble with my e-mail, it has trouble sending then sends twice. Grrr. Jeanmarie On Aug 20, 2009, at 5:05 PM, Dawn wrote: > Jeanmarie, > > I find it best to ignore this person. It's typical behavior I've > come to > expect after years of reading this list. > > Dawn > > From: > [mailto: ] On Behalf Of Jeanmarie Todd > Sent: Thursday, August 20, 2009 1:17 PM > > Subject: Re: please no name-calling > > I'm just asking for civility on this list. I'm not taking a position > on any policy opinion of yours, for or against. Just asking you to be > civil. > Thanks, > Jeanmarie > > On Aug 20, 2009, at 11:02 AM, Ancient Eyeball Recipe wrote: > > > > > > > Ok - so that quote establishes that I call everyone that I disagree > > " names " ? > > > > Or are you saying that I shouldn't post things that are > > counterproductive to my cause? > > > > I think that it's quite obvious to anyone with a brain that there is > > no 'bipartisan debate' at all. The Democrats, at least Obama have > > sold out to pharma and large corporations, and the Republicans want > > to derail the whole thing, with insane talk of 'death panels', and > > inciting people to violence. Pure demogoguery....as far as advancing > > a cause like this - do you think that anyone on this little list is > > " advancing " a cause? > > > > > > > > RECENT ACTIVITY > > 24 > > New Members > > Visit Your Group > > Give Back > > for Good > > Get inspired > > by a good cause. > > Y! Toolbar > > Get it Free! > > easy 1-click access > > to your groups. > > > > Start a group > > in 3 easy steps. > > Connect with others. > > . > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.