POLITICAL: fw: URGENT FOOD NANOTECHNOLOGY

[Guest guest]

forward from: Eileen Dannemann [ncowmail@...]

Perhaps some of you remember the day when the National Organic Standards Board

and most consumers knew nothing about GMO. And we had

to get educated fast and just managed to save the Organic standards from GMO on

a case to case basis which was being pushed by Gene

Kahn of Cascadian who sold out to Welches. Well....here is the next wave that

you must be prepared for. I suggest the leaders of

food movements take the time to educate themselves this weekend.

THIS IS ABOUT THE APPLICATION OF THE RELATIVELY NEW SCIENCE OF NANOTECHNOLOGY TO

FOOD

It relates to S.510 the Food Safety bill

It relates to the Organic Certification diminution and Kraft being " krafty " in

preparing the way with the its lobbying a few years

ago to potentially set up the Organic standards to employ its patented

nanotechnology and create organic product lines...like

Organic diet drinks, for example.

.... for your education, Tiny primer (primer for you on nanotechnology from

www.etcgroup.org)

And a blurb about SENOMYX.

And a video series by Bruce Lipton that is very enlightening when you think

about how Senomyx must work.

Bruce Lipton Perception (beliefs) controls genes (series of 10)

<http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JJXRjEPEhL0 & feature=related> & feature=related

Renowned cell biologist, former University of Wisconsin Medical School professor

and Stanford University researcher Bruce Lipton,

PhD, MD.

.... The question ultimately comes down to the " programmer, " those that decide

what intention they have for Senomyx. This means ,

" Do we trust the corporations to use this " drug " for the benefit of health.

Well there, I have a clear answer ... and that is, NO!

Interestingly, they company has made a concerted effort to keep their meddling

out of the public and off of the labels. That, in

itself, is the revelation of their intent. Upfront, they will crow about the

virtues of Senomyx, and in the back room they are

likely considering the manufacture of cheap Senomyx-flavored polystyrene food

substitutes.

Given the moral compass of today's food industry corporations, legitimizing

Senomyx is like giving a gun to the guy who is already

threatening your life with a knife.

Hope this personal assessment is useful!

Bruce

See also:

New Chemical Alternative to MSG That is Coming Soon

http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2009/01/08/chemists-cooking-u\

p-mysterious-quot-fifth-taste-quot.aspx

Are Nanofoods the Next Consumer Nightmare?

http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2008/08/19/are-nanofoods-the-\

next-consumer-nightmare.aspx

more from: from Eileen Dannemann:

Folks...You had better get familiar with nanotechnology. It is a technology of

such small scale they are putting it in our food and

drinks without labeling...for example Kraft, Nestle, Coca Cola,

...Senomyx...An unlabeled food enhancer that will allow

manufacturers (such as Kraft who is an " organic " foods processor) to put it in

our drinks instead of sugar say, or salt or even msg.

But the caveat is....Senomyx, as an example of nano technology that basically

when consuming the product, it DRUGS our tongue

receptors so that we " think " we are eating sugar but we are not. Are we going

to allow the food manufacturers to destroy our trust

in our senses? If so..the children and the intelligent of world had better

start developing the advance inner sixth sense which

they can't touch.

It was, by the way, a Kraft related lobbyist who diluted the organic standards

Senate Bill 510 Food Safety does not mention nanotechnology as a safety issue.

Are they really interested in food safety or

controlling the market? If you want more on our work on S510, let me know.

EXPOSURE TO AERIAL EMISSIONS OF NANO COMPOSITE MATERIALS RESULTED IN

CHOLINESTERASE INHIBITION

January 22, 2010

by Hildegarde Staninger, Ph.D., RIET-1, Industrial Toxicologist/IH & Doctor of

Integrative Medicine. Integrative Health Systems,

LLC, 415 3/4th N. Larchmont Blvd., Los Angeles, CA 90004 Tel: 323-466-2599, Fax:

323-466-2774 e-Mail: ihs-drhildy@... C

September 7, 2009:

ABSTRACT: Cholinesterase inhibition has been associated with exposure to

oranophosphate and carbamate pesticides, since their

creation during World War I and II. Traditionally, they cause severe

neurological disorders that can paralyze not only insects but

humans. Individuals are usually exposed by misuse of pesticide applications or

through aerial spraying. The cholinesterase

inhibition effects for chronic exposure or multiple acute exposures are

expressed in acetyl cholinesterase, enzyme (AChE) activities

inhibition. The integration of nano particulates in various nano composite

materials, such as aerial hydrogels and other similar

materials used in aerial vector sprays, weather modification and sensor grids,

resulted in the individual having as high as 96.2 %

cholinesterase inhibition and detectable readings of nano composite material

present. Confirming Ocean University, China's findings

in the June 2009 issue of Chemical Sensitivities, that nano particles are 100

times more toxic than a single molecule of a

pesticide, such as Malathion, propoxopur or benomyl.

Background:During the summer of 2007 in Phoenix, Arizona, a female age 51 was

exposed to aerial spraying for weather modification

and vector control (mosquito) as performed through G-1 requirements and Project

Earth Scope1. She was at home and had her windows

open and went outside of her home to see what was happening. She immediately

felt a burning and tingling sensation and became ill.

After numerous analytical testing and physician evaluations, it was determined

she was exposed at a minimum to nano composite

material and SencilT1 technology due to specimens of the materials taken from

her body appeared to be hair follicles, but were not

upon laboratory analysis. The sample melted at 650 degrees C, while human hair

melts at just above 135 degrees C and synthetic hair

melts at approximately 225 degreesC.

Discussion:

Primary concern was individual's symptoms, which coincided with chronic acetyl

cholinesterase (AChE) enzyme inhibition in the

circulating red blood cells that are depository regulators for the various soft

tissue organs within the body.2 Once the levels of

the red blood cell values become very high they trigger the release of plasma

cholinesterase to replenish any future inhibition

roller coastering effects. The roller coastering affects can be very sudden or

gradual; all depending upon the amount of recovery of

the enzyme into the organ systems and the trigger points of specific sensor

modulating factors within the cell membranes and nuclear

membrane.

A comprehensive toxicological analysis of the results using the standard

mathematical calculations to determine the percent (%)

inhibition of acetylcholinesterase was determined from initial testing in 2008

to present 2009 values. The values were calculated

and based upon the most current cholinesterase value for red blood cells and

plasma to show a linear time relationship and medically

observations by her treating physician/naturopath and toxicologist from the

chronic effects of cholinesterase inhibition and its

toxicological neurological mechanisms of action.

On August 15, 2009 her individual value for cholinesterase, plasma 2019 and RBC

5774 IUs. A comparative table is stated below, based

on each date's value and compared to August 15, 2008 (note exactly one year from

initial testing).

Table 1 -1: Date vs. Value Level (IU) and Calculated % Inhibition of

Cholinesterase

Plasma

08/15/2008 07/21/2009 08/11/2009

2019 4928 4581

% Inhibition Base Value (BV) 59% 7.57%

NOTE: BV to Most Resent Test Value % Inhibition is 55.92% inhibition of Plasma

Cholinesterase over a 1 year period.

...