Guest guest Posted December 15, 2009 Report Share Posted December 15, 2009 I read a study a while back that said the more sleep you get the better life expectancy, until above about 8 hours or so, then life expectancy went down. But thats just off the top of my head. I'd love to hear some information on the normative human sleep patterns before industrialization, clocks, jobs, etc. Pete haecklers wrote: > > I find it interesting that in order to qualify for a psychiatric > diagnosis, it has to interfere with daily life; so if you have the > same symptoms but get along quite well you should not be diagnosed. > Wouldn't that interfere with studies to find solutions to psychiatric > problems? > > I was reading up on bi-polar disorder out of curiosity and because I > have peroids where I function much better on low sleep (like 5 hours a > night) - feel brimming with creativity and energy and am very > productive in terms of finishing projects, getting new ideas (that are > fruitful), and such. And I have a monthly cycle that gives me about a > week where I want to withdraw and not do much and sleep closer to 8 > hours a night. > > For one thing, it's got me curious on how much sleep a person *really* > needs. I've read 8-9 hours a night for optimal health. Is that just > because of our unhealthy lifestyles? Is there a bi-polar rhythm that > is normal in people (women, especially I think because of the monthly > cycle of hormones that affect mood and behavior)? Why is it that many > of the great thinkers slept very little? Were they healthy or abnormal?? > > I saw a DVD in the library about an artist who was studying (on > himself) the effects of sleep deprivation on creativity - he seems to > think (based on the back of the cover) that less sleep creates better > creativity. > > Why is it that yesterday, when I had only slept 3 hours due to a mild > but annoying cough, I was more energetic all day, in a better mood > than days earlier, got more done, and didn't feel tired? > > Has anybody documented how much the natural people (i.e. " natives " ) slept? > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 15, 2009 Report Share Posted December 15, 2009 I've been reading up on this. There's a syndrome(?) called " creative insomnia " where people believe they do better creative work and problem solving in the middle of the night and view insomnia episodes as a gift rather than a curse. There's also a genetic mutation some folks have called FASPS where their circadian rhythm is several hours off compared to most people's so they get tired at 7:30 and wake up at 4:30, and their hunger, body chemistry and so forth is offset by about the same amount of time. I've been reading other accounts of artists and such who say they rarely sleep more than 4 hours a day and feel like the night hours are the times they do their best work - poetry, painting, etc. I do wonder how long they live tho (based on your longevity thing - but then again could some sleep problems be due to health problems while others aren't so the group of people who get less sleep is a mix of the good and the bad? Einstein and Edison both fell into this category, I believe (sleeping 4 hours a night or less). > > > > I find it interesting that in order to qualify for a psychiatric > > diagnosis, it has to interfere with daily life; so if you have the > > same symptoms but get along quite well you should not be diagnosed. > > Wouldn't that interfere with studies to find solutions to psychiatric > > problems? > > > > I was reading up on bi-polar disorder out of curiosity and because I > > have peroids where I function much better on low sleep (like 5 hours a > > night) - feel brimming with creativity and energy and am very > > productive in terms of finishing projects, getting new ideas (that are > > fruitful), and such. And I have a monthly cycle that gives me about a > > week where I want to withdraw and not do much and sleep closer to 8 > > hours a night. > > > > For one thing, it's got me curious on how much sleep a person *really* > > needs. I've read 8-9 hours a night for optimal health. Is that just > > because of our unhealthy lifestyles? Is there a bi-polar rhythm that > > is normal in people (women, especially I think because of the monthly > > cycle of hormones that affect mood and behavior)? Why is it that many > > of the great thinkers slept very little? Were they healthy or abnormal?? > > > > I saw a DVD in the library about an artist who was studying (on > > himself) the effects of sleep deprivation on creativity - he seems to > > think (based on the back of the cover) that less sleep creates better > > creativity. > > > > Why is it that yesterday, when I had only slept 3 hours due to a mild > > but annoying cough, I was more energetic all day, in a better mood > > than days earlier, got more done, and didn't feel tired? > > > > Has anybody documented how much the natural people (i.e. " natives " ) slept? > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 15, 2009 Report Share Posted December 15, 2009 Maybe great thinkers are more balanced. They do what they want to do and have escaped any negative distractions in their life. They also may be in a more meditative state because of the way they think. When people meditate they need less sleep. The longer you are able to keep your mind clear, maintain creativity and intuition, the greater quality of meditation you have. Many discoveries that came to these inventors happened in an " aha " moment and came to them from out of nowhere. This may involve something like meditation. They were more grounded and resolved than most people in the realm of dysfunctional thinking. They had their challenges but it was a different type of challenge that didn't eat away at your mind and your personal energy. Dan Holt ________________________________ From: haecklers <haecklers@...> Sent: Tue, December 15, 2009 6:11:32 AM Subject: Psychiatric diagnosis vs. life I find it interesting that in order to qualify for a psychiatric diagnosis, it has to interfere with daily life; so if you have the same symptoms but get along quite well you should not be diagnosed. Wouldn't that interfere with studies to find solutions to psychiatric problems? I was reading up on bi-polar disorder out of curiosity and because I have peroids where I function much better on low sleep (like 5 hours a night) - feel brimming with creativity and energy and am very productive in terms of finishing projects, getting new ideas (that are fruitful), and such. And I have a monthly cycle that gives me about a week where I want to withdraw and not do much and sleep closer to 8 hours a night. For one thing, it's got me curious on how much sleep a person *really* needs. I've read 8-9 hours a night for optimal health. Is that just because of our unhealthy lifestyles? Is there a bi-polar rhythm that is normal in people (women, especially I think because of the monthly cycle of hormones that affect mood and behavior)? Why is it that many of the great thinkers slept very little? Were they healthy or abnormal?? I saw a DVD in the library about an artist who was studying (on himself) the effects of sleep deprivation on creativity - he seems to think (based on the back of the cover) that less sleep creates better creativity. Why is it that yesterday, when I had only slept 3 hours due to a mild but annoying cough, I was more energetic all day, in a better mood than days earlier, got more done, and didn't feel tired? Has anybody documented how much the natural people (i.e. " natives " ) slept? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 16, 2009 Report Share Posted December 16, 2009 An interesting thing is that sometimes how you feel does not necessary dictate a healthy response by your body. I've talked to many people who felt great and full of energy on a raw vegan diet, and exercised very much because they felt soo good then finally learned much later the damage they were doing to there body...despite feeling very energetic and even euphoric. I wonder that even if getting less sleep might make you feel more energetic, it could have long lasting consequences that may not be anticipated. I also think many of the great thinkers were very passionate and even obsessive about whatever they were doing, and that factor is probably much more important than how much sleep they got. - > > I find it interesting that in order to qualify for a psychiatric diagnosis, it has to interfere with daily life; so if you have the same symptoms but get along quite well you should not be diagnosed. Wouldn't that interfere with studies to find solutions to psychiatric problems? > > I was reading up on bi-polar disorder out of curiosity and because I have peroids where I function much better on low sleep (like 5 hours a night) - feel brimming with creativity and energy and am very productive in terms of finishing projects, getting new ideas (that are fruitful), and such. And I have a monthly cycle that gives me about a week where I want to withdraw and not do much and sleep closer to 8 hours a night. > > For one thing, it's got me curious on how much sleep a person *really* needs. I've read 8-9 hours a night for optimal health. Is that just because of our unhealthy lifestyles? Is there a bi-polar rhythm that is normal in people (women, especially I think because of the monthly cycle of hormones that affect mood and behavior)? Why is it that many of the great thinkers slept very little? Were they healthy or abnormal?? > > I saw a DVD in the library about an artist who was studying (on himself) the effects of sleep deprivation on creativity - he seems to think (based on the back of the cover) that less sleep creates better creativity. > > Why is it that yesterday, when I had only slept 3 hours due to a mild but annoying cough, I was more energetic all day, in a better mood than days earlier, got more done, and didn't feel tired? > > Has anybody documented how much the natural people (i.e. " natives " ) slept? > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 16, 2009 Report Share Posted December 16, 2009 I read that Edison never got over the damage done to his body while he worked without sleep on the light bulb. he was a morphine addict ever after. I think there is a high that some bodies are better at, that kicks in with starvation or crisis. it's a flood of your bodies' natural endorphins (because the body knows that the activity is so destructive it's time to let loose with the painkillers.) > > I've been reading up on this. There's a syndrome(?) called " creative insomnia " where people believe they do better creative work and problem solving in the middle of the night and view insomnia episodes as a gift rather than a curse. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 16, 2009 Report Share Posted December 16, 2009 Then again Edison also took other individuals inventions but he had the money to actually market them. He probably just looked into cheaper materials to make them more marketable. He also looked into the cheapest method to mass produce them. He also took the opportunity to patent them so he gets all the money rights. He was more of an entrepreneur than an inventor. He's not in the same class as Einstein. Dan Holt ________________________________ From: cbrown2008 <cbrown2008@...> Sent: Tue, December 15, 2009 5:05:35 PM Subject: Re: Psychiatric diagnosis vs. life I read that Edison never got over the damage done to his body while he worked without sleep on the light bulb. he was a morphine addict ever after. I think there is a high that some bodies are better at, that kicks in with starvation or crisis. it's a flood of your bodies' natural endorphins (because the body knows that the activity is so destructive it's time to let loose with the painkillers. ) > > I've been reading up on this. There's a syndrome(?) called " creative insomnia " where people believe they do better creative work and problem solving in the middle of the night and view insomnia episodes as a gift rather than a curse. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 16, 2009 Report Share Posted December 16, 2009 Not all great thinkers are obsessive, but I definitely can't say that all great thinkers were very grounded and at peace with themselves. A genius that comes to mind first is Nikola Tesla. He was a very strange person and definitely was obsessive compulsive. Isaac Newton had nervous breakdowns and great fits of rage against anyone who disagreed with him. Beethoven had bipolar disorder, and wrote his most famous works while suffering psychotic delusions. - > > Passionate and obsessive. Perhaps, but not at the dysfunctional level many obsessed people are at that generates negative energy. Many people are obsessed because that is all they are good at and avoid other aspects of their life that they are not good at. > > Great thinkers came up with their ideas and inventions because they were very grounded and at peace with themselves. You have to be a resolved individual to tap into such potential. > > Dan Holt > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 16, 2009 Report Share Posted December 16, 2009 Here's what I don't get about that - if it's a disorder, how does it cause the highs they get, the reason many people with bipolar disorder don't want to take their medicine - the euphoria, creativity, boundless energy, etc.? How can deficiency cause that? Granted, in some it goes too far and they get themselves into trouble but how many artists and inventors have a functional version of that? BTW, it's not just lithium deficiency that causes that, some people have " high histamine " and also function in a very high state of energy. It's called histadelia and here's an article on it that says the Kennedy family are a good example: http://www.healthrecovery.com/HRC_2006/Depression_06/D_roller_coaster.htm > > Tesla was not a genius. Isaac Newton was a genius and I hardly call that much of a dysfunction. I don't think bipolar disorder is a dysfunction. It's an imbalance due to trace mineral deficiency from depleted soil and depleted food. > > Dan Holt > > > > > ________________________________ > From: <gdawson6@...> > > Sent: Tue, December 15, 2009 9:24:53 PM > Subject: Re: Psychiatric diagnosis vs. life > > > Not all great thinkers are obsessive, but I definitely can't say that all great thinkers were very grounded and at peace with themselves. > > A genius that comes to mind first is Nikola Tesla. He was a very strange person and definitely was obsessive compulsive. > > Isaac Newton had nervous breakdowns and great fits of rage against anyone who disagreed with him. > > Beethoven had bipolar disorder, and wrote his most famous works while suffering psychotic delusions. > > - > > --- In , Holt <danthemanholt@ ...> wrote: > > > > Passionate and obsessive. Perhaps, but not at the dysfunctional level many obsessed people are at that generates negative energy. Many people are obsessed because that is all they are good at and avoid other aspects of their life that they are not good at. > > > > Great thinkers came up with their ideas and inventions because they were very grounded and at peace with themselves. You have to be a resolved individual to tap into such potential. > > > > Dan Holt > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 16, 2009 Report Share Posted December 16, 2009 Why are Tesla and Edison not geniuses and inventors? That's absurd. Newton was probably one of the most disturbed, paranoid, repressed, secretive, angry, and obsessive individuals you would ever want to meet. He was definitely not " at peace with himself. " He had an extended breakdown in 1693, which Newton said resulted from lack of sleep, and historians relate to various causes such as mercury poisoning from his alchemy experiments or the collapse of his chaste relationship with Fatio de Duillier. Kepler is another obsessive, highly disturbed genius. I don't know that you could say that this is the norm for geniuses (can there a norm for geniuses?), but it is certainly not atypical to be unbalanced and unhealthy. Bill > > Tesla was not a genius. Isaac Newton was a genius and I hardly call that much of a dysfunction. I don't think bipolar disorder is a dysfunction. It's an imbalance due to trace mineral deficiency from depleted soil and depleted food. > > Dan Holt > > > > > ________________________________ > From: <gdawson6@...> > > Sent: Tue, December 15, 2009 9:24:53 PM > Subject: Re: Psychiatric diagnosis vs. life > > > Not all great thinkers are obsessive, but I definitely can't say that all great thinkers were very grounded and at peace with themselves. > > A genius that comes to mind first is Nikola Tesla. He was a very strange person and definitely was obsessive compulsive. > > Isaac Newton had nervous breakdowns and great fits of rage against anyone who disagreed with him. > > Beethoven had bipolar disorder, and wrote his most famous works while suffering psychotic delusions. > > - > > --- In , Holt <danthemanholt@ ...> wrote: > > > > Passionate and obsessive. Perhaps, but not at the dysfunctional level many obsessed people are at that generates negative energy. Many people are obsessed because that is all they are good at and avoid other aspects of their life that they are not good at. > > > > Great thinkers came up with their ideas and inventions because they were very grounded and at peace with themselves. You have to be a resolved individual to tap into such potential. > > > > Dan Holt > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 16, 2009 Report Share Posted December 16, 2009 Great thinkers came up with their ideas and inventions because they were very grounded and at peace with themselves. You have to be a resolved individual to tap into such potential. > This sounds rather idyllic . I live with an idea man and he is far from grounded and at peace. He is a tormented soul. There is more pressure on this kind of person to perform something great because they know they can but their environment doesn't allow them to follow their path. There are plenty of examples of creative people living a short life. Many of them are quite ill. The one who comes to my mind is the jazz pianist Bill . I think he died in his 30's? Depression is common amongst the creative which translates to thyroid issues. Manic bouts have long lasting effects on the body. It is pure adrenaline rush that contributes to heart disease and inflammation. It leaves the body tired. They also make people crazy. Working on a project or idea can prevent one from sleeping. One just doesn't say, " oh, look what time it is. Time to stop. " One goes to bed still trying to solve the problem, that is what creativity is, problem solving. Its a trade off, creativity or sleep, as I sit here suffering from adrenal fatigue. Much of my younger years ran on pure adrenaline. Now, I make sure I can get 8 -9 hours of sleep, which is required for the adrenals to heal. Sorry, I didn't answer the question about tribal peoples but I bet they sleep, especially ones who live without modern conveniences. Joan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 16, 2009 Report Share Posted December 16, 2009 > > Here's what I don't get about that - if it's a disorder, how does it cause the highs they get, the reason many people with bipolar disorder don't want to take their medicine - the euphoria, creativity, boundless energy, etc.? How can deficiency cause that? Granted, in some it goes too far and they get themselves into trouble but how many artists and inventors have a functional version of that? > That is a good point. No one calls the highs the bad part of the disorder. It is the lows that are unbearable and cause life dysfunction. And the highs and lows are paired. I agree with Joan that it is associated with all kinds of deficiencies - dopamine, low beta endorphin therefore high receptors, alcoholic metabolism of alcohol versus normal-person metabolism (there is a difference), maybe all kinds of biochemical and behavioral causes. I agreewith Bill that it has long been associated with intelligence and creativity. However, I do know some creative people who used to be " tortured artists " but healed with good nutrition. Turns out the creativity stays and all the angst, drama, life crap and wasted cycles go away. So I now think that the tortured part of the artist is from physical imbalance and if it was fixed the creativity can soar without impediments. Too many artists and what not have been cut off early for ignorance of such things. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 16, 2009 Report Share Posted December 16, 2009 > btw, my brain is much heavier than normal - I weighed myself both with and without my brain, and I'm simply off the scale. But only a few friends would consider me a genius. Hey congrats! most impressive. My friends have said, " check out the big brain on Connie " . I wonder if that counts. Connie Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 17, 2009 Report Share Posted December 17, 2009 Why do you keep talking out of your posterior? You are completely, totally wrong about Tesla and Edison. Read something about them (and not a web site). Looking at Einstein's brain is complete idiocy--it's superstitious pseudoscience. Newton was not a genius because he was efficient at storing and utilizing information, whatever that means. Science doesn't work by induction from raw data. Bill > > Genius is when you tap into the greatest potential of the brain and the ability to utilize it for thinking and analyzing at the ultimate degree. I believe at this point your brain becomes far mar efficient at storing information and utilizing it. When Einstein's brain was looked at scientists found that it was not any bigger than the average human brain. What they did find was that there were far more connective neurons than what most people had and that is what attributes to genius. > > Newton and Einstein paved the way for mind boggling discoveries. Tesla and Edison just took the ideas and concepts from other great thinkers and made cool inventions from it. > > > It sounds liks Newton's problems were situational and chemical rather than personal attitude. > > Dan Holt > > > > ________________________________ > From: Bill <lynchwt@...> > > Sent: Wed, December 16, 2009 6:51:50 AM > Subject: Re: Psychiatric diagnosis vs. life > > > Why are Tesla and Edison not geniuses and inventors? That's absurd. Newton was probably one of the most disturbed, paranoid, repressed, secretive, angry, and obsessive individuals you would ever want to meet. He was definitely not " at peace with himself. " He had an extended breakdown in 1693, which Newton said resulted from lack of sleep, and historians relate to various causes such as mercury poisoning from his alchemy experiments or the collapse of his chaste relationship with Fatio de Duillier. Kepler is another obsessive, highly disturbed genius. I don't know that you could say that this is the norm for geniuses (can there a norm for geniuses?), but it is certainly not atypical to be unbalanced and unhealthy. > > Bill > > --- In , Holt <danthemanholt@ ...> wrote: > > > > Tesla was not a genius. Isaac Newton was a genius and I hardly call that much of a dysfunction. I don't think bipolar disorder is a dysfunction. It's an imbalance due to trace mineral deficiency from depleted soil and depleted food. > > > > Dan Holt > > > > > > > > > > ____________ _________ _________ __ > > From: <gdawson6@ .> > > > > Sent: Tue, December 15, 2009 9:24:53 PM > > Subject: Re: Psychiatric diagnosis vs. life > > > > > > Not all great thinkers are obsessive, but I definitely can't say that all great thinkers were very grounded and at peace with themselves. > > > > A genius that comes to mind first is Nikola Tesla. He was a very strange person and definitely was obsessive compulsive. > > > > Isaac Newton had nervous breakdowns and great fits of rage against anyone who disagreed with him. > > > > Beethoven had bipolar disorder, and wrote his most famous works while suffering psychotic delusions. > > > > - > > > > --- In , Holt <danthemanholt@ ...> wrote: > > > > > > Passionate and obsessive. Perhaps, but not at the dysfunctional level many obsessed people are at that generates negative energy. Many people are obsessed because that is all they are good at and avoid other aspects of their life that they are not good at. > > > > > > Great thinkers came up with their ideas and inventions because they were very grounded and at peace with themselves. You have to be a resolved individual to tap into such potential. > > > > > > Dan Holt > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 17, 2009 Report Share Posted December 17, 2009 Really? That's good to know, because I imagine your brain is quite thick. > > http://faculty.washington.edu/chudler/ein.html > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Albert_Einsteins_brain > > The heaviest brain ever recorded weighed 5 lb. 1.1 oz. (2.3 kg). It belonged to a > 30-year-old male, and was reported by Dr. T. Mandybur of the Department > of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine at the University of Cincinnati, > Ohio, in Dec. 1992. An average-size brain for an adult would weigh 2.8 to 3 lb. (1.3 to 1.4 kg). > > So having the heaviest brain doesn't account for genius. > > Dan Holt > > > > > ________________________________ > From: Ancient Eyeball Recipe <implode7@...> > > Sent: Wed, December 16, 2009 1:17:05 PM > Subject: Re: Re: Psychiatric diagnosis vs. life > > > > > where did you come up with this? > > There is no biological indicator for genius. Genius is simply something that we call people whose capabilities are far beyond the norm. There are no 2 people who would agree on who exactly is a genius and who is not. > > Re: Psychiatric diagnosis vs. life > > > > > > Not all great thinkers are obsessive, but I definitely can't say that all great thinkers were very grounded and at peace with themselves. > > > > A genius that comes to mind first is Nikola Tesla. He was a very strange person and definitely was obsessive compulsive. > > > > Isaac Newton had nervous breakdowns and great fits of rage against anyone who disagreed with him. > > > > Beethoven had bipolar disorder, and wrote his most famous works while suffering psychotic delusions. > > > > - > > > > --- In , Holt <danthemanholt@ ...> wrote: > > > > > > Passionate and obsessive. Perhaps, but not at the dysfunctional level many obsessed people are at that generates negative energy. Many people are obsessed because that is all they are good at and avoid other aspects of their life that they are not good at. > > > > > > Great thinkers came up with their ideas and inventions because they were very grounded and at peace with themselves. You have to be a resolved individual to tap into such potential. > > > > > > Dan Holt > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 17, 2009 Report Share Posted December 17, 2009 Opinions are like another part of the anatomy. Every time something comes up, you opine about it like you've just come down from the mountain, even when you're just echoing wikipedia. Or you throw in something truly inane, like telling us that Tesla and Edison are hacks, making them sound like Bill Gates or something. Or that geniuses are well-balanced and healthy. Expecting to find out something about Einstein's genius by taking his brain apart is nonsense. First of all, people like Einstein are not geniuses primarily because they are smart--lots of people are smart--but they are in the right place at the right time with the right skills and mental frame. There are historical and psychological conditions that enable someone to make such transforming contributions. There's a whole literature on this topic and it doesn't begin with weighing brains and counting glial cells. Bill > > > > > > > > Passionate and obsessive. Perhaps, but not at the dysfunctional level many obsessed people are at that generates negative energy. Many people are obsessed because that is all they are good at and avoid other aspects of their life that they are not good at. > > > > > > > > Great thinkers came up with their ideas and inventions because they were very grounded and at peace with themselves. You have to be a resolved individual to tap into such potential. > > > > > > > > Dan Holt > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 17, 2009 Report Share Posted December 17, 2009 Interesting point. The book " The DaVinci Method " talks about how a certain percentage of the population is wired differently - more prone to be diagnosed as ADHD but also just thinks differently - more creatively. The author says instead of trying to force them to be cookie cutter versions of other people, which causes dysfunction and labeling, they should be allowed to cultivate their way of thinking and processing and have a creative outlet to really bloom. There is a diet/intolerance/imbalance piece to ADHD but there is also a fundamental difference in the way a lot of them process things that does give them a creative advantage, imho. Autism spectrum too, which is maybe why the adults with it get so angry when we talk of trying to cure them. They have some definate strengths they don't want to lose. >> > However, I do know some creative people who used to be " tortured artists " but healed with good nutrition. Turns out the creativity stays and all the angst, drama, life crap and wasted cycles go away. So I now think that the tortured part of the artist is from physical imbalance and if it was fixed the creativity can soar without impediments. Too many artists and what not have been cut off early for ignorance of such things. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 17, 2009 Report Share Posted December 17, 2009 > There is a diet/intolerance/imbalance piece to ADHD but there is also a fundamental difference in the way a lot of them process things that does give them a creative advantage, imho. Autism spectrum too, which is maybe why the adults with it get so angry when we talk of trying to cure them. They have some definate strengths they don't want to lose. > Totally agree. I know a couple of bona fide geniuses who defend their processing this way. ADHD, PTSD, and genius stuff all mixed together. I personally think they would do much better without the alcohol and sugar - since I think it's the cause of excess downs, procrastination, flitting from one topic to another without finishing, drama blowups - all those things that take away from the creativity. Because I've seen others bloom without all those impediments. But these geniuses are very much the boss of what they try in their own bodies and the mood-altering food and drink will be the last thing anyone pries out of their cold dead hands. C Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 18, 2009 Report Share Posted December 18, 2009 Go find out just how profoundly inventive Tesla and Edison were. If they weren't geniuses, no one was. You really want to defend the claim that Einstein born in some other time would automatically be a genius--that it is completely irrelevant the state of knowledge, his role as an outsider, his work as a patent clerk, the new interest in the crisis of physics, and all the other things that the actual literature on Einstein and on genius and creativity addresses? Go ahead. You're just revealing your ignorance. Doing a web search (you know, like " Tesla not genius no discoveries " ) won't remedy the situation. It is a fallacy to assume that characteristics of Einstein's brain are what explains why he was a genius. In any event, a sample of one will not tell you very much. Einstein, as significant as he was, is only one of a number of profound innovators in physics at the time--it was a revolutionary era in the science, which should tell you that a complete explanation would have to be social in character and/or refer to the contemporary state of knowledge--what anomalies there were, what research programs existed, the significance of trains and time schedules, and how Einstein's skills, like his use of thought experiments, was well suited to that particular moment in history. Einstein also benefited from a media-created cult status after Eddington's confirmation of the bending of light. The reason you think of Einstein as an iconic genius has to do with that story; as powerful as his science was, it was his reception that put the label " genius " on him. By the way, which one is supposed to be the genius--the college professor or the rocket scientist? What if the rocket scientist is a college professor? What about, say, Hawking or Murray Gell-Mann--college professors, right? Bill > > > > > > > > > > Passionate and obsessive. Perhaps, but not at the dysfunctional level many obsessed people are at that generates negative energy. Many people are obsessed because that is all they are good at and avoid other aspects of their life that they are not good at. > > > > > > > > > > Great thinkers came up with their ideas and inventions because they were very grounded and at peace with themselves. You have to be a resolved individual to tap into such potential. > > > > > > > > > > Dan Holt > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 18, 2009 Report Share Posted December 18, 2009 That's garbage in about 12 different ways. Every genius builds upon concepts that already existed. Einstein built his work on Mach, Poincaire, Lorenz, etc. If you won't read an actual book about Tesla or Edison before opining, how about running down the list of inventions on a web site? Would wirelessly transmitting power be far enough ahead of Tesla's time if you won't accept alternating current, tesla coils, etc.? (And why are we running candidates for genius by your judgment? Why is that the test?) " His brain shows that he analyzed concepts deeply and optimally utilized certain ares of his brain. " ??? How can you show by looking at a brain that he " analyzed concepts deeply " ?! Have you tested the brains of people who score really high on video games--maybe they've got the same brain structure? And why would his brain prove anything about why he created the science that he did. I'll take Murray Gell-Mann over Husserl any day. Still, curiosity is killing me--why is Husserl a genius? And would we include Heidegger, too? Of course, maybe being a Nazi is a sign of bad health, so perhaps we can exclude him. And can you maybe tape your lectures on the concept of genius so they can be preserved for posterity. That way we can cite you when the concept comes up again ( " Well, as Holt has shown, there are at least two twentieth-century geniuses... " ). I think I get why you think geniuses don't build on previous ideas--because you never bother with them. Just make something up and continue to defend it by mere assertion and logical fallacies. [screams...] Bill > > They both took from concepts that already existed and built upon them, which isn't genius. Einstein discovered new and powerful concepts. His brain shows that he analyzed concepts deeply and optimally utilized certain areas of his brain. Because of this his brain wasn't any larger than the average persons. It did have a far greater quantity of brain neurons and glial cells in the regions he used. > > Can't say if either Hawking or Murray are geniuses. > > Here is a list of people I know are geniuses. > > Einstein, Newton, Edmund Husserl, there may be many others. > > Dan Holt > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.