Guest guest Posted November 24, 2010 Report Share Posted November 24, 2010 This is an important bill, if you live in the US, please take a moment to take action on this. Thank you, ACTION TO TAKE This Thanksgiving week, please take a moment to call or email your Senators to tell them to hold firm on KEEPING the Tester-Hagan amendment part of the bill. You can call the Capitol Switchboard at 202-224-3121 or go to www.senate.gov <http://www.senate.gov/> to find their website (if the phone lines are busy, the best way to reach them is through the Contact Page on their website) Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2010 2:14 PM Subject: Food Safety Bill Update To all: Re: Senate Bill S.510, The Food Safety Bill Because of public pressure, several of the most draconian and oppressive components of the legislation have been deleted. But the remaining legislation remains a nightmare of excessive regulation and cost. The impetus of the bill is trade groups representing large-scale industrial agriculture, who are hoping the regulations and expense for those trying to comply with the law will put small organic farmers out of business. The FDA already has full authority to insure food safety; the recent outbreaks of food borne illness represent failure on the FDA's part, not a need for even more legislation. The law was intended also to attack supplement manufacturers under the guise of food safety, with criminal penalties of ten years for a company that didn't file paperwork properly. We have been told that the more onerous regulations have been deleted, but it is still critical that you contact your Senators and express your opposition to this bill which will be up for full Senate vote next Monday. Below is a memo from the Weston Price Foundation about the bill. As you scroll down you will find a link to the Senate to help you contact your Senators. UPDATE ON FOOD SAFETY LEGISLATION Agribusiness shows its true colors! Last week, the Senate voted 74-25 to move to consideration of S.510, the Food Safety Modernization Act. After thirty hours of debate and behind-the-scenes negotiations, the Senators released a final Managers Amendment that includes a compromise version of the Tester-Hagan amendment. Thank you to all our members who have called and written over the last several months to help protect local foods! But even though an agreement was reached on the Tester-Hagan amendment last week, the issue is still not over. The final vote on the bill has been delayed until Monday, November 29, due to disagreements over amendments relating to the health care bill and a ban on earmarks. And, in the meantime, Agribusiness has shown its true colors. For over a year, the big Agribusiness trade organizations have supported passage of S.510. From Agribusinesss perspective, the bill was a win-win: they could absorb the costs of the regulations because of their size; theyd gain good PR for supposedly improving food safety practices; and the competition created by local food producers, which is rapidly growing, would be crushed by the regulatory burdens. This was only speculation until now. But when the Senators agreed to include the Tester-Hagan amendment in the bill, to exempt small-scale direct-marketing producers from some of the most burdensome provisions, twenty Agribusiness trade organizations fired off a letter stating that they would now oppose the bill. The letter from the Agribusiness groups states: y incorporating the Tester amendment in the bill, consumers will be left vulnerable to the gaping holes and uneven application of the law created by these exemptions. In addition, it sets an unfortunate precedent for future action on food safety policy by Congress that science and risk-based standards can be ignored. http://www.unitedfresh.org/assets/files/Letter%20on%20Passage%20of%20S%20%20510%\ 20and%20Tester%20Amendment.pdf What science and risk? No one has produced any data or evidence of any widespread problems caused by local producers and marketed directly to consumers. All of the major foodborne illness outbreaks have been caused by products that went through the long supply chains of Agribusiness. Agribusinesss real concern about the Tester-Hagan amendment isnt food safety, but the precedent set by having Congress recognize that small, direct-marketing producers are different, and should be regulated differently than large Agribusinesses. Agribusiness is trying to convince the Senators to pull the Tester-Hagan amendment back out. While the amendment is currently part of the Managers Package the amended version of the bill agreed to by six bipartisan sponsors nothing is certain until the actual vote. ACTION TO TAKE This Thanksgiving week, please take a moment to call or email your Senators to tell them to hold firm on KEEPING the Tester-Hagan amendment part of the bill. You can call the Capitol Switchboard at 202-224-3121 or go to www.senate.gov <http://www.senate.gov/> to find their website (if the phone lines are busy, the best way to reach them is through the Contact Page on their website) --------------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about books and lecture recordings, see www.newspringpress.com <http://www.newspringpress.com/> To subscribe, send a blank message to drgonzalez-on@... 36 E 36th Street, Suite 204, New York, NY 10016 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Senator Durbin (D-IL) is the sponsor of this bill. Write these senators today and tell them to revoke their support of Senate Bill 510! <http://www.contactingthecongress.org/> Senate Bill 510 Will Make It Illegal to Grow, Share, Trade or Sell Homegrown Food History In the 1990s, Bill Clinton introduced HACCP (Hazardous Analysis Critical Control Points) purportedly to deal with contamination in the meat industry. Clinton's HACCP delighted the offending corporate (WorldTrade Organization " WTO " ) meat packers since it allowed them to inspect themselves, eliminated thousands of local food processors (with no history of contamination), and centralized meat into their control. Monsanto promoted HACCP. In 2008, Hillary Clinton, urged a powerful centralized food safety agency as part of her campaign for president. Her advisor was Mark Penn, CEO of Burson Marsteller*, a giant PR firm representing Monsanto. Clinton lost, but Clinton friends such as DeLauro, whose husband's firm lists Monsanto as a progressive client and globalization as an area of expertise, introduced early versions of S 510. S 510 fails on moral, social, economic, political, constitutional, and human survival grounds. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.