Guest guest Posted April 19, 2012 Report Share Posted April 19, 2012 Are you talking about clinical competency or performance of job tasks? In our organization Clinical competency reviews are peer generated , job performance reviews (from a task perspective) are Director generated. We have never had a problem with TJC with this process Ron Barbato PT Administrative Director, Rehabilitation Services Program Director, Cancer Support Services Ephraim McDowell Health PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL: This transmission may contain information that is privileged subject to attorney-client privilege or attorney work product, confidential and/or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient, then please do not read it and be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the information contained herein (including any reliance thereon) is STRICTLY PROHIBITED. If you received this transmission in error, please immediately advise me, by reply e-mail, and delete this message and any attachments without retaining a copy in any form. Thank you. Superision of other disciplines Hello collegues- I would like to hear how other facilities are handling performance reviews for individuals they might supervise who are outside their own particular discipline. We are a realtively small organization and have a very flat organizational structure without discipline specific therapy leads or levels. Simply a therapy supervisor who oversees all the PT, OT and Speech staff at their particular site. TJC Standard HR.01.06.01 requires that performance be evaluated by someone with the clinical training, knowledge, and competence to assess the skills of the practitioner. In their last visit to us, TJC determined that a PT could not evaluate the performance of an OT or Speech therapist and visa versa. We have used a peer review system in the past to collect data/feedback that we integrate into the performance appraisal. That did not meet TJC's needs. Any additional suggestions on how to improve on this ? Thanks very much! Marcy Stalvey, PT, NCS Edwin Shaw Rehabilitation Institute Cuyahoga Falls, OH 44221 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 19, 2012 Report Share Posted April 19, 2012 Our clinical competencies are peer reviewed as well, once a year. Ie...SLP evaluates SLP, OT evaluates with clinical competencies other OT's...PT's review PT's competencies. These competencies are also changed annually and have a component of reflection of our Performance Improvement Plans indicators as well as problem Prone, High Risk areas of care, that come from Monthly/Annual review of incidence reports or Fall data. Performance reviews are Director and Team Lead generated. We have always hit TJC and CARF stds with this process. E. Lynn MS PT Director of Rehabilitation Marlton Rehabilitation Hospital 92 Brick Rd. Marlton, NJ 08055 ext 4204 From: PTManager [mailto:PTManager ] On Behalf Of Ron Barbato Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2012 9:33 AM To: PTManager Subject: RE: Supervision of other disciplines Are you talking about clinical competency or performance of job tasks? In our organization Clinical competency reviews are peer generated , job performance reviews (from a task perspective) are Director generated. We have never had a problem with TJC with this process Ron Barbato PT Administrative Director, Rehabilitation Services Program Director, Cancer Support Services Ephraim McDowell Health PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL: This transmission may contain information that is privileged subject to attorney-client privilege or attorney work product, confidential and/or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient, then please do not read it and be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the information contained herein (including any reliance thereon) is STRICTLY PROHIBITED. If you received this transmission in error, please immediately advise me, by reply e-mail, and delete this message and any attachments without retaining a copy in any form. Thank you. Superision of other disciplines Hello collegues- I would like to hear how other facilities are handling performance reviews for individuals they might supervise who are outside their own particular discipline. We are a realtively small organization and have a very flat organizational structure without discipline specific therapy leads or levels. Simply a therapy supervisor who oversees all the PT, OT and Speech staff at their particular site. TJC Standard HR.01.06.01 requires that performance be evaluated by someone with the clinical training, knowledge, and competence to assess the skills of the practitioner. In their last visit to us, TJC determined that a PT could not evaluate the performance of an OT or Speech therapist and visa versa. We have used a peer review system in the past to collect data/feedback that we integrate into the performance appraisal. That did not meet TJC's needs. Any additional suggestions on how to improve on this ? Thanks very much! Marcy Stalvey, PT, NCS Edwin Shaw Rehabilitation Institute Cuyahoga Falls, OH 44221 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 19, 2012 Report Share Posted April 19, 2012 Excellent differentiation between the two compoennts- the issue was our clinical competency assessment., which we have since fized with peer reviews, we think. I appreciate the response of the list serve to this issue- most helpful! Marcy Stalvey, PT, NCS Edwin Shaw Rehabilitation Institute ________________________________ From: PTManager [PTManager ] on behalf of Ron Barbato [rbarbato@...] Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2012 9:32 AM To: PTManager Subject: RE: Supervision of other disciplines Are you talking about clinical competency or performance of job tasks? In our organization Clinical competency reviews are peer generated , job performance reviews (from a task perspective) are Director generated. We have never had a problem with TJC with this process Ron Barbato PT Administrative Director, Rehabilitation Services Program Director, Cancer Support Services Ephraim McDowell Health PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL: This transmission may contain information that is privileged subject to attorney-client privilege or attorney work product, confidential and/or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient, then please do not read it and be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the information contained herein (including any reliance thereon) is STRICTLY PROHIBITED. If you received this transmission in error, please immediately advise me, by reply e-mail, and delete this message and any attachments without retaining a copy in any form. Thank you. Superision of other disciplines Hello collegues- I would like to hear how other facilities are handling performance reviews for individuals they might supervise who are outside their own particular discipline. We are a realtively small organization and have a very flat organizational structure without discipline specific therapy leads or levels. Simply a therapy supervisor who oversees all the PT, OT and Speech staff at their particular site. TJC Standard HR.01.06.01 requires that performance be evaluated by someone with the clinical training, knowledge, and competence to assess the skills of the practitioner. In their last visit to us, TJC determined that a PT could not evaluate the performance of an OT or Speech therapist and visa versa. We have used a peer review system in the past to collect data/feedback that we integrate into the performance appraisal. That did not meet TJC's needs. Any additional suggestions on how to improve on this ? Thanks very much! Marcy Stalvey, PT, NCS Edwin Shaw Rehabilitation Institute Cuyahoga Falls, OH 44221 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.