Male Sex Workers & Vulnerability in India

[Guest guest]

Male sex workers: Are we ignoring a risk group in Mumbai, India?

ORIGINAL ARTICLE. Year : 2009 | Volume : 75 | Issue : 1 | Page: 41-46.

Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 2009;75:41-6

Santosh Shinde1, Maninder Singh Setia2, Ashok Row-Kavi3, Vivek Anand3, Hemangi

Jerajani4

1 Department of Dermatology, LTM Medical College, Mumbai; The Humsafar Trust,

Mumbai, India,

2 McGill University, Montreal, Canada,

3 The Humsafar Trust, Mumbai, India,

4 Department of Dermatology, LTM Medical College, Mumbai, India,

Correspondence Address:

Hemangi Jerajani

Department of Dermatology, LTMM College and LTMG Hospital, Sion, Mumbai - 400

022, India

Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None

Abstract

Background: Male sex workers (MSWs) have recently been recognized as an

important risk group for sexually transmitted infections (STIs) including human

immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection. Although there are global studies on

MSWs, few such studies describe the behavioral patterns and STIs among this

population in India.

Methods:

MSWs were evaluated at the Humsafar trust, a community based organization

situated in suburban Mumbai, India. We report on the demographics, sexual

behaviors, and STIs including HIV of these sex workers. Results: Of the 75 MSWs,

24 were men and 51 were transgenders. The mean age of the group was 23.3 (+ 4.9)

years. About 15% were married or lived with a permanent partner. Of these

individuals, 85% reported sex work as a main source of income and 15% as an

additional source. All the individuals reported anal sex (87% anal receptive sex

and 13% anal insertive sex). About 13% of MSWs had never used a condom. The HIV

prevalence was 33% (17% in men vs 41% in transgenders, P = 0.04). The STI

prevalence was 60% (58% in men vs 61% in transgenders, P = 0.8). Syphilis was

the most common STI (28%) in these MSWs. HIV was associated with being a

transgender (41 vs 17%, P = 0.04), age > 26 years (57 vs 28%, P = 0.04), more

than one year of sex work (38 vs 8%, P = 0.05), and income < Rs. 2000 per month

(62 vs 27%, P = 0.02). Conclusions: The MSWs have high-risk behaviors, low

consistent condom use, and high STI/HIV infections. These groups should be the

focus of intensive public health interventions aimed at reduction of risky

sexual practices, and STI/HIV prevention and care.

Keywords: Human immunodeficiency virus, male sex workers, men having sex with

men, sexually transmitted infections

How to cite this article:

Shinde S, Setia MS, Row-Kavi A, Anand V, Jerajani H. Male sex workers: Are we

ignoring a risk group in Mumbai, India?. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol

2009;75:41-6

How to cite this URL:

Shinde S, Setia MS, Row-Kavi A, Anand V, Jerajani H. Male sex workers: Are we

ignoring a risk group in Mumbai, India?. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol

[serial online] 2009 [cited 2009 Jan 26];75:41-6. Available from:

http://www.ijdvl.com/text.asp?2009/75/1/41/45219

Introduction

The organized sex trade has been a focus of intense discussion within the

context of the human immunodeficieny virus (HIV) epidemic in Maharashtra as well

as in India. [1] The female sex workers and their clients represent a high-risk

group for acquisition of sexually transmitted infections (STIs) including HIV.

Maharashtra's, and especially Mumbai's, organized brothels and various

commercial sex sites are frequently visited by men native to the city, and also

by the massive number of individuals migrating to the highly developed state in

search of employment. Also, the sex workers themselves come from both within and

outside the state.

Since the first case of HIV/AIDS was identified, prevention programs have

recognized the importance of understanding the sex work industry. This included

collecting systematic and reliable data on sex work, and contextual issues

around selling of sex. [2],[3],[4] While research on female sex workers is

extensive, comparatively less information exists on male sex work. Yet we cannot

simply assume that the pattern and characteristics of the female sex industry

will be the same as that of the male sex work industry. Coupled with sex trade

and industrialization, social marginalization of groups such as male sex workers

(MSWs) which include men who have sex with men (MSM) make prevention efforts

with these extremely vulnerable groups all the more difficult. [5]

MSM are a diverse and often hard-to-reach group, spanning all age groups and

socioeconomic backgrounds. [6],[7],[8] MSM in India can be divided into various

subgroups: self-identified MSM (gay identified, kothis, panthis ), behaviorally

MSM with no identity, bisexual men, and male-to-female transgenders ( hijras

).Other groups include subpopulations who are vulnerable because of their

occupations/profession, and often engage into 'survival sex'; work is often

intermittent and irregular for these men and they may actually have to offer sex

in exchange for money. [9]

This study aims to understand the prevalence of sexual behaviors and STIs

including HIV in MSWs. We further aim to understand the association of

sociodemographics and HIV in this risk group.

Methods

The present study is a cross-sectional analysis of unlinked anonymous secondary

data. We assessed the sociodemographic, behavioral, and clinical characteristics

of MSWs attending an STI clinic in an urban setting in India, Mumbai.

The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board at the Humsafar trust

as a secondary data analysis project.

Study site

The data were collected from men attending an STI clinic at the Humsafar trust,

a community based organization that provides services to various groups of MSM.

The clinical services include a voluntary HIV testing centre and an STI clinic.

About 100 new individuals access the services of the clinic every month. These

individuals are from all socioeconomic strata of the society; a large number of

them are self-identified gay men reporting for STI/ HIV testing and counselling.

Subjects

All individuals presenting at the STI clinic above the age of 18 years were

eligible for the present analysis. We defined MSWs as men or transgenders who

engaged in sexual activities with individuals in return for benefits either in

cash and/or in kind, and included them in the analysis.

Measurements

Data were collected on a structured interviewer-administered questionnaire. We

used demographic information: age, marital status, education, employment other

than male sex work if any, and income, for our analysis. We also used specific

information on sex work: age at first sexual exposure, number of clients per

day, meeting place for clients, preference of clients, type of sexual practices

(oral insertive, anal insertive, vaginal, anal receptive, or oral receptive) in

the past six months, in the present analysis. In addition, we included

information on other behaviors: condom use, alcohol use, injection drug use, and

any past history of blood transfusion, in our analysis.

Clinical evaluation

Subjects were clinically evaluated by trained physicians for the presence of any

STIs. Blood was collected for VDRL testing, Treponema pallidum hemagglutination

assay, hepatitis B surface antigen, HSV 2 IgG, hepatitis C, and HIV. Urethral

discharge, if present, was evaluated with Gram stain to identify white blood

cells and Gram negative intracellular diplocooci. Patients with genital ulcers

were treated clinically for syphilis, chancroid, and/or herpes. Patients with

symptoms of proctitis underwent anoscopy. All the subjects were treated

according to the guidelines laid down by National AIDS Control Organization,

India. Subjects were evaluated for HIV after consent and adequate pre-test

counselling by trained counsellors. They received their results at the clinic

after one week; they were post-test counselled during this visit. Clinicians

evaluated the response to medications in the subjects, and treatment was

modified according to the response to the previous medications.

Data analysis

Data were entered in EpiInfo 2000 and converted to Stata (version 10) for

analysis. Distribution of responses was calculated using means and standard

deviations (SD), medians, and proportions. Continuous variables were visualized

using histograms. We used t -test to calculate the difference between the means

of the continuous variables. Pearson's chi square tests and Fisher's exact test

(low expected cell counts) were used to evaluate the association of categorical

estimates. We calculated the odds ratio (OR) and the 95% confidence intervals

(CIs) as a measure of association.

Results

Data from 75 consecutive MSWs, 24 men and 51 male-to-female transgenders, were

analyzed. The HIV prevalence in the whole group was 33%; it was significantly

higher in transgenders compared with men (41% vs 17%, P = 0.04).

Characteristics of sex workers

The mean age (SD) of sex workers was 23.3 (+ 4.9) years. There was no

significant difference between the mean ages of men and transgenders, 22.2 (+

4.0) vs 23.7 (+ 5.2), P = 0.20. Majority of the sex workers were single (85%)

and were educated up to secondary or higher secondary school (55%). In our

population, we found that transgenders were more likely to be illiterate

compared with men (43 vs 25%), although the difference was not statistically

significant ( P = 0.15).

About 13% of the sex workers reported having anal insertive sex and about 87% of

them reported having anal receptive sex in the past six months. Men were more

likely to report anal insertive sex compared with transgenders (38 vs 2%, P <

0.00); the vice-versa was true for anal receptive sex (63 vs 98%, P < 0.00).

About 83% (62/75) of sex workers reported having oral sex in the past six

months; men were less likely to report oral sex compared with transgenders (75

vs 86%, P = 0.22). In addition, three men reported having vaginal sex in the

past six months. None of the transgenders reported having vaginal sex.

About 33% (25/75) of the sex workers had always used a condom, about 53% (40/75)

had sometimes used it, and about 13% (10/75) had never used it; there was no

statistical difference in condom use by men and transgenders. The most common

reason for not using a condom was nonavailability (43%), followed by refusal of

condom use by the partner (20%). About 15% (11/75) sex workers had tattoos, of

these six were HIV infected. Only one transgender reported injection drug use.

About 32% (24/75) of the sex workers were diagnosed with a clinical STI at the

time of presentation to the clinic. Among these STIs there were - seven cases of

perianal warts and genital scabies; four cases of perianal herpes infection; and

one case each of urethral gonorrhoea, rectal gonorrhoea, penile wart, perianal

molluscum contagiosum, primary syphilis, and secondary syphilis.

We have described certain demographic characteristics and STIs including HIV in

these sex workers in [Table 1].

Characteristics of sex work

About 80% (60/75) of our population identified sex work as their primary

occupation. All the transgenders stated that sex work was their primary

occupation. About 77% (58/75) of the MSWs met their clients at public places.

However, 67% (50/75) of the sex workers reported having sex in a private

environment (clients home, their home, or a hotel). About 85% (64/75) of them

reported sex work to be their primary source of income for survival. These MSWs

were more likely to be HIV infected compared with those that reported sex work

to be an additional source of income (39 vs 0%, P = 0.01). All the transgenders

had reported sex work to be their primary source of income. MSWs whose primary

source of income was sex work were more likely to report anal receptive

intercourse with their clients compared with others (92 vs 55%, P < 0.00).

We have described certain select sex work characteristics and association with

HIV in these sex workers in [Table 2].

Discussion

This is one of the few reports that provides data on the characteristics of MSWs

and male sex work in India. HIV infection in this group was significantly higher

in male-to-female transgenders, in sex workers >26 years of age, in those whose

total income was less than 2000 rupees per month, in those who reported sex work

to be the primary source of income, and in those who have been a sex worker for

more than a year. About 15% of the sex workers were married to a woman or lived

with a male partner, and 45% of these sex workers were HIV infected. Only 33% of

these sex workers had always used a condom. About 60% of the sex workers had an

STI (clinical and/or serological) at the time of presentation. Only 48% of the

sex workers perceived that they were at risk for HIV infection.

recommends using Maloney's definition of an MSW as 'any male who engages

repeatedly in sexual activities with persons with whom he would not otherwise

stand in any special relationship and for which he receives currency and/or the

provision of one or more of the necessities of living (food, clothing, and

protection)'. [10] The groups commonly involved in male sex work in Mumbai are

masseurs, transgenders, young migrant men practicing male sex work for survival,

or men with other occupations practicing male sex work for extra money. [11]

Among the sex workers, kothis are effeminate MSM who may have sex with men

and/or women. Though they are MSM, they nevertheless can turn their feminine

behavior on or off as the situation demands. This fluid behavior potentially

helps them to 'play with gender' in the context of sex work. However, in the

case of transgenders or hijras , the issue is compounded by their cross-dressing

and 'crossing over' to the female gender. They may be seen as objects for

penetration because of their cross over into the female gender. The noncastrated

transgenders have the option of being the insertive partners for other males;

their sexual behavior may still be fluid. Castrated transgenders can only offer

receptive sex; this 'fixed' gender identity and sexual behavior potentially

makes them most vulnerable for HIV/AIDS within the context of male sex work.

[11],[12],[13]

MSM are at a high risk for acquiring STIs including HIV. [14] The HIV prevalence

in our sample of MSWs was higher compared with other global studies.

[15],[16],[17],[18] Although, we did not find any published studies on HIV

prevalence in MSWs in India, Dandona and coworkers have reported that the

probability estimates for acquiring HIV by men who sell sex were 6.7 (95% CI:

4.9-9.2) times higher compared with women who sell sex. [19] Thus, MSWs are an

important risk group in the context of the HIV epidemic, and adequate attention

should be accorded to them. Though sex work per se is not a risk factor for HIV;

sharing drug-injecting equipment, condom use that varies between types of

partners, unsafe sexual behaviors, and inconsistent condom use increase MSWs'

vulnerability to STIs including HIV. [20]

Stigmatization of same sex behavior often results in hurried sex in the dark. In

our population, we found that although the common venues to access clients were

public places, the most common venue for the sexual act was a private venue. The

private space may potentially help in increasing condom use with clients.

However, condom negotiation may depend on various factors: economic

considerations, physical and/or emotional attraction toward the clients, types

of sexual practices (oral vs anal sex), and type of sexual partners. [12],[21]

In our sample, we found that individuals reporting sex work as the primary

source of income were more likely to be HIV infected. This observation was

potentially confounded by the type of sexual activity; majority of the sex

workers who reported sex work as main source of income were transgenders and

reported anal receptive sex. However, the role of economic factors in sexual

activity and condom negotiation by these sex workers should not be ignored.

Clients of MSWs form a heterogeneous group; broader understanding of the

interaction between the client and the sex worker may help us design effective

public health strategies.[22]

One of the limitations of the study was its sampling - it was a clinic-based

convenience sample, and hence may not be representative of the sex work in the

population. However, the Humsafar trust has a good peer outreach program and

provides information to various sections of the sex worker community. Our study

was conducted in an MSM STI/HIV clinic. Although there is a category of MSWs who

indulge purely in heterosexual sex trade, our study population did not include

these men. Thus, these findings may not be applicable to that population. Since

our data were collected in clinical settings, sex workers are more likely to

report socially desirable behaviors of safe sex practices; hence, we may have

underestimated risky sexual behaviors.

In spite of the above limitations, this is an important study which provides

information on MSWs in Mumbai. Unlike female sex work, where all other

identities of a woman are superseded and the primary identity becomes that of a

sex worker or woman in prostitution, in male sex work, they can hide under

various labels like masseurs, bar boys, etc. They can get away with these

'other' identities and still practice sex work without the stigma attached to

it. These groups should be the focus of intensive behavioral intervention - safe

sex and condom use, and STI/HIV prevention and care programs. [23] Qualitative

research would be an important tool to identify social aspects of sex work and

negotiation skills. Issues related to STI care access by these groups need to be

explored for effective public health interventions.

Acknowledgment

We would like to acknowledge the services of Specialty Ranbaxy Laboratory for

conducting the serological tests for STIs, Dr. Dethe for evaluating the

patients, and the outreach workers for assistance with data collection. One of

the co-authors (MSS) is funded by CIHR-IHSPR Fellowship and CIHR-RRSPQ Public

Health Training Programme for his doctoral studies at McGill University. The

Humsafar Trust would like to acknowledge support from Mumbai Districts AIDS

Control Society.

References

1. Gisselquist D, Correa M. How much does heterosexual commercial sex contribute

to India & #8242;s HIV epidemic? Int J STD AIDS 2006;17:736-42. Back to cited

text no. 1 [PUBMED] [FULLTEXT]

2. Dandona R, Dandona L, Gutierrez JP, Kumar AG, McPherson S, s F, et al .

High risk of HIV in non-brothel based female sex workers in India. BMC Public

Health 2005;5:87. Back to cited text no. 2 [PUBMED] [FULLTEXT]

3. Dandona R, Dandona L, Kumar GA, Gutierrez JP, McPherson S, s F,

Bertozzi SM. Demography and sex work characteristics of female sex workers in

India. BMC Int Health Hum Rights 2006;6:5. Back to cited text no. 3

4. Sarkar K, Bal B, Mukherjee R, Saha MK, Chakraborty S, Niyogi SK, Bhattacharya

SK. Young age is a risk factor for HIV among female sex workers: An experience

from India. J Infect 2006;53:255-9. Back to cited text no. 4 [PUBMED]

[FULLTEXT]

5. Mahalingam P, Watts R, J, Sundari E, Balasubramaniam S, Chakrapani V.

Stigma and discrimination affect access to medical care of HIV-infected men who

have sex with men (MSM) in Chennai, India. [abstract no. TuPeD5068]. 15th

International Conference on AIDS. Thailand: 2004. Back to cited text no. 5

6. Asthana S, Oostvogels R. The social construction of male

& #8242;homosexuality & #8242; in India: Implications for HIV transmission and

prevention. Soc Sci Med 2001;52:707-21. Back to cited text no. 6 [PUBMED]

[FULLTEXT]

7. Chan R, Kavi AR, Carl G, Khan S, Oetomo D, Tan ML, et al . HIV and men who

have sex with men: Perspectives from selected Asian countries. AIDS

1998;12:S59-65, S67-58. Back to cited text no. 7 [PUBMED] [FULLTEXT]

8. Khan S. Culture, sexualities, and identities: Men who have sex with men in

India. J Homosex 2001;40:99-115. Back to cited text no. 8 [PUBMED]

9. The Humsafar Trust. MSM Circle. In. Mumbai; 2008. Available from:

http://www.humsafar.org/resource_materials.htm. [last accessed on 2008 May 18].

Back to cited text no. 9

10. E. The development of male prostitution activity among gay and

bisexual adolescents. J Homosex 1989;17:131-49. Back to cited text no. 10

[PUBMED]

11. Kavi AR. Reaching out. Beyond the monsoon. India: AIDS Action; 1991. p. 4.

Back to cited text no. 11

12. Venkatesan C, Fernandes S, Ganapathy M, Mallika J. The hidden population of

male sex workers in Chennai, Tamilnadu - The need to develop specific

intervention programmes. In: II International Conference on AIDS. Chennai: 2000.

Back to cited text no. 12

13. Venkatesan C, , Fernandes S, M. High-risk sexual practices

among hijras in commercial sex work in Chennai, Tamil Nadu: Implications in

prevention and control of HIV. In: II International Conference on AIDS Chennai:

2000. Back to cited text no. 13

14. Setia MS, n C, Jerajani HR, Kumta S, Ekstrand M, Mathur M, et al . Men

who have sex with men and transgenders in Mumbai, India: An emerging risk group

for STIs and HIV. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 2006;72:425-31. Back to

cited text no. 14 [PUBMED] Medknow Journal

15. Coutinho RA, van Andel RL, Rijsdijk TJ. Role of male prostitutes in spread

of sexually transmitted diseases and human immunodeficiency virus. Genitourin

Med 1988;64:207-8. Back to cited text no. 15

16. Estcourt CS, Marks C, Rohrsheim R, AM, Donovan B, Mindel A. HIV,

sexually transmitted infections, and risk behaviours in male commercial sex

workers in Sydney. Sex Transm Infect 2000;76:294-8. Back to cited text no. 16

[PUBMED] [FULLTEXT]

17. Minichiello V, Marino R, Browne J, son M, K, Reuter B, et al .

Male sex workers in three Australian cities: Socio-demographic and sex work

characteristics. J Homosex 2001;42:29-51. Back to cited text no. 17

18. Tomlinson DR, Hillman RJ, JR, - D. Screening for

sexually transmitted disease in London-based male prostitutes. Genitourin Med

1991;67:103-6. Back to cited text no.

18 [PUBMED] [FULLTEXT]

19. Dandona L, Dandona R, Kumar GA, Gutierrez JP, McPherson S, Bertozzi SM. How

much attention is needed towards men who sell sex to men for HIV prevention in

India? BMC Public Health 2006;6:31. Back to cited text no. 19

20. Pleak RR. Sexual behavior and AIDS knowledge of young male prostitutes in

Manhattan. J Sex Res 1990;27:557-87. Back to cited text no. 20

21. Venkatesan C. Male sex work in Chennai. In: First National male sex worker

network. Thiruvanthanpuram: 2003. Back to cited text no. 21

22. Minichiello V, Marino R, Browne J, son M, K, Reuter B, et al .

A profile of the clients of male sex workers in three Australian cities. Aust N

Z J Public Health 1999;23:511-8. Back to cited text no. 22

23. Steen R, Mogasale V, Wi T, Singh AK, Das A, Daly C, et al . Pursuing scale

and quality in STI interventions with sex workers: Initial results from Avahan

India AIDS Initiative. Sex Transm Infect 2006;82:381-5. Back to cited text no.

23 [PUBMED] [FULLTEXT]

http://www.ijdvl.com/article.asp?issn=0378-6323;year=2009;volume=75;issue=1;spag\

e=40;epage=45;aulast=Shinde