Guest guest Posted November 29, 2008 Report Share Posted November 29, 2008 The nutrition advice given that says over 200 g of carbs is the target is a common problem in diabetes treatment. The reason given was that many would not eat less. This means the standard of care is being set at the worst case level rather then setting it at the level likely to provide optimal results. Too often doctors take a similar path. They will accept an a1c of 7 as ok when knowing that the current research based advice says 6 should be the worst case number. Both result in many more diabetics then would otherwise have better results are getting complications and are being misled by the complacency of the advice giver. They should be pushing not enabling poor results. I once read a doctor's advice that if your doctor is not yelling at you about your poor results then you should be yelling at your doctor. The problem is that the customer is not being told results are poor and complications are the price they pay. There is another prroblem with the carb advice. It is almost useless to set a standard number as a target given the range of individual reactions to the same number of carbs. One should rather set a post meal number for blood glucose which will then on average result in an effective a1c over time. One relies on the meter to tell us how many carbs of what kind result in what post meal number. One then adjusts that carb content of that kind of food accordingly until the post meal target is matched. XB IC|XC Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.