Jump to content
RemedySpot.com

Dan - certification program

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Hi Dan,

Just now took the time to read further posts you wrote. Would like to respond

to this:

" Or, you can stick to a couple key sentences. This should all been in one book

while it's usually spread out in several books. Then this one book would offer

simple science on it:

body fat percentage

weight

activity level

activities

goals

aerobic/anaerobic activities and macronutrient energy intake/expenditure "

I totally agree that some books go on and on by repeating themselves over and

over. However, the more I study nutrition, the more I realize the complexity of

our human bodies and minds simply never ends! For instance, I could list at

least 2 dozen factors to weight that you don't list above (sorry, but I don't

have that much time right now!) that have nothing to do with calories in and

calories out.

Glad to hear you're checking into NTA. The majority of those books are

recommended, not mandatory.

Laree

_________________________________________________________________

Hotmail: Trusted email with powerful SPAM protection.

http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/201469227/direct/01/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There's lots of extra facts that aren't necessary to know unless you have a

certain need to know other than the relevance of the topic. Such as if you're a

scientist and want to know what role red blood cells play in weight loss. Just

giving an example, don't know if red blood cells do in actuality factor in to

weight loss or weight gain. It's not useful knowledge to you average reader.

Barry Sears wastes all kinds of time in his books with pseudo facts.

If you have certain health issues that factor into weight like constipation,

bloating, or wheat/gluten/dairy sensitivity that should go into a healing book,

not a weight loss book. Unless it's a specialized healing weightloss book. If

that's the case it should be compact with all kinds of information rather than

just a couple facts.

For a college course it would be wise to condense information so you don't have

to go through so many books.

Dan Holt

________________________________

From: Laree Kline <lareekline@...>

Native Nutrition < >

Sent: Fri, February 19, 2010 8:06:21 AM

Subject: Dan - certification program

 

Hi Dan,

Just now took the time to read further posts you wrote. Would like to respond to

this:

" Or, you can stick to a couple key sentences. This should all been in one book

while it's usually spread out in several books. Then this one book would offer

simple science on it:

body fat percentage

weight

activity level

activities

goals

aerobic/anaerobic activities and macronutrient energy intake/expenditure "

I totally agree that some books go on and on by repeating themselves over and

over. However, the more I study nutrition, the more I realize the complexity of

our human bodies and minds simply never ends! For instance, I could list at

least 2 dozen factors to weight that you don't list above (sorry, but I don't

have that much time right now!) that have nothing to do with calories in and

calories out.

Glad to hear you're checking into NTA. The majority of those books are

recommended, not mandatory.

Laree

____________ _________ _________ _________ _________ _________ _

Hotmail: Trusted email with powerful SPAM protection.

http://clk.atdmt. com/GBL/go/ 201469227/ direct/01/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

With my ability to shorten things to the point I probably could condense all

health, food, sources, agriculture, metabolic, exercise, macronutrient, and

health issues all in one book. With easy to read chapters. One thing I don't

other authors don't do is leave out a lot of unnessecary words. You'll find

you'll have a far quicker time running through a book while retaining far more

information. I would make learning easy, effective, and quick. Get straight to

the point. Use colorful charts to illustrate a point rather than trying to word

it. An explanation can be as simple as one simple sentence that feels an entire

chapter in other books.

Dan Holt

________________________________

From: Laree Kline <lareekline@...>

Native Nutrition < >

Sent: Fri, February 19, 2010 8:06:21 AM

Subject: Dan - certification program

 

Hi Dan,

Just now took the time to read further posts you wrote. Would like to respond to

this:

" Or, you can stick to a couple key sentences. This should all been in one book

while it's usually spread out in several books. Then this one book would offer

simple science on it:

body fat percentage

weight

activity level

activities

goals

aerobic/anaerobic activities and macronutrient energy intake/expenditure "

I totally agree that some books go on and on by repeating themselves over and

over. However, the more I study nutrition, the more I realize the complexity of

our human bodies and minds simply never ends! For instance, I could list at

least 2 dozen factors to weight that you don't list above (sorry, but I don't

have that much time right now!) that have nothing to do with calories in and

calories out.

Glad to hear you're checking into NTA. The majority of those books are

recommended, not mandatory.

Laree

____________ _________ _________ _________ _________ _________ _

Hotmail: Trusted email with powerful SPAM protection.

http://clk.atdmt. com/GBL/go/ 201469227/ direct/01/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...