Jump to content
RemedySpot.com

Re: Psychiatric diagnosis vs. life

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

I read a study a while back that said the more sleep you get the better

life expectancy, until above about 8 hours or so, then life expectancy

went down. But thats just off the top of my head.

I'd love to hear some information on the normative human sleep patterns

before industrialization, clocks, jobs, etc.

Pete

haecklers wrote:

>

> I find it interesting that in order to qualify for a psychiatric

> diagnosis, it has to interfere with daily life; so if you have the

> same symptoms but get along quite well you should not be diagnosed.

> Wouldn't that interfere with studies to find solutions to psychiatric

> problems?

>

> I was reading up on bi-polar disorder out of curiosity and because I

> have peroids where I function much better on low sleep (like 5 hours a

> night) - feel brimming with creativity and energy and am very

> productive in terms of finishing projects, getting new ideas (that are

> fruitful), and such. And I have a monthly cycle that gives me about a

> week where I want to withdraw and not do much and sleep closer to 8

> hours a night.

>

> For one thing, it's got me curious on how much sleep a person *really*

> needs. I've read 8-9 hours a night for optimal health. Is that just

> because of our unhealthy lifestyles? Is there a bi-polar rhythm that

> is normal in people (women, especially I think because of the monthly

> cycle of hormones that affect mood and behavior)? Why is it that many

> of the great thinkers slept very little? Were they healthy or abnormal??

>

> I saw a DVD in the library about an artist who was studying (on

> himself) the effects of sleep deprivation on creativity - he seems to

> think (based on the back of the cover) that less sleep creates better

> creativity.

>

> Why is it that yesterday, when I had only slept 3 hours due to a mild

> but annoying cough, I was more energetic all day, in a better mood

> than days earlier, got more done, and didn't feel tired?

>

> Has anybody documented how much the natural people (i.e. " natives " ) slept?

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've been reading up on this. There's a syndrome(?) called " creative insomnia "

where people believe they do better creative work and problem solving in the

middle of the night and view insomnia episodes as a gift rather than a curse.

There's also a genetic mutation some folks have called FASPS where their

circadian rhythm is several hours off compared to most people's so they get

tired at 7:30 and wake up at 4:30, and their hunger, body chemistry and so forth

is offset by about the same amount of time.

I've been reading other accounts of artists and such who say they rarely sleep

more than 4 hours a day and feel like the night hours are the times they do

their best work - poetry, painting, etc. I do wonder how long they live tho

(based on your longevity thing - but then again could some sleep problems be due

to health problems while others aren't so the group of people who get less sleep

is a mix of the good and the bad?

Einstein and Edison both fell into this category, I believe (sleeping 4 hours a

night or less).

> >

> > I find it interesting that in order to qualify for a psychiatric

> > diagnosis, it has to interfere with daily life; so if you have the

> > same symptoms but get along quite well you should not be diagnosed.

> > Wouldn't that interfere with studies to find solutions to psychiatric

> > problems?

> >

> > I was reading up on bi-polar disorder out of curiosity and because I

> > have peroids where I function much better on low sleep (like 5 hours a

> > night) - feel brimming with creativity and energy and am very

> > productive in terms of finishing projects, getting new ideas (that are

> > fruitful), and such. And I have a monthly cycle that gives me about a

> > week where I want to withdraw and not do much and sleep closer to 8

> > hours a night.

> >

> > For one thing, it's got me curious on how much sleep a person *really*

> > needs. I've read 8-9 hours a night for optimal health. Is that just

> > because of our unhealthy lifestyles? Is there a bi-polar rhythm that

> > is normal in people (women, especially I think because of the monthly

> > cycle of hormones that affect mood and behavior)? Why is it that many

> > of the great thinkers slept very little? Were they healthy or abnormal??

> >

> > I saw a DVD in the library about an artist who was studying (on

> > himself) the effects of sleep deprivation on creativity - he seems to

> > think (based on the back of the cover) that less sleep creates better

> > creativity.

> >

> > Why is it that yesterday, when I had only slept 3 hours due to a mild

> > but annoying cough, I was more energetic all day, in a better mood

> > than days earlier, got more done, and didn't feel tired?

> >

> > Has anybody documented how much the natural people (i.e. " natives " ) slept?

> >

> >

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe great thinkers are more balanced. They do what they want to do and have

escaped any negative distractions in their life. They also may be in a more

meditative state because of the way they think. When people meditate they need

less sleep. The longer you are able to keep your mind clear, maintain

creativity and intuition, the greater quality of meditation you have. Many

discoveries that came to these inventors happened in an " aha " moment and came to

them from out of nowhere. This may involve something like meditation. They

were more grounded and resolved than most people in the realm of dysfunctional

thinking. They had their challenges but it was a different type of challenge

that didn't eat away at your mind and your personal energy.

Dan Holt

________________________________

From: haecklers <haecklers@...>

Sent: Tue, December 15, 2009 6:11:32 AM

Subject: Psychiatric diagnosis vs. life

I find it interesting that in order to qualify for a psychiatric diagnosis, it

has to interfere with daily life; so if you have the same symptoms but get along

quite well you should not be diagnosed. Wouldn't that interfere with studies to

find solutions to psychiatric problems?

I was reading up on bi-polar disorder out of curiosity and because I have

peroids where I function much better on low sleep (like 5 hours a night) - feel

brimming with creativity and energy and am very productive in terms of finishing

projects, getting new ideas (that are fruitful), and such. And I have a monthly

cycle that gives me about a week where I want to withdraw and not do much and

sleep closer to 8 hours a night.

For one thing, it's got me curious on how much sleep a person *really* needs.

I've read 8-9 hours a night for optimal health. Is that just because of our

unhealthy lifestyles? Is there a bi-polar rhythm that is normal in people

(women, especially I think because of the monthly cycle of hormones that affect

mood and behavior)? Why is it that many of the great thinkers slept very

little? Were they healthy or abnormal??

I saw a DVD in the library about an artist who was studying (on himself) the

effects of sleep deprivation on creativity - he seems to think (based on the

back of the cover) that less sleep creates better creativity.

Why is it that yesterday, when I had only slept 3 hours due to a mild but

annoying cough, I was more energetic all day, in a better mood than days

earlier, got more done, and didn't feel tired?

Has anybody documented how much the natural people (i.e. " natives " ) slept?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

An interesting thing is that sometimes how you feel does not necessary dictate a

healthy response by your body. I've talked to many people who felt great and

full of energy on a raw vegan diet, and exercised very much because they felt

soo good then finally learned much later the damage they were doing to there

body...despite feeling very energetic and even euphoric.

I wonder that even if getting less sleep might make you feel more energetic, it

could have long lasting consequences that may not be anticipated.

I also think many of the great thinkers were very passionate and even obsessive

about whatever they were doing, and that factor is probably much more important

than how much sleep they got.

-

>

> I find it interesting that in order to qualify for a psychiatric diagnosis, it

has to interfere with daily life; so if you have the same symptoms but get along

quite well you should not be diagnosed. Wouldn't that interfere with studies to

find solutions to psychiatric problems?

>

> I was reading up on bi-polar disorder out of curiosity and because I have

peroids where I function much better on low sleep (like 5 hours a night) - feel

brimming with creativity and energy and am very productive in terms of finishing

projects, getting new ideas (that are fruitful), and such. And I have a monthly

cycle that gives me about a week where I want to withdraw and not do much and

sleep closer to 8 hours a night.

>

> For one thing, it's got me curious on how much sleep a person *really* needs.

I've read 8-9 hours a night for optimal health. Is that just because of our

unhealthy lifestyles? Is there a bi-polar rhythm that is normal in people

(women, especially I think because of the monthly cycle of hormones that affect

mood and behavior)? Why is it that many of the great thinkers slept very

little? Were they healthy or abnormal??

>

> I saw a DVD in the library about an artist who was studying (on himself) the

effects of sleep deprivation on creativity - he seems to think (based on the

back of the cover) that less sleep creates better creativity.

>

> Why is it that yesterday, when I had only slept 3 hours due to a mild but

annoying cough, I was more energetic all day, in a better mood than days

earlier, got more done, and didn't feel tired?

>

> Has anybody documented how much the natural people (i.e. " natives " ) slept?

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I read that Edison never got over the damage done to his body while he worked

without sleep on the light bulb. he was a morphine addict ever after.

I think there is a high that some bodies are better at, that kicks in with

starvation or crisis. it's a flood of your bodies' natural endorphins (because

the body knows that the activity is so destructive it's time to let loose with

the painkillers.)

>

> I've been reading up on this. There's a syndrome(?) called " creative

insomnia " where people believe they do better creative work and problem solving

in the middle of the night and view insomnia episodes as a gift rather than a

curse.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Then again Edison also took other individuals inventions but he had the money to

actually market them. He probably just looked into cheaper materials to make

them more marketable. He also looked into the cheapest method to mass produce

them. He also took the opportunity to patent them so he gets all the money

rights. He was more of an entrepreneur than an inventor. He's not in the same

class as Einstein.

Dan Holt

________________________________

From: cbrown2008 <cbrown2008@...>

Sent: Tue, December 15, 2009 5:05:35 PM

Subject: Re: Psychiatric diagnosis vs. life

I read that Edison never got over the damage done to his body while he worked

without sleep on the light bulb. he was a morphine addict ever after.

I think there is a high that some bodies are better at, that kicks in with

starvation or crisis. it's a flood of your bodies' natural endorphins (because

the body knows that the activity is so destructive it's time to let loose with

the painkillers. )

>

> I've been reading up on this. There's a syndrome(?) called " creative

insomnia " where people believe they do better creative work and problem solving

in the middle of the night and view insomnia episodes as a gift rather than a

curse.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not all great thinkers are obsessive, but I definitely can't say that all great

thinkers were very grounded and at peace with themselves.

A genius that comes to mind first is Nikola Tesla. He was a very strange person

and definitely was obsessive compulsive.

Isaac Newton had nervous breakdowns and great fits of rage against anyone who

disagreed with him.

Beethoven had bipolar disorder, and wrote his most famous works while suffering

psychotic delusions.

-

>

> Passionate and obsessive. Perhaps, but not at the dysfunctional level many

obsessed people are at that generates negative energy. Many people are obsessed

because that is all they are good at and avoid other aspects of their life that

they are not good at.

>

> Great thinkers came up with their ideas and inventions because they were very

grounded and at peace with themselves. You have to be a resolved individual to

tap into such potential.

>

> Dan Holt

>

>

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here's what I don't get about that - if it's a disorder, how does it cause the

highs they get, the reason many people with bipolar disorder don't want to take

their medicine - the euphoria, creativity, boundless energy, etc.? How can

deficiency cause that? Granted, in some it goes too far and they get themselves

into trouble but how many artists and inventors have a functional version of

that?

BTW, it's not just lithium deficiency that causes that, some people have " high

histamine " and also function in a very high state of energy. It's called

histadelia and here's an article on it that says the Kennedy family are a good

example:

http://www.healthrecovery.com/HRC_2006/Depression_06/D_roller_coaster.htm

>

> Tesla was not a genius. Isaac Newton was a genius and I hardly call that much

of a dysfunction. I don't think bipolar disorder is a dysfunction. It's an

imbalance due to trace mineral deficiency from depleted soil and depleted food.

>

> Dan Holt

>

>

>

>

> ________________________________

> From: <gdawson6@...>

>

> Sent: Tue, December 15, 2009 9:24:53 PM

> Subject: Re: Psychiatric diagnosis vs. life

>

>

> Not all great thinkers are obsessive, but I definitely can't say that all

great thinkers were very grounded and at peace with themselves.

>

> A genius that comes to mind first is Nikola Tesla. He was a very strange

person and definitely was obsessive compulsive.

>

> Isaac Newton had nervous breakdowns and great fits of rage against anyone who

disagreed with him.

>

> Beethoven had bipolar disorder, and wrote his most famous works while

suffering psychotic delusions.

>

> -

>

> --- In , Holt <danthemanholt@ ...>

wrote:

> >

> > Passionate and obsessive. Perhaps, but not at the dysfunctional level many

obsessed people are at that generates negative energy. Many people are obsessed

because that is all they are good at and avoid other aspects of their life that

they are not good at.

> >

> > Great thinkers came up with their ideas and inventions because they were

very grounded and at peace with themselves. You have to be a resolved

individual to tap into such potential.

> >

> > Dan Holt

> >

> >

> >

> >

>

>

>

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why are Tesla and Edison not geniuses and inventors? That's absurd. Newton was

probably one of the most disturbed, paranoid, repressed, secretive, angry, and

obsessive individuals you would ever want to meet. He was definitely not " at

peace with himself. " He had an extended breakdown in 1693, which Newton said

resulted from lack of sleep, and historians relate to various causes such as

mercury poisoning from his alchemy experiments or the collapse of his chaste

relationship with Fatio de Duillier. Kepler is another obsessive, highly

disturbed genius. I don't know that you could say that this is the norm for

geniuses (can there a norm for geniuses?), but it is certainly not atypical to

be unbalanced and unhealthy.

Bill

>

> Tesla was not a genius. Isaac Newton was a genius and I hardly call that much

of a dysfunction. I don't think bipolar disorder is a dysfunction. It's an

imbalance due to trace mineral deficiency from depleted soil and depleted food.

>

> Dan Holt

>

>

>

>

> ________________________________

> From: <gdawson6@...>

>

> Sent: Tue, December 15, 2009 9:24:53 PM

> Subject: Re: Psychiatric diagnosis vs. life

>

>

> Not all great thinkers are obsessive, but I definitely can't say that all

great thinkers were very grounded and at peace with themselves.

>

> A genius that comes to mind first is Nikola Tesla. He was a very strange

person and definitely was obsessive compulsive.

>

> Isaac Newton had nervous breakdowns and great fits of rage against anyone who

disagreed with him.

>

> Beethoven had bipolar disorder, and wrote his most famous works while

suffering psychotic delusions.

>

> -

>

> --- In , Holt <danthemanholt@ ...>

wrote:

> >

> > Passionate and obsessive. Perhaps, but not at the dysfunctional level many

obsessed people are at that generates negative energy. Many people are obsessed

because that is all they are good at and avoid other aspects of their life that

they are not good at.

> >

> > Great thinkers came up with their ideas and inventions because they were

very grounded and at peace with themselves. You have to be a resolved

individual to tap into such potential.

> >

> > Dan Holt

> >

> >

> >

> >

>

>

>

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Great thinkers came up with their ideas and inventions because they were very

grounded and at peace with themselves. You have to be a resolved individual to

tap into such potential.

>

This sounds rather idyllic . I live with an idea man and he is far from

grounded and at peace. He is a tormented soul. There is more pressure on this

kind of person to perform something great because they know they can but their

environment doesn't allow them to follow their path.

There are plenty of examples of creative people living a short life. Many of

them are quite ill. The one who comes to my mind is the jazz pianist Bill

. I think he died in his 30's? Depression is common amongst the creative

which translates to thyroid issues.

Manic bouts have long lasting effects on the body. It is pure adrenaline rush

that contributes to heart disease and inflammation. It leaves the body tired.

They also make people crazy.

Working on a project or idea can prevent one from sleeping. One just doesn't

say, " oh, look what time it is. Time to stop. " One goes to bed still trying to

solve the problem, that is what creativity is, problem solving.

Its a trade off, creativity or sleep, as I sit here suffering from adrenal

fatigue. Much of my younger years ran on pure adrenaline. Now, I make sure I

can get 8 -9 hours of sleep, which is required for the adrenals to heal.

Sorry, I didn't answer the question about tribal peoples but I bet they sleep,

especially ones who live without modern conveniences.

Joan

Link to comment
Share on other sites

>

> Here's what I don't get about that - if it's a disorder, how does it cause the

highs they get, the reason many people with bipolar disorder don't want to take

their medicine - the euphoria, creativity, boundless energy, etc.? How can

deficiency cause that? Granted, in some it goes too far and they get themselves

into trouble but how many artists and inventors have a functional version of

that?

>

That is a good point. No one calls the highs the bad part of the disorder. It

is the lows that are unbearable and cause life dysfunction. And the highs and

lows are paired.

I agree with Joan that it is associated with all kinds of deficiencies -

dopamine, low beta endorphin therefore high receptors, alcoholic metabolism of

alcohol versus normal-person metabolism (there is a difference), maybe all kinds

of biochemical and behavioral causes. I agreewith Bill that it has long been

associated with intelligence and creativity.

However, I do know some creative people who used to be " tortured artists " but

healed with good nutrition. Turns out the creativity stays and all the angst,

drama, life crap and wasted cycles go away. So I now think that the tortured

part of the artist is from physical imbalance and if it was fixed the creativity

can soar without impediments. Too many artists and what not have been cut off

early for ignorance of such things.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

> btw, my brain is much heavier than normal - I weighed myself both with and

without my brain, and I'm simply off the scale. But only a few friends would

consider me a genius.

Hey congrats! most impressive.

My friends have said, " check out the big brain on Connie " . I wonder if that

counts.

Connie

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why do you keep talking out of your posterior? You are completely, totally wrong

about Tesla and Edison. Read something about them (and not a web site). Looking

at Einstein's brain is complete idiocy--it's superstitious pseudoscience. Newton

was not a genius because he was efficient at storing and utilizing information,

whatever that means. Science doesn't work by induction from raw data.

Bill

>

> Genius is when you tap into the greatest potential of the brain and the

ability to utilize it for thinking and analyzing at the ultimate degree. I

believe at this point your brain becomes far mar efficient at storing

information and utilizing it. When Einstein's brain was looked at scientists

found that it was not any bigger than the average human brain. What they did

find was that there were far more connective neurons than what most people had

and that is what attributes to genius.

>

> Newton and Einstein paved the way for mind boggling discoveries. Tesla and

Edison just took the ideas and concepts from other great thinkers and made cool

inventions from it.

>

>

> It sounds liks Newton's problems were situational and chemical rather than

personal attitude.

>

> Dan Holt

>

>

>

> ________________________________

> From: Bill <lynchwt@...>

>

> Sent: Wed, December 16, 2009 6:51:50 AM

> Subject: Re: Psychiatric diagnosis vs. life

>

>

> Why are Tesla and Edison not geniuses and inventors? That's absurd. Newton was

probably one of the most disturbed, paranoid, repressed, secretive, angry, and

obsessive individuals you would ever want to meet. He was definitely not " at

peace with himself. " He had an extended breakdown in 1693, which Newton said

resulted from lack of sleep, and historians relate to various causes such as

mercury poisoning from his alchemy experiments or the collapse of his chaste

relationship with Fatio de Duillier. Kepler is another obsessive, highly

disturbed genius. I don't know that you could say that this is the norm for

geniuses (can there a norm for geniuses?), but it is certainly not atypical to

be unbalanced and unhealthy.

>

> Bill

>

> --- In , Holt <danthemanholt@ ...>

wrote:

> >

> > Tesla was not a genius. Isaac Newton was a genius and I hardly call that

much of a dysfunction. I don't think bipolar disorder is a dysfunction. It's

an imbalance due to trace mineral deficiency from depleted soil and depleted

food.

> >

> > Dan Holt

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > ____________ _________ _________ __

> > From: <gdawson6@ .>

> >

> > Sent: Tue, December 15, 2009 9:24:53 PM

> > Subject: Re: Psychiatric diagnosis vs. life

> >

> >

> > Not all great thinkers are obsessive, but I definitely can't say that all

great thinkers were very grounded and at peace with themselves.

> >

> > A genius that comes to mind first is Nikola Tesla. He was a very strange

person and definitely was obsessive compulsive.

> >

> > Isaac Newton had nervous breakdowns and great fits of rage against anyone

who disagreed with him.

> >

> > Beethoven had bipolar disorder, and wrote his most famous works while

suffering psychotic delusions.

> >

> > -

> >

> > --- In , Holt <danthemanholt@ ...>

wrote:

> > >

> > > Passionate and obsessive. Perhaps, but not at the dysfunctional level

many obsessed people are at that generates negative energy. Many people are

obsessed because that is all they are good at and avoid other aspects of their

life that they are not good at.

> > >

> > > Great thinkers came up with their ideas and inventions because they were

very grounded and at peace with themselves. You have to be a resolved

individual to tap into such potential.

> > >

> > > Dan Holt

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Really? That's good to know, because I imagine your brain is quite thick.

>

> http://faculty.washington.edu/chudler/ein.html

>

> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Albert_Einsteins_brain

>

> The heaviest brain ever recorded weighed 5 lb. 1.1 oz. (2.3 kg). It belonged

to a

> 30-year-old male, and was reported by Dr. T. Mandybur of the Department

> of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine at the University of Cincinnati,

> Ohio, in Dec. 1992. An average-size brain for an adult would weigh 2.8 to 3

lb. (1.3 to 1.4 kg).

>

> So having the heaviest brain doesn't account for genius.

>

> Dan Holt

>

>

>

>

> ________________________________

> From: Ancient Eyeball Recipe <implode7@...>

>

> Sent: Wed, December 16, 2009 1:17:05 PM

> Subject: Re: Re: Psychiatric diagnosis vs. life

>

>

>

>

> where did you come up with this?

>

> There is no biological indicator for genius. Genius is simply something that

we call people whose capabilities are far beyond the norm. There are no 2 people

who would agree on who exactly is a genius and who is not.

>

> Re: Psychiatric diagnosis vs. life

> >

> >

> > Not all great thinkers are obsessive, but I definitely can't say that all

great thinkers were very grounded and at peace with themselves.

> >

> > A genius that comes to mind first is Nikola Tesla. He was a very strange

person and definitely was obsessive compulsive.

> >

> > Isaac Newton had nervous breakdowns and great fits of rage against anyone

who disagreed with him.

> >

> > Beethoven had bipolar disorder, and wrote his most famous works while

suffering psychotic delusions.

> >

> > -

> >

> > --- In , Holt <danthemanholt@ ...>

wrote:

> > >

> > > Passionate and obsessive. Perhaps, but not at the dysfunctional level many

obsessed people are at that generates negative energy. Many people are obsessed

because that is all they are good at and avoid other aspects of their life that

they are not good at.

> > >

> > > Great thinkers came up with their ideas and inventions because they were

very grounded and at peace with themselves. You have to be a resolved individual

to tap into such potential.

> > >

> > > Dan Holt

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Opinions are like another part of the anatomy. Every time something comes up,

you opine about it like you've just come down from the mountain, even when

you're just echoing wikipedia. Or you throw in something truly inane, like

telling us that Tesla and Edison are hacks, making them sound like Bill Gates or

something. Or that geniuses are well-balanced and healthy.

Expecting to find out something about Einstein's genius by taking his brain

apart is nonsense. First of all, people like Einstein are not geniuses primarily

because they are smart--lots of people are smart--but they are in the right

place at the right time with the right skills and mental frame. There are

historical and psychological conditions that enable someone to make such

transforming contributions. There's a whole literature on this topic and it

doesn't begin with weighing brains and counting glial cells.

Bill

> > > >

> > > > Passionate and obsessive. Perhaps, but not at the dysfunctional level

many obsessed people are at that generates negative energy. Many people are

obsessed because that is all they are good at and avoid other aspects of their

life that they are not good at.

> > > >

> > > > Great thinkers came up with their ideas and inventions because they were

very grounded and at peace with themselves. You have to be a resolved individual

to tap into such potential.

> > > >

> > > > Dan Holt

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interesting point. The book " The DaVinci Method " talks about how a certain

percentage of the population is wired differently - more prone to be diagnosed

as ADHD but also just thinks differently - more creatively. The author says

instead of trying to force them to be cookie cutter versions of other people,

which causes dysfunction and labeling, they should be allowed to cultivate their

way of thinking and processing and have a creative outlet to really bloom.

There is a diet/intolerance/imbalance piece to ADHD but there is also a

fundamental difference in the way a lot of them process things that does give

them a creative advantage, imho. Autism spectrum too, which is maybe why the

adults with it get so angry when we talk of trying to cure them. They have some

definate strengths they don't want to lose.

>>

> However, I do know some creative people who used to be " tortured artists " but

healed with good nutrition. Turns out the creativity stays and all the angst,

drama, life crap and wasted cycles go away. So I now think that the tortured

part of the artist is from physical imbalance and if it was fixed the creativity

can soar without impediments. Too many artists and what not have been cut off

early for ignorance of such things.

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

> There is a diet/intolerance/imbalance piece to ADHD but there is also a

fundamental difference in the way a lot of them process things that does give

them a creative advantage, imho. Autism spectrum too, which is maybe why the

adults with it get so angry when we talk of trying to cure them. They have some

definate strengths they don't want to lose.

>

Totally agree. I know a couple of bona fide geniuses who defend their

processing this way. ADHD, PTSD, and genius stuff all mixed together. I

personally think they would do much better without the alcohol and sugar - since

I think it's the cause of excess downs, procrastination, flitting from one topic

to another without finishing, drama blowups - all those things that take away

from the creativity. Because I've seen others bloom without all those

impediments.

But these geniuses are very much the boss of what they try in their own bodies

and the mood-altering food and drink will be the last thing anyone pries out of

their cold dead hands.

C

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Go find out just how profoundly inventive Tesla and Edison were. If they weren't

geniuses, no one was. You really want to defend the claim that Einstein born in

some other time would automatically be a genius--that it is completely

irrelevant the state of knowledge, his role as an outsider, his work as a patent

clerk, the new interest in the crisis of physics, and all the other things that

the actual literature on Einstein and on genius and creativity addresses? Go

ahead. You're just revealing your ignorance. Doing a web search (you know, like

" Tesla not genius no discoveries " ) won't remedy the situation.

It is a fallacy to assume that characteristics of Einstein's brain are what

explains why he was a genius. In any event, a sample of one will not tell you

very much. Einstein, as significant as he was, is only one of a number of

profound innovators in physics at the time--it was a revolutionary era in the

science, which should tell you that a complete explanation would have to be

social in character and/or refer to the contemporary state of knowledge--what

anomalies there were, what research programs existed, the significance of trains

and time schedules, and how Einstein's skills, like his use of thought

experiments, was well suited to that particular moment in history. Einstein also

benefited from a media-created cult status after Eddington's confirmation of the

bending of light. The reason you think of Einstein as an iconic genius has to do

with that story; as powerful as his science was, it was his reception that put

the label " genius " on him.

By the way, which one is supposed to be the genius--the college professor or the

rocket scientist? What if the rocket scientist is a college professor? What

about, say, Hawking or Murray Gell-Mann--college professors, right?

Bill

> > > > >

> > > > > Passionate and obsessive. Perhaps, but not at the dysfunctional level

many obsessed people are at that generates negative energy. Many people are

obsessed because that is all they are good at and avoid other aspects of their

life that they are not good at.

> > > > >

> > > > > Great thinkers came up with their ideas and inventions because they

were very grounded and at peace with themselves. You have to be a resolved

individual to tap into such potential.

> > > > >

> > > > > Dan Holt

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's garbage in about 12 different ways. Every genius builds upon concepts

that already existed. Einstein built his work on Mach, Poincaire, Lorenz, etc.

If you won't read an actual book about Tesla or Edison before opining, how about

running down the list of inventions on a web site? Would wirelessly transmitting

power be far enough ahead of Tesla's time if you won't accept alternating

current, tesla coils, etc.? (And why are we running candidates for genius by

your judgment? Why is that the test?)

" His brain shows that he analyzed concepts deeply and optimally utilized certain

ares of his brain. " ??? How can you show by looking at a brain that he " analyzed

concepts deeply " ?! Have you tested the brains of people who score really high on

video games--maybe they've got the same brain structure? And why would his brain

prove anything about why he created the science that he did.

I'll take Murray Gell-Mann over Husserl any day. Still, curiosity is killing

me--why is Husserl a genius? And would we include Heidegger, too? Of course,

maybe being a Nazi is a sign of bad health, so perhaps we can exclude him. And

can you maybe tape your lectures on the concept of genius so they can be

preserved for posterity. That way we can cite you when the concept comes up

again ( " Well, as Holt has shown, there are at least two twentieth-century

geniuses... " ). I think I get why you think geniuses don't build on previous

ideas--because you never bother with them. Just make something up and continue

to defend it by mere assertion and logical fallacies.

[screams...]

Bill

>

> They both took from concepts that already existed and built upon them, which

isn't genius. Einstein discovered new and powerful concepts. His brain shows

that he analyzed concepts deeply and optimally utilized certain areas of his

brain. Because of this his brain wasn't any larger than the average persons.

It did have a far greater quantity of brain neurons and glial cells in the

regions he used.

>

> Can't say if either Hawking or Murray are geniuses.

>

> Here is a list of people I know are geniuses.

>

> Einstein, Newton, Edmund Husserl, there may be many others.

>

> Dan Holt

>

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...