Re: Minger Refutes the China Study Once and For All

[Guest guest]

--- In , Masterjohn <chrismasterjohn@...>

wrote:

>

> Minger Refutes the China Study Once and For All

>

http://www.westonaprice.org/blogs/denise-minger-refutes-the-china-study-once-and\

-for-all.html

The responses from 's critics have included mentions of the 700 studies

referenced in the book that supposedly corroborate the book's claims. Has there

been any analysis of the book that deals with those studies?

[Guest guest]

The blog I just posted was primarily about one of them.

Chris

>

>

>

> --- In , Masterjohn <chrismasterjohn@>

wrote:

> >

> > Minger Refutes the China Study Once and For All

> >

http://www.westonaprice.org/blogs/denise-minger-refutes-the-china-study-once-and\

-for-all.html

>

> The responses from 's critics have included mentions of the 700 studies

referenced in the book that supposedly corroborate the book's claims. Has there

been any analysis of the book that deals with those studies?

>

[Guest guest]

FAcebook blog imports has been malfunctioning. However, it should be there now

since I posted a link on fb.

Chris

> >> >

> >> > Minger Refutes the China Study Once and For All

> >> >

http://www.westonaprice.org/blogs/denise-minger-refutes-the-china-study-once-and\

-for-all.html

> >>

> >> The responses from 's critics have included mentions of the 700

studies referenced in the book that supposedly corroborate the book's claims.

Has there been any analysis of the book that deals with those studies?

> >>

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >------------------------------------

> >

> >