Guest guest Posted August 23, 2011 Report Share Posted August 23, 2011 This topic has been discussed several times on this list serv and I believe it is an important discussion. Here is a policy from CareFirst BCBS in land stating dry needling is not covered as it is considered experimental/investigational. At least one of the studies reviewed was done by a member of APTA. With that said, would a payment system based on the severity of the condition and intensity of services required and provided be a better form of reimbursement instead of per CPT code or per visit without rationale for why insurances reimburse what they reimburse? Let the therapist decide what interventions are best for their patients and who is best to provide that intervention all while under the responsibility of the evaluating therapist. http://notesnet.carefirst.com/ecommerce/medicalpolicy.nsf/vwwebtablex/60e7261c3d\ b2eed1852576d9004f7291?OpenDocument Rick Gawenda, PT President Gawenda Seminars & Consulting, Inc. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.