Guest guest Posted February 3, 2009 Report Share Posted February 3, 2009 Dear Dr , I appreciate the eye opoening arguements. But I want to differ about certain terminologies. Medical transmission of HIV is not correct and meant differently. It is used to be referred as Occupational hazards or occupational risk among health care providers. Likewise the nosocomial infections also meant hospital cross infections acquired within the premises of a hospital , the organisms exposed to all antibiotics and highly resistant and difficult to treat. That also is not very much applicable to hospital sharps acquired HIV infection. Regarding transmission though needles, ear piercing, shaving etc are theoratically possible , but the transmission efficiency is very much low. Moreover in dry conditions the highly friable virus are not able to retain its infectivity for no longer than minutes and in wet conditions not more than hours especially in corpse and in hollow needles. That too not very long in a tropical country like ours. The information given by you only make the normal community more panicky, HIV TRANSMISSION IS FAR LESS THAN THAT of HBS, HCV virus. So we must be little more conscious about all these possibilities. ROUTE EFFICIENCY %OF TOTAL SEXUAL INTERCOURSE 0.1-1.0% 80-90% BLOOD TRANSFUSIONÂ > 90% 3 - 5 % INTRAVENOUS DRUG USE 0.5-1.0 5-10% EQUIPMENT/NEEDLES < 0.5 < 0.1% PERINATAL 15-45% < 0.1% Otherwise I totally agree with you regards the various aspects of sexual transmission. Thanking you. Dr S.Murugan Consultant HIV pHYSICIAN (Former HOD , STD Dept) CCC Medical officer , Tirunelveli Tamilnadu e-mail: <muruganyes@...> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 3, 2009 Report Share Posted February 3, 2009 Dear FORUM, Re: /message/9874 This is an excellent point made by . Infact, I feel that we need to revise the standard tranmission message a little. Presently, the message for transmission broadly lists 4 points, viz, 1. Through unprotected sexual intercourse with infected person/partner 2. Through infected syringes 3. Through Infected blood 4. From an Infected woman to her baby while delivery /breastfeeding Here, the point 2 and 3 will have to be detailed, mentioning Infection from infected blood, blood products and procedures involving open cut or wounds. Would love to know what can be the alternate message. Ayan Chakravarty Ph: 91 9839 121368 E-MAIL: <chakravarty.ayan@...> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 4, 2009 Report Share Posted February 4, 2009 Re: Medical transmission of HIV in India /message/9879 Thank you for your input Ayan. In the Beijing Global Forum for Health Research meeting where I presented on HIV and the Bias Free Framework (Nov 2007 www.globalforumhealth.org) and I raised the issue of HIV transmission in health care, (it's available on the web) I also attended the Session on patient safety (where I was not speaking), but Pr N.K Arora was, who was the leader in the investigation of unsafe injections practices by INCLEN in India. In the largest such investigation, revealing about 50% unsafe injections, I asked him if he thought the DECLINE in HIV cases, in the post 2005 period, - compared to projected number of cases by the UN in the 2002-2004 period for 2005-6, might not be due to measures taken by Indian authorities to beginning to clamp down on these unsafe injection practices after INCLEN published its findings, rather than changes in sexual behavior. He answered that indeed, and it was not fortuitous if the HIV rates were highest in India where injection practices were the worse, as in the State of Tamil Nadu Ayan, Please tell us more of what you do Sir, and join our network of concerned researchers, health care givers, PLWAS, journalists and other individuals Nance e-mail: <g_upham@...> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 23, 2009 Report Share Posted February 23, 2009 Dear FORUM, This is in response to Dr Murugan's posting Re: /message/9900 I am involved in training and advocacy against nosocomial infections for more than 25 years. It is very problematic to be as assertive as you are when your definition of what is a nosocomial infection is as erroneous as the one you give! A nosocomial infection or a hospital acquired infection is any kind of infection which the patient acquires during the process of his/her care in hospital / health center. It has nothing to do with bacterial resistance to treatment which is a different matter. An infection contracted in health care may be or may not be drug resistant.For example, both 'regular' tuberculosis, and multi-drug resistant TB, or even Extreme drug resistant TB can likewise be nosocomial infections. In the case of HIV, nosocomial transmission of HIV has been documented ever since the epidemic began, and today, we begin to see cases of ARV resistant HIV being transmitted through care. Does that make it clearer? Nance Upham e-mail: <g_upham@...> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.